I read that book, I didn't learn that much.

It's an interesting book, but it's a little too much theory.

I was expecting some practical tricks and advices on building OU devices.
The parts abouts Bedini's devices is really small and doesn't have any
details about building the thing, it's only explaining why this device is
showing OU. No construction details are revealed.

It's worth reading it though. But there was no discovery to be made in that
book. It's a bit like reading the Car Owner's Manual... You never learn many
new things in that, only a few details that is worth remembering.

I'm still trying to get ONE device working in OU. So far, the most
interesting devices I found that's worth replicating are the "Sweet Vaccuum
Triode Amplifier" which doesn't have enough information for anyone to
replicate. And the other, the Testatika from Methernitha, which is still a
mystery for all the scientists that inspected it closely. No one happened to
succeed replicating the Testatika.

Thomas Bearden is a good writer. However, he didn't really bring anything
new in that book. I would recommend that book to you guys because it brings
strength and motivation to the energy experimenter in you. This book gives
real reasons and explaination as to WHY FREE ENERGY IS POSSIBLE.

Monsieur Bonheur


>From: "jimsiwek32" <jimsiwek32@...>
>Reply-To: Bedini_SG@yahoogroups.com
>To: Bedini_SG@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Bedini_SG] Re: The info for building a more powerful device
>Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:35:05 -0000
>
>
>
>
>In Bedini's patent diagrams, there is a 3rd coil that feeds a bridge
>rectifier that charges the capacitor. That is the additional coil you
>see on the opposite side of the magnet wheel. The additional silver
>wheel is a mechanical switch sized to discharge the capacitor to the
>charging battery at appropriate intervals. The capacitors are very
>large, Lindemann noted they used up to 330,000 uF caps, which if fully
>charged could do some real damage.
>
>The SG circuit is much more simple. There are a few directions you
>could take it, which is why I hope John or Peter will chime in after
>we have successfully replicated it.
>
>I have seen a lot of the pages you reference below, but the
>information is scattered over so many different sites and pages, the
>challenge is to find it all, read it, digest it, and determine
>chronology to make sure we study the latest discoveries. Some of the
>stuff goes back over 20 years -- no sense in reinventing the wheel, no
>pun intended.
>
>Thanks for the info on the Bearden book. I have been reading just
>about everything for his I can find on the web, but have not yet
>picked up his book. From what I can tell, it is definitely plausible.
>He is hardcore, so I'll have to psych myself up to tackle 952 pages of
>this stuff!
>
>Jim
>
>--- In Bedini_SG@yahoogroups.com, "rickfriedrich" <rickfriedrich@y...>
>wrote:
> >
> > Jim,
> >
> > How do you suppose the capacitor would run across the coil? I know
> > so little about electronics that I would not which wires of the
> > four, or how big a capacitor. I don't think I am going to try and
> > experiment with anything other than the structure of the wheels and
> > the number of magnets, etc. Here is one of John's pages with one of
> > his machines (towards the end) with three capacitors on it:
> > http://www.energenx.com/john34/index11.html (most of the pictures on
> > that page are not showing) Note also the wheel is thin and much more
> > efficient than our machines. Also there is two coils on either side
> > of the magnets (so the south pole must also do something similar as
> > the north pole). Finally, note also the gearing ratio how the rotor
> > shaft where the belt drives it is more than 20 times the drive wheel
> > size. There is either a motor on that wheel or the magnet rotor is
> > powering it by the belts (which I do not think is the case). With
> > what little equipment I have I tried to hook up a 1/4hp motor to the
> > shaft of my stationary bike. I was able to do it and spin the large
> > gear at 1700 rpm. But when I hooked up the wheel (with a wooden
> > frame out the back of the bike away from the metal frame) which has
> > magnets on it and has a very small gear it put too much strain on
> > the motor which triped its circuit breaker. I tried to give it a
> > little help by hand turning the other peddle first, but in order for
> > that to have worked I would have had to have that wheel spinning
> > very very fast. The gears need to be reversed in size. But I do see
> > how I could ride the bike to make it spin farely fast (although that
> > would put me in the path of any flying magnets that may come
> > loose!). I am desiring to make another wheel with such a motor
> > eventually.
> >
> > Peter and John have already showed us the answer to producing
> > machines much more useful. If you check out their web sites you will
> > find such information. Peter lists web sites and books that give
> > thousands of pages of info about this:
> > http://www.free-energy.ws/products.html
> > http://www.free-energy.ws/links.html
> > http://www.free-energy.ws/lindemann-1.html (At the end of this
> > article by Peter called: The World of Free Energy, he lists the
> > following:
> > LIST OF RESOURCES:
> > Books:
> > Living Energies by Callum Coats
> > The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity by Peter Lindemann,
> > D.Sc.
> > Applied Modern 20th Century Aether Science by Dr. Robert Adams
> > Physics Without Einstein by Dr. Harold Aspden [see the following
> > link http://www.aspden.org/ for many articles some of which appeared
> > in scientific journals, etc.]
> > Secrets of Cold War Technology by Gerry Vassilatos
> > The Coming Energy Revolution by Jeane Manning )
> > Peter writes in his above links page:
> > "http://www.cheniere.org/ - Website for Dr. Tom Bearden. This is a
> > great site for people who are interested in free energy theory and
> > how it fits into classical physics."
> >
> > I just got Tom's massive 6 by 9 small print 952 page text book
> > called Energy from the Vacuum concepts and Principles. This book
> > from 2001 has a massive amount of information. The first 70 some
> > pages are on this web site to give you an idea of what the book
> > contains: http://www.cheniere.org/books/efv/toc.htm
> > My problem is that I have little understanding of physics so it is
> > hard to understand. But it has a large Annotated Glossary of
> > selected terms form page 609 to 737 which is very helpful (although
> > many advanced terms are used there which require turning to such
> > words in the same glossary). This book has a lot of information
> > about John's inventions and the theories behind them. Tom shares a
> > patent with John where I believe Tom explained the physics behind
> > the working device.
> > See also Tom's page that lists free energy working divices:
> > http://www.cheniere.org/misc/oulist.htm where he says: "A number of
> > working overunity devices can be built from the plans posted on John
> > Bedini's Website. Tom Bearden advises that these devices will work
> > only if they are built exactly as shown, with no deviations
> > or "improvements.""
> >
> > And John's site shows more info as well as actual circuits:
> > http://www.energenx.com/john34/intro.html
> > See him recommend Tom's book above:
> > "Their is only energy from the vacuum, known as radiant energy. to
> > find out more about this you need to read Tom Bearden's book."
> > See also: http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Final%20Secret%209%
> > 20Feb%201993/indexold.html
> > John's previous website still does not have all the info it once had
> > (or I do not know where to find it). But you can find some of those
> > pages on the following website:
> > http://www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/bp/16/content1.htm [change the
> > last word to content2.htm or content3.htm so on till content7.htm
> > for more of the same kind of pages]
> > See also following page:
> > http://www.energenx.com/john34/index100.htm
> > The last picture shows the patent picture of the circuit called:
> > Monopole radiant mechanical oscillator charger. Has anyone tried to
> > build this yet? My question would be how do you wind that coil (is
> > there any way to tell by the picture how many winds the third wire
> > gets)? what is the diode beside the H11D1? and what is the thick
> > black line between the four battery's positive wire and the three
> > transitors?
> > Here we have what appears to be an advanced SG device. One battery
> > charging four others, with two capacitors, four or five transitors,
> > a timer, 1 kv bridge, etc. It appears that the thrid wire around the
> > coil with its connection to the timer and extra transitor will also
> > charge the powering battery.
> > I would like to see some discussion about this circuit. I would
> > imagine that this circuit would be more efficient or useful than
> > what we are working with as it has more parts and seems to recharge
> > the primary battery. Anyone care to give their expert opinions?
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > > For the SG project, the objective is to simply experimentally
> > > demonstrate that the batteries charge as fast or faster than the
> > > source discharges. There is no external work performed by this
> > system,
> > > besides low torque rotation of the wheel, which is not much.
> > >
> > > Once there have been successful replications of the SG energizer,
> > I'm
> > > hopeful that John and/or Peter will clue us in on useful
> > applications
> > > of this concept to perform real work on a load.
> > >
> > > From what I can tell from piecing together ideas from Bedini's
> > other
> > > systems, simply adding a capacitor across the energizer coil is
> > all
> > > that is necessesary to draw useable current from a properly tuned
> > > system to power a load while simultaneously charging the battery
> > bank.
> > >
> > > My best guess is that this system releases much more energy than
> > can
> > > be stored by the accumulator batteries. Since there is no load in
> > the
> > > SG system to take advantage of this extra energy, any excess
> > energy
> > > that is not stored in the batteries is essentially wasted, which
> > is
> > > why the SG energizer is "only" a COP = 1 rather than COP > 1.
> > >
> > > For now, our task is to simply replicate the SG energizer as a COP
> > = 1
> > > machine, and if/when that has been proven by at least two
> > independent
> > > parties (hopefully more!), then I'm sure this discussion will move
> > > toward practical applications.
> > >
> > > Jim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>=================
>Bedini "School Girl" (Simplified)
>http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Bedini_SG
>
>by PES Network Inc
>http://pureenergysystems.com
>http://freeenergynews.com
>http://pesn.com
>http://peswiki.com
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>