Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
BurgessRefractors · Burgess Refractors
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 10790 - 10819 of 14546   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
10790
... I wasn't at WSP, but spoke to Bill yesterday. He's expecting to post pictures taken through the 80mm as well as pictures of the scope in the near future....
kmclark40222
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2006
2:26 pm
10791
Hi Gang, I was just thinking...it's been 37 months since I ordered by 1026...I guess we will see a nice (and complete) 4" Burgess scope some day. The prototype...
David Holt
dave_holt
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2006
7:26 pm
10792
Dear Dave: LOL!! Great to hear from you ­ and thanks for both the unique perspective and for having put forth all the original effort to form this List in the...
Norman L. Rubenstein
nlrubenstein
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2006
7:36 pm
10793
Dave & Norm; Well with NEAF coming up next month as I recall hopefully we will be hearing about several new developments as well as announcements on the items...
Rich Wood
astronut1001
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2006
7:54 pm
10794
Date correction. NEAF is early May. Rich Wood ... be ... an ... List ... hopefully ... it,...
Rich Wood
astronut1001
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2006
7:59 pm
10795
Hi Dave: Quite a few times I've scroll back to the first several posts for this forum (January 2003) - including your inaugural post. Boy, those were good...
Mark Vincent Costello...
markvcostello3
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2006
10:27 pm
10796
Hi Guys I had a great time at the WSP. One night the seeing was so good you could easily go over 100 x per inch with any scope. We showed the new model 24...
burgoptics
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2006
11:45 pm
10797
Dear Bill: Not only does everything else you said sound just delicious ‹ but you just got my vote for the Oscar for Best Tease Of The Year for this last one!...
Norman L. Rubenstein
nlrubenstein
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
12:38 am
10798
Hey Bill ... That's me. Well, me and a few others.... :^) ... Okey-Dokey!! Mark Costello Matthews, NC...
Mark Vincent Costello...
markvcostello3
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
2:31 am
10799
Thanks Bill for the update. It's much appreciated. ... you just ... one! Wow! ... new...
jason_milani
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
5:32 am
10800
... features. ... several ... we ... mm ... those ... Hi All, I'll let you know tomorrow how my tests go on the 2.5mm, 7mm, 7.5mm and 8mm Planetary eyepieces....
tmboptical
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
8:28 am
10801
Thomas, What is the "final" list of focal lengths in the Planetary line? I remember you posting this not long ago, but I can't find it. -- Mike...
Michael Hosea
mehosea
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
3:22 pm
10802
The TMB/Burgess Optical Planetary line of eyepieces includes the following focal lengths: 2.5 mm 4 mm 5 mm 6 mm 7 mm 8 mm 9 mm We received a prototype of a...
Burgess Optical WebMa...
burgessoptic...
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
5:15 pm
10803
Thomas; What will the next Paragon focal lengths scheduled for production be? I would like to see a 30mm as next production available as this is a large enough...
Rich Wood
astronut1001
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
5:24 pm
10804
"waiting on the BackPackers give me a few more days to compare a new ... Are these earth days or venusian days??? Sorry Bill, just couldn't resist. Good...
charlie
chollman55
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
5:36 pm
10805
... Yeah!!! This is the update I've been waiting for. Great news ... Tim...
tmsiminski
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
6:08 pm
10806
Yes!!! You need a 3mm. There is a big jump from 2.5 to 4 for planetary use. Then you have 4,5,6,7,8,9. A 3mm fills the gap between 2.5 and 4. Tom....
Tom Marshall
btom
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
6:31 pm
10807
I say yes, PLEASE! Tom....
Tom Marshall
btom
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
6:32 pm
10808
2.5mm to 4mm does seem a bit of a spread considering how tight the longer FL are so also maybe a 7.5mm instead of a 7mm and an 8mm. Though I wouldn't know if...
Ryan McIvor
rcmcivor2000
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
6:32 pm
10809
Here's my 2 cents. Independent of the telescope used, there's a 60% increase in magnification going from 4mm to 2.5mm, whereas the other jumps are all 25% and...
Michael Hosea
mehosea
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
6:54 pm
10810
I heard (from where I can't remember ATM) that the 7.5mm was probably a no go, and it doesn't make sence (to me atleast) if there is going to be a 7mm and an...
Ryan McIvor
rcmcivor2000
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
7:34 pm
10811
... I'd go for a 3mm. Charles...
greedyshark
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
7:42 pm
10812
... a ... Hi Rich, The next Paragon scheduled for production will be the 35mm or 30mm. With some luck, we may be able to bring both out at the same time. I...
tmboptical
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2006
8:20 pm
10813
Some very good ideas about the best focal lengths in the Planetary series. Thanks to everyone that helped. After Bill and I read all the posts, and talked on...
tmboptical
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
9:06 am
10814
That's great news Thomas! You mentioned that they were sharp to the edge of the field, what was the FR of the scope they were tested in? tmboptical...
Ryan McIvor
rcmcivor2000
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
4:25 pm
10815
Guys Here is something you want see often. Thomas and I are going to Auction off the 7.5 MM Planetary. This eyepiece is fully production on the glass, ...
burgoptics@...
burgoptics
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
9:37 pm
10816
$101...
David
moravianus
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
10:32 pm
10817
How would the planet hunter work with digital SLR cameras? I do prefer the longer f ratio refractors. What is the F ratio of the new (I assume 4") TMB triplet...
Michael H. Cain
mhowardcain
Online Now Send Email
Mar 3, 2006
11:25 pm
10818
$120. Tim...
tmsiminski
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
12:04 am
10819
$151 Donald [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
Donald Rosenfield
domarturo
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2006
12:37 am
Messages 10790 - 10819 of 14546   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help