Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
CPTech
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 2590 - 2596 of 2596   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#2596 From: answerman <answerman@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:25 pm
Subject: What's the clipboard
answerman@...
Send Email Send Email
 


I am a 75 yr old lady living in my "rusty" age!  I learned the
computer all on my own by trial and error over the past 6 years. I
do not know how I managed before a friend turned me on to your site.

Could you explain to me what a clipboard is and does? 

Thank you, Freddie

Dear Freddie,

The clipboard is a part of your computer's operating system that you
don't normally see, but it has a valuable function when you are
using your computer.

Let's say that your friend has sent you her new mailing address in
an e-mail message and you want to use that address in a letter that
you are typing. You could print the e-mail out and then re-type the
address in the letter, but the computer has a much easier way.

Using your mouse, you can highlight the address (Just point to the
beginning of the address and hold down the left mouse button then
drag the mouse to the end of the address. The whole thing will have
a blue background and we would say it is highlighted.) and then
click on "Edit" in the menu bar, then click "Copy". This copies the
address to the clipboard, which is just a storage place in your
computer's memory.

Once the address is on the clipboard, you can paste it anywhere on
your computer that you would like. Go to your letter that you are
typing, click once where you want the address to go, and click
"Edit" then "Paste" and the address will come from the clipboard to
your letter.

One other thing about the clipboard is that it will keep the
information you put on it and you can paste it over and over again
until you replace the information by copying something new.


USE our Training videos to show you answers to questions like this and much more
http://www.calpactech.com/VIDEOS/Training%20IDX.htm

++++++++++____________+++++++++++++______________
If  Your at risk and we all are we do have the Anti intruder ware available which covers all of it not just Anti Virus.    Cost only $35.50 a year  ( They are updated monthly via CD mailed to you.  Just reply and we will send you the first installment  ( and the bill). Now containing our TUNE UP Facility for your computer. You can just reply to this Email to subscribe:
nccorthu@...

This is the only security system fully supported by the manufacturer.

Gary Orthuber
Cal-Pac Computing 
300 Montgomery Ave. Oxnard, Ca. 93036
(805) 988-9540
http://www.calpactech.com/
EMail:  nccorthu@...


#2595 From: answerman <answerman@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:19 pm
Subject: Sorting Outlook mail
answerman@...
Send Email Send Email
 


Thank you very much for all of the useful information and helpful
tips. I am running Win XP-Home with Office 2000 Pro.

My problem is when I open outlook to retrieve my mail, most of the
time the order of the mail is scrambled and very much out of
alphabetical sequence. How can I get it reset to it begins with A
and ends with Z?

, Chet

Dear Chet,

In your outlook program there is a row just above your e-mail
messages that labels what that column is for. Common headings are
"From" "Subject" "Received" etc.

All you have to do, is click on a heading to sort your e-mails by
that column. If you want your e-mails sorted by the date you
received them, click on the "Received" heading and they will sort
by the date.

If you want them sorted by the subject, click on the "Subject"
heading.

I usually keep my e-mails lined up by date, but if I want to see all
the e-mails from a particular sender, I click on one e-mail from
that person and then click the "From" heading. Now all the e-mails
from that person are all together.

*********************************************************
Look for our New Video Computer / InternetTraining  Video site at
http://www.calpactech.com/Documents/LearnTrain/VIDEOS/Training%20IDX.htm
They are all free and really an easy way to upgrade your skills when you want to as well as answer questions you may have.
Answerman
Cal-Pac Computing
300 Montgomery Ave. Oxnard, Ca. 93030
(805)988-9540
E Mail:   answerman@...
Web:
http://www.cal-pactech.com/


#2594 From: answerman <answerman@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:12 pm
Subject: More on XP Icons
answerman@...
Send Email Send Email
 


I am having problems with my desktop.  The icons, for a reason I
cannot explain, have all bunched up on the left side of the screen
and when I try to move one, it moves all right, but then it flips
right back to where it was. I have tried everything I can think of,
but to no avail.




Answer

Your icons are being controlled by a setting called "Auto Arrange"

To turn off the auto arrange setting in Windows XP, right click on a
blank spot on your desktop.

On the menu that appears, point to "Arrange icons by" and a sub-list
will drop down.

On the sub-list, click to remove the check mark from "Auto Arrange".

Now, you should be able to place your icons wherever you want.

To turn off the auto arrange settings in Windows Vista, follow these
directions:

1. right click on a blank spot on your desktop.

2. In the context menu that appears, point to "View".

3. In the sub-list under view, click to remove the check mark from,
"Auto Arrange".

***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---
Get free IT support that actually gets you answers. Join and Get your friends to join CPTech it's free to all. They Can do so by going to http://calpactech.com/ and CPTech Group or send an E Mail message to nccorthu@... . asking to subscribe  to the above Email address and just mention your name. You can also suggest their name(s) and if they sign up we send you the free CD. Pure win win.

Gary Orthuber
Cal-Pac Computing 
300 Montgomery Ave. #S  Oxnard, Ca. 93036
(805)988-9540  
http://www.calpactech.com/
EMail:  nccorthu@...


#2593 From: answerman <answerman@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:10 pm
Subject: Adjusting the Staret Menu (XP)
answerman@...
Send Email Send Email
 


In previous versions of Windows I was able to organize my Start menu
programs and shortcuts into folders that I created. However, in XP,
when I open Windows Explorer/Start I do not see all the programs.
Therefore, it seems impossible to organize. Do you know how I can
change the folder settings to allow me to see everything that is in
my Start menu? I would love to organize the programs by categories.



ANSWER


In Windows XP, there is a way to view all items in your start menu.

1. Right click on a blank spot on your taskbar and click on
"Properties" in the menu that appears.

2. In the "Taskbar and Start Menu Properties" window, click on the
"Start Menu" tab, and click on the first "Customize" button.

3. In the "Customize Start Menu" window, click on the "Advanced" tab
and look at the middle section labeled "Start menu items:"

4. Scroll through the list of start menu items until you find the
item that says, "Scroll Programs". Remove the check mark from this
item and click "OK" in both windows to close them.

Now your start menu will be listed in several columns instead of one
scrolling column.

If you want to view all the items in your start menu in Windows
Vista, just follow these directions:

1. Right click on a blank spot on your taskbar, and click on
"Properties" in the context menu that appears.

2. In the "Taskbar and Start Menu Properties" window, click on the
"Start Menu" tab and then click to select, "Classic Start Menu".

3. Click the "OK" button at the bottom of the dialog box to save
your changes and close the window.

We have all kinds of FREE and Tested Software on our site. We will also support them
Gary Orthuber
Cal-Pac Computing
300 Montgomery Ave.. Oxnard, Ca. 93036
(805)988-9540
http://www.calpactech.com/
E Mail:  nccorthu@...


#2592 From: answerman <answerman@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:45 pm
Subject: Verizon is fater and covers more in Wireless
answerman@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Here is an article on the coverage .  Don't bother watching the Verizon ad.   Please Note that this issue really affects the use of the ATT wireless networks for on line stuff especially anything with graphics. THEY are SIMPLY Slower, but you don't get any reduced price.

http://blog.su-spectator.com/2009/11/get-out-the-popcorn-verizon-vs-att-is-sure-to-be-a-thriller/

****----****----****----****----****----****----
Remember CPTech is a two way conversation not totally a sales pitch.  Pass on what you've learned.  send an email to the group.      If you have questions on something send it.  Others, I can guarantee have the same question.  That way, one answer gets all.
Gary
Gary Orthuber
Cal-Pac Computing 
300 Montgomery Ave.  Oxnard, Ca. 93036
(805)988-9540
http://www.calpactech.com/
nccorthu1@...


#2591 From: G W Orthuber <nccorthu@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:23 pm
Subject: Is an Upgrade to Vista/Windows 7 Worth it
nccorthu1
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Windows 7 vs. XP Performance Shoot-Out

Buzz up!on Yahoo!

After I compared the performance of Windows 7 with that of Windows Vista, a lot of readers expressed interest in seeing a comparison with the decade-old, but still popular, Windows XP. So I decided to see how each of the three operating systems compared to each other in several crucial categories. Frankly, the results were a bit surprising. While they aren't a knockout blow for Windows 7, they do show that, by some measures, XP outperforms Windows 7 on legacy hardware.

To start, I did a clean install of each OS on a 1.73-GHz Toshiba Satellite M45-S269 laptop with 1GB RAM and a 100GB hard drive. Because upgrading from XP will be of interest to businesses as well individuals, I chose to install Windows XP Professional, and stuck with the Professional edition for Vista and 7. I used 32-bit versions, since most XP installations are of that variety. For each OS version, I performed a clean installation.

I then installed Microsoft Office 2007 Ultimate , Windows Live Essentials (Mail, Movie Maker , Photo Gallery , Messenger), and Picasa 3.5 , since testing a PC with no programs installed wouldn't tell much about real-world performance. Then I ran a series of tests to determine the PC's start-up and shutdown times in each OS, as well as its performance on a series of benchmark tests. I ran each test at least three times and averaged the results.

Start-up and Shutdown
The results from these two most basic tests were somewhat surprising. For startup comparison, I pressed the power button and stopped the timer when the desktop and all interface elements appeared and the Start menu became operational. Windows XP actually started up fastest, but keep in mind that my test machine was built in the XP days; new machines will be more tuned for quick start-up in Windows 7, possibly very quick start-up. But for the purposes of this story, testing on one of those machines would be pointless—this story's about the experience those who are upgrading can expect. For most people, that means an older machine.

  Windows XP Windows Vista Windows 7
Start-up time (in minutes:seconds) 0:49 1:07 1:03
Shutdown time (in seconds) 17 12.5 11.5
Picasa video Encoding (in minutes:seconds) 5:36 6:02 5:41
Geekbench (higher is better) 1,241 1,248 1,260
SunSpider (in milliseconds, lower is better) 3,170 2,647 1,828
PCMark05 (higher is better) 1,868 1,731 1,823
* Green is best, red is worst.

Windows 7 evened the score when it came to shutdown, however, besting XP by an impressive 5.5 seconds, or 32 percent. As in my previous testing, Windows 7 surpasses Vista in both start-up and shutdown time. One of the major criticisms of XP performance has been the long "Windows is shutting down" time, and my testing bears this out. Even Vista shut down faster than XP did. Of course, startup speed is far more important to most users—so far, XP is in the lead.—Next: PCMark >

PCMark
The PCMark05 benchmark runs 11 system tests, each designed to represent a certain type of PC usage, including hard disk access, 3D and graphics physics rendering, Web page rendering, file decryption, and multithreading with video, audio, text editing, and image decompression. The benchmark spits out a result in PCMarks, with a higher number equating to better performance. (I had to use PCMark 05 version 1.2.0 because the more recent version, PCMark Vantage, doesn't run under Windows XP. You can read more about FutureMark's benchmark software or purchase it for your own use at www.futuremark.com.)

Running PCMark05 under Windows 7 was a bit of a trick, I had to right-click the benchmark's desktop icon, then select "Troubleshoot compatibility," which displayed a dialog that suggested I run the benchmark in Windows XP compatibility mode. (Note that this capability is only available in the Professional, Ultimate, and Enterprise editions of Windows 7.) But I wanted to test Windows 7, not its XP emulation. After downloading a hotfix from Futuremark and choosing "Run as administrator," I got the benchmark to run, and it reported the OS as Windows 7, not XP. I also set Firefox 3.5 as the default browser in each OS, as PCMark uses the default browser for some of its testing.

I saw a slight drop (2 percent) in PCMark scores moving from Windows XP to Windows 7, but XP was 7 percent better than Vista and Windows 7 was still 5 percent better than Vista. I saw even bigger improvements going from Vista to 7 when testing with PCMark Vantage. This means that, among the three OSes, XP would be (marginally) better at gaming, since the test has a bent towards tasks performed by games. Keep in mind, however, that newer games that require DirectX 10 or 11 won't run under XP in any case. Another marginal win for XP over Windows 7, and another dismal showing from Vista.

  Windows XP Windows Vista Windows 7
Start-up time (in minutes:seconds) 0:49 1:07 1:03
Shutdown time (in seconds) 17 12.5 11.5
Picasa video Encoding (in minutes:seconds) 5:36 6:02 5:41
Geekbench (higher is better) 1,241 1,248 1,260
SunSpider (in milliseconds, lower is better) 3,170 2,647 1,828
PCMark05 (higher is better) 1,868 1,731 1,823
* Green is best, red is worst.

Because Windows Live Movie Maker doesn't run on Windows XP, I had to use Picasa 3.5 for the video encoding test. I created a 1-minute movie with transitions from seven video clips and photos, and then used Picasa's Create Movie option to output it to 720p resolution. The result for this was a wash between XP and Windows 7, but both beat Vista by about 20 seconds.—Next: Geekbench >

Geekbench
This test from Primate Labs runs a series of geeky tests like prime number, Mandelbrot, blowfish encryption, text compression, image sharpen and blur, and a memory stream test. The subtests comprise both single- and multithreaded applications. These tests are hardware intensive, but I did indeed see incremental improvements when upgrading Windows—both from XP to Vista, and again from Vista to Windows 7.

The most astounding result I encountered was the improvement in JavaScript performance, as evidenced by the SunSpider benchmark: Windows 7 was 42 percent better than XP, and 26 percent better than Vista on this test. When I contacted a Microsoft representative, he said that this was "pretty closely in line" with what Windows 7 product managers have seen. I ran the benchmark using Firefox 3.5 on all three Windows versions, to level the browser software playing field. I contacted Mozilla for a comment on their browser's striking improvement under Windows 7, but no one was available for comment—they were all "heads down on Firefox 3.6.

  Windows XP Windows Vista Windows 7
Start-up time (in minutes:seconds) 0:49 1:07 1:03
Shutdown time (in seconds) 17 12.5 11.5
Picasa video Encoding (in minutes:seconds) 5:36 6:02 5:41
Geekbench (higher is better) 1,241 1,248 1,260
SunSpider (in milliseconds, lower is better) 3,170 2,647 1,828
PCMark05 (higher is better) 1,868 1,731 1,823
* Green is best, red is worst.

Windows 7 Performance Conclusions
For the most part, these tests don't show Windows 7 soundly trouncing XP. But for an operating system that's far richer in features and more advanced in interface, Windows 7 is quite close to the older OS and tops it in several tests. Most impressive among Windows 7's wins were its JavaScript and shutdown time results. Maybe most telling was that Windows 7 beat Vista on every test. But to that much-belittled OS's credit, Vista actually shut down faster and performed 16 percent better on SunSpider than XP, even if it took significantly longer to start up.

Though it may be unreasonable to expect faster performance alongside more interface and convenience features and lower requirements, I was still disappointed not to see Windows 7 top all these tests, particularly that for startup speed, given the promises Microsoft made one Window's behalf. The much faster JavaScript performance in Windows 7 will become increasingly important for a vast number of users as Web applications become richer and richer. For gamers, the results are pretty much a wash between XP and Windows 7. In any case, power gamers are far more likely to be buying for a new high-end machines and not upgrading an old XP system.

In all, I think Windows 7's performance gains are welcome steps toward ending the reputation Microsoft's operating systems have gotten for code bloat. On none of the tests did Windows 7 score last among the three versions of Windows tested. XP, which is finally starting to show its age, scored dead last in three. While these results aren't unalloyed good news for Windows 7, they do show that Microsoft seems to have finally woken up to the fact that it shouldn't rely on Moore's Law to deliver ever-increasing processing to handle ever-more bloated operating systems. This can only be a good thing, especially given the current demand for low-power, low-cost netbooks.


Copyright (c) 2009Ziff Davis Media Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Gary Orthuber
 Robogeek  Remote and phone support services available from 8 to 8 Mon -Fri & 8-1 Sat...see Our collection of tested free software on our site...Go to our site and choose "TESTED Freeware" on the left....ALSO now free Video Training at Video Training on
http://www.calpactech.com/  join CPTech or Call 805-988-9540 300 Montgomery Ave. #S, Oxnard, CA. 93036 ( El Rio)


#2590 From: G W Orthuber <nccorthu@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 10:39 pm
Subject: Re: Disc Data
nccorthu1
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
All you need to do is copy it to another location then if it won't read  go to the Drive in Windows Explorer ( not internet explorer)  right click on the drive or folder that contains it and take off the read only attribute.   You might do that on where you have the data now.   This assumes that it is some form of hard drive and not a CD.
 
Gary Orthuber
 Robogeek  Remote and phone support services available from 8 to 8 Mon -Fri & 8-1 Sat...see Our collection of tested free software on our site...Go to our site and choose "TESTED Freeware" on the left....ALSO now free Video Training at Video Training on
http://www.calpactech.com/  join CPTech or Call 805-988-9540 300 Montgomery Ave. #S, Oxnard, CA. 93036 ( El Rio)



From: Theresa <blueswan1@...>
To: CPTech@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 11:45:35 AM
Subject: [CPTech] Disc Data

 

I saved data on to a read only disc by mistake. I would like to use and update this data, which has important info on it. Can anyone tell me if it can be done? and how? HELP


Messages 2590 - 2596 of 2596   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help