Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
21cfrpart11 · A forum for issues and questions regardi
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 17257 - 17286 of 19734   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
17257
Hi all, I would like some thoughts on having an older GxP system that exposes the passwords to the system administrator. The system does not employ e-sigs....
paulkrason
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2007
12:39 pm
17258
Hello Paul; Sounds like your risk exposure is rather high from both a general IT Security perspective as well as Part 11. If the password can be seen (even by...
Scott@...
slmargolis
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2007
3:52 pm
17259
Any use of static (meaning traditional, not one-time or dynamic) passwords confronts this conundrum (which is why use of digital signatures with the private...
Guida, Richard [JJCUS]
RGuida@...
Send Email
Nov 1, 2007
4:39 pm
17260
Can someone guide me thru the various implementation methods for E-Signatures? We are new to 21 CFR Part11. We are currently building an in-house Task...
Gregory Toland
expectingfall
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2007
7:36 pm
17261
So what are your own thoughts? Soren Bogoe ... From: 21cfrpart11@yahoogroups.com [mailto:21cfrpart11@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of paulkrason Sent: Wednesday,...
Søren Bogø
sorenb2001
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2007
8:16 pm
17262
Paul, If the GxP application has passwords that are not secure, then I would suggest using the Windows operating system login to protect the application. Users...
David Ward
david_ward99uk
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2007
2:36 pm
17263
Risk. _Always_ start with risk. What does the system do? What is the risk created by exposure of these passwords? What's the worst that could happen? Could...
Finner, Doug
mrdfin47
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2007
2:36 pm
17264
First I'd like to thank everyone that contributed to the thread so far. Lots of very good thinking going on. As I suspected, I received a wide range of...
paulkrason
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2007
8:19 pm
17265
a little off the subject, but an inquisitive question: i may be naive, but i never understood the gamp risk categorizations of 'high' or 'low.' to me it's...
akash arya
akasharya74
Offline Send Email
Nov 2, 2007
8:20 pm
17266
... Hi! Sorry but I don't get your point regarding Excel or Access! Concerning the documentation of Audits and Certrification I use e- doc system to track the...
manuel.grassler
Offline Send Email
Nov 6, 2007
2:52 am
17267
If an audit is done properly.... thats right! The problem is that most of the times within our company there are no ressources left to plan an audit properly....
manuel.grassler
Offline Send Email
Nov 6, 2007
2:53 am
17268
One question: how do you define "Assessment"? () If I read something about assessments like scampi it seems to be nearly the same as an audit within my way of ...
manuel.grassler
Offline Send Email
Nov 6, 2007
2:58 am
17269
Hey Graham! That is exactly the point why I started to work on that issue. If there has to be an audit, then it shall at least generate benefits but nearly...
manuel.grassler
Offline Send Email
Nov 6, 2007
5:53 am
17270
Hi, I want to start out by saying I've been reading this group but never posted before, and I've learned a lot by just reading the topics and replies, and I'm...
laurie g
lauriehgberg
Offline Send Email
Nov 7, 2007
12:27 am
17271
This comes down to do you consider the system an open or closed system. If it is open then you have to follow the rules for that. At this point I don't see...
Greg Ventura
gwventura
Offline Send Email
Nov 8, 2007
3:46 pm
17272
Laurie, If it's a web app, and it's validated, why would the input device matter? A web site is a web site is a web site and a browser is a browser is a...
Finner, Doug
mrdfin47
Offline Send Email
Nov 8, 2007
3:46 pm
17273
To All, I am in desparate need of some help/advice on the above topic. I recently started working at a CRO in Validation. I have learned that one of our sites...
stock1cjs
Offline Send Email
Nov 8, 2007
3:47 pm
17274
Hi Laurie, As long as the signature is adequately linked to the information (record) and meets the non-repudiation requirement, it should be fine. That sounds...
Martin G. Knop
mjknop
Offline Send Email
Nov 8, 2007
3:47 pm
17275
What challenges/pitfall would there be validating an office network and Adobe for an electronic document/signature system? The correct procedures are in place...
vfoley00
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2007
2:37 am
17276
All pharmaceutical companies conduct vendor Due Diligence before signing a contract. The due diligence includes GMP and Regulatory Compliance audits. The ...
hemavora@...
hemavora2
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2007
2:37 am
17277
Hemant In my experience that is the exception rather than the rule (only looking at it from a GMP perspective). As with all GMP issues, it is a question of how...
Schmitt, Siegfried
parexel
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2007
5:49 pm
17278
Perhaps you could enlighten me, which particular Pharmaceutical GMP regulation is not auditing vendors a violation of?? Auditing suppliers may be good business...
David Ward
david_ward99uk
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2007
5:50 pm
17279
Do your validation protocols include test scripts/test cases? Greg Ventura ... From: 21cfrpart11@yahoogroups.com [mailto:21cfrpart11@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf...
Greg Ventura
gwventura
Offline Send Email
Nov 12, 2007
5:50 pm
17280
Thanks for your response, Greg. At the moment, no. After you bringing it to my attention and looking at GAMP Good Practice Guide for IT Infrastructure Control...
vfoley00
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2007
12:02 pm
17281
I'll agree with the group. The printing does not "create, modify, or delete electronic records." Paul A. Labas...
paul.labas
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2007
12:03 pm
17282
David, I suggest you review General Principals for Software Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Section 6.3. That section states that "The...
paul.labas
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2007
12:03 pm
17283
Hi David Try 21 CFR 820.50 Alex...
alex.kennedy@...
albridgeuk
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2007
5:34 pm
17284
I don't bring up test cases with the idea of adding them, but rather wondering how you handle numerous potential signings and/or initials on. It is not really...
Greg Ventura
gwventura
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2007
5:34 pm
17285
Just to clarify.. 820.50 is a Medical Device regulation not Pharmaceutical General Principals for Software Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA...
Graham Tinsley
graham_tinsl...
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2007
8:56 pm
17286
Regarding 21 CFR 820.50, isn't this a case of your auditing would be based on the "suppliers, contractors, and consultants" product or service affecting...
Greg Ventura
gwventura
Offline Send Email
Nov 13, 2007
8:59 pm
Messages 17257 - 17286 of 19734   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help