Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

BFAIG · Boston Flex Application Incubator Group

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 1 - 30 of 299   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#1 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:17 pm
Subject: Update & Meeting Announcement :: Monday February 11 :: 7:00 PM EST :: Online!
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi All,
 
I've posted an update and announcement to our blog at http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=10.
 
We still have openings for learner-presenters, or even just-plain-presenters at Monday's meeting, so please be in touch if interested. And, of course, you're welcome to simply show up and join in the fun. :)
 
Douglas
 

#2 From: "Carl Thien" <cthien@...>
Date: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:57 pm
Subject: Re: Update & Meeting Announcement :: Monday February 11 :: 7:00 PM EST :: Online!
carl_thien
Send Email Send Email
 
Douglas

Just wanted to let you know that I will not be showing up online for the meeting tonight.  I don't enjoy online meetings myself...  I will be at the physical meeting the first Monday in March, to be sure.

Just wanted to give you a heads up

The Flex 3 training from the source book is listed on Amazon as have a 3/22 ship date, so Flex 3 must be getting close http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Flex-3-Training-Source/dp/0321529189
I have applied for and received an educational serial number for Flex 2, BTW.

---Carl


On Feb 10, 2008 3:17 PM, Douglas McCarroll <org.yahoo.001@...> wrote:

Hi All,
 
I've posted an update and announcement to our blog at http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=10.
 
We still have openings for learner-presenters, or even just-plain-presenters at Monday's meeting, so please be in touch if interested. And, of course, you're welcome to simply show up and join in the fun. :)
 
Douglas
 



#3 From: "Cam Howard" <chowardnh@...>
Date: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:10 pm
Subject: RE: Update & Meeting Announcement :: Monday February 11 :: 7:00 PM EST :: Online!
chowardnh
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Douglas,
 
I'm looking forward to the online meeting.
 
Is listening via VOIP rather than calling into the teleconferencing service a possibility?
 
Thanks,
 Cam
 


From: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BFAIG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 3:17 PM
To: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BFAIG] Update & Meeting Announcement :: Monday February 11 :: 7:00 PM EST :: Online!

Hi All,
 
I've posted an update and announcement to our blog at http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=10.
 
We still have openings for learner-presenters, or even just-plain-presenters at Monday's meeting, so please be in touch if interested. And, of course, you're welcome to simply show up and join in the fun. :)
 
Douglas
 


#4 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:53 pm
Subject: VOIP vs Teleconference
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
> Is listening via VOIP rather than calling into the teleconferencing service a possibility?
 
Hi Cam,
 
We can experiment with this tonight - try both, and see how they work. In the past I've noticed a fair amount of lag over VOIP - maybe a second - but this might not be any problem at all if we only have one person speaking at a time.
 
Douglas


On Feb 11, 2008 12:10 PM, Cam Howard <chowardnh@...> wrote:

Hi Douglas,
 
I'm looking forward to the online meeting.
 
Is listening via VOIP rather than calling into the teleconferencing service a possibility?
 
Thanks,
 Cam
 


From: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BFAIG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 3:17 PM
To: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BFAIG] Update & Meeting Announcement :: Monday February 11 :: 7:00 PM EST :: Online!

Hi All,
 
I've posted an update and announcement to our blog at http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=10.
 
We still have openings for learner-presenters, or even just-plain-presenters at Monday's meeting, so please be in touch if interested. And, of course, you're welcome to simply show up and join in the fun. :)
 
Douglas
 



#5 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:35 pm
Subject: Language Collaborative prototype & tonight's agenda
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi All,
 
I've posted a prototype of my Language Collaborative player app to the blog:
 
 
And I've updated the agenda for tonight's meeting at:
 
 
Douglas

#6 From: "Cam Howard" <chowardnh@...>
Date: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:16 pm
Subject: RE: VOIP vs Teleconference
chowardnh
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Douglas,
 
Thanks for being willing to try this.
 
My experience with VoIP in Adobe Connect is that those using VoIP will be able to listen via their computer speakers and participate by typing in the chat window.
 
Is that what you envision? Or do the VoIP users need to do something different?
 
Thanks,
  Cam
 


From: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BFAIG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 1:54 PM
To: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BFAIG] VOIP vs Teleconference

> Is listening via VOIP rather than calling into the teleconferencing service a possibility?
 
Hi Cam,
 
We can experiment with this tonight - try both, and see how they work. In the past I've noticed a fair amount of lag over VOIP - maybe a second - but this might not be any problem at all if we only have one person speaking at a time.
 
Douglas


On Feb 11, 2008 12:10 PM, Cam Howard <chowardnh@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Douglas,
 
I'm looking forward to the online meeting.
 
Is listening via VOIP rather than calling into the teleconferencing service a possibility?
 
Thanks,
 Cam
 
 
.


#7 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: VoIP vs Teleconference
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi All,
 
This is a quick update on the question of whether we should use our teleconferencing service or Connect's VoIP for online meetings.
 
I'll be posting a more complete report on last night's meeting some time this week but, in brief, it was *great*.  :)
 
We attempted to experiment with using Connect's VOIP but couldn't get that to work, so we ended up using the teleconferencing service for the remainder of the meeting. I'll try to figure out how to get Connect's VoIP to work before next Monday's meeting so that we can experiment with it.
 
That said, I'm inclined to think that we should continue to use the teleconferencing service. Here are my reasons:
 
  - After last night's meeting I'm feeling that it is definitely desirable for us to have an infrastructure that allows verbal discussion, as opposed to attendees just texting in questions, comments, etc.
 
  - I think that we'll find that the lag-time inherant in VoIP makes this much more awkward. It's hard enough to negotiate conference calls without adding lag-time into the mix.
 
  - Our teleconferencing service provides the moderator with a really handy control panel that allows the moderator to mute and unmute participants as needed, and allows participants to "raise their hand" by pressing 5* on their phone. If our attendance grows we'll probably want to use these features.
 
  - The main (only?) problem with the teleconferencing service is the fact that one has to pay long distance telephone charges to call in if one doesn't have an unlimited calling plan. I'm not sure this needs to be a significant problem. I've posted an "Inexpensive ways to call into our 'free' teleconferencing service" post to our blog at http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=13. In it I've given details on two inexpensive long distance calling options. Perhaps others can contribute other options to this list as well.
 
I want to make sure that I'm clear in this email that I'm still completely open to experimenting with the VoIP approach. While I'm inclined to think that the teleconference approach will be easier overall, we won't know how well the VoIP approach works until we try it.
 
I invite further input on this subject either via this thread or next Monday, when we're chatting via VoIP.  :)
 
Douglas

On Feb 11, 2008 6:16 PM, Cam Howard <chowardnh@...> wrote:

Hi Douglas,
 
Thanks for being willing to try this.
 
My experience with VoIP in Adobe Connect is that those using VoIP will be able to listen via their computer speakers and participate by typing in the chat window.
 
Is that what you envision? Or do the VoIP users need to do something different?
 
Thanks,
  Cam
 


From: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BFAIG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 1:54 PM
To: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BFAIG] VOIP vs Teleconference

> Is listening via VOIP rather than calling into the teleconferencing service a possibility?
 
Hi Cam,
 
We can experiment with this tonight - try both, and see how they work. In the past I've noticed a fair amount of lag over VOIP - maybe a second - but this might not be any problem at all if we only have one person speaking at a time.
 
Douglas


On Feb 11, 2008 12:10 PM, Cam Howard <chowardnh@...> wrote:

Hi Douglas,
 
I'm looking forward to the online meeting.
 
Is listening via VOIP rather than calling into the teleconferencing service a possibility?
 
Thanks,
 Cam
 

 
.



#8 From: "Cam Howard" <chowardnh@...>
Date: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:57 am
Subject: RE: VoIP vs Teleconference
chowardnh
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Douglas,
 
I agree, Monday night's meeting was terrific! Thanks for inviting Michael Labriola to join us. His input, questions, code-poking, and teaching was enormously helpful and seeing your project was great. I appreciated the feedback on my storyboard layout sketch and use of XML, too.
 
Thanks for your willingness to try the VoIP again, although you make a good case for not using it. Given the anticipated drawbacks, we may not want to spend a lot of time experimenting with it. I'll check out the other options you posted on the blog.
 
Is anyone else especially interested in using VoIP?
 
Thanks,
  Cam
 
 


From: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BFAIG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:33 AM
To: BFAIG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BFAIG] VoIP vs Teleconference

Hi All,
 
This is a quick update on the question of whether we should use our teleconferencing service or Connect's VoIP for online meetings.
 
I'll be posting a more complete report on last night's meeting some time this week but, in brief, it was *great*.  :)
 
We attempted to experiment with using Connect's VOIP but couldn't get that to work, so we ended up using the teleconferencing service for the remainder of the meeting. I'll try to figure out how to get Connect's VoIP to work before next Monday's meeting so that we can experiment with it.
 
That said, I'm inclined to think that we should continue to use the teleconferencing service. Here are my reasons:
 
  - After last night's meeting I'm feeling that it is definitely desirable for us to have an infrastructure that allows verbal discussion, as opposed to attendees just texting in questions, comments, etc.
 
  - I think that we'll find that the lag-time inherant in VoIP makes this much more awkward. It's hard enough to negotiate conference calls without adding lag-time into the mix.
 
  - Our teleconferencing service provides the moderator with a really handy control panel that allows the moderator to mute and unmute participants as needed, and allows participants to "raise their hand" by pressing 5* on their phone. If our attendance grows we'll probably want to use these features.
 
  - The main (only?) problem with the teleconferencing service is the fact that one has to pay long distance telephone charges to call in if one doesn't have an unlimited calling plan. I'm not sure this needs to be a significant problem. I've posted an "Inexpensive ways to call into our 'free' teleconferencing service" post to our blog at http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=13. In it I've given details on two inexpensive long distance calling options. Perhaps others can contribute other options to this list as well.
 
I want to make sure that I'm clear in this email that I'm still completely open to experimenting with the VoIP approach. While I'm inclined to think that the teleconference approach will be easier overall, we won't know how well the VoIP approach works until we try it.
 
I invite further input on this subject either via this thread or next Monday, when we're chatting via VoIP.  :)
 
Douglas

#9 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:19 pm
Subject: MVCS
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi All,
 
There's been some discussion of Joe Berkovitz's MVCS architecture within our group so I thought that I'd mention this...
 
Joe has just created a post that links to all the available resources for MVCS, and has added a few comments as well. It's at http://www.joeberkovitz.com/mvcs.
 
Douglas

#10 From: "bobby_world" <bobby_world@...>
Date: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:14 pm
Subject: Re: VoIP vs Teleconference
bobby_world
Send Email Send Email
 
I enjoyed Monday's meeting also! Although, it didn't seem I had much
to say on the teleconference. The reason being is because I was busy
listening and absorbing the creativity, ideas and teaching from each
of you. I look forward to more participation in the future meetings.

One topic I would like to discuss/learn is something I came across as
a challenge that I came across this week with regards to Flex
components. I  feel I am getting a handle on how I would go about
creating my own custom components based off of extending the standard
Flex components. My question is how to go about using other developers
components that people are sharing out there on the internet/blogs.
Examples of these developer components would be using FlexLib, Ely
Greenfields and Adobe AS3 classes on Google code.

I also would like to know how to load XML data from multiple sources.
This being I have XML coming from this server and another server that
I would want to tie it together in one application.

Flex is exciting stuff and I am enjoying learning all about it. This
is a great resource for me.

Bobby

#11 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:12 pm
Subject: Re: Re: VoIP vs Teleconference
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Bobby,

One topic I would like to discuss/learn is something I came across as
a challenge that I came across this week with regards to Flex
components. I feel I am getting a handle on how I would go about
creating my own custom components based off of extending the standard
Flex components. My question is how to go about using other developers
components that people are sharing out there on the internet/blogs.
Examples of these developer components would be using FlexLib, Ely
Greenfields and Adobe AS3 classes on Google code.

 
This is a pretty big question and the answer is going to depend on what you want to extend. For example I just took a look at Ely's Landscape component and, after an hour or so, concluded that I could get the result I wanted much more quickly by rolling my own much simpler code. Of course, my code won't be reusable as Ely's is, and I could have learned a lot by digging into Ely's code, but my quick appraisal is that it would have taken days to do this. For one thing, a lot of his code isn't commented. It isn't easy to quickly get the big picture.
 
If you can be more specific about a task that you'd like to accomplish, we'll be better able to help. If you've made a stab at it and can post some code to the blog, that will probably also increase the amount of helpful input that the group can provide. But we can also start from square one.
 



I also would like to know how to load XML data from multiple sources.
This being I have XML coming from this server and another server that
I would want to tie it together in one application.

 
This is more specific. Good!  :)  I'm assuming that you want to import two XML files into XML objects, then combine their data in a new XML object. Yes? Can you provide XML samples?
 
See you (?)  (what does one say for online meetings without cameras?) tonight.
 
Douglas
 
 

Flex is exciting stuff and I am enjoying learning all about it. This
is a great resource for me.

Bobby



#12 From: "douglasmccarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:53 pm
Subject: Online Meeting Tonight, and a recap of last week's meeting
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Details here:

http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=14

See you there!  :)

#13 From: "douglasmccarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:53 pm
Subject: Another prototype for my Language Collaborative app
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi All,

I've posted another AIR prototype for my app at
http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=15.

The feedback I got last week was extremely helpful, and I look forward
to getting some more at tonight's meeting. If you can't attend, but
have feedback, please post it to this list.  :)

Douglas

#14 From: "douglasmccarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:53 pm
Subject: More on teleconferencing vs. VoIP
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
#15 From: "douglasmccarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:35 pm
Subject: Code Samples from Monday's meeting and my Flex search URL
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi All,

At Mondays meeting I promised to post a couple of code samples. Here
they are.

Example Code - Using data binding to implement percentage-based
container constraints:

http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=22

Example Code - Importing & parsing XML:

http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=23

Also, here's the URL for my Flex custom search engine. I've just
upgraded it to include 102 Flex-related URLs. :)

http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=007474618155310509141%3Aybgzqzmzvbi

Enjoy. :)

Douglas

#16 From: "bobby_world" <bobby_world@...>
Date: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:17 pm
Subject: Good Flex/AIR example
bobby_world
Send Email Send Email
 
I came across this Flex/AIR application today. It reminded me of Cam &
my project we are building.

http://www.richapps.de/?p=115

I did ping the developer and he said he uses Ely's DisplayShelf Flex
component we had previously discussed in our meeting. Also, I believe
he uses Papervision 3D.

I now will be adding learning how to use Papervision 3D to my list of
things to learn with learning how to load/parse XML. :)Also, I think
learning how to develop custom components will be helpful in using
other developer's components.

Bobby

#17 From: "Michael Labriola" <labriola@...>
Date: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:32 pm
Subject: Re: Good Flex/AIR example
malabriola
Send Email Send Email
 
Perhaps in one of these meetings I can do a brain dump on custom
components for everyone. That is my specialty.


--- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "bobby_world" <bobby_world@...> wrote:
>
> I came across this Flex/AIR application today. It reminded me of
Cam &
> my project we are building.
>
> http://www.richapps.de/?p=115
>
> I did ping the developer and he said he uses Ely's DisplayShelf
Flex
> component we had previously discussed in our meeting. Also, I
believe
> he uses Papervision 3D.
>
> I now will be adding learning how to use Papervision 3D to my list
of
> things to learn with learning how to load/parse XML. :)Also, I
think
> learning how to develop custom components will be helpful in using
> other developer's components.
>
> Bobby
>

#18 From: "douglasmccarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:44 pm
Subject: Re: Good Flex/AIR example
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Mike,

> Perhaps in one of these meetings I can do a brain dump on custom
> components for everyone. That is my specialty.

That would be great. I suspect that we could spend several (many?)
meetings on this. From what I've seen so far it's fairly easy to
simply extend a component in simple ways with MXML, more complex to do
so with ActionScript, then even more complex if you are working with
the full component lifecycle. I've done the first two and need more
experience with those, and to get started with the third.

It might be good if you gave members an assignment of some sort, then
reviewed what they came up with, either before or after your brain dump...

Of course, all this would need to be tailored to fit into the amount
of time that you are comfortable contributing. I'm guessing that we
could suck up all your Monday evenings for the next few months on
this, if you let us.  :)  We should probably try to find a way to do
this that's not too structured, so that you can contribute when you
have the time and energy.

Thanks,

Douglas


--- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Labriola" <labriola@...> wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps in one of these meetings I can do a brain dump on custom
> components for everyone. That is my specialty.
>
>
> --- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "bobby_world" <bobby_world@> wrote:
> >
> > I came across this Flex/AIR application today. It reminded me of
> Cam &
> > my project we are building.
> >
> > http://www.richapps.de/?p=115
> >
> > I did ping the developer and he said he uses Ely's DisplayShelf
> Flex
> > component we had previously discussed in our meeting. Also, I
> believe
> > he uses Papervision 3D.
> >
> > I now will be adding learning how to use Papervision 3D to my list
> of
> > things to learn with learning how to load/parse XML. :)Also, I
> think
> > learning how to develop custom components will be helpful in using
> > other developer's components.
> >
> > Bobby
> >
>

#19 From: "Michael Labriola" <labriola@...>
Date: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:54 pm
Subject: Re: Good Flex/AIR example
malabriola
Send Email Send Email
 
Good idea. I actually do a 11 hour intense component development
session for a lot of the larger teams I work with. That's a lot of
meetings.

So... assignment:

Read through this text.
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex3/html/Part3_as_components_1.html

I am mainly concered about the sections entitled :
   Simple Visual Components in ActionScript
   Advanced Visual Components in ActionScript

Don't worry if it is a bit over your head, the important part is
familiarity, not complete understanding.

Next week I am presenting in Atlanta for 360 Flex. If I can stop by
at all, it will be brief. The next week is your in person meeting
and I will likely be out of the country.

So, as a proposal, what if we made the 10th of March a component
development mentoring session?

Mike

--- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "douglasmccarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> > Perhaps in one of these meetings I can do a brain dump on custom
> > components for everyone. That is my specialty.
>
> That would be great. I suspect that we could spend several (many?)
> meetings on this. From what I've seen so far it's fairly easy to
> simply extend a component in simple ways with MXML, more complex
to do
> so with ActionScript, then even more complex if you are working
with
> the full component lifecycle. I've done the first two and need more
> experience with those, and to get started with the third.
>
> It might be good if you gave members an assignment of some sort,
then
> reviewed what they came up with, either before or after your brain
dump...
>
> Of course, all this would need to be tailored to fit into the
amount
> of time that you are comfortable contributing. I'm guessing that we
> could suck up all your Monday evenings for the next few months on
> this, if you let us.  :)  We should probably try to find a way to
do
> this that's not too structured, so that you can contribute when you
> have the time and energy.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Douglas
>
>
> --- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Labriola" <labriola@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Perhaps in one of these meetings I can do a brain dump on custom
> > components for everyone. That is my specialty.
> >
> >
> > --- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "bobby_world" <bobby_world@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I came across this Flex/AIR application today. It reminded me
of
> > Cam &
> > > my project we are building.
> > >
> > > http://www.richapps.de/?p=115
> > >
> > > I did ping the developer and he said he uses Ely's
DisplayShelf
> > Flex
> > > component we had previously discussed in our meeting. Also, I
> > believe
> > > he uses Papervision 3D.
> > >
> > > I now will be adding learning how to use Papervision 3D to my
list
> > of
> > > things to learn with learning how to load/parse XML. :)Also, I
> > think
> > > learning how to develop custom components will be helpful in
using
> > > other developer's components.
> > >
> > > Bobby
> > >
> >
>

#20 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:22 pm
Subject: Component development & extension - Was: Good Flex/AIR example
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
> So, as a proposal, what if we made the 10th of March a component
> development mentoring session?
 
Sounds great. In the mean time it would probably be a good idea to get group members up to speed as much as possible on extending components with MXML.
 
If any of you are comfortable doing this, and would like to show an example at a meeting, please volunteer.
 
If you haven't any experience with this, I suggest that you check out the MXML Custom Components section of the docs, make a stab at it, and show the group what you've done and/or where you got stuck.
 
Douglas

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Michael Labriola <labriola@...> wrote:


Good idea. I actually do a 11 hour intense component development
session for a lot of the larger teams I work with. That's a lot of
meetings.

So... assignment:

Read through this text.
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex3/html/Part3_as_components_1.html

I am mainly concered about the sections entitled :
Simple Visual Components in ActionScript
Advanced Visual Components in ActionScript

Don't worry if it is a bit over your head, the important part is
familiarity, not complete understanding.

Next week I am presenting in Atlanta for 360 Flex. If I can stop by
at all, it will be brief. The next week is your in person meeting
and I will likely be out of the country.

So, as a proposal, what if we made the 10th of March a component
development mentoring session?

Mike

--- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "douglasmccarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
wrote:


>
> Hi Mike,
>
> > Perhaps in one of these meetings I can do a brain dump on custom
> > components for everyone. That is my specialty.
>
> That would be great. I suspect that we could spend several (many?)
> meetings on this. From what I've seen so far it's fairly easy to
> simply extend a component in simple ways with MXML, more complex
to do
> so with ActionScript, then even more complex if you are working
with
> the full component lifecycle. I've done the first two and need more
> experience with those, and to get started with the third.
>
> It might be good if you gave members an assignment of some sort,
then
> reviewed what they came up with, either before or after your brain
dump...
>
> Of course, all this would need to be tailored to fit into the
amount
> of time that you are comfortable contributing. I'm guessing that we
> could suck up all your Monday evenings for the next few months on
> this, if you let us. :) We should probably try to find a way to
do
> this that's not too structured, so that you can contribute when you
> have the time and energy.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Douglas
>
>
> --- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Labriola" <labriola@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Perhaps in one of these meetings I can do a brain dump on custom
> > components for everyone. That is my specialty.
> >
> >
> > --- In BFAIG@yahoogroups.com, "bobby_world" <bobby_world@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I came across this Flex/AIR application today. It reminded me
of
> > Cam &
> > > my project we are building.
> > >
> > > http://www.richapps.de/?p=115
> > >
> > > I did ping the developer and he said he uses Ely's
DisplayShelf
> > Flex
> > > component we had previously discussed in our meeting. Also, I
> > believe
> > > he uses Papervision 3D.
> > >
> > > I now will be adding learning how to use Papervision 3D to my
list
> > of
> > > things to learn with learning how to load/parse XML. :)Also, I
> > think
> > > learning how to develop custom components will be helpful in
using
> > > other developer's components.
> > >
> > > Bobby
> > >
> >
>



#21 From: Andy Buttaro <andrewbuttaro@...>
Date: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:10 pm
Subject: hi
andrewbuttaro
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi Everyone,

I joined this group last weekend and have not had time to introduce myself.

My name is Andy. I work in Braintree for Starwood Hotels and live in Cambridge.

I am a Java developer and have mostly worked on the back-end and middleware, but have been doing more front-end work this past year.

Realizing that the JavaEE stack for the front end is a Nightmare, requiring a solid skill set of a half dozen (or more) languages, technologies, and frameworks to put any half-decent application together and that doing so can be a long, painful process, I began looking to see what else is out there for front end technologies.

I noticed FLEX last year after it had been open-sourced, but did not do too much with it without reason to use it.  However, finally I have a chance to use it for a new project I have begun this month.

Thus far my experience with it has been great.  It is a really fun programming model that lets you put together amazingly slick applications incredibly fast.

My only frustration is that I am currently the only one at my job that is working with FLEX and that it would be ideal to be in a more collaborative environment.

So, I guess that is how I wound up here :)

It appears that I am just a few weeks late from the start of the group, but it seems like a good fit.  It sounds like the goal is to learn FLEX together and this is more or less where I am at right now.

So, I guess I'll be "seeing" you all on Monday.

Andy


Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

#22 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:34 pm
Subject: Re: hi
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Welcome, Andy! We'll look forward to having you join us.
 
Douglas

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Andy Buttaro <andrewbuttaro@...> wrote:


Hi Everyone,

I joined this group last weekend and have not had time to introduce myself.

My name is Andy. I work in Braintree for Starwood Hotels and live in Cambridge.

I am a Java developer and have mostly worked on the back-end and middleware, but have been doing more front-end work this past year.

Realizing that the JavaEE stack for the front end is a Nightmare, requiring a solid skill set of a half dozen (or more) languages, technologies, and frameworks to put any half-decent application together and that doing so can be a long, painful process, I began looking to see what else is out there for front end technologies.

I noticed FLEX last year after it had been open-sourced, but did not do too much with it without reason to use it.  However, finally I have a chance to use it for a new project I have begun this month.

Thus far my experience with it has been great.  It is a really fun programming model that lets you put together amazingly slick applications incredibly fast.

My only frustration is that I am currently the only one at my job that is working with FLEX and that it would be ideal to be in a more collaborative environment.

So, I guess that is how I wound up here :)

It appears that I am just a few weeks late from the start of the group, but it seems like a good fit.  It sounds like the goal is to learn FLEX together and this is more or less where I am at right now.

So, I guess I'll be "seeing" you all on Monday.

Andy


Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.



#23 From: "bobby_world" <bobby_world@...>
Date: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:51 pm
Subject: Re: Component development & extension - Was: Good Flex/AIR example
bobby_world
Send Email Send Email
 
I am going through the Flex 2 Training from the Source book and Total
Training for Flex 2 DVD. I also have Flex 2 Programming from O'Reilly.

I would love to learn about components and having homework assignments
to reinforce what is taught. I recently went to a Flex Camp here in
DC, but they didn't get into more in depth on components. I also am
unable to afford going to a conference like 360 Flex, MAX, or classes
because I am a student.  I continue to learn through the books,
videos, and whatever I can get my hands.

Bobby

#24 From: "Cam Howard" <chowardnh@...>
Date: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:48 pm
Subject: learning languages online and other feedback
chowardnh
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi all,

One of the Instructional Design mailing lists I'm on recently included a
short discussion of strategies for learning languages online.

I'm passing along a few bits in case the concepts are helpful to Douglas'
Language Collaborative Player project.

One instructor listed the following as effective learning and practice
strategies:

1. Modeling: comparing pronunciation, mouth movements, etc. against a model
2. Repetition through self-paced drills
3. Structured conversation with partners in real-time or with virtual
avatars
4. Defining and applying grammatical rules to build phrases and sentences
5. Building vocabulary with the aid of visual cues and use in context
6. Studying the cultural context of the language

He created a proof of concept at http://voicethread.com/share/14823/.

Another person mentioned LoMasTv (http://lomastv.com/product/home.php) "a
weekly video magazine for people who wish to improve and maintain their
Spanish skills with authentic Spanish television and videos from throughout
the Spanish speaking world." Click on the "Free Demo" to see it in action.
It includes video, text-based Spanish/English translation, and the ability
to look up words and control the speed of the audio.

Both of these appear to be designed for people sitting in front of computer
screens rather than Douglas' plan for using mobile devices. I don't know if
either one uses Flex; it's mostly the language learning concepts I thought
might be of interest.


In response to other notes this week...

VoIP vs. Teleconference
Either method has the potential for including or excluding people. With the
options and rationale Douglas provided on the blog
(http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=13), it seems the teleconference method works
best for the group process (no lag time, etc.). As one of the people who
originally asked about using VoIP, I'm fine with using the teleconference
method and will probably experiment with Skype (personal VoIP instead of
group VoIP!). I hope this option proves helpful for Barry and others.

Components
Mike's proposal for the March 10 meeting along with the homework assignment
sounds great!

Bobby: Thanks for the link to the RichApps site. The more projects I look
at, the more I see what is possible with Flex.

Thanks,
   Cam

#25 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:58 pm
Subject: Re: learning languages online and other feedback
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks for the notes & links on language learning, Cam. There are a lot of great ideas popping up as technology evolves!


 
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Cam Howard <chowardnh@...> wrote:

Hi all,

One of the Instructional Design mailing lists I'm on recently included a
short discussion of strategies for learning languages online.

I'm passing along a few bits in case the concepts are helpful to Douglas'
Language Collaborative Player project.

One instructor listed the following as effective learning and practice
strategies:

1. Modeling: comparing pronunciation, mouth movements, etc. against a model
2. Repetition through self-paced drills
3. Structured conversation with partners in real-time or with virtual
avatars
4. Defining and applying grammatical rules to build phrases and sentences
5. Building vocabulary with the aid of visual cues and use in context
6. Studying the cultural context of the language

He created a proof of concept at http://voicethread.com/share/14823/.

Another person mentioned LoMasTv (http://lomastv.com/product/home.php) "a
weekly video magazine for people who wish to improve and maintain their
Spanish skills with authentic Spanish television and videos from throughout
the Spanish speaking world." Click on the "Free Demo" to see it in action.
It includes video, text-based Spanish/English translation, and the ability
to look up words and control the speed of the audio.

Both of these appear to be designed for people sitting in front of computer
screens rather than Douglas' plan for using mobile devices. I don't know if
either one uses Flex; it's mostly the language learning concepts I thought
might be of interest.

In response to other notes this week...

VoIP vs. Teleconference
Either method has the potential for including or excluding people. With the
options and rationale Douglas provided on the blog
(http://www.bfaig.org/blog/?p=13), it seems the teleconference method works
best for the group process (no lag time, etc.). As one of the people who
originally asked about using VoIP, I'm fine with using the teleconference
method and will probably experiment with Skype (personal VoIP instead of
group VoIP!). I hope this option proves helpful for Barry and others.

Components
Mike's proposal for the March 10 meeting along with the homework assignment
sounds great!

Bobby: Thanks for the link to the RichApps site. The more projects I look
at, the more I see what is possible with Flex.

Thanks,
Cam



#26 From: Andy Buttaro <andrewbuttaro@...>
Date: Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:40 pm
Subject: Topics
andrewbuttaro
Send Email Send Email
 

There are a few topics I am interested in exploring if anyone else in the group is also interested in them.

I. BlazeDS / LifeCycle Data services
II. Cairngorm
III. Development Tools

I think I will send them in separate threads to avoid confusion.


Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

#27 From: Andy Buttaro <andrewbuttaro@...>
Date: Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:43 pm
Subject: Cairngorm
andrewbuttaro
Send Email Send Email
 

I decided to use Cairngorm (against some online recommendations for Flex beginners) for the application i am working on.  It was not a big learning curve since I am familiar with most of the design patterns it uses and it seems to discipline development by encouraging separation of concerns.

I am interested to know of other's experience with it and if there are any criticisms.  I haven't found too much online except that it can be overkill in some cases.

If there is not a lot of knowledge of this and there is interest, I would be comfortable as a presenter of what i have learned of Cairngorm.  However, I am by far not an expert on this and would only be reviewing what I have learned from these articles from the Flex developer center and very limited experience.

http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/graduating_pt1.html
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/cairngorm_pt1.html


Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

#28 From: Andy Buttaro <andrewbuttaro@...>
Date: Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:42 pm
Subject: BlazeDS / LifeCycle Data services
andrewbuttaro
Send Email Send Email
 
 
I have little knowledge of this only to know that it appears to offer some very powerful features from what I have read.

For one, it is compelling to be able to directly expose a server side object directly to a Flex app.  The claim is that this is 10x faster, which makes sense by eliminating the XML parsing. And also, it seems easier from a development standpoint as you don't have to implement an XML or SOAP layer to expose your back-end services.

More interesting is the messaging support that allows pushing data to the client. To my knowledge, this is not something you can do using other web-based technologies.

If anyone is unfamiliar with this, there are web-casts available from the "RealWorld Flex" Seminar in NYC 8/14/2006 here:
http://www.flexseminar.com/
(you may have to register to view them - I also have a DVD of them that came with a book I bought if anyone local is interested)

Specifically Chris Conraets' session has an example where his app has a Customer service rep and a customer "sharing" the customer's session.   For me, this was very impressive.  There are also other examples with real time updating stock quotes and pie charts representing a portfolio.

For my current application it would be difficult to justify licensing for LCDS, but seeing BlazeDS appears to be opensourcing all(?) of the features of LCDS is exciting.





Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

#29 From: Andy Buttaro <andrewbuttaro@...>
Date: Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:46 pm
Subject: Development Tools
andrewbuttaro
Send Email Send Email
 

I have been using Flex Builder 2 and intend to use ant for a build tool.

Does anyone have any other development tools, tips, and/or tricks?


Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

#30 From: "Douglas McCarroll" <org.yahoo.001@...>
Date: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:35 am
Subject: Re: BlazeDS / LifeCycle Data services
douglasmccar...
Send Email Send Email
 
Yes, these are very attractive technologies, IMO.
 
I've assembled a page of links on these subjects at http://www.brightworks.com/technology/adobe_flex/livecycle_data_services.html.

 For one, it is compelling to be able to directly expose a server side object directly to a Flex app.  The claim is that this is 10x faster, which makes sense by eliminating the XML parsing. And also, it seems easier from a development standpoint as you don't have to implement an XML or SOAP layer to expose your back-end services.

 
Yes, and Yes. You're referring to the RemoteObject functionality which uses the binary AMF format to transmit data, rather than XML text.
 
For my current application it would be difficult to justify licensing for LCDS, but seeing BlazeDS appears to be opensourcing all(?) of the features of LCDS is exciting.
 
No, not all. There's a great diagram on this page which makes it clear what each includes:
 
 
But you can use the free version of LCDS if one CPU will be able to handle your traffic.
 
Douglas
 
 
.



Messages 1 - 30 of 299   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help