Brett,

Glad to help. You are asking the right kind of questions. Here is my
best shot at answering them.

1) My book consistently refers to the radiant spike LEADING the pulse.
That is true. The high voltage transient that leads the pulse is a
much purer form of radiant energy. This circuit actually feeds this
pulse back to the first battery in opposition to the forward current.
With a fast scope, you can see it across the battery. The high
voltage transient produced from the collapsing field of the coil is
also radiant, and it is in the same direction as the current delivered
to the second battery. John refers to this as "reactive power"
because the voltage transient is very short, followed by the current.
The voltage transient that is visible on the scope is really only the
"transverse artifact" of a radiant, longitudinal wave. These
longitudinal waves are very electron deficient, and therefore do not
register well on electrical meters and scopes that are looking for the
passage of electrons to give you a reading.

I'll get to the rest of your questions in the morning.

Peter


--- In Bedini_SG@yahoogroups.com, "brettnichols" <brettnichols@y...>
wrote:
>
> Peter,
> Whew! You cleared up a bunch for me. Thank you very, very much.
>
> What you have said reconciles perfectly with my testing.
>
> However, my inferior scientific abilites would greatly desire
> this "large" window to be much larger. :)
>
> I have done so much testing outside of this "window" that when I may
> have inadvertantly made it through a couple of times barely (say at
> the 120% range, I have wrote it off as measurement error.
> I am greatly encouraged to keep on trying. Again, many thanks.
>
> Now here are my two questions.
>
> #1) I am confused by fact that your book consistently refers to the
> radiant energy LEADING the pulse. However, the spikes we are
> charging with are the result of the collapsing magnetic field of the
> coil, and are hence, at the tail of the pulse (as can be seen by
> looking at them on the scope). Can you clarify this?
>
> #2) When charging with these spikes, is there a quicker way of
> optimizing the value of the base resistor for maximum charging
> efficiency than to charge the battery completely at the c20 rate and
> then load test the battery at the c20 rate? This takes incredible
> amounts of time. (I have well over a thousand hours invested in
> doing this.) I know that we can not readily see the "radiant"
> ingredient on the current. But should we adjust for maximum output
> current at the recovery diode per current flow from the input
> battery (maximum "conventional" efficiency) or maybe a particular
> waveshape on the scope? Maybe a voltmeter on the recovery battery
> with a stopwatch to measure dV/dT on the battery vs. amps at the
> diode (but this really isn't that great seeing that the charging
> curves are not real linear)? Suggestions???
>
>
> Again, many thanks,
>
> Brett
>
> --- In Bedini_SG@yahoogroups.com, "pal112358" <pal112358@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Brett,
> >
> > You have "hit the nail on the head!" This project produces a set
> of
> > circuit conditions that accomplishes what Tesla referred to as
> > "inductive fractionation" of electricity. In this process, radiant
> > energy is released, but not seperated from the flow of electron
> > current. This produces a modified form of electricity that has a
> > lower density of electrons than normal. As the ratio of
> > radiant-to-current rises, the battery charges better than with
> current
> > alone until it peaks and then falls off. Pure radiant with zero
> > current does not charge the battery very well. But there is a
> > significantly large window where an enhanced battery charging
> > phenomena appears.
> >
> > It is this "electron deficiant" form of electricity that comes back
> > out of the machine that this project explores, and its unusually
> high
> > capability of charging batteries. Optimizing your test model to
> > charge the back battery best while draining the front battery the
> > least is the object of this project. Once this is accomplished,
> > studying what happens to the battery when it is charged this way is
> > the goal. The "Bedini School Girl Motor" is a learning tool. It
> > teaches you the truth about the nature of "electricity" and that
> it is
> > really much more than simply the flow of electrons.
> >
> > Peter Lindemann
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Sterling and All,
> > >
> > > ..........It's almost like it shorts out the
> > > very top end of the charge, but on a really small scale.
> However,
> > > this may be significant because I think we are all still
> charging
> > > our batteries with a very impure form of radiant--probably
> something
> > > like 90% "current-containing, conventional" electric spikes, and
> > > maybe 10% radiant.
> > > I think this is what John is trying to show us, just a glimpse
> of
> > > radiant in order to get our attention.
> > >
> > > Brett