Ben, this is exactly right on track to the bigger machine, I'm glad
someone took my name in vane, better you then me, but I have taken my
own name in vane after popping 100's of devices into clouds of smoke.
Folks this is not a simple machine and everybody sees this different,
For those without an engineering back ground your in big trouble. "If
the engineering is built into you", you will succeed sooner or later
after you get past the mind blocks.
In a way Ben is right when it comes to a big machine, but the real
question is how do I control the impedance , not an easy task as you
shall find out after you spend hundreds of dollars on transistors or
fets. If the group thinks for one moment that the pictures I have
posted are even close to a E-Amp design or a SG think again, the
energizer in the pictures is completely different including the
magnetic construction of the rotor, The normal rotor on the early
machines can only develop a limited power level as can be seen by the
pictures of the early machines, not so with the big rotary machine
for their is no magnetic fields like you have ever seen before on the
rotor, it is based on full scalar electromagnetics of which I can not
go into on the SG group. I can say that it requires full, Quaternion
math, The machine does develop and is running on scalar fields. I can
also say that the coils look like a dead short to the devices. I can
also say that the trigger is not recorded or discussed anywhere on
any of my pages and that I have not discussed it with anybody except
Peter who works 24/7 with me every day without fail and it is from
the year 1971 in my lab notes, and that the only other person that
ever knew of this energizer was my good friend Ron Cole, dead now.
That machine cost us 30.000 dollars to build. so their is nothing
free about it. I can also say that it took about a month to machine
all the parts and some could only be made by hand. The devices are
not in any electronic stores at hand and must be selected for the
proper impedance by buying 100's of them. So yes their is a lot to
building this machine. But the group is not at this level yet. I
started to go into it with the drawings located on my home page, but
I found out people just did not understand and that my skills in
writing this was not in me at the time. But what I did do was to try
to give three different people pointers into this direction, but they
could not make it run either. Peter and I did make it run after
smoking it three different times, and when those batteries smoke
something it's smoke. The term E-Amp is the early multi-pole
machines, it has nothing to do with this biggest machine. Ben is
leading you all down the right path in building a bigger machine, but
I must admit Jack Welsh also has found something out and reported so,
Jim is on his way their, to have total success. The SG energizer will
if built right charge every battery you could collect from junk
yards, and you could make it from junk, a 25 watt light in total
darkness is pretty bright.
So this group now has people on it that can make this a success if
the focus stays. The SG is a simple version to gain an understanding
into this energy. Yes I will say this again one junk yard battery can
charge them all. I think Ben has many hours into this field now, he
builds everything and has the knowledge to do so. Jim is the next in
line to have total success at this, Jack has already done it. The SG
built big will show a whole different picture even if it only had one
big coil. Simple rules, C20 discharge rate, big batteries, properly
adjusted trigger, ferrite magnets, low impedance coil. Here you have
the answers, to make it work.
Thanks Sterling for the group and the pages.

Thanks Ben for the comments on the energizer, it helps. I also hope
this answers some of the questions I received by e-mail tonight, as
to the cost of this machine.
John