Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Artilect · "I believe that 21st century technologies will allow the creation of "artilects" (artificial intellects, artificial intelligenc
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Questions for the artilect group   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #24 of 163 |
Re: Questions for the artilect group

I also recently joined via the same route, and though I have not got too
into the technical yet, I do have a few thoughts to share, and some more
questions.

Given that the future of the world economy is dependent on securing the
viability of the internet. This will require security, robustness from both
failure and external aggressors, guaranteed uninterrupted power, automated
disaster recovery etc. We also know the processing power achieved through
persuading internet users to allow their desktop computers or even servers
to be strung together to perform specific tasks. Couple these factors
together and it does seem we are building the environment for an artilect.

As de Garis et al point out, artilect(s) will be something we cannot know.
Also there is no world wide governmental control on this research. So, how
will we know when it has arrived? This is to say, How will we know when the
first one becomes self-conscious if it is not a consciousness we can
recognise? And, how do we know this hasn't already happened?

We have to ask:
Is there an international register of CBM installations?
Is there legislation controlling the production or sale of FPGA's? Why is
there no public debate on the control of these issues?

And for a bit of ultra-conspiracy: the artilect is already here and is just
waiting for us to sort out a home for it. And furthermore, it is
manipulating us into building it for him\her.

Obviously nonsense, but the fact is this area is a gold mine for conspiracy
theorists, BUT WHERE ARE THEY ALL? You pointed out how little activity
there is within this group and this seems to be the case else where.
Indeed, when I try and tell anyone about this stuff they look at me like I
am a nutter; even the X-Filers and the SETI heads I know, don't think it's
anything to get excited about.

Well I am beginning to think there is a conspiracy to re-direct conspiracy
theorist activity away from AI, and in fact Area 51 is the site of the
worlds biggest CBM installation (surely the US government must have one
somewhere?).

So my question is: If there are so many well respected academics telling us
artilects are on 'their' way (and soon), why does it all get so little
press?

regards
Tony Savage


>From: JackJennings@...
>Reply-To: Artilect@onelist.com
>To: Artilect@onelist.com
>Subject: [Artilect] Questions for the artilect group
>Date: 10 Feb 2000 16:56:09 -0000
>
>From: JackJennings@...
>
>I have just joined this group from following the link from DeGaris' new web
>site. I read all of the archived messages and see that the group is not
>that
>active, but I'll post this anyway. Maybe the majority of the currently 36
>members are like me and primarily read what's there more so than post
>messages
>themselves.
>
>Since discovering DeGaris' web-site in 1999, I have periodically gone back
>to
>it every 3 months or so to see how he is progressing with his Cellular
>Automata
>machine development. When I went there this quarter, I was surprised to
>see
>that he had abruptly moved from the Japanese research agency to one based
>in
>Brussels. Does anyone know the circumstances of this move for Dr. DeGaris?
>
>More important though, I have gotten the downloaded unix c program running
>and
>found the resulting program interesting, but I would like to understand the
>underlying theory better. Of course, Dr. DeGaris provides all of the
>information on his comprehensive site, but I wonder if anyone has an
>explanation of the mathematical design of his CoDi (Collect-Distribute)
>neural
>network in simpler terms. His descriptions, I'm afraid, are somewhat above
>me. However, with effort, I think I can get through to a better
>understanding
>of it. For reference, one of the URL links I'm talking about is
>http://foobar.starlab.net/~degaris/cbm/index.html
>
>So, if anyone can help, please feel free to do so. Thank you.
>
>Jack Jennings
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
>GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds. Get rates as low as 2.9 percent
>Intro or 9.9 percent Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW.
><a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/NextcardCreative4CL ">Click
>Here</a>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Join the ArtilectRing
>http://artilect.org/artilectring
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com






Sun Feb 13, 2000 2:12 am

a_lsavage@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #24 of 163 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I have just joined this group from following the link from DeGaris' new web site. I read all of the archived messages and see that the group is not that ...
JackJennings@...
Send Email
Feb 10, 2000
4:56 pm

I also recently joined via the same route, and though I have not got too into the technical yet, I do have a few thoughts to share, and some more questions. ...
Tony Savage
a_lsavage@...
Send Email
Feb 12, 2000
7:12 pm

... The answer depends on whether you are a Terran or a Cosmist. Cheers, --J. R. Molloy http://www.shasta.com/jr...
J. R. Molloy
jr@...
Send Email
Feb 13, 2000
8:26 pm

The answer depends on whether you are a Terran or a Cosmist. ?Very cryptic. Are we not all Cosmists here? Tony ...
Tony Savage
a_lsavage@...
Send Email
Feb 14, 2000
3:22 pm

Tony, How do you know that "artilects" are not getting noticed -- what, just because you don't find much in the press about it? -Wolfspider ... From: "Tony...
Jeff Western
wolfspider@...
Send Email
Feb 14, 2000
7:53 pm

How do you know that "artilects" are not getting noticed? * A number of projects have shown proof of concept, yet hard AI still seems to be gasping for real...
Tony Savage
a_lsavage@...
Send Email
Feb 15, 2000
1:34 pm

I see nothing to prevent an artilect taking the side of the Terrans. After all, some humans have taken the side of other primates in danger of extinction. A ...
J. R. Molloy
jr@...
Send Email
Feb 16, 2000
4:07 am

... If a Terran opposes all fundamental changes to the human condition, and a Cosmist wants to create AIs at (almost) any cost, then I'm neither. Why on earth...
D.den Otter
neosapient@...
Send Email
Feb 16, 2000
2:45 pm

I am very new to all this, but it is difficult to see any major differences between Cosmism and Transhumanism. The main distinction seems to come after we...
Tony Savage
a_lsavage@...
Send Email
Feb 17, 2000
3:35 pm

... Hi den Otter, You posted the following last December: "You can join the list at: http://www.onelist.com/community/transvision or drop me a note with...
J. R. Molloy
jr@...
Send Email
Feb 17, 2000
5:03 am

Indeed, let us become as gods. Then shall humans and their paltry machinations wither away, displaced by hyper-cognitive transhumans. --J. R. How do we decide...
Tony Savage
a_lsavage@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2000
11:03 am

... Yes, that's correct. With transhumanism, we merge with our machines, symbiotically. IOW, we become bionic cyborgs. With de Garis' Cosmism, we build ...
J. R. Molloy
jr@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2000
6:49 pm

... If only an artilect could deal with that, then obviously "we" would not need to make a decision about transhuman opportunity. The decision as to whether...
J. R. Molloy
jr@...
Send Email
Feb 20, 2000
6:29 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help