LCP>- CVS Client (WinCVS 1.3 or TortiseCVS) CVS is the "Concurrent Version System", a free/open source version management system. According to the web site,...
... To put it simply, you can't. ActiveLock is designed to protect programs. However, what you could do is have a back end database which holds a list of users...
Hi Michael ! The official home of ActiveLock is www.activelock.com and ActiveLock is trade mark (TM) of Nelson Correa de Toledo Ferraz (nferraz@...)....
... Wait a minute! I find this very disturbing. I thought ActiveLock is open source and public domain? Now what's this trademark crap? I'd be less inclined to...
I agree Thanh I also find this very disturbing. I also thought ActiveLock is open source and public domain. I think it would be a waste of every devolopers...
... It will be interesting on how Nelson himself responds to this new twist. I am not sure if Luiz C. Pinheiro is officially speaking for Nelson or expressing...
THT>Wait a minute! I find this very disturbing. I thought ActiveLock THT>is open source and public domain? Now what's this trademark crap? According to the...
Nelson, I have no problem with the software being copyrighted. I have no problem with it being copyrighted under your name when your were the main force...
Hi Thanh, Considering how insecure Nelson's implementation is, the only useful thing you'll be pulling from the current version is the name. And also...
Hi, As Mr Nelson Correa de Toledo Ferraz created the term 'ActiveLock' he is entitled to trademark the name 'ActiveLock '. To trademark a name or other...
I've see meny mails talking about trademark , legacy, owner,Copyright... But what about the purpouse of developing a component to make softaware selling...
OOOooohhh, here we go again. I personally have more faith - Nelson can own the copyright and we can use/modify it under the terms of the copyright agreement...
Thanh, THT>I have no problem with the software being copyrighted. I have no THT>problem with it being copyrighted under your name when your were THT>the main...
This is getting ridiculous! every time I turn around Mr. Crute is tiring to pull another fast one. Why is he the only admin at sourceforge again? Well All I...
e>In my experience Mr Ferraz is taking the preliminary steps to lock e>down his rights in preparation for selling Activelock as a copyrighted e>commercial...
I've updated ActiveLock's download page, stating the new ActiveLock ... ActiveLock Copyright 1998-2002 Nelson Ferraz Copyright 2003 by the contributing...
Wade, Thank you for your input, but as I mentioned in my email to the development group entitled "Head Count" (this was to the private development group, see...
Everyone, Contrary to the beliefs of Mr. Wade Grimm I am not trying to "own" ActiveLock, I am trying to keep a good project alive. I have assembled a TEAM of...
MessageMike, What does having a team mean? I had signed up, as you requested... as far as participating? don't you have to have something to do first? I've...
Sent to my personal e-mail... <snip> Wade, I do not appreciate your insults. I am doing the best I can to keep this project alive. You certainly show no...
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the ActiveLock group: Who should 'own' the SourceForge project? This position would not require anyone ...
ActiveLock@yahoogroup...
Jul 3, 2003 7:22 pm
1632
Mike closed this poll 10 minutes after I started it... not sure what the problem is... ... From: ActiveLock@yahoogroups.com To: ActiveLock@yahoogroups.com ...
See below... Also visit <https://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?group_id=70007> https://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?group_id=70007 -Mike ...
Why you ask? Because it is not a topic for discussion. ActiveLock Software Group are the owners of ActiveLock from version 2.0 on not me not you not Thanh the...
Wow!!! Stop fighting about stupid things... I know... I'm new in ActiveLock development but I don't know if I should continue... Wade Grimm wrote: "Activelock...
MessageHey great! I didn't realize that! Man I was worried there for a sec, I thought only one person hd ultimate control... That clears everything up then......
... I'd love too... I really would. But if someone doesn't look out for your right to code in this project, then who will? What are the determining factors...
I have to admit.. with the current direction (or lack there of) and the threats of non-open source code, I have decided to sit back and wait... as many have.....