Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

BACnetLighting · BACnet Lighting Apps. Working Group

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 133
  • Category: Protocols
  • Founded: Apr 2, 2001
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 201 - 230 of 327   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#201 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Wed Jan 6, 2010 11:00 am
Subject: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello BACnet Lighting Working Group!

We are scheduled to meet on Thursday January 21, 2009, from 8am to
5pm, at the ASHRAE Winter Conference in Orlando, Florida. All meeting
rooms are in the the conference hotel: The Rosen Shingle Creek at 9939
Universal Blvd, Orlando, Florida. I don't have our room assignments
yet - but will post them when I get them.

The plenary meetings for SSPC-135 BACnet will be on Saturday, January
23, 2009 and Monday, January 25, 2009. Other BACnet working group
meetings will be held on Thursday, Friday, Sunday (January 21, 22, 24)

LA-WG agenda items:

  1.     SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 revision
        Approve the revised text for SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i for the
fourth public review for the Lighting Output object and its friends.
Draft is available in Files section of Yahoo Groups as
"Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft 7.doc" file.
  2.     Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
  3.     Discuss BACnet Schedule for Dawn Dusk (removed from 2008 Addendum W)
  4.     IESNA Computer Committee XML standard for photosensors -
BACnet applicability?
  5.     Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.

Please post any additional Lighting Application working group agenda
items to this mailing list.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
The Watt Stopper / Legrand
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#202 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Thu Jan 7, 2010 8:45 pm
Subject: Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello BACnet Lighting Working Group,

Happy New Year! I am resending my meeting announcment with the year corrected...

We are scheduled to meet on Thursday January 21, 2010, from 8am to
5pm, at the ASHRAE Winter Conference in Orlando, Florida. All meeting
rooms are in the the conference hotel: The Rosen Shingle Creek at 9939
Universal Blvd, Orlando, Florida. I don't have our room assignments
yet - but will post them when I get them.

The plenary meetings for SSPC-135 BACnet will be on Saturday, January
23, 2010 and Monday, January 25, 2010. Other BACnet working group
meetings will be held on Thursday, Friday, Sunday (January 21, 22, 24)

LA-WG agenda items:
1.     SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 revision
      Approve the revised text for SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i for the
fourth public review for the Lighting Output object and its friends.
Draft is available in Files section of Yahoo Groups as
"Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft 7.doc" file.
2.     Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
3.     Discuss BACnet Schedule for Dawn Dusk (removed from 2008 Addendum W)
4.     IESNA Computer Committee XML standard for photosensors - BACnet
applicability?
5.     Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.

Please post any additional Lighting Application working group agenda
items to this mailing list.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
The Watt Stopper / Legrand
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#203 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:21 pm
Subject: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello BACnet Lighting Working Group,

I am resending my meeting announcement with the room assignments added.

We are scheduled to meet on Thursday January 21, 2010, from 8am to
5pm, at the ASHRAE Winter Conference in Orlando, Florida. All meeting
rooms are in the the conference hotel: The Rosen Shingle Creek at 9939
Universal Blvd, Orlando, Florida. We will meet in the Wekiwa 4 meeting
room.

The plenary meetings for SSPC-135 BACnet will be on Saturday, January
23, 2010 in the Wekiwa 5 meeting room, and Monday, January 25, 2010,
in the Suannee 15 meeting room. Other BACnet working group meetings
will be held on Thursday, Friday (Wekiwa 1, Suanee11 meeting rooms),
and Sunday (Wekiwa 7 and Wekiwa 2 meeting rooms) (January 21, 22, 24).

LA-WG agenda items:
1.     SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 revision
      Approve the revised text for SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i for the
fourth public review for the Lighting Output object and its friends.
Draft is available in Files section of Yahoo Groups as
"Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft 7.doc" file.
2.     Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
3.     Discuss BACnet Schedule for Dawn Dusk (removed from 2008 Addendum W)
4.     IESNA Computer Committee XML standard for photosensors - BACnet
applicability?
5.     Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.

Please post any additional Lighting Application working group agenda
items to this mailing list.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
The Watt Stopper / Legrand
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#204 From: "David Ritter" <dritter@...>
Date: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:16 pm
Subject: RE: Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
dritter77
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi Steve,

 

Could you send out the latest draft version of Addendum i to the group? Thanks.

 

See you all in Orlando.

 

David

 

 

From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Karg
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:45 PM
To: BACnet Lighting Working Group
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida

 

 

Hello BACnet Lighting Working Group,

Happy New Year! I am resending my meeting announcment with the year corrected...

We are scheduled to meet on Thursday January 21, 2010, from 8am to
5pm, at the ASHRAE Winter Conference in Orlando, Florida. All meeting
rooms are in the the conference hotel: The Rosen Shingle Creek at 9939
Universal Blvd, Orlando, Florida. I don't have our room assignments
yet - but will post them when I get them.

The plenary meetings for SSPC-135 BACnet will be on Saturday, January
23, 2010 and Monday, January 25, 2010. Other BACnet working group
meetings will be held on Thursday, Friday, Sunday (January 21, 22, 24)

LA-WG agenda items:
1.     SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 revision
      Approve the revised text for SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i for the
fourth public review for the Lighting Output object and its friends.
Draft is available in Files section of Yahoo Groups as
"Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft 7.doc" file.
2.     Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
3.     Discuss BACnet Schedule for Dawn Dusk (removed from 2008 Addendum W)
4.     IESNA Computer Committee XML standard for photosensors - BACnet
applicability?
5.     Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.

Please post any additional Lighting Application working group agenda
items to this mailing list.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
The Watt Stopper / Legrand
--
http://steve.kargs.net/


#205 From: Christoph Zeller <christoph.zeller@...>
Date: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:19 am
Subject: Antwort: RE: Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
zeller_chr
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Steve and all,
I suggest to distribute additional proposals (DALI-Mapping for example) to
group as well.
Thanks Christoph

Christoph Zeller
Abt. NT
Fr. Sauter AG
Im Surinam 55, CH-4016 Basel
Telefon +41 (0)61 695 55 55
Telefax +41 (0)61 695 56 19
http://www.sauter-controls.com

DISCLAIMER:
This communication, and the information it contains is for the sole use of
the intended recipient. It is confidential, may be legally privileged and
protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any part
thereof may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error,
please destroy all copies and kindly notify the sender.

Before printing out this e-mail or its attachments, please consider
whether
it is really necessary to do so.
Using less paper helps the environment.




Von:
"David Ritter" <dritter@...>
An:
<BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com>
Datum:
12.01.2010 23:16
Betreff:
RE: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
Gesendet von:
BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com




Hi Steve,

Could you send out the latest draft version of Addendum i to the group?
Thanks.

See you all in Orlando.

David


From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com [
mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Karg
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:45 PM
To: BACnet Lighting Working Group
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida


Hello BACnet Lighting Working Group,

Happy New Year! I am resending my meeting announcment with the year
corrected...

We are scheduled to meet on Thursday January 21, 2010, from 8am to
5pm, at the ASHRAE Winter Conference in Orlando, Florida. All meeting
rooms are in the the conference hotel: The Rosen Shingle Creek at 9939
Universal Blvd, Orlando, Florida. I don't have our room assignments
yet - but will post them when I get them.

The plenary meetings for SSPC-135 BACnet will be on Saturday, January
23, 2010 and Monday, January 25, 2010. Other BACnet working group
meetings will be held on Thursday, Friday, Sunday (January 21, 22, 24)

LA-WG agenda items:
1.     SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 revision
       Approve the revised text for SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i for the
fourth public review for the Lighting Output object and its friends.
Draft is available in Files section of Yahoo Groups as
"Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft 7.doc" file.
2.     Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
3.     Discuss BACnet Schedule for Dawn Dusk (removed from 2008 Addendum
W)
4.     IESNA Computer Committee XML standard for photosensors - BACnet
applicability?
5.     Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.

Please post any additional Lighting Application working group agenda
items to this mailing list.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
The Watt Stopper / Legrand
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#206 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:59 pm
Subject: Re: RE: Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Christoph and David,

> I suggest to distribute additional proposals (DALI-Mapping for example) to
> group as well.

All the proposals we are discussing have been available on the Yahoo
Groups site since our last meeting in November, 2009.  I have also
sent the proposals, agenda, and meeting minutes to the BACnet FTP site
maintainer for our Orlando meeting.

DALI Mapping
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/files/RLH-001.pdf

Latest draft version of 2008 Addendum i
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/files/Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft
7.doc

See you in Orlando!

Best Regards,

Steve
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#207 From: Christoph Zeller <christoph.zeller@...>
Date: Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:55 pm
Subject: Antwort: Re: RE: Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
zeller_chr
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Steve,
the RLH-001.pdf is dated 15 June 2009.
This is significantly older than our last meeting.
Is it still the valid one?
Thanks Christoph


Christoph Zeller
Abt. NT
Fr. Sauter AG
Im Surinam 55, CH-4016 Basel
Telefon +41 (0)61 695 55 55
Telefax +41 (0)61 695 56 19
http://www.sauter-controls.com

DISCLAIMER:
This communication, and the information it contains is for the sole use of
the intended recipient. It is confidential, may be legally privileged and
protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any part
thereof may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error,
please destroy all copies and kindly notify the sender.

Before printing out this e-mail or its attachments, please consider
whether
it is really necessary to do so.
Using less paper helps the environment.




Von:
Steve Karg <steve@...>
An:
BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Datum:
13.01.2010 16:59
Betreff:
Re: RE: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
Gesendet von:
BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com




Hello Christoph and David,

> I suggest to distribute additional proposals (DALI-Mapping for example)
to
> group as well.

All the proposals we are discussing have been available on the Yahoo
Groups site since our last meeting in November, 2009. I have also
sent the proposals, agenda, and meeting minutes to the BACnet FTP site
maintainer for our Orlando meeting.

DALI Mapping
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/files/RLH-001.pdf

Latest draft version of 2008 Addendum i
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/files/Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft

7.doc

See you in Orlando!

Best Regards,

Steve
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#208 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: Re: RE: Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Christoph,

> the RLH-001.pdf is dated 15 June 2009.
> This is significantly older than our last meeting.
> Is it still the valid one?

We have not discussed this proposal in a long time, and there have
been no revisions posted by Rick or Robert.  The RLH-001 posted on
Yahoo Groups is the latest file that I have.

Best Regards,

Steve
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#209 From: Christoph Zeller <christoph.zeller@...>
Date: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:04 am
Subject: Comments on Addendum i Draft 7
zeller_chr
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear all,
I was rereading the draft 7 for the Addendum i.
As follow the concerns I found in the document:

- Chapter 12.X.9 paragraph 2 (just under the table 12-Y)
   ... or the priority field of the LIghtingCommand if present

   The concept I see is that if this field in the lighting command is
present its this content to be used, if the field is not present in the
lighting command then
   the property priority is used. Which one of the two has the priority
might not be clear enough (although you should be able to correclty guess
from the context).
   I would suggest add a paragraph generally describing this behaviour and
not repeating it on all occasions (with slightly different language in the
next paragraph).
   It should be considered to change the language for all such fields of
the lighting command.
   One possible solution to make it even more clear is to rename the
corresponding properties to Default_xxx.

- Chapter 12.X.15.1 Blink Warning Behaviour
   I guess that the description of auto-reliquish is not behaving as
expected:
   Example: We have a priority Array with one populated Entry of 100% at
priority 12. All other entries are NULL.
   Now we are writing 0% to priority 8 which triggers blink warning. Blink
Warning is inserting 0% to priority 6 for Blink-Time.
   Next 100% is written to priority 6 to restore the previous level for
Warn-Delay seconds. Then priority 6 should be relinquished.
   Unfortunately with the language written we are relinquishing priority 8
which results in 100% (Why did we had a Blink-Warning?)
   There might be more ambiguities with auto-relinquish I was not checking
all occurences so far.

   The critical point with interference with COV-Notifications is still not
resolved!

- Chapter 12.X.30/31
   introducing a new concept of automatically readjust min_pres_value and
max_pres_value if they are commanded to opposite directions.
   In all other objects this is not done and potentially controversal
during public review (Analog Output Objects are not mentioning it).
   If we introduce it here, we should consider introducing the same
mechanism to all other opjects as well.

See you soon in Orlando
Regards
Christoph



Christoph Zeller
Abt. NT
Fr. Sauter AG
Im Surinam 55, CH-4016 Basel
Telefon +41 (0)61 695 55 55
Telefax +41 (0)61 695 56 19
http://www.sauter-controls.com

DISCLAIMER:
This communication, and the information it contains is for the sole use of
the intended recipient. It is confidential, may be legally privileged and
protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any part
thereof may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error,
please destroy all copies and kindly notify the sender.

Before printing out this e-mail or its attachments, please consider
whether
it is really necessary to do so.
Using less paper helps the environment.




Von:
Steve Karg <steve@...>
An:
BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Datum:
13.01.2010 18:13
Betreff:
Re: Re: RE: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Orlando, Florida
Gesendet von:
BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com




Hello Christoph,

> the RLH-001.pdf is dated 15 June 2009.
> This is significantly older than our last meeting.
> Is it still the valid one?

We have not discussed this proposal in a long time, and there have
been no revisions posted by Rick or Robert. The RLH-001 posted on
Yahoo Groups is the latest file that I have.

Best Regards,

Steve
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#210 From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:09 am
Subject: New file uploaded to BACnetLighting
BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the BACnetLighting
group.

   File        : /Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft.pdf
   Uploaded by : stephenkarg <steve@...>
   Description : Draft of 135-2004 Addendum i - Publication Public Review 4
(Lighting Output object)

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/files/Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft.pdf

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

stephenkarg <steve@...>

#211 From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:27 pm
Subject: New file uploaded to BACnetLighting
BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the BACnetLighting
group.

   File        : /Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft.pdf
   Uploaded by : stephenkarg <steve@...>
   Description : Draft of 135-2004 Addendum i - Publication Public Review 4
(Lighting Output object)

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/files/Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft.pdf

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.htmlfiles

Regards,

stephenkarg <steve@...>

#212 From: "rickleinen" <rleinen@...>
Date: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:18 pm
Subject: Date for Next Meeting
rickleinen
Send Email Send Email
 
Has the schedule for the meeting in May been determined?  I am scheduled to
attend Lightfair which is the same week.

#213 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:25 pm
Subject: Lighting Output object
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello BACnet Lighting Applications working group!

There are a bunch of BACnet addenda (ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 135 and
135.1) out for public review from March 26, 2010 to May 10, 2010:
https://osr.ashrae.org/

Specifically, the Lighting Output object:
https://osr.ashrae.org/sitepages/showdoc2.aspx/ListName/Public%20Review%20Draft%\
20Standards/ItemID/337/IsAttachment/N/Add-135-2008i-PPR4-Draft+_chair-approved_.\
pdf

Please review, and submit any "supportive" comments as needed. :-)

Best Regards,

Steve
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#214 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:13 pm
Subject: Meeting in Germantown, Maryland
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Lighting Applications Working Group!

As proposed at our last meeting, the next scheduled meeting of the
Lighting Applications working group will be at the Spring interim SSPC
meeting, which is being held at Montgomery College Germantown Campus
from May 10, 2010, through May 14, 2010. The Lighting Applications
working group will be meeting on Monday, May 10, 2010, from 1pm to 5pm
in GB105, and Tuesday, May 11, 2010, from 8am to 10am in GB106. Other
working groups will be meeting during the week as well, and SSPC 135
BACnet will meet on Thursday and Friday, May 13-14, 2010, in GB105.

The Lighting Applications working group Agenda will include the following items:
1. SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 comment responses.
2. Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
3. Discuss BACnet Schedule for Dawn Dusk (removed from 2008 Addendum W)
4. IESNA Computer Committee XML standard for photosensors - BACnet
applicability?
5. Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.

Please post any additional Lighting Application working group agenda
items to this mailing list.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
Lithonia Lighting
--
Montgomery College is served by three major international airports in
the Washington, DC area, Baltimore-Washington International(BWI),
Dulles International(IAD) and Reagan National (DCA).

Our host arranged a block of rooms at the nearby Hampton Inn which is
within easy walking distance of the meetings.

Hampton Inn
20260 Goldenrod Lane
Germantown, MD 20876
Contact: Richard Petras, General Manager, e-mail: GermantownDOS@...
Phone: +1 (301) 428-1300
Fax: +1 (301) 428-9034
www.hamptoninngermantown.com
Group/Convention Code: ASH
Rate: $117.00 + tax (May 8, 2010 -May 16, 2009)
Location: The Hampton Inn is located on property adjacent to the
Germantown Campus and is a 2 block walk through parking lots that adjoin
the campus. Maps and directions can be found on the website.

Meeting Location:
Goldenrod Building (GB), Rooms GB105 & GB106
Goldenrod Lane
Germantown, Maryland 20876
Note: Goldenrod Building is across the street from the Hampton Inn on
Goldenrod Drive.
Contact: Mike Whitcomb, P.E.
Office Phone: Office Phone: +1 (240) 567-7375, Mobile Phone: +1 (301) 509-3723
e-mail: mike.whitcomb@...
http://www.montgomerycollege.edu/maps/gcamp.html

#215 From: "H. Michael Newman" <hmn2@...>
Date: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:06 pm
Subject: Lighting Controls Consultant
hmiken2
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Lighting Folks!

Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, is looking for the services of a lighting controls consultant who is familiar with BACnet and the lighting requirements of critical laboratory research facilities. If you are one, or know someone you would be comfortable recommending, please let me know directly.

Thanks!

Mike Newman


H. Michael Newman
Manager, BACS Integration
Facilities Operations
Cornell University
Humphreys Service Building
Ithaca, NY 14853-3701
USA
607-255-4630
607-592-2109 (Cell)

#216 From: Paul Ericson <pericsonsd@...>
Date: Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Subject: Re: Lighting Controls Consultant
pericsonsd
Send Email Send Email
 
Michael,
I am a lighting consultant that is familiar with labs and Bacnet.
I work for Syska Hennessy.
I will send you an email from my work address.
Paul

Paul K. Ericson
San Diego, CA

--- On Fri, 4/16/10, H. Michael Newman <hmn2@...> wrote:

From: H. Michael Newman <hmn2@...>
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Lighting Controls Consultant
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April 16, 2010, 8:06 AM

 
Hello Lighting Folks!

Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, is looking for the services of a lighting controls consultant who is familiar with BACnet and the lighting requirements of critical laboratory research facilities. If you are one, or know someone you would be comfortable recommending, please let me know directly.

Thanks!

Mike Newman


H. Michael Newman
Manager, BACS Integration
Facilities Operations
Cornell University
Humphreys Service Building
Ithaca, NY 14853-3701
USA
607-255-4630
607-592-2109 (Cell)


#217 From: "Kaelin, Rene" <rene.kaelin@...>
Date: Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Subject: Lighting Output object, alternate solutions
kaelin_ren
Send Email Send Email
 

Hello LA-WG folks

We at Siemens analyzed the addendum 135-2008i intensively and came to the conclusion that we would like to propose alternate solutions to improve the current approach. We know that we are quite late in the process because we just finished our investigations to use BACnet for the Light domain. 

In comparison with the actual addendum 135-2008i we elaborated an alternate solution to solve the issues regarding the prioritization mechanism. One of the strengths of the solution is that it is also applicable to other domains for example Blind or Video (control a camera position) as well.

We think that our proposal overcomes the limitations of the automatic relinquish approach of addendum 135-2008i. In addition to sending our proposal we will enter corresponding comments for addendum 135-2008i.

Siemens is committed to provide the alternate solution for discussion and is also committed to contribute to bring a revised addendum 135-2008i as fast as possible to publication. I am locking forward to explain and discuss the proposal in Germantown.

Please find attached the proposal RK-006-1 which explains our alternate solutions. If you have any questions don't hesitate to contact me.

<<RK-006-1.pdf>>

Mit freundlichem Gruss
René Kälin

Siemens Switzerland Ltd.
Industry Sector
Building Technologies Division
International Headquaters

HVAC Products Systems
System Design & Test, Integrations
I BT HVP SYS RD SDT
Gubelstrasse 22

6301 Zug

Tel direkt: +41 (0)41 724 32 32
Mailto:rene.kaelin@...



1 of 1 File(s)


#218 From: "Kaelin, Rene" <rene.kaelin@...>
Date: Sun May 9, 2010 5:56 pm
Subject: LA-WG meeting Germantown
kaelin_ren
Send Email Send Email
 

Hello all,

I will not be able to participate the LA-WG meeting in Germantown on Monday because they cancled my flight to Washington. Hope that I'll make it to Germantown on Thuesday.

Gruss
René Kälin


#219 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:24 pm
Subject: Meeting in Albuquerque
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Lighting Applications Working Group!

As proposed at our last meeting, the next scheduled meeting of the
Lighting Applications working group will be at the Summer SSPC
meeting, which is being held in Albuquerque from June 24, 2010,
through June 28, 2010. The Lighting Applications working group will be
meeting on Thursday, June 24, 2010, from 8am to 5pm in Enchantment C
room of the Hyatt Regency. Keep in mind that there are rooms named
"Enchantment" in both the Convention Center and Hyatt Regency.

As usual, the plenary meetings for SSPC 135 will be on Saturday and
Monday, with working group meetings on Thursday, Friday, and Sunday.

The Lighting Applications working group Agenda will include the following items:
1. SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 comment responses.
2. SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR5 draft

Please post any additional Lighting Application working group agenda
items to this mailing list.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
WattStopper
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#220 From: pete.baselici@...
Date: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:02 pm
Subject: Pete Baselici/LNA is out of the office.
baselici
Send Email Send Email
 
I will be out of the office starting  06/13/2010 and will not return until
06/18/2010.

I am on vacation

This email, and any document attached hereto, may contain
confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the
intended recipient (or have received this email in error) please
notify the sender immediately and destroy this email.  Any
unauthorized, direct or indirect, copying, disclosure, distribution
or other use of the material or parts thereof is strictly
forbidden.

#221 From: "David Ritter" <dritter@...>
Date: Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:28 pm
Subject: BACnet addendum i open issues
dritter77
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi BACneteers,

 

On Thursday and Friday the BACnet lighting applications working group met to discuss the comments to the last public review (PPR-4) of the lighting output object. Here are the major unresolved issues which still need resolution. Please feel free to add comments or statements to clarify the issues.

 

We would like to have these issues resolved by the next meeting (BACnet Fall meeting Oct 25-29, venue TBA) so that we may draft responses to the public review comments and have a new draft ready for the BACnet winter meeting in January 2011. Any comments you have regarding the direction that we want to take on these issues will be appreciated.

 

BACnet Lighting Output – Open Issues for Addendum i PPR-4

 

1. Automatic Relinquish -    When a lighting command is sent you may also include an optional duration value. The duration value indicates the time, in milliseconds, after which the command is automatically relinquished at the priority to which the command was written.

One of the uses of automatic relinquish is solve the problem of two (or more) writers attempting to command the lighting output for a fixed duration at the same priority. For example, consider a room with two wall switches, both of which may be used independently to extend the time that the lights remain on in after hours mode by sending an ON command to the lighting output. If each of the switches is responsible for relinquishing the ON command after the duration has expired then the ON command will be relinquished after the first duration has expired and not, as would be expected, after the last duration has expired. The auto relinquish feature solves this problem by resetting the duration timer each time it receives an ON command.

This problem may also be solved without using the automatic relinquish feature by having some control process outside of the lighting output be responsible for arbitrating between the two light switches. This process would also be responsible for relinquishing the ON command.

NOTE: Even if we agree to disallow the automatic relinquish feature for general Lighting Commands the blink warn functionality will still be required to automatically relinquish the value that was held in the priority array during the “grace” period.

2. Stale Commands – In the current version when a slot in the priority array is relinquished the normal rules of evaluating the priority array apply and the next highest command or value in the priority array will become active.

However, it has been argued in RK-006, that this may not be the correct behavior from the user point of view. Specifically, when a slot in the priority array is relinquished the next highest command may be stale (e.g., a previous fade or ramp command) and therefore the actual present value (i.e., physical light) should not change. It is proposed to tag each value in the priority array as “target value” or “command”. On a relinquish, if the next highest value is a Target Value then the present value would take on the new value. If the next highest value is a Command then the present value would not change. This extension to the BACnet priority array mechanism may also have applications in other domains.

3. Lighting Command with Multiple Priorities – The lighting command has an associated property which specifies the priority at which commands are written. However, when a lighting command is written the sender may optionally specify a different priority. This functionality was added primarily to enable fading between values at different priorities when the current value is relinquished. This is accomplished using the RELINQUISH_FADE_TO and RELINQUISH_RAMP_TO lighting commands.

Fading between relinquished values could be accomplished by adding a new property (e.g., Relinquish_Fade_Rate) that would specify the fade rate when a relinquish occurs. A value of 0 for this property would disable the fade. Alternatively, the Fade_Time or Ramp_Rate could also be used as the transition time.

Removing the ability to specify the priority for a lighting command would simplify the lighting output object.

4. Binary Interface for an analog object – The lighting control object is a native analog object that can present a binary interface through the use of optional binary properties.

It has been proposed that the lighting object should only be presented as an analog object and that the binary mapping should be a local matter.

5. Blink Warning trigger – In the current PPR4 addendum the specific conditions under which a blink warning is triggered are specified. In general, a blink warning occurs whenever the present value transitions from an ON value to an OFF value, unless specifically prohibited. A blink warn may be prohibited if blink warning is not enabled (i.e., Blink_Enable = FALSE) for this output or if a specific lighting command is issued which prohibits blinking (e.g., RELINQUISH_NO_WARN).

It has been proposed that there are circumstances in which a blink warning would occur, given the blink warning trigger rules in PPR-4, for which it should not. Therefore the lighting output should not attempt to make the determination for when a blink warning should occur. The determination should be made from some other control logic which resides outside of the lighting output object. In this case the lighting output object should only provide a method whereby an external source can trigger a blink warn.

This could be achieved through two new Lighting Commands; WARN_AND_OFF and WARN_AND_RELINQUISH. Writing an OFF (or 0%) to the present value would no longer cause a blink warning. Legacy devices which do not support the Lighting Command data type would only cause a blink warning by writing to an intermediate entity which can provide the translation.

 

Best Regards,

 

David Ritter M.Sc.

Delta Controls Inc.

17850 56th Ave

Surrey, BC

V3S 1C7

604.574-8492 (direct)

604.574.9444 (office)

604.837-1330 (cellphone)

 


#222 From: Christoph Zeller <christoph.zeller@...>
Date: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:46 pm
Subject: New Whitepaper
zeller_chr
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi LA-folks,
during the minutes I figured out that we are potentially not talking form the
same assumptions.
Therefore I compiled a document to layout the basic assumptions and to show a
possible deployment

Best regards Christoph

1 of 1 File(s)


#223 From: "SKarg" <steve@...>
Date: Tue Jul 6, 2010 4:41 pm
Subject: Re: Meeting in Albuquerque
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Lighting Applications Working Group!

The Lighting Applications working group met at the Summer SSPC meeting, held in
Albuquerque on June 24, 2010, and June 25, 2010.

Below are the minutes, which will be posted to the BACnet committee as LA032.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
WattStopper
--
Minutes
BACnet Lighting Applications Working Group
BACnet Summer Meeting
Albuquerque, New Mexico

8:00AM – 5:00 PM on Thursday, June 24, 2010 - Enchantment C, Hyatt Regency
3:15PM– 5:00 PM on Friday, June 25, 2010 - Sandia, Convention Center
--------------------------------
  1. Opening remarks - working group (8:00PM - 5 minutes)
  2. Circulation of attendance sheet, and introduction of those present (8:05 - 5
minutes)
Name Organization
Bernhard Isler Siemens
Klaus Waechter Siemens
Sharon Dinges Trane-Ingersoll Rand
Scott Ziegenfus Lutron Electronics
Chariti Young ALC
Christoph Zeller Sauter
Duane L. King Acuity Brands Controls
Rick Leinen Leviton
Steve Karg Watt Stopper
René Kälin Siemens
Dana Petersen Johnson Controls
David Fisher Polarsoft

  3. Meeting role assignments (8:10 - 5 minutes)
• time keeper:  (breaks: 10AM, 2PM, 3PM, 4PM) – Rick Leinen
• scribe – Chariti Young
• non-agenda item attendant – Cristoph Zeller
  4. Approval of the minutes from the previous meeting. (8:15 - 5 minutes)

Some discussion of the previous minutes.
Corrected misspelling of Rene's name and "idea".
Refer SSPC 135 minutes for details on RK-006 presentation and discussion

>> David Ritter moved that the minutes be accepted as amended. Seconded by Duane
King. Unanimously approved.

Updated minutes posted to server.

  5. Discussion and approval of the agenda for this meeting. (8:20 - 5 minutes)

Added action item from SSPC 135 to clarify how lighting output object should
work within a BACnet system as part of the bigger picture - develop a design and
usage guide for object.

Added action from SSPC 135 to sort through proposals in terms of what is still
valid or not.  Continue, table, reject, completed.

>> Revised agenda approved..

  6. Liason updates (NEMA, IESNA, DALI) (8:25 - 5 minutes)
No updates

  7. Action Items – Proposals and Responses (8:30 – 7 hours)
  8. Clarify how lighting output object should work within a BACnet system as
part of the bigger picture – develop a design and usage guide for object. 
Discuss Use Cases developed in Germantown (STK-029-3.doc).

Began with discussion of Rene's proposal for a Design and Usage guide.
(Design_And_Usage_Lighting_Output_Object_EN.ppt)

Proposal was coordinated among Siemens control and lighting resources.

Slide 12: In = information sent to lamp. Out = information provided from lamp.

Slide 15: If we can make the assumptions that control logic always exists
outside of the lighting output object and that there is no direct interaction
between input and output, then the resolution of multiple inputs (perhaps with
the exception of priority arbitration) should be handled by the control logic,
not by the output object.

If we remove the control logic type specifications from the output object
specification (e.g. handling of input chatter, how to handle timeout switches),
other objects could be added in the future if needed to standardize the way that
control logic and interface are handled.  May have difficulty deciding what's an
important interface to the control logic and what's an integral piece of the
output object – where is the line?  Need to discuss and decide which pieces of
the control logic truly belong in the output (perhaps minimum on/off), and which
can be better or more appropriately handled external to (above or before) the
output object.

If compare Addendum I to design and usage guide proposal, most of the contents
fall within the proposed paradigm.  A few properties may need some further
discussion to either provide a more abstract interface specification (rather
than a specific output object specification) or to determine that the specified
property is indeed control logic that should be exposed in the output object. 
Per comments received, blink behavior is one area that may need to be revisited,
as well as the resolution of command, priority arbitration, and blink.  Expected
behavior should also be considered as part of the specification. If integrate
multiple BACnet systems, could vendor-unique implementation and behavior cause a
problem for the end-use customer? Agreement on the paradigm may help the
committee come to consensus on contentious inclusions to the specification.

Blink Warn:  Should blink warn be part of this object?  Primary objection is the
coupling of the blink warning functionality with the priority array.  There is a
day-to-day need for blink warning. Decision re: whether or not to blink warn
could be source-dependent, application-specific, device-specific, and/or
time-sensitive.  Network latency issues require that blink happen at the output
device.

Possible needs identified:
      1. An inherent property (output object supports/performs blink or doesn't)
      2. A command-included property that specifies blink/not
      3. Property to auto-trigger blink when present value transitions to zero

In the case of (3), interleaved commands can cause unexpected behavior.  
"Blink" is tied to "off."  But "off" is not necessarily tied to "blink."

History: having a zero present value write trigger blink allows legacy client
devices to treat the output object as an analog object, yet enable this
lighting-specific behavior to occur.

  9. SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 comment review and response
add-135-2008i-ppr4-draft
LAWG-135-2008i-PPR4-Comment-Detail

0002-001: How do we handle blink? Much discussion. Resolution over whether we
need to allow legacy scheduler a way to achieve a blink warning directly: it is
acceptable to require some external control logic that can consume a signal from
a legacy scheduler and convert it to a command to the lighting output object. 
Concern over removing the entire blink sequence from the output object, because
if non-atomic, execution and interruption becomes unreliable.  Remove "present
value (0) = blink."  Replace with a lighting command (blink and off).  Blink
occurs via the lighting command only, and the language re: interaction between
blink and priority array goes away.  If default behavior is no blink, need
Relinquish and Blink_ and_Relinquish. The lighting output object should only
require one timer, although more are allowed (and may be required, depending on
the implementation).

If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority and a higher priority is in
effect, the command never writes a value to the priority array, it just
relinquishes the slot.  If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority, then
something happens at a higher priority, cancel the command and execute higher
priority command.  (Should the value at the lower priority slot be relinquished?
Behavior must be defined.)

Need to be able to interrupt blink and begin a timeout with a switch input.  And
an input from a second switch should interrupt the original timeout and begin a
second timeout.  All BACnet clients that can write are also responsible for
relinquishing.

Having only one priority allowed for lighting commands is problematic – multiple
priorities are used regularly to decide which lighting command to execute.  They
provide a way to have a fade to value and fade to relinquish happen on
exceptional situations. For example, a lighting test in a board room that allows
both the on and off command to fade rather than jump to a value.

Other primary objection with existing proposal is with the concept of
auto-relinquish after a delay/duration.  Also, what to do with stale commands.

Next steps:
Dave F to draft resolution of removing present value (0) = blink and add new
blink commands by 7/31.
Dave R to comb review comments, add any open issues to those raised at this
meeting
     * automatic relinquish
     * stale commands
     * need for lighting command at multiple priorities
     * Need for binary properties, or can the object just be analog
     * Blink warning
and send email to LA-WG on yahoo group by  6/30.

  10. Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
RLH-001-3b – Not discussed.
  11. Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.
STK-021-1 – Not discussed.
  12. Discussion of Non-Agenda Items (4:45PM - 10 minutes)
  13. Sort through proposals in terms of what is still valid or not.  Continue,
table, reject, or completed.  – Not completed.
  14. Schedule for future meetings.(4:55PM - 5 minutes)

6/25 3-5pm CC Sandia

Once we have a draft to discuss, Steve K will publish an agenda and schedule one
or more teleconference(s).

Steve K to publish minutes to yahoo group by 6/30

If another interim meeting is not scheduled, the next meeting will be in
conjunction with the SSPC 135 interim fall meeting in October.

#224 From: Klaus Waechter <waechter_klaus@...>
Date: Wed Jul 7, 2010 8:11 am
Subject: Re: Re: Meeting in Albuquerque
waechter_klaus
Send Email Send Email
 
Howdy Steve

I am missing David Ritter at the participant list.
As far as I remember we talked about a telco where we then decide if a 'Lighting Application Summit' is needed or not.
My expectation is to have this telco mid of August when most people are back from holidays.

Kind Regards
Klaus Waechter

Siemens
Gubelstrasse 22
6301 Zug, Switzerland

Tel direct: +41 41 724 56 13

Fax: +41 41 723 55 58
Mobile: +41 79 260 58 47
Mailto: waechter.klaus@...




From: SKarg <steve@...>
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 6:41:52 PM
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Albuquerque

 



Hello Lighting Applications Working Group!

The Lighting Applications working group met at the Summer SSPC meeting, held in Albuquerque on June 24, 2010, and June 25, 2010.

Below are the minutes, which will be posted to the BACnet committee as LA032.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
WattStopper
--
Minutes
BACnet Lighting Applications Working Group
BACnet Summer Meeting
Albuquerque, New Mexico

8:00AM – 5:00 PM on Thursday, June 24, 2010 - Enchantment C, Hyatt Regency
3:15PM– 5:00 PM on Friday, June 25, 2010 - Sandia, Convention Center
--------------------------------
1. Opening remarks - working group (8:00PM - 5 minutes)
2. Circulation of attendance sheet, and introduction of those present (8:05 - 5 minutes)
Name Organization
Bernhard Isler Siemens
Klaus Waechter Siemens
Sharon Dinges Trane-Ingersoll Rand
Scott Ziegenfus Lutron Electronics
Chariti Young ALC
Christoph Zeller Sauter
Duane L. King Acuity Brands Controls
Rick Leinen Leviton
Steve Karg Watt Stopper
René Kälin Siemens
Dana Petersen Johnson Controls
David Fisher Polarsoft

3. Meeting role assignments (8:10 - 5 minutes)
• time keeper: (breaks: 10AM, 2PM, 3PM, 4PM) – Rick Leinen
• scribe – Chariti Young
• non-agenda item attendant – Cristoph Zeller
4. Approval of the minutes from the previous meeting. (8:15 - 5 minutes)

Some discussion of the previous minutes.
Corrected misspelling of Rene's name and "idea".
Refer SSPC 135 minutes for details on RK-006 presentation and discussion

>> David Ritter moved that the minutes be accepted as amended. Seconded by Duane King. Unanimously approved.

Updated minutes posted to server.

5. Discussion and approval of the agenda for this meeting. (8:20 - 5 minutes)

Added action item from SSPC 135 to clarify how lighting output object should work within a BACnet system as part of the bigger picture - develop a design and usage guide for object.

Added action from SSPC 135 to sort through proposals in terms of what is still valid or not. Continue, table, reject, completed.

>> Revised agenda approved..

6. Liason updates (NEMA, IESNA, DALI) (8:25 - 5 minutes)
No updates

7. Action Items – Proposals and Responses (8:30 – 7 hours)
8. Clarify how lighting output object should work within a BACnet system as part of the bigger picture – develop a design and usage guide for object. Discuss Use Cases developed in Germantown (STK-029-3.doc).

Began with discussion of Rene's proposal for a Design and Usage guide. (Design_And_Usage_Lighting_Output_Object_EN.ppt)

Proposal was coordinated among Siemens control and lighting resources.

Slide 12: In = information sent to lamp. Out = information provided from lamp.

Slide 15: If we can make the assumptions that control logic always exists outside of the lighting output object and that there is no direct interaction between input and output, then the resolution of multiple inputs (perhaps with the exception of priority arbitration) should be handled by the control logic, not by the output object.

If we remove the control logic type specifications from the output object specification (e.g. handling of input chatter, how to handle timeout switches), other objects could be added in the future if needed to standardize the way that control logic and interface are handled. May have difficulty deciding what's an important interface to the control logic and what's an integral piece of the output object – where is the line? Need to discuss and decide which pieces of the control logic truly belong in the output (perhaps minimum on/off), and which can be better or more appropriately handled external to (above or before) the output object.

If compare Addendum I to design and usage guide proposal, most of the contents fall within the proposed paradigm. A few properties may need some further discussion to either provide a more abstract interface specification (rather than a specific output object specification) or to determine that the specified property is indeed control logic that should be exposed in the output object. Per comments received, blink behavior is one area that may need to be revisited, as well as the resolution of command, priority arbitration, and blink. Expected behavior should also be considered as part of the specification. If integrate multiple BACnet systems, could vendor-unique implementation and behavior cause a problem for the end-use customer? Agreement on the paradigm may help the committee come to consensus on contentious inclusions to the specification.

Blink Warn: Should blink warn be part of this object? Primary objection is the coupling of the blink warning functionality with the priority array. There is a day-to-day need for blink warning. Decision re: whether or not to blink warn could be source-dependent, application-specific, device-specific, and/or time-sensitive. Network latency issues require that blink happen at the output device.

Possible needs identified:
1. An inherent property (output object supports/performs blink or doesn't)
2. A command-included property that specifies blink/not
3. Property to auto-trigger blink when present value transitions to zero

In the case of (3), interleaved commands can cause unexpected behavior. "Blink" is tied to "off." But "off" is not necessarily tied to "blink."

History: having a zero present value write trigger blink allows legacy client devices to treat the output object as an analog object, yet enable this lighting-specific behavior to occur.

9. SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 comment review and response
add-135-2008i-ppr4-draft
LAWG-135-2008i-PPR4-Comment-Detail

0002-001: How do we handle blink? Much discussion. Resolution over whether we need to allow legacy scheduler a way to achieve a blink warning directly: it is acceptable to require some external control logic that can consume a signal from a legacy scheduler and convert it to a command to the lighting output object. Concern over removing the entire blink sequence from the output object, because if non-atomic, execution and interruption becomes unreliable. Remove "present value (0) = blink." Replace with a lighting command (blink and off). Blink occurs via the lighting command only, and the language re: interaction between blink and priority array goes away. If default behavior is no blink, need Relinquish and Blink_ and_Relinquish. The lighting output object should only require one timer, although more are allowed (and may be required, depending on the implementation).

If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority and a higher priority is in effect, the command never writes a value to the priority array, it just relinquishes the slot. If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority, then something happens at a higher priority, cancel the command and execute higher priority command. (Should the value at the lower priority slot be relinquished? Behavior must be defined.)

Need to be able to interrupt blink and begin a timeout with a switch input. And an input from a second switch should interrupt the original timeout and begin a second timeout. All BACnet clients that can write are also responsible for relinquishing.

Having only one priority allowed for lighting commands is problematic – multiple priorities are used regularly to decide which lighting command to execute. They provide a way to have a fade to value and fade to relinquish happen on exceptional situations. For example, a lighting test in a board room that allows both the on and off command to fade rather than jump to a value.

Other primary objection with existing proposal is with the concept of auto-relinquish after a delay/duration. Also, what to do with stale commands.

Next steps:
Dave F to draft resolution of removing present value (0) = blink and add new blink commands by 7/31.
Dave R to comb review comments, add any open issues to those raised at this meeting
* automatic relinquish
* stale commands
* need for lighting command at multiple priorities
* Need for binary properties, or can the object just be analog
* Blink warning
and send email to LA-WG on yahoo group by 6/30.

10. Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
RLH-001-3b – Not discussed.
11. Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.
STK-021-1 – Not discussed.
12. Discussion of Non-Agenda Items (4:45PM - 10 minutes)
13. Sort through proposals in terms of what is still valid or not. Continue, table, reject, or completed. – Not completed.
14. Schedule for future meetings.(4:55PM - 5 minutes)

6/25 3-5pm CC Sandia

Once we have a draft to discuss, Steve K will publish an agenda and schedule one or more teleconference(s).

Steve K to publish minutes to yahoo group by 6/30

If another interim meeting is not scheduled, the next meeting will be in conjunction with the SSPC 135 interim fall meeting in October.



#225 From: "winston BASS" <winston_bass@...>
Date: Fri Jul 9, 2010 2:44 am
Subject: RE: Digest Number 155
winstonhethe...
Send Email Send Email
 

Steve and all,

 

I have not been able to meet with the WG other than on Telco’s. That being said I am not up to speed with the overall discussions, so if I sound a little off base, that’s because I may be. When I first joined group last year, my interest was to see the interconnect with DALI through to a published definition. My question now is did the last addendum submitted make it through the public review process and when will ASHRAE release the latest version?

 

Reading through the attached minutes from Albuquerque, I have the Impression that the present discussion revolves around functions not necessarily intended to interconnect with DALI but would support lighting control functions beyond the capabilities of DALI. In fact, functions being discussed would supersede DALI in several areas. Am I correct in my observations?

 

I am not against the concept at all but I am just trying to verify that the DALI interface is now a finished work and that product will be available with the latest changes included. Can anyone validate my question? I apologize if this is a finished work and I have missed the announcement.

 

Thanks.

 

 

Winston Hetherington  BAS Specialist. LM_ASHRAE 

BASS Consulting Services

907 - 1300 Pinecrest Rd.

Ottawa, Ontario.  K2C3M5

Phone 613 829-2039 or Cell 613 296-2188

winston_bass@...

http://www.bass-consulting-services.ca

 

 

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 


From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:34 AM
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Digest Number 155

 

Messages In This Digest (1 Message)

1a.

Re: Meeting in Albuquerque From: Klaus Waechter

Message

1a.

Re: Meeting in Albuquerque

Posted by: "Klaus Waechter" waechter_klaus@...   waechter_klaus

Wed Jul 7, 2010 1:11 am (PDT)



Howdy Steve

I am missing David Ritter at the participant list.
As far as I remember we talked about a telco where we then decide if a 'Lighting
Application Summit' is needed or not.
My expectation is to have this telco mid of August when most people are back
from holidays.

Kind Regards
Klaus Waechter

Siemens
Gubelstrasse 22
6301 Zug, Switzerland

Tel direct: +41 41 724 56 13
Fax: +41 41 723 55 58
Mobile: +41 79 260 58 47
Mailto: waechter.klaus@siemens.com

________________________________
From: SKarg <steve@kargs.net>
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 6:41:52 PM
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Albuquerque

Hello Lighting Applications Working Group!

The Lighting Applications working group met at the Summer SSPC meeting, held in
Albuquerque on June 24, 2010, and June 25, 2010.

Below are the minutes, which will be posted to the BACnet committee as LA032.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
WattStopper
--
Minutes
BACnet Lighting Applications Working Group
BACnet Summer Meeting
Albuquerque, New Mexico

8:00AM – 5:00 PM on Thursday, June 24, 2010 - Enchantment C, Hyatt Regency
3:15PM– 5:00 PM on Friday, June 25, 2010 - Sandia, Convention Center
--------------------------------
1. Opening remarks - working group (8:00PM - 5 minutes)
2. Circulation of attendance sheet, and introduction of those present (8:05 - 5
minutes)
Name Organization
Bernhard Isler Siemens
Klaus Waechter Siemens
Sharon DingesTrane-Ingersoll Rand
Scott ZiegenfusLutron Electronics
Chariti Young ALC
Christoph ZellerSauter
Duane L. King Acuity Brands Controls
Rick LeinenLeviton
Steve Karg Watt Stopper
RenéKälin Siemens
Dana Petersen Johnson Controls
David Fisher Polarsoft

3. Meeting role assignments (8:10 - 5 minutes)
• time keeper: (breaks: 10AM, 2PM, 3PM, 4PM) – Rick Leinen
• scribe – Chariti Young
• non-agenda item attendant – CristophZeller
4. Approval of the minutes from the previous meeting. (8:15 - 5 minutes)

Some discussion of the previous minutes.
Corrected misspelling of Rene's name and "idea".
Refer SSPC 135 minutes for details on RK-006 presentation and discussion

>> David Ritter moved that the minutes be accepted as amended. Seconded by Duane
>>King. Unanimously approved.

Updated minutes posted to server.

5. Discussion and approval of the agenda for this meeting. (8:20 - 5 minutes)

Added action item from SSPC 135 to clarify how lighting output object should
work within a BACnet system as part of the bigger picture - develop a design and
usage guide for object.

Added action from SSPC 135 to sort through proposals in terms of what is still
valid or not. Continue, table, reject, completed.

>> Revised agenda approved..

6. Liason updates (NEMA, IESNA, DALI) (8:25 - 5 minutes)
No updates

7. Action Items – Proposals and Responses (8:30 – 7 hours)
8. Clarify how lighting output object should work within a BACnet system as part
of the bigger picture – develop a design and usage guide for object. Discuss
Use Cases developed in Germantown (STK-029-3.doc).

Began with discussion of Rene's proposal for a Design and Usage guide.
(Design_And_Usage_Lighting_Output_Object_EN.ppt)

Proposal was coordinated among Siemens control and lighting resources.

Slide 12: In = information sent to lamp. Out = information provided from lamp.

Slide 15: If we can make the assumptions that control logic always exists
outside of the lighting output object and that there is no direct interaction
between input and output, then the resolution of multiple inputs (perhaps with
the exception of priority arbitration) should be handled by the control logic,
not by the output object.

If we remove the control logic type specifications from the output object
specification (e.g. handling of input chatter, how to handle timeout switches),
other objects could be added in the future if needed to standardize the way that
control logic and interface are handled. May have difficulty deciding what's an
important interface to the control logic and what's an integral piece of the
output object – where is the line? Need to discuss and decide which pieces of
the control logic truly belong in the output (perhaps minimum on/off), and which
can be better or more appropriately handled external to (above or before) the
output object.

If compare Addendum I to design and usage guide proposal, most of the contents
fall within the proposed paradigm. A few properties may need some further
discussion to either provide a more abstract interface specification (rather
than a specific output object specification) or to determine that the specified
property is indeed control logic that should be exposed in the output object.
Per comments received, blink behavior is one area that may need to be revisited,
as well as the resolution of command, priority arbitration, and blink. Expected
behavior should also be considered as part of the specification. If integrate
multiple BACnet systems, could vendor-unique implementation and behavior cause a
problem for the end-use customer? Agreement on the paradigm may help the
committee come to consensus on contentious inclusions to the specification.

Blink Warn: Should blink warn be part of this object? Primary objection is the
coupling of the blink warning functionality with the priority array. There is a
day-to-day need for blink warning. Decision re: whether or not to blink warn
could be source-dependent, application-specific, device-specific, and/or
time-sensitive. Network latency issues require that blink happen at the output
device.

Possible needs identified:
1. An inherent property (output object supports/performs blink or doesn't)
2. A command-included property that specifies blink/not
3. Property to auto-trigger blink when present value transitions to zero

In the case of (3), interleaved commands can cause unexpected behavior.
"Blink" is tied to "off." But "off" is not necessarily tied to "blink."

History: having a zero present value write trigger blink allows legacy client
devices to treat the output object as an analog object, yet enable this
lighting-specific behavior to occur.

9. SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 comment review and response
add-135-2008i-ppr4-draft
LAWG-135-2008i-PPR4-Comment-Detail

0002-001: How do we handle blink? Much discussion. Resolution over whether we
need to allow legacy scheduler a way to achieve a blink warning directly: it is
acceptable to require some external control logic that can consume a signal from
a legacy scheduler and convert it to a command to the lighting output object.
Concern over removing the entire blink sequence from the output object, because
if non-atomic, execution and interruption becomes unreliable. Remove "present
value (0) = blink." Replace with a lighting command (blink and off). Blink
occurs via the lighting command only, and the language re: interaction between
blink and priority array goes away. If default behavior is no blink, need
Relinquish and Blink_ and_Relinquish. The lighting output object should only
require one timer, although more are allowed (and may be required, depending on
the implementation).

If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority and a higher priority is in
effect, the command never writes a value to the priority array, it just
relinquishes the slot. If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority, then
something happens at a higher priority, cancel the command and execute higher
priority command. (Should the value at the lower priority slot be relinquished?
Behavior must be defined.)

Need to be able to interrupt blink and begin a timeout with a switch input. And
an input from a second switch should interrupt the original timeout and begin a
second timeout. All BACnet clients that can write are also responsible for
relinquishing.

Having only one priority allowed for lighting commands is problematic – multiple
priorities are used regularly to decide which lighting command to execute. They
provide a way to have a fade to value and fade to relinquish happen on
exceptional situations. For example, a lighting test in a board room that allows
both the on and off command to fade rather than jump to a value.

Other primary objection with existing proposal is with the concept of
auto-relinquish after a delay/duration. Also, what to do with stale commands.

Next steps:
Dave F to draft resolution of removing present value (0) = blink and add new
blink commands by 7/31.
Dave R to comb review comments, add any open issues to those raised at this
meeting
* automatic relinquish
* stale commands
* need for lighting command at multiple priorities
* Need for binary properties, or can the object just be analog
* Blink warning
and send email to LA-WG on yahoo group by 6/30.

10. Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
RLH-001-3b – Not discussed.
11. Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.
STK-021-1 – Not discussed.
12. Discussion of Non-Agenda Items (4:45PM - 10 minutes)
13. Sort through proposals in terms of what is still valid or not. Continue,
table, reject, or completed. – Not completed.
14. Schedule for future meetings.(4:55PM - 5 minutes)

6/25 3-5pm CC Sandia

Once we have a draft to discuss, Steve K will publish an agenda and schedule one
or more teleconference(s).

Steve K to publish minutes to yahoo group by 6/30

If another interim meeting is not scheduled, the next meeting will be in
conjunction with the SSPC 135 interim fall meeting in October.

Recent Activity

·                                  1

Visit Your Group

Stay on top

of your group

activity with

Yahoo! Toolbar

Ads on Yahoo!

Learn more now.

Reach customers

searching for you.

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web

======================================================
To view the message archive, set user options, or view
files in our archive, visit the following web page:

    http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/BACnetLighting/

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    BACnetLighting-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


#226 From: "David Fisher" <dfisher@...>
Date: Fri Jul 9, 2010 1:24 pm
Subject: RE: Digest Number 155
polars15213
Send Email Send Email
 

Winston,

One of the objectives for the LAWG has been to develop a new Lighting Output object

type. One of the goals for the LO object was (and still is) to provide mechanisms

that take advantage of DALI-like features in a standardized manner. We have deliberated

at great length on what those features should be, how they should work, and how

a given implementation with and without DALI devices could exploit this featureset.

 

After four public reviews, there are aspects of the proposed LO object that remain

somewhat contentious. None of these is really at issue with the proposed DALI

features. The hold up has been that several individuals have questioned some

of the proposed behavior and mechanisms. Yet their counter-proposals have not

been able to reach a consensus.

 

In the Albuquerque meetings, an extensive review of the proposals has indicated

a possible way forward. We are in the process of drafting revisions to the LO

object that may satisfy the remaining issues. Hopefully this could lead to a consensus

in the Atlanta meetings this autumn, which in turn would trigger another public review.

The outcome of that review would determine what additional work if any is required

prior to publication. Recent changes in ASHRAE standards rules and policy may help

to accelerate this procedure somewhat. However, the actual publication of the new

documents is still some time in the future.

 

David Fisher

PolarSoft® Inc.

914 South Aiken Ave

Pittsburgh PA 15232-2212

dfisher@...

www.polarsoft.biz

412-683-2018

412-683-5228 fax

 


From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of winston BASS
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 10:45 PM
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [BACnetLighting] Digest Number 155

 

 

Steve and all,

 

I have not been able to meet with the WG other than on Telco’s. That being said I am not up to speed with the overall discussions, so if I sound a little off base, that’s because I may be. When I first joined group last year, my interest was to see the interconnect with DALI through to a published definition. My question now is did the last addendum submitted make it through the public review process and when will ASHRAE release the latest version?

 

Reading through the attached minutes from Albuquerque, I have the Impression that the present discussion revolves around functions not necessarily intended to interconnect with DALI but would support lighting control functions beyond the capabilities of DALI. In fact, functions being discussed would supersede DALI in several areas. Am I correct in my observations?

 

I am not against the concept at all but I am just trying to verify that the DALI interface is now a finished work and that product will be available with the latest changes included. Can anyone validate my question? I apologize if this is a finished work and I have missed the announcement.

 

Thanks.

 

 

Winston Hetherington  BAS Specialist. LM_ASHRAE 

BASS Consulting Services

907 - 1300 Pinecrest Rd.

Ottawa, Ontario.  K2C3M5

Phone 613 829-2039 or Cell 613 296-2188

winston_bass@sympatico.ca

http://www.bass-consulting-services.ca

 

 

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 


From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:34 AM
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Digest Number 155

 

Messages In This Digest (1 Message)

1a.

Re: Meeting in Albuquerque From: Klaus Waechter

Message

1a.

Re: Meeting in Albuquerque

Posted by: "Klaus Waechter" waechter_klaus@yahoo.com   waechter_klaus

Wed Jul 7, 2010 1:11 am (PDT)



Howdy Steve

I am missing David Ritter at the participant list.
As far as I remember we talked about a telco where we then decide if a 'Lighting
Application Summit' is needed or not.
My expectation is to have this telco mid of August when most people are back
from holidays.

Kind Regards
Klaus Waechter

Siemens
Gubelstrasse 22
6301 Zug, Switzerland

Tel direct: +41 41 724 56 13
Fax: +41 41 723 55 58
Mobile: +41 79 260 58 47
Mailto: waechter.klaus@siemens.com

________________________________
From: SKarg <steve@kargs.net>
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 6:41:52 PM
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Albuquerque

Hello Lighting Applications Working Group!

The Lighting Applications working group met at the Summer SSPC meeting, held in
Albuquerque on June 24, 2010, and June 25, 2010.

Below are the minutes, which will be posted to the BACnet committee as LA032.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
WattStopper
--
Minutes
BACnet Lighting Applications Working Group
BACnet Summer Meeting
Albuquerque, New Mexico

8:00AM – 5:00 PM on Thursday, June 24, 2010 - Enchantment C, Hyatt Regency
3:15PM– 5:00 PM on Friday, June 25, 2010 - Sandia, Convention Center
--------------------------------
1. Opening remarks - working group (8:00PM - 5 minutes)
2. Circulation of attendance sheet, and introduction of those present (8:05 - 5
minutes)
Name Organization
Bernhard Isler Siemens
Klaus Waechter Siemens
Sharon DingesTrane-Ingersoll Rand
Scott ZiegenfusLutron Electronics
Chariti Young ALC
Christoph ZellerSauter
Duane L. King Acuity Brands Controls
Rick LeinenLeviton
Steve Karg Watt Stopper
RenéKälin Siemens
Dana Petersen Johnson Controls
David Fisher Polarsoft

3. Meeting role assignments (8:10 - 5 minutes)
• time keeper: (breaks: 10AM, 2PM, 3PM, 4PM) – Rick Leinen
• scribe – Chariti Young
• non-agenda item attendant – CristophZeller
4. Approval of the minutes from the previous meeting. (8:15 - 5 minutes)

Some discussion of the previous minutes.
Corrected misspelling of Rene's name and "idea".
Refer SSPC 135 minutes for details on RK-006 presentation and discussion

>> David Ritter moved that the minutes be accepted as amended. Seconded by Duane
>>King. Unanimously approved.

Updated minutes posted to server.

5. Discussion and approval of the agenda for this meeting. (8:20 - 5 minutes)

Added action item from SSPC 135 to clarify how lighting output object should
work within a BACnet system as part of the bigger picture - develop a design and
usage guide for object.

Added action from SSPC 135 to sort through proposals in terms of what is still
valid or not. Continue, table, reject, completed.

>> Revised agenda approved..

6. Liason updates (NEMA, IESNA, DALI) (8:25 - 5 minutes)
No updates

7. Action Items – Proposals and Responses (8:30 – 7 hours)
8. Clarify how lighting output object should work within a BACnet system as part
of the bigger picture – develop a design and usage guide for object. Discuss
Use Cases developed in Germantown (STK-029-3.doc).

Began with discussion of Rene's proposal for a Design and Usage guide.
(Design_And_Usage_Lighting_Output_Object_EN.ppt)

Proposal was coordinated among Siemens control and lighting resources.

Slide 12: In = information sent to lamp. Out = information provided from lamp.

Slide 15: If we can make the assumptions that control logic always exists
outside of the lighting output object and that there is no direct interaction
between input and output, then the resolution of multiple inputs (perhaps with
the exception of priority arbitration) should be handled by the control logic,
not by the output object.

If we remove the control logic type specifications from the output object
specification (e.g. handling of input chatter, how to handle timeout switches),
other objects could be added in the future if needed to standardize the way that
control logic and interface are handled. May have difficulty deciding what's an
important interface to the control logic and what's an integral piece of the
output object – where is the line? Need to discuss and decide which pieces of
the control logic truly belong in the output (perhaps minimum on/off), and which
can be better or more appropriately handled external to (above or before) the
output object.

If compare Addendum I to design and usage guide proposal, most of the contents
fall within the proposed paradigm. A few properties may need some further
discussion to either provide a more abstract interface specification (rather
than a specific output object specification) or to determine that the specified
property is indeed control logic that should be exposed in the output object.
Per comments received, blink behavior is one area that may need to be revisited,
as well as the resolution of command, priority arbitration, and blink. Expected
behavior should also be considered as part of the specification. If integrate
multiple BACnet systems, could vendor-unique implementation and behavior cause a
problem for the end-use customer? Agreement on the paradigm may help the
committee come to consensus on contentious inclusions to the specification.

Blink Warn: Should blink warn be part of this object? Primary objection is the
coupling of the blink warning functionality with the priority array. There is a
day-to-day need for blink warning. Decision re: whether or not to blink warn
could be source-dependent, application-specific, device-specific, and/or
time-sensitive. Network latency issues require that blink happen at the output
device.

Possible needs identified:
1. An inherent property (output object supports/performs blink or doesn't)
2. A command-included property that specifies blink/not
3. Property to auto-trigger blink when present value transitions to zero

In the case of (3), interleaved commands can cause unexpected behavior.
"Blink" is tied to "off." But "off" is not necessarily tied to "blink."

History: having a zero present value write trigger blink allows legacy client
devices to treat the output object as an analog object, yet enable this
lighting-specific behavior to occur.

9. SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 comment review and response
add-135-2008i-ppr4-draft
LAWG-135-2008i-PPR4-Comment-Detail

0002-001: How do we handle blink? Much discussion. Resolution over whether we
need to allow legacy scheduler a way to achieve a blink warning directly: it is
acceptable to require some external control logic that can consume a signal from
a legacy scheduler and convert it to a command to the lighting output object.
Concern over removing the entire blink sequence from the output object, because
if non-atomic, execution and interruption becomes unreliable. Remove "present
value (0) = blink." Replace with a lighting command (blink and off). Blink
occurs via the lighting command only, and the language re: interaction between
blink and priority array goes away. If default behavior is no blink, need
Relinquish and Blink_ and_Relinquish. The lighting output object should only
require one timer, although more are allowed (and may be required, depending on
the implementation).

If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority and a higher priority is in
effect, the command never writes a value to the priority array, it just
relinquishes the slot. If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority, then
something happens at a higher priority, cancel the command and execute higher
priority command. (Should the value at the lower priority slot be relinquished?
Behavior must be defined.)

Need to be able to interrupt blink and begin a timeout with a switch input. And
an input from a second switch should interrupt the original timeout and begin a
second timeout. All BACnet clients that can write are also responsible for
relinquishing.

Having only one priority allowed for lighting commands is problematic – multiple
priorities are used regularly to decide which lighting command to execute. They
provide a way to have a fade to value and fade to relinquish happen on
exceptional situations. For example, a lighting test in a board room that allows
both the on and off command to fade rather than jump to a value.

Other primary objection with existing proposal is with the concept of
auto-relinquish after a delay/duration. Also, what to do with stale commands.

Next steps:
Dave F to draft resolution of removing present value (0) = blink and add new
blink commands by 7/31.
Dave R to comb review comments, add any open issues to those raised at this
meeting
* automatic relinquish
* stale commands
* need for lighting command at multiple priorities
* Need for binary properties, or can the object just be analog
* Blink warning
and send email to LA-WG on yahoo group by 6/30.

10. Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
RLH-001-3b – Not discussed.
11. Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.
STK-021-1 – Not discussed.
12. Discussion of Non-Agenda Items (4:45PM - 10 minutes)
13. Sort through proposals in terms of what is still valid or not. Continue,
table, reject, or completed. – Not completed.
14. Schedule for future meetings.(4:55PM - 5 minutes)

6/25 3-5pm CC Sandia

Once we have a draft to discuss, Steve K will publish an agenda and schedule one
or more teleconference(s).

Steve K to publish minutes to yahoo group by 6/30

If another interim meeting is not scheduled, the next meeting will be in
conjunction with the SSPC 135 interim fall meeting in October.

Recent Activity

·                                  1

Visit Your Group

Stay on top

of your group

activity with

Yahoo! Toolbar

Ads on Yahoo!

Learn more now.

Reach customers

searching for you.

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web

======================================================
To view the message archive, set user options, or view
files in our archive, visit the following web page:

    http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/BACnetLighting/

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    BACnetLighting-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


#227 From: "winston BASS" <winston_bass@...>
Date: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:12 pm
Subject: RE: Digest Number 157
winstonhethe...
Send Email Send Email
 

David,

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

I apologize for the delay in sending this thank you. In the interim my wife passed away. She had been struggling with MS for several years and in great pain and misery.

 

Her struggle is over and she is at her eternal rest. I am happy for her and I am at peace.

 

Take care. More about lighting at another time.

 

Winston Hetherington  BAS Specialist. LM_ASHRAE 

BASS Consulting Services

907 - 1300 Pinecrest Rd.

Ottawa, Ontario.  K2C3M5

Phone 613 829-2039 or Cell 613 296-2188

winston_bass@...

http://www.bass-consulting-services.ca

 

 

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 


From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 3:32 AM
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Digest Number 157

 

Messages In This Digest (1 Message)

1a.

Re: Digest Number 155 From: David Fisher

Message

1a.

Re: Digest Number 155

Posted by: "David Fisher" dfisher@...   polars15213

Fri Jul 9, 2010 6:25 am (PDT)



Winston,

One of the objectives for the LAWG has been to develop a new Lighting Output
object

type. One of the goals for the LO object was (and still is) to provide
mechanisms

that take advantage of DALI-like features in a standardized manner. We have
deliberated

at great length on what those features should be, how they should work, and
how

a given implementation with and without DALI devices could exploit this
featureset.

After four public reviews, there are aspects of the proposed LO object that
remain

somewhat contentious. None of these is really at issue with the proposed
DALI

features. The hold up has been that several individuals have questioned some

of the proposed behavior and mechanisms. Yet their counter-proposals have
not

been able to reach a consensus.

In the Albuquerque meetings, an extensive review of the proposals has
indicated

a possible way forward. We are in the process of drafting revisions to the
LO

object that may satisfy the remaining issues. Hopefully this could lead to a
consensus

in the Atlanta meetings this autumn, which in turn would trigger another
public review.

The outcome of that review would determine what additional work if any is
required

prior to publication. Recent changes in ASHRAE standards rules and policy
may help

to accelerate this procedure somewhat. However, the actual publication of
the new

documents is still some time in the future.

David Fisher

PolarSoft® Inc.

914 South Aiken Ave

Pittsburgh PA 15232-2212

<mailto:dfisher@polarsoft.biz> dfisher@polarsoft.biz

www.polarsoft.biz

412-683-2018

412-683-5228 fax

_____

From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of winston BASS
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 10:45 PM
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [BACnetLighting] Digest Number 155

Steve and all,

I have not been able to meet with the WG other than on Telco’s. That being
said I am not up to speed with the overall discussions, so if I sound a
little off base, that’s because I may be. When I first joined group last
year, my interest was to see the interconnect with DALI through to a
published definition. My question now is did the last addendum submitted
make it through the public review process and when will ASHRAE release the
latest version?

Reading through the attached minutes from Albuquerque, I have the Impression
that the present discussion revolves around functions not necessarily
intended to interconnect with DALI but would support lighting control
functions beyond the capabilities of DALI. In fact, functions being
discussed would supersede DALI in several areas. Am I correct in my
observations?

I am not against the concept at all but I am just trying to verify that the
DALI interface is now a finished work and that product will be available
with the latest changes included. Can anyone validate my question? I
apologize if this is a finished work and I have missed the announcement.

Thanks.

Winston Hetherington BAS Specialist. LM_ASHRAE

BASS Consulting Services

907 - 1300 Pinecrest Rd.

Ottawa, Ontario. K2C3M5

Phone 613 829-2039 or Cell 613 296-2188

winston_bass@sympatico.ca

http://www.bass- <http://www.bass-consulting-services.ca/>
consulting-services.ca

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

_____

From: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com]

Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:34 AM
To: BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Digest Number 155

<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting;_ylc=X3oDMTJkcTluMjJ1BF9TAzk3M
zU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNoZHIEc2xrA2hwaARzd
GltZQMxMjc4NTc0NDM0> BACnet Lighting Apps. Working Group

Messages In This Digest (1 Message)

1a.

Re: Meeting in Albuquerque From: Klaus Waechter

View
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbGtiNGE0
BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNkbXNnBHNs
awNhdHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyNzg1NzQ0MzQ-?xm=1&m=p&tidx=1> All Topics | Create
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZnRhN2lsBF9T
Azk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNkbXNnBHNsawNu
dHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyNzg1NzQ0MzQ-> New Topic

Message

1a.

<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/message/224;_ylc=X3oDMTJwcHRzc
TMxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BG1zZ0lkAzIyN
ARzZWMDZG1zZwRzbGsDdm1zZwRzdGltZQMxMjc4NTc0NDM0> Re: Meeting in Albuquerque

Posted by: "Klaus Waechter" waechter_klaus@
<mailto:waechter_klaus@yahoo.com?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Meeting%20in%20Albuquerq
ue> yahoo.com waechter_klaus <http://profiles.yahoo.com/waechter_klaus>

Wed Jul 7, 2010 1:11 am (PDT)

Howdy Steve

I am missing David Ritter at the participant list.
As far as I remember we talked about a telco where we then decide if a
'Lighting
Application Summit' is needed or not.
My expectation is to have this telco mid of August when most people are back

from holidays.

Kind Regards
Klaus Waechter

Siemens
Gubelstrasse 22
6301 Zug, Switzerland

Tel direct: +41 41 724 56 13
Fax: +41 41 723 55 58
Mobile: +41 79 260 58 47
Mailto: waechter.klaus@ <mailto:waechter.klaus%40siemens.com> siemens.com

________________________________
From: SKarg <steve@kargs. <mailto:steve%40kargs.net> net>
To: BACnetLighting@ <mailto:BACnetLighting%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 6:41:52 PM
Subject: [BACnetLighting] Re: Meeting in Albuquerque

Hello Lighting Applications Working Group!

The Lighting Applications working group met at the Summer SSPC meeting, held
in
Albuquerque on June 24, 2010, and June 25, 2010.

Below are the minutes, which will be posted to the BACnet committee as
LA032.

Best Regards,

Steve Karg
WattStopper
--
Minutes
BACnet Lighting Applications Working Group
BACnet Summer Meeting
Albuquerque, New Mexico

8:00AM – 5:00 PM on Thursday, June 24, 2010 - Enchantment C, Hyatt Regency
3:15PM– 5:00 PM on Friday, June 25, 2010 - Sandia, Convention Center
--------------------------------
1. Opening remarks - working group (8:00PM - 5 minutes)
2. Circulation of attendance sheet, and introduction of those present (8:05
- 5
minutes)
Name Organization
Bernhard Isler Siemens
Klaus Waechter Siemens
Sharon DingesTrane-Ingersoll Rand
Scott ZiegenfusLutron Electronics
Chariti Young ALC
Christoph ZellerSauter
Duane L. King Acuity Brands Controls
Rick LeinenLeviton
Steve Karg Watt Stopper
RenéKälin Siemens
Dana Petersen Johnson Controls
David Fisher Polarsoft

3. Meeting role assignments (8:10 - 5 minutes)
• time keeper: (breaks: 10AM, 2PM, 3PM, 4PM) – Rick Leinen
• scribe – Chariti Young
• non-agenda item attendant – CristophZeller
4. Approval of the minutes from the previous meeting. (8:15 - 5 minutes)

Some discussion of the previous minutes.
Corrected misspelling of Rene's name and "idea".
Refer SSPC 135 minutes for details on RK-006 presentation and discussion

>> David Ritter moved that the minutes be accepted as amended. Seconded by
Duane
>>King. Unanimously approved.

Updated minutes posted to server.

5. Discussion and approval of the agenda for this meeting. (8:20 - 5
minutes)

Added action item from SSPC 135 to clarify how lighting output object should

work within a BACnet system as part of the bigger picture - develop a design
and
usage guide for object.

Added action from SSPC 135 to sort through proposals in terms of what is
still
valid or not. Continue, table, reject, completed.

>> Revised agenda approved..

6. Liason updates (NEMA, IESNA, DALI) (8:25 - 5 minutes)
No updates

7. Action Items – Proposals and Responses (8:30 – 7 hours)
8. Clarify how lighting output object should work within a BACnet system as
part
of the bigger picture – develop a design and usage guide for object. Discuss

Use Cases developed in Germantown (STK-029-3.doc).

Began with discussion of Rene's proposal for a Design and Usage guide.
(Design_And_Usage_Lighting_Output_Object_EN.ppt)

Proposal was coordinated among Siemens control and lighting resources.

Slide 12: In = information sent to lamp. Out = information provided from
lamp.

Slide 15: If we can make the assumptions that control logic always exists
outside of the lighting output object and that there is no direct
interaction
between input and output, then the resolution of multiple inputs (perhaps
with
the exception of priority arbitration) should be handled by the control
logic,
not by the output object.

If we remove the control logic type specifications from the output object
specification (e.g. handling of input chatter, how to handle timeout
switches),
other objects could be added in the future if needed to standardize the way
that
control logic and interface are handled. May have difficulty deciding what's
an
important interface to the control logic and what's an integral piece of the

output object – where is the line? Need to discuss and decide which pieces
of
the control logic truly belong in the output (perhaps minimum on/off), and
which
can be better or more appropriately handled external to (above or before)
the
output object.

If compare Addendum I to design and usage guide proposal, most of the
contents
fall within the proposed paradigm. A few properties may need some further
discussion to either provide a more abstract interface specification (rather

than a specific output object specification) or to determine that the
specified
property is indeed control logic that should be exposed in the output
object.
Per comments received, blink behavior is one area that may need to be
revisited,
as well as the resolution of command, priority arbitration, and blink.
Expected
behavior should also be considered as part of the specification. If
integrate
multiple BACnet systems, could vendor-unique implementation and behavior
cause a
problem for the end-use customer? Agreement on the paradigm may help the
committee come to consensus on contentious inclusions to the specification.

Blink Warn: Should blink warn be part of this object? Primary objection is
the
coupling of the blink warning functionality with the priority array. There
is a
day-to-day need for blink warning. Decision re: whether or not to blink warn

could be source-dependent, application-specific, device-specific, and/or
time-sensitive. Network latency issues require that blink happen at the
output
device.

Possible needs identified:
1. An inherent property (output object supports/performs blink or doesn't)
2. A command-included property that specifies blink/not
3. Property to auto-trigger blink when present value transitions to zero

In the case of (3), interleaved commands can cause unexpected behavior.
"Blink" is tied to "off." But "off" is not necessarily tied to "blink."

History: having a zero present value write trigger blink allows legacy
client
devices to treat the output object as an analog object, yet enable this
lighting-specific behavior to occur.

9. SSPC-135-2008 Addendum i PPR4 comment review and response
add-135-2008i-ppr4-draft
LAWG-135-2008i-PPR4-Comment-Detail

0002-001: How do we handle blink? Much discussion. Resolution over whether
we
need to allow legacy scheduler a way to achieve a blink warning directly: it
is
acceptable to require some external control logic that can consume a signal
from
a legacy scheduler and convert it to a command to the lighting output
object.
Concern over removing the entire blink sequence from the output object,
because
if non-atomic, execution and interruption becomes unreliable. Remove
"present
value (0) = blink." Replace with a lighting command (blink and off). Blink
occurs via the lighting command only, and the language re: interaction
between
blink and priority array goes away. If default behavior is no blink, need
Relinquish and Blink_ and_Relinquish. The lighting output object should only

require one timer, although more are allowed (and may be required, depending
on
the implementation).

If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority and a higher priority is
in
effect, the command never writes a value to the priority array, it just
relinquishes the slot. If blink and relinquish is commanded to a priority,
then
something happens at a higher priority, cancel the command and execute
higher
priority command. (Should the value at the lower priority slot be
relinquished?
Behavior must be defined.)

Need to be able to interrupt blink and begin a timeout with a switch input.
And
an input from a second switch should interrupt the original timeout and
begin a
second timeout. All BACnet clients that can write are also responsible for
relinquishing.

Having only one priority allowed for lighting commands is problematic –
multiple
priorities are used regularly to decide which lighting command to execute.
They
provide a way to have a fade to value and fade to relinquish happen on
exceptional situations. For example, a lighting test in a board room that
allows
both the on and off command to fade rather than jump to a value.

Other primary objection with existing proposal is with the concept of
auto-relinquish after a delay/duration. Also, what to do with stale
commands.

Next steps:
Dave F to draft resolution of removing present value (0) = blink and add new

blink commands by 7/31.
Dave R to comb review comments, add any open issues to those raised at this
meeting
* automatic relinquish
* stale commands
* need for lighting command at multiple priorities
* Need for binary properties, or can the object just be analog
* Blink warning
and send email to LA-WG on yahoo group by 6/30.

10. Discuss Annex H clause H.X "Using BACnet with DALI"
RLH-001-3b – Not discussed.
11. Discuss Lighting Application BIBB and 135.1 Testing additions.
STK-021-1 – Not discussed.
12. Discussion of Non-Agenda Items (4:45PM - 10 minutes)
13. Sort through proposals in terms of what is still valid or not. Continue,

table, reject, or completed. – Not completed.
14. Schedule for future meetings.(4:55PM - 5 minutes)

6/25 3-5pm CC Sandia

Once we have a draft to discuss, Steve K will publish an agenda and schedule
one
or more teleconference(s).

Steve K to publish minutes to yahoo group by 6/30

If another interim meeting is not scheduled, the next meeting will be in
conjunction with the SSPC 135 interim fall meeting in October.

Back to top <>

Reply
<mailto:waechter_klaus@yahoo.com?Subject=Re%3A%20Meeting%20in%20Albuquerque>
to sender | Reply
<mailto:BACnetLighting@yahoogroups.com?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Meeting%20in%20Alb
uquerque> to group | Reply
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJwbTZvMTdqBF9T
Azk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BG1zZ0lkAzIyNARzZWMD
ZG1zZwRzbGsDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxMjc4NTc0NDM0?act=reply&messageNum=224> via web
post
Messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/message/219;_ylc=X3oDMTMzbzA2N
Tk2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BG1zZ0lkAzIyN
ARzZWMDZG1zZwRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMjc4NTc0NDM0BHRwY0lkAzIxOQ--> in this
topic (3)

Recent Activity

* 1

<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/files;_ylc=X3oDMTJnNmo3ZmNiBF9
TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3Z
maWxlcwRzdGltZQMxMjc4NTc0NDM0> New Files

<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYTg4bjZhBF9TAzk3M
zU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc
3RpbWUDMTI3ODU3NDQzNA--> Visit Your Group

Stay on top

of your group

activity with

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15l5suc1b/M=493064.14125818.14044277.8674578/D=
groups/S=1705701014:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1278581634/L=2932eb76-8a63-11df-bbae-73fe
350ef40a/B=8_m4HdGDJG8-/J=1278574434208809/K=Ax5NMkO3tfeq1.8utKSEPw/A=608391
3/R=0/SIG=11flbnfil/*http:/us.toolbar.yahoo.com/?.dl=1&.cpdl=grpj> Yahoo!
Toolbar

Ads on Yahoo!

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15l3jmbvg/M=493064.12016308.12445700.8674578/D=
groups/S=1705701014:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1278581634/L=2932eb76-8a63-11df-bbae-73fe
350ef40a/B=9Pm4HdGDJG8-/J=1278574434208809/K=Ax5NMkO3tfeq1.8utKSEPw/A=384864
3/R=0/SIG=131q47hek/*http:/searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/srchv2.php?o=US2005
&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=Groups4&s=Y&s2=&s3=&b=50> Learn more now.

Reach customers

searching for you.

Yahoo! Finance

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15l3f20v6/M=493064.12016257.12445664.8674578/D=
groups/S=1705701014:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1278581634/L=2932eb76-8a63-11df-bbae-73fe
350ef40a/B=9fm4HdGDJG8-/J=1278574434208809/K=Ax5NMkO3tfeq1.8utKSEPw/A=450717
9/R=0/SIG=12de4rskk/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=50284/*http:/finance.yahoo.co
m/personal-finance> It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily
Digest.

Create
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDA2YzI0BF9T
Azk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250
cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI3ODU3NDQzNA--> New Topic | Visit
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting;_ylc=X3oDMTJjZjlxajNuBF9TAzk3M
zU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2hwBHN0a
W1lAzEyNzg1NzQ0MzQ-> Your Group on the Web

Messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJlY241NGlk
BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xr
A21zZ3MEc3RpbWUDMTI3ODU3NDQzNA--> | Files
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/files;_ylc=X3oDMTJmaTN0aW1xBF9
TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2Z
pbGVzBHN0aW1lAzEyNzg1NzQ0MzQ-> | Photos
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/photos;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNjFicmh0BF
9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3
Bob3QEc3RpbWUDMTI3ODU3NDQzNA--> | Links
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMzg0Z24wBF9
TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2x
pbmtzBHN0aW1lAzEyNzg1NzQ0MzQ-> | Database
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/database;_ylc=X3oDMTJjY3UzYWd0
BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xr
A2RiBHN0aW1lAzEyNzg1NzQ0MzQ-> | Polls
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/polls;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYmhzZm1oBF9
TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3B
vbGxzBHN0aW1lAzEyNzg1NzQ0MzQ-> | Members
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNGZoMWhzB
F9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA
21icnMEc3RpbWUDMTI3ODU3NDQzNA--> | Calendar
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/calendar;_ylc=X3oDMTJkN2s0bm1h
BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xr
A2NhbARzdGltZQMxMjc4NTc0NDM0>

======================================================
To view the message archive, set user options, or view
files in our archive, visit the following web page:

http://www.yahoogro <http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/BACnetLighting/>
ups.com/group/BACnetLighting/

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

BACnetLighting-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

MARKETPLACE

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15ojfob6f/M=493064.13983314.14041046.13298430/D
=groups/S=1705701014:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1278581634/L=2932eb76-8a63-11df-bbae-7
3fe350ef40a/B=8Pm4HdGDJG8-/J=1278574434208809/K=Ax5NMkO3tfeq1.8utKSEPw/A=606
0255/R=0/SIG=1194m4keh/*http:/us.toolbar.yahoo.com/?.cpdl=grpj> Stay on top
of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo!
Toolbar now.

_____

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15o4coptq/M=493064.13814537.14041040.10835568/D
=groups/S=1705701014:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1278581634/L=2932eb76-8a63-11df-bbae-7
3fe350ef40a/B=8fm4HdGDJG8-/J=1278574434208809/K=Ax5NMkO3tfeq1.8utKSEPw/A=607
8812/R=0/SIG=114ae4ln1/*http:/dogandcatanswers.yahoo.com/> Get great advice
about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

_____

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15oe2v0rb/M=493064.14012770.13963757.13298430/D
=groups/S=1705701014:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1278581634/L=2932eb76-8a63-11df-bbae-7
3fe350ef40a/B=8vm4HdGDJG8-/J=1278574434208809/K=Ax5NMkO3tfeq1.8utKSEPw/A=601
5306/R=0/SIG=11vlkvigg/*http:/advision.webevents.yahoo.com/hobbiesandactivit
ieszone/> Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions!
Explore new interests.

<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkdmNqbm5iBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwN
zk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMjc4NTc0NDM0>
Yahoo! Groups
Change
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMW5oNjBhBF9T
Azk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3N0
bmdzBHN0aW1lAzEyNzg1NzQ0MzQ-> settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch
<mailto:BACnetLighting-normal@yahoogroups.com?subject=Email%20Delivery:%20In
diviual%20Email> delivery to Individual | Switch
<mailto:BACnetLighting-traditional@yahoogroups.com?subject=Change%20Delivery
%20Format:%20Traditional> format to Traditional
Visit
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BACnetLighting;_ylc=X3oDMTJkYmQ2MzgyBF9TAzk3M
zU5NzE1BGdycElkAzMwNzk5NTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NzAxMDE0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2hwZgRzd
GltZQMxMjc4NTc0NDM0> Your Group | Yahoo! Groups
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
<mailto:BACnetLighting-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359715/grpId=3079952/grpspId=1705701014/msgId
=155/stime=1278574434/nc1=6083913/nc2=3848643/nc3=4507179>

Recent Activity

·                                  1

Visit Your Group

Stay on top

of your group

activity with

Yahoo! Toolbar

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

New business?

Get new customers.

List your web site

in Yahoo! Search.

Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web

======================================================
To view the message archive, set user options, or view
files in our archive, visit the following web page:

    http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/BACnetLighting/

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    BACnetLighting-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


#228 From: "Isler, Bernhard" <bernhard.isler@...>
Date: Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:58 pm
Subject: LA-WG Interim Meeting Clarification
bi71259
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,

Since I need to make travel arrangements for Atlanta, I would like to
ask for clarification on an LA-WG interim meeting.

Since the IT-WG will not have an interim meeting, I suppose that there
will not be an LA-WG interim meeting, and also no additional extra LA-WG
days in Atlanta.

Correct?

Best,
Bernhard


Bernhard Isler
Siemens Switzerland Ltd
Building Technologies Division
International Headquarters
Fire Safety & Security Products

Gubelstrasse 22
CH-6301 Zug, Switzerland

Tel: +41 (41) 724 33 87
Mob: +41 (79) 561 77 23
Fax: +41 (41) 723 48 94

mailto:bernhard.isler@...
http://www.siemens.com/buildingtechnologies

Note: This e-mail may contain confidential information. If you have
received this e-mail without being the proper recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, copying or distribution is strictly
prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original
transmittal. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the
author of this e-mail and do not necessarily represent those of Siemens
Switzerland Ltd, unless otherwise specifically stated.

#229 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:06 pm
Subject: Re: LA-WG Interim Meeting Clarification
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Bernhard,

> Since I need to make travel arrangements for Atlanta, I would like to
> ask for clarification on an LA-WG interim meeting.
>
> Since the IT-WG will not have an interim meeting, I suppose that there
> will not be an LA-WG interim meeting, and also no additional extra LA-WG
> days in Atlanta.

I have not made any arrangement for additional meetings outside of the
November BACnet SSPC-135 meeting in Atlanta, so it is safe to assume
that we will not have an interim meeting before Atlanta.

I have also not made any arrangements for conference calls to reach
consensus on 2008 Addendum-i Lighting Output object proposal and
public review comments.  I'm either quite the slacker, or a quite busy
making BACnet products (assume the latter, please).  Please accept my
apologies in advance.  I hope to make good progress in November when
we meet.

> Correct?

You are correct.

Best Regards,

Steve
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

#230 From: Steve Karg <steve@...>
Date: Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:17 pm
Subject: Re: LA-WG Interim Meeting Clarification
stephenkarg
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Bernhard,

I mentioned SSPC meetings in Atlanta in November, but I think that was
a mistake.  The SSPC meetings were tentatively scheduled for October
25-29 in Atlanta.  As far as I know, the BACnet meetings are still
scheduled for October, and the Lighting Applications working group
will meet then. I'll post more details when I get them.

I must have been thinking about the BTL Plugfest that is being held in
Atlanta in November...

Best Regards,

Steve
--
http://steve.kargs.net/

Messages 201 - 230 of 327   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help