Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
AudioBox · RSD's AudioBox User Group Mailing List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
FW: another wild Richard idea.... just to drive you crazy!   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1224 of 1253 |
RE: [AudioBox] Re: FW: another wild Richard idea.... just to drive you crazy!



> -----Original Message-----
> From: AudioBox@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:AudioBox@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jdow
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 1:45 AM
> To: AudioBox@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [AudioBox] Re: FW: another wild Richard idea....
> just to drive you crazy!
>

> If all the audience is more than 20 ms away from the sound
> source the 10 ms minimum delay of SoundMan would mean
> nothing. You do want the sound from the speakers to come up
> just as or a touch after the direct sound reaches the
> listener, don't you? Isn't the speed of sound on the (very)
> rough order of 1 foot per ms? So at -20' difference between
> the sound arrival from a speaker location and the
> direct sound arrival puts you in a safe ballpark.
>

The actors are not 20ms away from stage monitors most of the time. Nor
are musicians 20ms away from any hotspots or other pit monitors,
etc..... :-))

This is why I want to control where the delay is, and not be controlled
(or limited) by it.

Although I doubt anyone can really hear 4ms, except maybe in a headphone
mix (which of course is getting more and more popular in orchestra pits
these days), in my opinion adding 10ms onto everything is just a bit too
much. Plus as I said before, I think those are rather rosy, best case
scenarios, but feel free to prove me wrong.

> {^_-} <- sometimes she gets obnoxious, doesn't she?
>

Yea, but when I need a computer issue solved.... it's good to have her
around! :-))

fellow PITA,

Richard B. Ingraham
RBI Computers and Audio
http://www.rbicompaudio.20m.com/
rbI@...


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/476 - Release Date:
10/14/2006





Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:19 pm

rbi71
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1224 of 1253 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I sent this email to Charlie Richmond and Loren Wilton privatly. Charlie has asked me to forward it to the list. To possiblly stimulate conversation. Although...
Richard B. Ingraham
rbi71
Offline Send Email
Oct 11, 2006
8:06 am

If you throw enough hardware it is estimated that SoundMan would poop out well above a piddly eight in/eight out scenario. Loren tests routinely with MOTU 828...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2006
2:39 am

... Of course, but I only suggested limiting the number of live inputs.... not the number of outputs, because: 1. I figured that way you wouldn't be trying to...
Richard B. Ingraham
rbi71
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2006
2:58 pm

Richard, I think your suggestion to get SoundMan out there sooner rather then later as an SFX alternative is a good one, but I think it's the UI that will help...
Bruce Ellman
bruce_ellman
Offline Send Email
Oct 13, 2006
2:42 pm

From: "Bruce Ellman" <bruce@...> ... Precisely how little? {^_-}...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2006
7:21 am

... 1.4mS, analog in to analog out. C...
Charlie Richmond
charlierichmond
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2006
12:44 pm

... I would never want to put a sound system together that has more than 5ms of total latency through out the entire system. And this means all devices from...
Richard B. Ingraham
rbi71
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
2:37 am

From: "Richard B. Ingraham" <rbingraham@...> ... They have vastly different form factors. And the AB does not need the external plugin boxes for its...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2006
7:27 am

... No, it doesn't unless you use Cobranet or Ethersound and external converters - but then, that can be more convenient because the analog lines don't have...
Charlie Richmond
charlierichmond
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2006
12:54 pm

... No it doesn't. You can have 64 analog inputs and outputs if you want to spend the money. ... And that is too high for most live audio applications, plus...
Richard B. Ingraham
rbi71
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
2:44 am

How little does he really need? That is a market differentiator between AudioBox and SoundMan, though. {^_-} ... From: "Charlie Richmond"...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2006
10:49 pm

... My point exactly...... so why bother trying to route dozens of channels of live audio, if the latency is going to be too high for most applications. ...
Richard B. Ingraham
rbi71
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
2:48 am

From: "Charlie Richmond" <charlier@...> ... No, I packed up my job cue as tight as it goes. This is going to go for "months" most likely. ...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2006
10:51 pm

From: "Richard B. Ingraham" <rbingraham@...> ... If all the audience is more than 20 ms away from the sound source the 10 ms minimum delay of...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
5:53 am

... the ... If the routing was for reinforcement only perhaps so, but when you get into real-world applications where performers have to sing/play along to...
Bruce Ellman
bruce_ellman
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
3:11 pm

... The actors are not 20ms away from stage monitors most of the time. Nor are musicians 20ms away from any hotspots or other pit monitors, etc..... :-)) ...
Richard B. Ingraham
rbi71
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
4:21 pm

From: "Richard B. Ingraham" <rbingraham@...> ... Increasing the latency does not reduce CPU load materially. Arguably it increases the CPU load if it...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
5:58 am

... The this is counter to all of my experiences with DAWs then. I don't know how all this buffer stuff works well enough to really give examples, but all I...
Richard B. Ingraham
rbi71
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
4:28 pm

From: "Bruce Ellman" <bruce@...> ... Pieces of the UI are coming together. The communications with the server still need to be added. {^_^}...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
8:09 pm

From: "Richard B. Ingraham" <rbingraham@...> ... I wonder of a MOTU 828 can be configured to loop back locally within the box for "zero" latency for...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
8:11 pm

... It would only be possible if they allow ethernet connectivity, which would then mean latency again goes out the window.... There is a driver A&G have...
Charlie Richmond
charlierichmond
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
8:29 pm

From: "Richard B. Ingraham" <rbingraham@...> ... Likely that means there are transient intervals during which the machine gets overloaded with what...
jdow
ferdyfubar
Offline Send Email
Oct 15, 2006
8:26 pm

... My mistake! The setting I'm referring to is the buffer size, and not the number of buffers. Hey, as I said, I don't care what all these things really do,...
Richard B. Ingraham
rbi71
Offline Send Email
Oct 16, 2006
4:41 am

... Nahhhhh... not even close!!! ;-) ... always use the tool that is appropriate .... ... Well... of course we are still hoping to provide a complete and...
Charlie Richmond
charlierichmond
Offline Send Email
Oct 16, 2006
4:53 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help