Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
21cfrpart11 · A forum for issues and questions regardi
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 11260 - 11289 of 19734   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
11260
David, I fail to understand how denigrating the ValBOK effort can possibly benefit either the people who sell C3Q(tm), or any other commercial product, or...
Dave Ward
david_ward99uk
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
10:46 am
11261
Question: If a company is going to utilize electronic signatures (of course the application selected is part 11 compliant) does the company need to register...
jfinniganpart11
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
4:18 pm
11262
In the case a manufacturer or integrator design an application using Visual Basic, and create some hidden screen with preset (which means nobody can change the...
Claudio Molina
molinac@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
4:19 pm
11263
Ouch! I would have considered that being flamed but it made it through the moderator so I guess I'm just too sensitive. Yes, Mr. Weitz I do work with Mr....
John DeFazio
John_DeFazio@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
4:19 pm
11264
Such trap doors represent a compliance risk. (How serious this risk is depends upon what the data on the system is used for, and how often you expect vendor...
chemera2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:37 pm
11265
Just submit a letter certifying that e-signatures used by Company X are intended to be the legally binding equivalent of traditional hand-written signatures....
Albert, William
balbert_19067
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:37 pm
11266
I believe that as long as you control and limit who has access to this userid and password, it should not be a problem. In any database there will always be...
Greg Ventura
gwventura
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:38 pm
11267
I don't think there is a specific document you have to fill out to notify the FDA. Just write a letter on company letter head stating your intentions and make...
John M
johnmonto
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:40 pm
11268
If a system has the ability to delete "base data", this is OK as long as the company is performing backup and archiving of data for possible future ...
John M
johnmonto
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:40 pm
11269
Any company utilizing electronic signatures must send a letter to the FDA. Reference the Part 11 Rule, page 13456, comment 120 for details. The agency has...
cm0r02769@...
cmor02769
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:40 pm
11270
Hi, I was going to sit out this acrimonious thread but since it seems to be settling down and covers some important ground I'll throw my opinion into the ring....
tom_mizukami
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:41 pm
11271
You need to simply send the agency a notification that you intend to use e-sigs and that they will carry the same weight as hand signature. You do not need to...
jstrokis@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:43 pm
11272
I suggest that you read preamble comments 119-121. They describe the form of the certification e.g. submitted once, in paper form with traditional handwritten...
Taylor, Allan
allan.taylor@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:44 pm
11273
Thanks Bill! Jay ... From: Albert, William [mailto:albertw@...] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:39 AM To: '21cfrpart11@yahoogroups.com' ...
Jay Finnigan
jfinniganpart11
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:46 pm
11274
I believe that it is a simple certification that the company deems electronic records and signatures to be the binding equivalent of paper records and...
chemera2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:52 pm
11275
all you have to do is notify them, following the reference you have given. But don't forget, you need to put controls in place for 11.100a and 11.100b ...
Greg Mendizabal
mendi
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
6:46 pm
11276
What you describe sounds like an extremely poor design. YOU should be able to decide who has access to your system and when. Backdoors are an invitation to ...
Greg Mendizabal
mendi
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
6:49 pm
11277
It's my understanding that the FDA is most interested in knowing that the signatures are legally binding for whatever role the signers are performing,...
john leonard
john_leonard...
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
6:51 pm
11278
Hi I'd like to know how the FDA handles 'code'. Does the 'code' need to be consistent with Part 11 requirements? Thanks in advance! -Rajni ...
Rajani Gautam
lakshmi_dev01
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
6:52 pm
11279
Hi, I would suggest you to read 21 CFR Part 11 (Electronic Records and Electronic Sigantures) doc from the FDA website. www.fda.org . Make sure you are reading...
Komil QA
komil_qa
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
7:09 pm
11280
Code and configuration are to be handled just as the master production record. Change control and versioning (revision tracking) is required as stated in the...
profjb2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
7:32 pm
11281
Hello All, I'm an IT manager at a medium sized biotech firm. We are currently looking at the possibility of purchasing a quality management product designed...
bnice03
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
7:32 pm
11282
I was in your predicament a few years ago. Somebody must point out to you what is required per client SOPs. Companies usually have policy statements and/or...
singalon63
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
7:41 pm
11283
Hi, I would like to know if any kind of "code" needs to comply with Part 11 requirements? Does FDA have any requirements to handle "code"? Thanks in advance! ...
lakshmi_dev01
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
8:38 pm
11284
Code and configuration are to be handled just as the master production record. Change control and versioning (revision tracking) is required as stated in the...
profjb2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
11:03 pm
11285
Dear All Thanks to all those who have contributed to my original query, I have been to "The Hollis Group" site and obtained information about C3Q prior to my...
multivits2004
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
11:23 pm
11286
Can you explain your rational that PLC code is outside the scope of Part 11 in more detail? The definition of an electronic record within Part 11 and the new ...
chemera2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2004
11:52 pm
11287
Can you plz explain what "off-the-shelf" means? ... _________________________________________________________________ Free up your inbox with MSN Hotmail Extra...
Rajani Gautam
lakshmi_dev01
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2004
2:03 pm
11288
Does anybody know of a COTS to track user access that is also Part 11- ready. We are looking to track user access worldwide to gmp systems and currently have...
gfclyne
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2004
2:03 pm
11289
Tt sounds to me like you are writin code inhouse as opposed to using a COTS? The answer is No if a) the system is not intended to have any kind of GMP function...
gfclyne
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2004
2:03 pm
Messages 11260 - 11289 of 19734   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help