Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
21cfrpart11 · A forum for issues and questions regardi
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 19504 - 19533 of 19733   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
19504
I am trying to understand exactly what the impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies) is. I have reviewed several REMS...
jspan1971
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
4:51 pm
19505
I imagine that you would evaluate whether the system you are dealing needs to be compliant. If you need to be compliant then you would evaluate what you need...
Greg Ventura
gwventura
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
5:00 pm
19506
One is an apple, the other is an orange? One is a set of regulations for compliance, specifically covering electronic records and signatures. The other is a...
Graham Tinsley
graham_tinsl...
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
6:48 pm
19507
I understand what you are saying, however, in the FDA appilcations letters I have reviewed, none of them mention being 21 CFR Part 11 compliant.  However, in...
James Spangler
jspan1971
Offline Send Email
Jul 7, 2009
2:03 pm
19508
I understand what you are saying, however, in the FDA appilcations letters I have reviewed, none of them mention being 21 CFR Part 11 compliant.  However, in...
James Spangler
jspan1971
Offline Send Email
Jul 7, 2009
2:05 pm
19509
Unless you are able to provide more specific examples (e.g. what REMS program, which supporting system?) then from the information you have provided I would...
Graham Tinsley
graham_tinsl...
Offline Send Email
Jul 7, 2009
4:05 pm
19510
Graham, can it be that the FDA is referring to the Part 11 compliance of a computerized system used to monitor post-marketing REMS and maybe HIPAA for...
Acosta_Harry
Acosta_Harry@...
Send Email
Jul 8, 2009
1:05 pm
19511
REMS are mostly written using MS Word, so it's difficult to see where Part 11 comes in Siegfried ________________________________ From:...
Schmitt, Siegfried
parexel
Offline Send Email
Jul 8, 2009
3:32 pm
19512
That is certainly possible. There are quite a few interested parties involved and the primary relationship would seem to be between physician and patient,...
Graham Tinsley
graham_tinsl...
Offline Send Email
Jul 8, 2009
3:33 pm
19513
Hi all, I know this is a little off topic, but I am working on a research project on the med device industry's thoughts as to the impact of the impending...
sara.camden
Offline Send Email
Jul 8, 2009
6:38 pm
19514
Through the implementation of a PLM system, our documents have a lifecycle that we use to trigger the protections of the object necessary to ensure Part 11...
josephjmagee
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
6:45 pm
19515
This conversation comes up in this group fairly frequently and the group is pretty much broken into two camps. Camp A says 'no changes ever to a signed...
Finner, Doug
mrdfin47
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
1:16 pm
19516
I am curious as to why you would firstly get a mistake like "the" being misspelled, and if that was a bad example, what these administrators are really allowed...
Graham Tinsley
graham_tinsl...
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
1:38 pm
19517
As a general industry practice, is it required to use the word "must" for each requirement, or is it sufficient to state that the following requirements must...
Kari E Hulgaard
kari_viking@...
Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
1:49 pm
19518
I don't think the verb IS required, but do accept it is common to use that verb a lot. I understand the verb is used to denote the criticality of the...
Mulero, Miguel
miguel_mm89
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
2:05 pm
19519
... This is based on my experience - YMMV. I've always used "shall" when specifying requirements, and I've always tried to limit requirements documents to the...
Mike Emeigh
mwemeigh
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
2:24 pm
19520
I agree with you Mike. It is very important to understand what "Must" go into a requirements document.  When it becomes more of a wish list, people lose focus...
Jim Validation
jimvalidation
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
2:33 pm
19521
One other comment - if you use Traceability as a disciplined approach, then for compliance purposes: All requirements MUST trace to a regulation (internal or...
Graham Tinsley
graham_tinsl...
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
5:06 pm
19522
A requirement for a requirement: interesting.   I prefer using the word "Shall"; it conveys formal commitment and more flexibility than "Must". ... From: Kari...
Tulio Luna
gmpauto@...
Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
5:06 pm
19523
My concern is that if all requirements are written with "must," it creates a high criticality for everything, which is redundant with the fact that it is a...
Kari E Hulgaard
kari_viking@...
Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
5:07 pm
19524
Hi Kari The regulators have stated that in the URS requirements must be clearly given, and not be ambiguous in any way. Clearly in any URS there will be...
alex.kennedy@...
albridgeuk
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
5:07 pm
19525
I take unambiguous to mean stay from a requirement such as: The system shall/must (whatever word you want) be user friendly. There is no specific requirement...
Jim Validation
jimvalidation
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
5:27 pm
19526
Agreed.  However, if all of the requirements must be met, can the author of the URS not compose a statement that all requirements must be met, unless...
Kari E Hulgaard
kari_viking@...
Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
5:27 pm
19527
If it is in a requirements document, it should be important. Isn't one using a risk based approach if the requirements procedure is stating to only include...
Jim Validation
jimvalidation
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
5:36 pm
19528
I agree with you.  It is just a matter of style and some preferring to keep with their way of doing things since that is how it has been done in the past. I...
Jim Validation
jimvalidation
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
5:37 pm
19529
Adding to what Mike said...If you're figuring out what's important in your system, then that's the preliminary stages of system selection or project scope. At...
Akash Arya
akasharya74
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
6:43 pm
19530
Graham, I can't answer for the poster, but for us, we would not make a big deal about 'teh'. In our case, we'd unsign/recalculate documents because there was a...
Finner, Doug
mrdfin47
Offline Send Email
Jul 20, 2009
1:08 pm
19531
There is in fact an ISO document on the subject ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2, 2004 Annex H (normative) Verbal forms for the expression of provisions ...
Schmitt, Siegfried
parexel
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2009
1:42 pm
19532
I'm curious to see what folks think about what triggers the validation of a computer system? I have heard a numebr of times over the years "We'll get this up...
ffredersen
Offline Send Email
Jul 28, 2009
5:02 pm
19533
Well - if on the first day, God created light, I am reasonably certain that the day before he wrote a validation plan. So the sequence would be.. Create the...
Graham Tinsley
graham_tinsl...
Offline Send Email
Jul 28, 2009
6:17 pm
Messages 19504 - 19533 of 19733   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help