where can I get one?

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@... wrote:
>
>
> Hey Guys
>
> The Passports are shipped and should start arriving late this week. YOU will
be surprised.
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

On Nov 19, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Jim McPherson wrote:

> The comparison between the Canon 15x50is and the Passport is quite
> laughable. These are two completely different items. Firstly the exit
> pupil is completely different. The apeture is different and the IS
> system makes the apeture differences even more pronounced. So
> comparing the two is like comparing an Indy car to a go cart. It doest
> matter if the go cart is the best go kart in the world. It still will
> lose a race to the Indy.  Now compare the passports to an equal
> competitor a 4x the price and that will be a fair and useful review.
>

I think you are missing my point. I was HAPPY with the Passports even
when compared to my Canons. Sure, it isn't an Indy car, but for the
price they are fantastic.


> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 18, 2009, at 11:51 PM, Paul Cezanne <oblique@...>
> wrote:
>
>> I just compared and contrasted the Burgess 8x42s against the Canon
>> 15x50is.
>>
>> As you might imagine, the Canon's won. This was to be expected given
>> the almost $1,000 difference in the price.
>>
>> M38 almost had shape in the Canon's, it was just a smudge in the
>> Burgess.
>>
>> The Belt filled the Canon's, the Belt and the Sword almost, but
>> didn't
>> quite make it in the the FOV of the Burgess.
>>
>> But the kicker was the Pleiades. I just love the curve of 6 dim stars
>> that lead into the heart of the 7 sisters. They shine brightly in the
>> Canon's and you can see them in the Burgess, but they just don't
>> glow.
>>
>> Winner? The Canon's of course.
>>
>> Does this mean I regret my Burgess? Not at all? I'll be happy to
>> borrow them from my daughter. They are great binocs and cost almost
>> $1,000 less.
>>
>> (Note, I've not commented about edge sharpness, my eyes are awful, I
>> see seagulls even when I'm not at the beach. Everything is a smear to
>> me. My optometrist hates me and I personally wonder why I enjoy this
>> hobby. At least I don't have to spend money on expensive optics!)
>>
>> Hey Bill, can you make some image stabilized binocs for me?
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

The comparison between the Canon 15x50is and the Passport is quite
laughable. These are two completely different items. Firstly the exit
pupil is completely different. The apeture is different and the IS
system makes the apeture differences even more pronounced. So
comparing the two is like comparing an Indy car to a go cart. It doest
matter if the go cart is the best go kart in the world. It still will
lose a race to the Indy.  Now compare the passports to an equal
competitor a 4x the price and that will be a fair and useful review.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 18, 2009, at 11:51 PM, Paul Cezanne <oblique@...> wrote:

> I just compared and contrasted the Burgess 8x42s against the Canon
> 15x50is.
>
> As you might imagine, the Canon's won. This was to be expected given
> the almost $1,000 difference in the price.
>
> M38 almost had shape in the Canon's, it was just a smudge in the
> Burgess.
>
> The Belt filled the Canon's, the Belt and the Sword almost, but didn't
> quite make it in the the FOV of the Burgess.
>
> But the kicker was the Pleiades. I just love the curve of 6 dim stars
> that lead into the heart of the 7 sisters. They shine brightly in the
> Canon's and you can see them in the Burgess, but they just don't glow.
>
> Winner? The Canon's of course.
>
> Does this mean I regret my Burgess? Not at all? I'll be happy to
> borrow them from my daughter. They are great binocs and cost almost
> $1,000 less.
>
> (Note, I've not commented about edge sharpness, my eyes are awful, I
> see seagulls even when I'm not at the beach. Everything is a smear to
> me. My optometrist hates me and I personally wonder why I enjoy this
> hobby. At least I don't have to spend money on expensive optics!)
>
> Hey Bill, can you make some image stabilized binocs for me?
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Good God !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not hand held then ;-D

Andy.

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@... wrote:
>
>
>
> Hey Guys
>
> Looking for a new home for my 30x180 Russian Binoculars. They are new (I took
them to a couple of Star Party)  My cost was over $3000 many years ago but I
will take the best offer. You will need to
> buy or make a mount for them. I had grand plans but can never find the time.
Some observatory
> would just love these.
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

I just compared and contrasted the Burgess 8x42s against the Canon
15x50is.

As you might imagine, the Canon's won. This was to be expected given
the almost $1,000 difference in the price.

M38 almost had shape in the Canon's, it was just a smudge in the
Burgess.

The Belt filled the Canon's, the Belt and the Sword almost, but didn't
quite make it in the the FOV of the Burgess.

But the kicker was the Pleiades. I just love the curve of 6 dim stars
that lead into the heart of the 7 sisters. They shine brightly in the
Canon's and you can see them in the Burgess, but they just don't glow.

Winner? The Canon's of course.

Does this mean I regret my Burgess? Not at all? I'll be happy to
borrow them from my daughter. They are great binocs and cost almost
$1,000 less.

(Note, I've not commented about edge sharpness, my eyes are awful, I
see seagulls even when I'm not at the beach. Everything is a smear to
me. My optometrist hates me and I personally wonder why I enjoy this
hobby. At least I don't have to spend money on expensive optics!)

Hey Bill, can you make some image stabilized binocs for me?

On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Paul Cezanne wrote:

> I didn't stay out the full half an hour to get dark adapted. After a
> few minutes I could see the nearby 3.85 mag star naked eye with avert
> vision, and later on I could see it with direct vision. With averted
> vision I could just glimpse M110 and this was from memory, I wasn't
> sure which side of M31 it was on. (I just checked, I got it right!)

I just got M36, 37 and 38 with no dark adaptation. Then M42 of course,
M1 was hard, I needed a star chart.

Buy these binocs!

Just got "my" (my daughter's) passports today. Sweet little binocs!
Much much smaller than my Canon 15x50is!

I no longer have great dark skies and I have very limited horizons,
but I can see straight up so I just laid down out back to spot M31.
Sweet, nicely framed, the large FOV is great.

I didn't stay out the full half an hour to get dark adapted. After a
few minutes I could see the nearby 3.85 mag star naked eye with avert
vision, and later on I could see it with direct vision. With averted
vision I could just glimpse M110 and this was from memory, I wasn't
sure which side of M31 it was on. (I just checked, I got it right!)

Any nits? Yeah, my vision sucks, I'm -8 in one eye, -9, in the other
and I cannot bring these to focus w/o my glasses. Not a show stopper
for me but disappointing. (My Canons just barely come to focus w/o my
glasses).

At this price, if you can't put a pair of these in your kit, or give
one to any of your kids, well, I don't know what's wrong with you...
Nice job Bill!

Hi Bill and Tammy



You can put me down for 10 of those.

What would the dealer rebate be?



Matt





To: BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com
From: burgoptics@...
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:31:33 -0500
Subject: [BurgessRefractors] Passport 9.5x63






Ok Guys

We are making 25 pairs of the 9.5x63 Passports and 3 pairs are sold. It will
take 40 days to complete
production because they must make new tooling to hold the prisms for the special
coatings. If you want a pair (Limit 1) contact Tammy at
binocularspecials@... The price is $69

Bill

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





_________________________________________________________________
Keep your friends updated—even when you’re not signed in.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-\
network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_5:092010

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hey Guys

Looking for a new home for my 30x180 Russian Binoculars. They are new (I took
them to a couple of Star Party)  My cost was over $3000 many years ago but I
will take the best offer. You will need to
buy or make a mount for them. I had grand plans but can never find the time.
Some observatory
would just love these.


Bill




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Ok Guys

We are making 25 pairs of the 9.5x63 Passports and 3 pairs are sold. It will
take 40 days to complete
production because they must make new tooling to hold the prisms for the special
coatings. If you want a pair (Limit 1) contact Tammy at
binocularspecials@...  The price is $69


Bill




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

yes please count me in also

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, "Lou & Wes" <martay6@...> wrote:
>
> Bill-
> I'll take a pair... please have Tammy send me an invoice when they're ready!
> Thanks- and Happy Thanksgiving!
> Wes James
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: burgoptics@...
>   To: BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 3:59 PM
>   Subject: [BurgessRefractors] Passport 9.5x63
>
>
>
>
>   Hello Guys
>
>   The 8x42 passports have been a huge hit so I thought we should speed up the
larger size we had planned for next year. Were going to make one run of the new
9.5x63 Passports this year. These
>   are truly the largest hand holdable binoculars made. Like the 8x42 they are
more Shock resist than
>   any of the porro binoculars and also water resistant. Here is a one time
offer $69.00 for this first run,
>   so if you are waiting on the 12x70 or 10x60 Porros you might consider these.
>
>   Bill
>
>   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

On Nov 16, 2009, at 3:59 PM, burgoptics@... wrote:

>
> Hello Guys
>
> The 8x42 passports have been a huge hit so I thought we should speed
> up the larger size we had planned for next year. Were going to make
> one run of the new 9.5x63 Passports this year. These
> are truly the largest hand holdable binoculars made.

I ordered the 8x42's for my teenage daughter. I do a lot of binocular
observing with my Canon 15x50is binoculars. (I have only ONE more
messier to go!) I was looking forward to the 12x70s, but these 9x63s
intrigue me. Will the 12x70s be considered hand holdable? How about if
you are sitting down? I don't want to go the tripod route but aperture
matters.

> Like the 8x42 they are more Shock resist than
> any of the porro binoculars and also water resistant. Here is a one
> time offer $69.00 for this first run,
> so if you are waiting on the 12x70 or 10x60 Porros you might
> consider these.


The 63s admit 58% more light than my 50s.  But the 70s admit about 96%
more light. I know, get them both but I can't. What do the experienced
binocular observers suggest?

Hi Keith

They are in transit to me now. We should have them out late this week and finish
early next week.


Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: kd4avp <kd4avp@...>
To: BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Nov 17, 2009 9:07 am
Subject: [BurgessRefractors] Laser Pointers






Bill,

Can we get a status of the laser pointers? Club members were inquiring on them
this weekend.

Keith







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Bill,

Can we get a status of the laser pointers? Club members were inquiring on them
this weekend.

Keith

Send me an Invoice,

Jeff Roisum

Bill-
I'll take a pair... please have Tammy send me an invoice when they're ready!
Thanks- and Happy Thanksgiving!
Wes James

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: burgoptics@...
   To: BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 3:59 PM
   Subject: [BurgessRefractors] Passport 9.5x63




   Hello Guys

   The 8x42 passports have been a huge hit so I thought we should speed up the
larger size we had planned for next year. Were going to make one run of the new
9.5x63 Passports this year. These
   are truly the largest hand holdable binoculars made. Like the 8x42 they are
more Shock resist than
   any of the porro binoculars and also water resistant. Here is a one time offer
$69.00 for this first run,
   so if you are waiting on the 12x70 or 10x60 Porros you might consider these.

   Bill

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I would like to order a pair.
Will there be a link or email address?
Jeff S




________________________________
From: "burgoptics@..." <burgoptics@...>
To: BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, November 16, 2009 2:59:33 PM
Subject: [BurgessRefractors] Passport 9.5x63

 

Hello Guys

The 8x42 passports have been a huge hit so I thought we should speed up the
larger size we had planned for next year. Were going to make one run of the new
9.5x63 Passports this year. These
are truly the largest hand holdable binoculars made. Like the 8x42 they are more
Shock resist than
any of the porro binoculars and also water resistant. Here is a one time offer
$69.00 for this first run,
so if you are waiting on the 12x70 or 10x60 Porros you might consider these.

Bill

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello Guys

The 8x42 passports have been a huge hit so I thought we should speed up the
larger size we had planned for next year. Were going to make one run of the new
9.5x63 Passports this year. These
are truly the largest hand holdable binoculars made. Like the 8x42 they are more
Shock resist than
any of the porro binoculars and also water resistant. Here is a one time offer
$69.00 for this first run,
so if you are waiting on the 12x70 or 10x60 Porros you might consider these.

Bill




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I also have my Passports. I tried them out last night a great pair of
binoculars. Probably the best $49.00 I've spent in this hobby.  Phil

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, "orionridge1" <orionridge1@...> wrote:
>
> I have my Passport and it is fine.  Clear in-focus, non-cometary edges with a
fine field of view that shows straight lines everywhere.  I like the waterproof,
fogproof, shockproof design with the captive lens covers (front and back) and
the floatable strap that keeps them afloat if they are dropped.  Sorry, but I
got the first pair! <grin>
>
> The DR
>
> --- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hey Guys
> >
> > The Passports are shipped and should start arriving late this week. YOU will
be surprised.
> >
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

I have my Passport and it is fine.  Clear in-focus, non-cometary edges with a
fine field of view that shows straight lines everywhere.  I like the waterproof,
fogproof, shockproof design with the captive lens covers (front and back) and
the floatable strap that keeps them afloat if they are dropped.  Sorry, but I
got the first pair! <grin>

The DR

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@... wrote:
>
>
> Hey Guys
>
> The Passports are shipped and should start arriving late this week. YOU will
be surprised.
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

George, I have a Skyshed POD which is 8 feet in diameter.  Without the optional
bays there would be room enough to sleep except for the ancillary equipment such
as computers, skychart table, stool, eyepiece case, DVD recorder, camera
support, etc.  It also depends on the scope you have inside.  With a tent you
most likely would have a tripod which takes up extra space.  My guess is that
you could possibly sleep in it, but you would be too cramped to be comfortable. 
I usually use my tent or other sleeping arrangements with my dome.  The tent
would be more portable than the POD for quick spur of the moment observing (I
think), and from Bill's description should be very quickly set up.  I would be
interested, also.

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, "George" <gjsmason@...> wrote:
>
> Bill:
> For Dobs a shorter height would work out good, but for refractors on tripod
mounts a 6 foot + high side would be better.

> Would there be enough room to sleep in it also - with the scope installed?
>
> George
> NY
>
> --- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok Guys
> >
> > First the Passport 8x42 should be here today we are checking on them. Now
for what I need your help on. We are making Astronomy Tents, they are 6 sided
but have a zip out round opening in the top. They are going to be the pop open
design so no set up. My problem is how tall to make the side. I want them tall
enough to block light and wind at the eyepiece but to be able to see the horizon
> > if I stand up. Right now the sample is being made 5' tall and 7 ' in
diameter. Tell me what you think and WHY. (I can post a picture.) Before you ask
they will be under $100
> >
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

As a frequent user of Dobsonian telescopes and binoculars, I vote for between 4
and 5 feet.  Strictly my personal preference.  For those using SCT's and imaging
mostly overhead a higher wall probably would be more suitable.  What about an
option of different wall heights, perhaps enabled with telescoping wall
supports?  Then we could get the 6 foot wall height, lower the wall supports,
let the excess gather at ground level and be able to use it with 4,5, or 6 foot
walls depending upon the equipment being used.  If the opening in the top is
going to be zip out, there should be no problem with the roof hitting you in the
head.

The DR

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@... wrote:
>
>
> Ok Guys
>
> First the Passport 8x42 should be here today we are checking on them. Now for
what I need your help on. We are making Astronomy Tents, they are 6 sided but
have a zip out round opening in the top. They are going to be the pop open
design so no set up. My problem is how tall to make the side. I want them tall
enough to block light and wind at the eyepiece but to be able to see the horizon
> if I stand up. Right now the sample is being made 5' tall and 7 ' in diameter.
Tell me what you think and WHY. (I can post a picture.) Before you ask they will
be under $100
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Very solidly constructed, the end caps are well thought out.
Generous amount of eye relief, more than I need but should be good for people
who wear glasses. Nice twist up eye cups to compensate for the er. Crystal
clear, starts to get soft 85/90% outer fov. This is during low light clouded
skies. Very comfortable to hold a lot lighter than my 7x50's. Now gonna wait for
the sky to re-appear

I'm up to my neck in EP's. Frankly, offering the option of buying it w/o EP's
would be nice, too (though I know that changes the price; sorry).    :^/  
BR

--- On Wed, 11/11/09, George <gjsmason@...> wrote:


From: George <gjsmason@...>
Subject: [BurgessRefractors] Re: I'm Back! Binoviewing Anyone?
To: BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 3:27 PM


 



Just like my model 24 with 2 sets of ep's included in the metal padded case.
Very cool.

Geo
NY

--- In BurgessRefractors@ yahoogroups. com, burgoptics@. .. wrote:
>
>
> Hey Guys
>
> It want be safe to buy a binoviewer soon. After 2 years of development I think
we have perfected
> the binoviewer. If you own a refractor more than likely you will not need any
corrector to come to focus. It will also be the brightest 1.25" binoviewer you
can buy with the largest fully illuminated
> image PERIOD The new binoviewer has about 1/2 the optical path and about 1/5
the weight of other SO CALLED premium binoviewers. (I'll post a pic later.) Now
Tell me how you want it packaged.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Bill,
Based on your sketch, if your astrotent is pop-up and under $100, I want one!
Regards ,
Mel R.

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@... wrote:
>
>
> Hey Guys
>
> I was able to change the wall height of the Astro Tent to 6' and with the
tiedowns you can reduce
> the wall height on any or all of the side panels to suit. (Look for a pic in
minutes)
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Hi Bill

Any update on the ED objective for the BO-1278?
Getting anxious to test it out! ;o)

John
CCD-Freak

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, "John" <wd5ikx@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill
>
> I am getting anxious to try the new ED objective for my BO1278 visually and
with my CCD cameras.
>
> Any updates ???????
>
> John
> CCD-Freak
>
> DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>
> --- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi John
> >
> >
> >
> > It is not. We had 5 down but lost 2 because they do not have a scope to put
the lens in.
> >
> > Contact Tammy at burgessoptical@
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

Bill,

Any word on the shipping of the laser pointers?

Keith

Just like my model 24 with 2 sets of ep's included in the metal padded case. 
Very cool.

Geo
NY

--- In BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com, burgoptics@... wrote:
>
>
> Hey Guys
>
> It want be safe to buy a binoviewer soon. After 2 years of development I think
we have perfected
> the binoviewer. If you own a refractor more than likely you will not need any
corrector to come to focus. It will also be the brightest 1.25" binoviewer you
can buy with the largest fully illuminated
> image PERIOD The new binoviewer has about 1/2 the optical path and about 1/5
the weight of other SO CALLED premium binoviewers. (I'll post a pic later.) Now
Tell me how you want it packaged.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Bill,

Will you still be offering the RSO doublet 8x42's for $199 ?
If so -- send me an invoice.

Thanks


Jeff Roisum

Hmmm... Interesting, Bill-
What do you think would be good eyepieces with this?? 1/5th the weight??? What
will it be made out of??
What about with SCT's??
Wes


   ----- Original Message -----
   From: burgoptics@...
   To: BurgessRefractors@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 7:25 PM
   Subject: [BurgessRefractors] I'm Back! Binoviewing Anyone?




   Hey Guys

   It want be safe to buy a binoviewer soon. After 2 years of development I think
we have perfected
   the binoviewer. If you own a refractor more than likely you will not need any
corrector to come to focus. It will also be the brightest 1.25" binoviewer you
can buy with the largest fully illuminated
   image PERIOD The new binoviewer has about 1/2 the optical path and about 1/5
the weight of other SO CALLED premium binoviewers. (I'll post a pic later.) Now
Tell me how you want it packaged.

   Bill

   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]