Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
AirTrafficControl · AirTraffic Control
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Thanks and some feedback   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #2 of 6 |
Hi there,
First of all thanks so much for sharing this tool, although it seems
designed for precise and flexible multichannel work it also seems very
well suited for experimentation, particularly within modular
environments that can take advantage of its flexibility. Overall a
very useful plugin, congrats!

Having tested a couple previous versions plus the most recent one
(ATC080512), I can report that it seems pretty solid and stable on
WinXPSP2 with the hosts I've tried: energyXT, Bidule and Usine.

I also have a couple feature requests for future versions, of course
feel free to ignore them as you please:

- FR: "Hidden" parameters available to host
I believe there are a bunch of parameters that were set up through the
old .NET GUI options and now they are unreachable in the latest build.
Would it be possible to make those "hidden" parameters such as
elevation, etc available to the host as VST parameters for automation
or external control? Of course ideally those parameters would be
better set up through the gui without the need for .NET, but that
might be quite time-consuming to implement so my suggestion is perhaps
a nice short-term compromise so users can still access them in the
meantime. Imho removing the .NET dependency is a step in the right
direction, so kudos for that.

- FR: Attenuation and cutoff for inputs
The attenuation and cutoff areas on the outputs are two of the things
that make this plugin so flexible... would it be possible to implement
them for the inputs as well? I understand that the interaction between
inputs and outputs would then be a bit more complex, but I think it
would be worth the effort.


Oh, and I also have a very minor cosmetic issue to report:

- BR: Inputs from 29 to 60 appear superimposed
When you rename the dll so it has more than 28 inputs, all the inputs
from the 29 onwards appear superimposed... so if you want to click and
drag, say, input 42 you have to get inputs 29 through 41 out of the
way first. Perhaps a 2 or 3 column arrangement of the inputs by
default would solve this.


That's it for now. Hope this helps and once again thank you for
sharing this nice plugin.




Mon May 12, 2008 3:10 pm

juanjo55555
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #2 of 6 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi there, First of all thanks so much for sharing this tool, although it seems designed for precise and flexible multichannel work it also seems very well...
juanjo55555
Offline Send Email
May 12, 2008
3:10 pm

... <walnutdoor@...> wrote: I believe there are a bunch of parameters that were set up through the old .NET GUI options and now they are unreachable in the...
kentlangseth
Offline Send Email
May 12, 2008
6:19 pm

... Fair enough, I was just thinking out loud and I totally understand your point of view. The thing is really powerful as it is now anyway :)...
juanjo55555
Offline Send Email
May 13, 2008
3:03 pm

... Thanks for the comments! ... FIXED....
kentlangseth
Offline Send Email
May 13, 2008
12:24 pm

... Fixed indeed in 080513, cheers!...
juanjo55555
Offline Send Email
May 13, 2008
3:00 pm
< Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help