Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
21cfrpart11 · A forum for issues and questions regardi
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 11765 - 11794 of 19734   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
11765
Hi Can someone please help me here. How many years does data need to be archived? I have heard 8 and 10, but have never seen this outlined anywhere... ...
bharkol1
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2004
6:54 pm
11766
Could you define "Drug Safety System"? Do you mean an adverse event reporting system? skaternum ... a...
skaternum
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2004
6:54 pm
11767
There is no single number of years for all GXP data. You will need to review the predicate rules associated with the data you are archiving to determine how...
Lisa Morton
mortonl@...
Send Email
Jul 1, 2004
8:35 pm
11768
That depends the type of data you are archiving. If you are arching for Regulatory reasons (namely the FDA) you need to be aware of the predicate rule...
CM
cmor02769
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2004
8:36 pm
11769
Unfortunately this is not a view it is just a plain fact. Re 1) How can you test the software that will be in a device without the device????? which is...
pauls@...
multivits2004
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2004
8:36 pm
11770
You miss one salient point and that is validation is not a destination it is a journey. If you discover incomplete specifications or anomalies then you go back...
pauls@...
multivits2004
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2004
8:36 pm
11771
Drug Safety System is nothing but SAE (Serious Adverse Events) reporting system. There are two major players in the market (I think Argus and the other one was...
validation_slave
validation_s...
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2004
8:38 pm
11772
Dear All Could you please help where do i can find out address for the interpretation of 21 CFR part 11. Thanks Kholid...
M. Cholid
mchoudss
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
12:31 pm
11773
Depends what it is I guess the answer is. I've heard seven years is the legal requirement for retaining legal documents, and was to that batch records and the...
Andrew Gibson
agibson@...
Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
12:32 pm
11774
Paul, You are absolutely right. I was merely making a stand for the place of the writer within the tech world. The better the communication, the fewer the...
john leonard
john_leonard...
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
12:32 pm
11775
To clarify some points in this debate over specs and test plans: If the URS and other specs are written by competent people, as opposed to more-or-less copying...
Alex Platkin
alexplatkin
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
12:33 pm
11776
Hi, I want to point out that there is "software validation" and therefore I have to object the plain fact :-). This term is widely known in software ...
Johannes Albrecht
ja200361
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
12:33 pm
11777
Unless you are asking about the GLPs and non-clinical systems. Wells Horton PO Box 191 Woods Corners - Bldg 42, Floor 2 Norwich, New York 13815 Office (607)...
horton.cw@...
Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
12:33 pm
11778
There is a commercial product on the market called ARISg which facilitates adverse events reporting. The adverse events need to be reported once the product...
john leonard
john_leonard...
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
12:34 pm
11779
Depends on the regulation, for example: Sec. 820.180 General requirements. ... (b) Record retention period. All records required by this part shall be retained...
Greg Ventura
gwventura
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
2:03 pm
11780
I guess I'll wade into this. Andrew (and others) are right that "it depends". My experience is such: the Legal department wants to minimize exposure to ...
Greg Mendizabal
mendi
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
4:31 pm
11781
If you are looking for a web page, see: http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/Part11/default.htm Greg Ventura ... From: M. Cholid...
Greg Ventura
gwventura
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
4:31 pm
11782
Hello All, Here is the latest update for <http://www.21CFRPart11.com>. ______________________________________________________________________ CONFERENCES &...
landervv
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2004
4:33 pm
11783
Did you finalize the vendor? any suggestion? Still we are evaluating the vendors. We are planning to integrate the LIMS with Document Management System to keep...
eastcoast_lab
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2004
2:56 am
11784
One further point, It's a good idea to have the schedule approved. For the reason that when documents start to get shredded and someone tries to make it sound...
Andrew Gibson
agibson@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
1:25 pm
11785
Applied Biosystems was claiming to have done this with SQL*LIMS. I have seen a demo but have not tried the product. ... evaluating ... to ... experience ... ...
netstat1
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
1:25 pm
11786
HI, could anybody help me out with the info reg the sales force automation (SFA) tools available in the market. does the 21 CFR Part 11 reqs and other GxP...
Pat Connolly
pat_connolly...
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
1:26 pm
11787
At the moment I am having a discussion on what QA-signatures that are required on documents written for the qualification (IQ, OQ and PQ) of a computerised...
validation9999
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
1:26 pm
11788
When it comes to document destruction, GxPs are silent; you need to go to business law. Basically: 1) There must be a procedure on destroying...
James Vesper
jvesper@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
6:25 pm
11789
Yes, that's a given that the schedule would be approved and would be part of an SOP (or policy) document. I think anyone working in our industry understands ...
Greg Mendizabal
mendi
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
6:25 pm
11790
Your both questions seemed the same to me. However the entire qualification document with all test scripts should be pre-approved by QA. This demonstrates that...
urspq
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
9:45 pm
11791
Jim, I have to disagree with you on the regulations aspect. Document retentions are based "at minimum" on GxP regs but the company can store for more than that...
urspq
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
9:45 pm
11792
Lots will disagree (probably)- but my interpretation is that for human drug production (21 CFR 211), there are no QA signature requirements for validation...
chemera2002
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
9:46 pm
11793
Agree with you and Graham. While it is true that software validation cannot be done without the hardware and hence Paul's view that documents should be...
urspq
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2004
9:46 pm
11794
Hi Jo Thanks for your reply. What I really think is happening here is that we in the pharmaceutical industry "validate" lots of systems and equipment and this...
pauls@...
multivits2004
Offline Send Email
Jul 7, 2004
1:30 pm
Messages 11765 - 11794 of 19734   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help