Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
CAnearshore · California nearshore finfish management interim options discussion
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1229 - 1258 of 1937   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1229
It has come to my attention that the PFMC has decided to reallocate 18 metric tons of nearshore rockfish from the recreational fishery south of Cape Mendocino...
divebobber
Offline Send Email
Dec 6, 2001
9:37 am
1230
I'm responding to the article, California Sportfishing Restrictions Tightened in today's Contra Costa Times. As the Fish and Game Commission further shuts down...
Bob Humphrey
divebobber
Offline Send Email
Dec 8, 2001
7:26 pm
1231
Bob, I think you are engaging in a little revisionist history here. First off the origin of the MLMA was a group of commercial nearshore fishermen going to the...
Chris Miller
cmlobster@...
Send Email
Dec 8, 2001
8:55 pm
1232
(Bob) "The anti-commercial rhetoric coupled with denigrating the department is not going to help the situation." Chris Miller Chris, in good faith, I engaged...
Bob Humphrey
divebobber
Offline Send Email
Dec 8, 2001
9:48 pm
1233
Chris; Recreational fishers and responsible environmental groups are in this not as a resource grab or anti-commercial campaign, but to protect the resource. ...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 9, 2001
6:45 pm
1234
Ok, one of my own has chastised me for my recent blast. As I told him, I did not mean to blast the FGC. They handed down a decision that was the best one based...
Bob Humphrey
divebobber
Offline Send Email
Dec 9, 2001
9:57 pm
1235
Dear Chris, After almost 35 years of looking at our fish stocks under water, I realize the extent of devastation. These new divers and especially those who...
ted
ted@...
Send Email
Dec 10, 2001
12:58 am
1236
Were these fish on the table as fish destined to be caught in the first place. assuming that somehow enough fish are left to reproduce or carry on then what is...
fish2fish95436
Offline Send Email
Dec 10, 2001
3:47 am
1237
I remember quite a while ago sending a post to mike Malone via oceancoalition listserve offering my services as an sFO and he basically told me thanks but no...
fish2fish95436
Offline Send Email
Dec 10, 2001
3:54 am
1238
Why restricted access for recreationals? Recreationals are looking at a bevy of depleted reefs new bag limits and seasons. Commercial fishing decline in many...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 10, 2001
3:23 pm
1239
Are rod and reel entirely selective? I think you should really qualify your request for selective gear. Some may question how selective you require it to be....
fish2fish95436
Offline Send Email
Dec 11, 2001
2:14 am
1240
Ron, It is almost 2002 alot has happened since the cases of over fishing you cite. Lets get back to the drawing board here. We were talking about Gill nets at...
Chris Miller
cmlobster@...
Send Email
Dec 11, 2001
5:20 am
1241
Chris thanks for your response. I realize that you are a professional advocate for commercial fisheries, as well as being a working fisher, I understand you...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 11, 2001
7:50 am
1242
... Apples and oranges. Rod and reel are not categorized as either Category I or II gear. For good reason, it has vastly less bycatch. Don't agree? Then your...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 11, 2001
7:53 am
1243
Ron There is no legal basis for the statement. "nat'l park of the ocean". Management of fish in the waters surrounding the CINP and in the CINMS is the...
Jim Marshall
jmarsh93013
Offline Send Email
Dec 12, 2001
3:01 am
1244
Ron, I am a professional fisherman and an advocate for better fishery management. I would be happy to be a professional advocate, I think I have gotten the ...
Chris Miller
cmlobster@...
Send Email
Dec 12, 2001
4:58 am
1245
... Jim, Notice I use quotes. ED and other environmental groups use the MPA analogy to national parks in their literature all the time. It's a good analogy. ...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 12, 2001
3:15 pm
1246
Chris, I stand corrected, you, like me, are a volunteer. I was paid staff for Sea Turtle Restoration Project. I helped develop our "Reform California Gillnet...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 12, 2001
3:27 pm
1247
Ron I ask the question again. In your thinking, is there any level of by-catch or impact on non-target species that is permissible? Jim Marshall...
Jim Marshall
jmarsh93013
Offline Send Email
Dec 12, 2001
3:43 pm
1248
... Gear not rated as Category I II or III. With the exceptions of that fixed gear (set lines and traps) that need consideration for such rating. ...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 12, 2001
11:05 pm
1249
Ron Sorry, I'm not up on what the categories denote. Are these categories defined in law or regulation? Where? Do the categories denote a level of by-catch...
Jim Marshall
jmarsh93013
Offline Send Email
Dec 12, 2001
11:46 pm
1250
Ron, Let me give you another perspective on your complaints about the F&G department. It is sort of a loose historical one but accurate. The department at one...
Chris Miller
cmlobster@...
Send Email
Dec 13, 2001
3:49 am
1251
Jim, these categories are mandated by the MMPA to rate the impact various gear has on marine mammals. Category I us the worst. However there are those gear ...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 13, 2001
3:08 pm
1252
Chris, I'm not sure the point you are making in your recount of history. We're not talking pollution here, but fisheries reform. If you are insinuating that ...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 13, 2001
3:19 pm
1253
Chris, My opinion is simple. Recreational anglers need to be listened to and the lack of official representation will always lead to these debates. My...
Jim Wilson
polymor
Offline Send Email
Dec 15, 2001
7:33 am
1254
In opposing commercial fishing in the nearshore, a number of folks have cited the State Constitution at Article 1, Section 25, as granting recreational...
MLeoWeber@...
Send Email
Dec 18, 2001
4:39 pm
1255
Mike Weber wrote, [In opposing commercial fishing in the nearshore, a number of folks have cited the State Constitution at Article 1, Section 25, as granting ...
Bob Humphrey
divebobber
Offline Send Email
Dec 18, 2001
9:52 pm
1256
Mike; I interpret the state constitution to grant fishing as an "individual righ" not a commercial one. If an individual wants to be an owner operator and fish...
Ron Gaul
rongaul
Offline Send Email
Dec 18, 2001
11:09 pm
1257
Ron, The recreational interests did get a preference in allocation of the nearshore. They got a preference in total allowable catch and they can fish every day...
Chris Miller
cmlobster@...
Send Email
Dec 19, 2001
3:50 am
1258
Hello Mike, I don't agree the references to CSC Article 1, Section 25 are made in "opposition" to commercial fishing. In fact, the most unfettered statement...
Jim Wilson
polymor
Offline Send Email
Dec 19, 2001
4:33 am
Messages 1229 - 1258 of 1937   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help