Dear Sirs,

If I denied admission with any of the universities in India, On the ground that
I did Open University  Masters, and is not recognized  I wish to send a copy of
my  thesis to American Cancer Society , British Coma Recovery cell, German
Paralytic Society and wish to transfer my findings  for further research at free
of cost and they can patent my findings in their name!!! since no university 
India is willing to  admit me as a scholar for Ph.D.


If I get a name and fame, the Indian People or Government can not share the joy
with others to be proud.

If my findings are acknowledged and taken for further research, that is more
than enough.


   I enrolled myself for  PhD, with Utkal University of Culture  in Nov 2007.
topic

"Vedas- A New Critical Analysis with Special Reference to Human Body and
Health."


Not only that I found that Ravana the Lankathipathi  also wrote commentary in
Rig Veda  and authored "Arka Prakasa"  which talks about Child birth  and this
was reproduced in Charka samhita written in 5th Century A.D. and repeated in 9th
century. by Jeevika  and spread in China.

Through this I found the NaNo rays can cure cancer, Coma, paralysis (this day we
can say this as Supportive therapy).

These rays are by burning oils that created Uranium rays, that strengthen the
Iron in blood.

This I shared with American Cancer Society, who offered me a Membership at free
of cost (without paying any money)  and asked me to send my thesis to them for
Review.

Once I present this thesis I am sure the entire medical and astronomy field will
get a shock, and they will take an U turn in their approach.

I expect my thesis to be presented by March 2010. with Utkal University of
Culture, Bhubhaneshwar.

But I am yet to get the Registration Number from the University.

The Education systems in our country is very very in awkward condition. The
Universities prefers to give honorary Doctorates to Politicians, Cine Artists
who didn't do any research and helped the society  but  to get publicity the
Universities are  behind the Cine Artists and to gain personal confidence  and
earn a name the Committee members of the Universities prefers to recommend
candidates for Honorary doctorates. There is no validity in this.

On the other hand if a person who passed the Masters degree in Open
Universities,  Joined M.Phil., and  wish to join Ph.D., on the knowledge he has,
and he hopes that the presentations of his thesis will help the public and
innovation he makes  will be appreciated by the world of intellectuals,  the
Universities close their eyes and says that he is unfit since he didn't hold a
Bachelor degree.

The presentation of the thesis even if  is excellent and challenging the
authorities are closing their eyes and throwing Gems and diamonds in to dust
bin.

When this will Change?


Regards

--
Ramachandran

For a few years now, just the fact that CRN folks have ignored history of like
the Greeks with the Spartans, Persians, and then the Romans; and then, the
history of the Romans with the Christians murder of Hypatia and the burning of
the Alexandrian library . . . and then the history of the medieval period and so
on and so forth has kind of bothered me.  They mention terrorism in the
backfield, but they don't understand it; i've put it in terms of some rather
interesting ideas about rationality which they've just kind of ignored or played
silence games.

But, couple that with the facts of these two new technologies(and the news of
some recent middle eastern governments that have been voted out by terrorist
organisations), and you know these guys are that socially bound up; i mean when
you point out things like socially bound up and they do exactly those behaviors,
you have to conclude they are irrationalists.  They are plato's who combine
their mathematics with mythologies(witness the Gospel of John's "jesus is the
'word' of god to see the influence of Plato's rational mythology); Plato's modo
of taking advantage of those who want to be believe in falsities to protect
their fragile minds is also seen in Eusebius's Preparatio Evangelica(Eusebius
was Emporor Constantine's right hand man during the Necine conferences to decide
which gospels and other books were to be considered cannonized New Testament
material; after it was decided, those who were excluded were hunted down; some
'Gnostic' gospel people managed to hide their 'Gnostic' gospels in the Egyptian
sands to be uncovered around 1930s) were Eusebius essentially says on a chapter
heading "on how it is o.k. to make up superstition for those who want to be
decieved."  You see, this is what compelled Bill Joy and the Unabomber to write
and do what they've done; because they see that mathematical science will become
victorious if mathematical science and technology continue on the pace they are.

Well anyways, at first, upon hearing about these brain reading and cloaking
technologies, I felt stronger than ever that mankind must not be confined on
Earth so that Democracies such as the Roman Republic with Julius Caesar and the
Germans when the Nazies were voted in, and recently some middle eastern
states(and recently, America had voted in rather irrationalist Republican
organisation) don't get voted out; so that the true human spirit that every
human child is born with is never beat down and mindwarped, space colonization
and expansion must be established.  Lifeboats goal of protecting the Earth is
one thing, but permanent human confinement is quite another.  CRN's paranoia of
others getting their hands on nanotechnologies is taken without question by the
lifeboat group and probably others who fear other human groups from developing
one way or another.  Just listen to Mike Treder and his 'disruptive
technologies' talk; if nanotechnology happens, the industrial past will be swept
aside; oh no!  Not!  I can't wait till the industrial past is swept clean! This
'disruptive' technologies will only lead to disruptive thought; meaning, oh no,
this guy just disproved me; he's disrupting my thinking!  and, and, my way of
life!  whaahhhh! CRN's 'disruptive' talk is about preserving the irrational past
and can only lead to a new dark ages with all the associated inquisitions.
Nanomanufacturing naturaly lends towards decentralization; the permanent freeing
of mankind from mental/social fear group slavery and space expansion, and
Drexler, Mr's Phoenix/Treder/Joy/Kurzweil and the list goes on and on . . .
either originating the idea or blindly going with it because they've never had
to deal with social terrorisms(there's a reason they've become who they are now;
because the social group they were in supported and helped them along; a fact
they have zero appreciation for); they don't understand the fear mongering and
social anti-science that goes on with the rest of humanity; around puberty time,
most humans are too weak minded to notice and say no to the irrationality
mongering that starts to be accepted around those times . . . getting back to
those cloaking and brain reading technologies . . . now, I see that they can be
used to make the natural decentralized nano-world safe out in space(or even on
Planet Earth).

Today, we've taken on a nuclear standoff to prevent nuclear war; CRN argues that
won't work with nano-manufacturing.  Even argueing with them on that point, I'm
thinking now that cloaking and even brain reading technologies can due in the
nano-world what the nuclear standoff did for the twentieth century. For
instance, out in space, maybe somebody has some ideas he'd like to share; but,
he does not know the other social groups; both groups are cloaked(and out in
space, these cloaking technologies can be even more effective); one guy either
wants help solvin some mathematics problems are wants to join in with solving
some mathematical science problems; neither has to uncloak; both can send their
ideas to a determined location and uncloak there with neither revealing the true
location each other is in; well, there can be lots of different ways of making
all this work.  But, much the same idea can happen with brain reading
technologies; one group can agree(if they so choose) to enter a brain reading
room to those who they trust(if they feel they can trust each other; it's their
choice); there the person can see whether this social group is benign or not;
really, I'm thinking that the brain reading technologies should be able to
advance enough to where both can see and read each others thoughts and know
where each other stands.  This can even be done while both parties are cloaked.

The truth is that there's only one way humanity is to learn to deal with the
nano-future rationally; and that is to become scientific; and, there's only one
way to make humanity scientific; to put it in an environment where it grows up
knowing it better by scientific about things, and that is out in space.  One of
Eric Drexler's last chapters of his 'Engines of Creation' book is about
'avoiding' lazyness, stupidity, and evil' more or less; out in space, we can
certainly avoid two of those; and I would say with the cloaking and brain
reading technologies, we can avoid most evils; and, out in space, I think most
and almost certainly all given enough time, social groups will learn how to see
that there's something bigger than their small petty concerns they learned how
to fight over on Earth.

Readers of this group might be interested in a recent themed issue of Science
for Environment Policy focusing on Nanomaterials
(http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/12si.pdf).
The issue addresses the difficult question of health and environmental risks
that might arise from novel nanomaterials and how these could be tested. The
news alert highlights recent research ranging from the potential of carbon
nanotubes to cause lung disease to the effects of sunscreen nanoparticles on the
skin. A must for the nano-interested.

Concerning the use of fabricators to assemble progressively larger
machines: Won't these machines require at least some parts of
progressively larger size? As these parts get larger, they will no
longer have the immunity that atomic scale parts have to wear and
fatigue. I would think the machines would have to be fully
self-repairing before such a bootstrap process is possible.

" . . . the originators of new ideas are too protective of their
brainchildren to develop them properly; creativity impliies a
corresponding lack of perspective." - Paul Dirac

Going from one mathematical science development after another
reveals a lot of different slants and takes on this; for instance,
Archimede's integral and differential calculus was hampered by his
use of geometric algebra and arithmetic; while some like Frederick
Gauss argued and wondered why and how come Archemedes didn't think
to make the hindu/arabic numerals; well, I'd argue that Archemedes
certainly developed his ideas 'improperly', but considering lifes
pressures and that he could(obviously) see how to get the results he
wanted without travelling all over the world . . . stumbling on
India's invention of zero . . . hanging out with the arabs to see
them symbolize algebra and arithmetic(really this didn't happen till
Vieta anyways!) . . .and all this while managing to live for a
thousand years or more; well, I think you get the point.

Newton's invention of the Calculus is actually a good example of
what Mr Dirac had in mind; Galileo had the idea of average speed,
Fermat had done the tangent to the line thing, and his initial
teacher and as teacher to Isaac Newton as he could be Barrow had
much of the various calculus theorems like the derivative of the
sum, multiplication and so on; but, Barrow could not see how to put
it all together; even here, Newton actually could not see how to do
all of the basic calculus students learn today; he did not know
rolle's theorem and the proving of all the basic derivative
formula's by means of limits that Cauchy did in the eighteen
hundreds.

What to make of it all? Just goes to show you that you can never
confine mankind in a finite box and expect to learn the universe
(kind of a necessity for us humans I would say!

Fear not!

Number one . . . i remember a stats page at the Foresight Institute
showing the number of countries that visit the site and how often; i
remember reading of countries I've never heard of before or since!
That was a long time ago; i can't even remember how many years ago
they took down that stats page!

Point is number two . . . every country is investing in nano this
and nano that; by the time anybody brings out the first assemblers
(primitive) . . . even if the economy is affected, all those
countries will have enough various nanotechnologies to take care of
themselves.

Whoever comes up with the first primitive assemblers would be stupid
to wage war because all those other countries will have plenty of
nano this and nano that; it would be futile not to mention insane
considering that country will be able to live 'off the grid' so to
speak; they won't have to get money and trade with other countries
to survive.

Worries about that first country performing genocide on its
population?  Well, number one there . . . i think it is highly
improbable; most countries just won't; they'll fear what they look
like to others and other such social politics.  And if they do . . .
well, I'm sorry, but so long as you didn't do it; what  are you
worried about?  Somebody blaiming you for the genocide; so long as
you didn't do it, your on teh moral highground.  I'm sorry, but
causing world war three is not justified for preventing what others
are going to do to their own people.  Your business is what social
group you choose to be with!

What else this is leading to deserves another thread.

Bologna seems to be one of the greatest cities of all time.  It was
founded by the Etruscans which evolved into the Roman world. Later, it
was conquered by the Lombards whom named it Bologna.  It went through
all the medieval period gyrations; and then, with the crusades and the
translations of Greek and classical civilization books in Spain around
1000 A.D., Bolongna was at the center of it all again.  Petrarch is one
early pre-Renaissance(1500s) name.  Cardano also learned and taught
medicine there.  Today, Bolongna is considered one of the five top
cities of the world!  Not bad historical and contemporary value to say
the least!  Why all this about Bologna though?

Well, this!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtI-hWUQI7w&feature=related

i thought i'd give that link first since it is the start of the show!
But, really, what I'm poining out is in the second part of this youtube!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCGEE1FzhCQ&feature=related

Well, between the history of mathematics I read and this video, I took
a little bit of an interest in Bologna; and, I noticed the
correspondence between some of what James Burke says about Bologna in
this second part(the second link above) and CRN's "System of Three
Ethics."  As James Burke says it, around 1050, Bologna was growing
again, and they were amongst the first to his the problem; he stands in
I'm guessing a(possibly 'the') major social/political center of
Bologna; and he points out how the place is set up; i mena he's
standing in a square concrete center with fountains and all . . . and
various great buildings which as James Burke points out correspond to a
division of various social/political concerns of a given city-state;
there is the emperor building, the town council building, church, and
merchant building(notice, there's no university building(s)!  As he
says, all of them wanted to run the place, nobody was strong enough to
do it by themselves; so, with all this political back and forth,
humdrum concerns like "who threw the boiling oil" took precedence!

As Mr Burke says, the trouble was they were trying to run before they
could walk; they didn't understnad things; they didn't have education!
(not to mention, they were all split up; you can't funciton when you're
all split up!)

I'm not argueing against the 'System of Three Ethics'; i'm arguieng
that the points about the 'system of three ethics' is incomplete; who's
in charge?  The military?  THe scientists? Or, the business people?
CRN and really the founding fathers of the U.S.A, prove the system of
three ethics; but, I'm thinking we have a choice amongst the three(or
four, if your counting the religion!) activities of . . .
civilization.  Let me point out that Nano-manufacturing and its
associated nanotechnologies allows a given person or group(I would
think a given person would chose not to be lonely) to do away with
economics. Military?  If you need it.  Let me point out something else;
who's going to maintain all this potentially wonderfull technologies?
Nano-manufacturing allows a given person(s) to forget about the world;
a given person(s) could grow rather forgetfull of the science and
technology we as human beings need to survive in this world; we are the
technologically dependent species; we forget that, and the
nanotechnologies break(including the nanomanufacturing system) the
nanotechnology dependent humans . . . become extinct!

In a previous post, I've pointed out that at the same time a given
state comes up with a primitive nanomanufacturing system, all the stats
of the world will have sufficient nanotechnologies to surive on their
own. There are two possibilities here.  One, soembody thinks they've
got to conquer the world to prevent nano-wars(and to feed all the poor
people of the world . . . finally); the other is to not because you
don't need to; you have all the necessities of the world and nobody is
going to bother with you(except that your living in the same land as a
previous nano-era state).  The previous possibility leads to world war
three; not just a nuclear war anymore; a nano-war; in this war, you
have no idea who's going to win out because you don't know what the
other side knows.  The second possibility could lead to wars; but will
it lead to the extermenation of the whole species? I think not.

There will be great pressure to just expand out in space because nobody
knows what hundreds of nanotechnology states are going to do.  I for
one prefer this second possibility.  Why?  Because in this world,
nobody can conqure the rest of the world, and two, nobody becomes
complacent with their nanotechnologies.  I don't think the majority of
the nanotechnology states will wage war; and really, I have an interest
in space; i'm not going to worry about nano(and nuclear) wars, because
I'm going to be billions if not trillions of miles away.  My only
concern is not having others to give insights that I cannot(becaue
everybody has insights others can't have); i'm more worried about not
having a social group that enjoys exploring the universe with me.  I
know that all knowledge is incomplete and that we are dependent on
learning ever more.  My goal is to set up an Isaac
Asimovian 'Foundation.'  And, I'm not worried about all these other
nanotechnology states expanding in opposite directions because I know
that even if they are anti-my Jacob Bronowski scientific humanism
because they are dependent on that science and technolopgy and over
time due to the pressures of existence in this universe and the fact
that they are human beings, they will change over time.

My worry is world war three with nanotechnology and nuclear
weapons . . . and roman republic/and empire and Nazy Germany stuff;
Republics and Democracies that vote out democracy and science.

I'm propsing an Isaac Asimovian 'Foundation" which chooses science
amongst the system of three ethics with Arthur Kantrowitz's science
courts to keep those military, economic, and supernatural/vagueness
gmaing religious influences form steering my Isaac
Asimovian "Foundation" from going wrong.  We should be collecting,
analysing, and synthesizing the world's knowledge in an Isaac
Asimovian "Foundation" before the nano-era really kicks in; and if some
of our group concludes the data differently, they can exapond out in
space in opposite directions . . . and we'll see who's right or wrong
about the data because those who are wrong will run into one
contradiction after another; the moral thing to do is in their court;
to change their ways.

By means of this poocess, humanities(and intelligence in the universe)
is secured in the universe; because 1) dogma does not take over and
complacency does not blidn us the breakdown of the bewildering
nanotechnologies that nobody is ever going to understand it all, and/or
number two,  supernova and other astronomically energetic events
doesn't wipe us out because we have all our eggs in one basket here on
Earth.

Would the report on nanotechnology in the UK hinder research and
progress? Or will everything still resume as normal, but just with
more regulations

Thanks

Dear Colleagues,

How to teach nanotechnology? - Answers by Hans P. Mikelson:

Blog, ppt-s:
http://www.nanopaprika.eu/profiles/blog/list?user=2zaik0ftnj764
Part 1.:
Teaching Nanotechnology at the Community College Level
Part 2.:
First Week of Intro to Nano
Part 3.:
Intro to Nano Outline
Part 4.:

The Nanoscale
Part 5.:
Nanochemistry
Part 6.:

Argus Lab
Part 7.:
Waves and Light
Part 8.:

Test Time

Part 9.:
PowerPoints, Learning Guides and Labs, Oh My
Part 10.:
Quantum Mechanics Part 1
Part 11.:
Quantum Mechanics Part 2
Part 12.:
Program Considerations
Part 13.:
POVRay Images
Part 14.:
Tools of Nanoscience
Part 15.:
Optical Microscopy
Part 16.:
Scanning Electron Microscopy

Part 17.:
Transmission Electron Microscopy

Part 18.:

Atomic Force Microscopy

Blog, ppt-s:
http://www.nanopaprika.eu/profiles/blog/list?user=2zaik0ftnj764


Best regards

A.P.

--
András Paszternák
creator and editor of The International NanoScience Community
Web: http://www.nanopaprika.eu
E-mail: editor@...

Thank you

okerdavid wrote:
>             Actually, this might be more like what your looking for!
>  http://www.physorg. com/news14043832 6..html
>



       Get your preferred Email name!
Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com.
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/

I'm working on a short presentation for my university communications
class on molecular manufacturing.  I have a very short time to speak
and I'd like to include information that will motivate people to
research this on their own.  I'm hoping to include either the
percentage or number of jobs that could be lost in a worst case
scenario if MM was released completely unregulated.  That is, as far
as jobs focused on manufacturing, transportation, storage, and sales
are concerned - rather then the economic fallout scenario.

Is this data available anywhere?  Or how might I go tracking it down?

Thanks, in advance, for any help.
Max

My name is aadil and I am doing MSC in Nanoelectronics and
Nanomechanics at the University of Sheffield, UK. Here I am intrested
to work on the topic ''LAB ON A CHIP''. As I am fresh student to this
emerging field and I have to write scientific essay on this topic, I
am hoping you people will help me about knowing this particular topic
''LAB ON A CHIP''. If some of you have material on this topic, please
do share with me.
Regards,

Hi,

why is it that nano assemblers use DNA type chemical assemblers? Is it
not possible to create a nano assembler that does not use natural-dna-
type assembly? How would one go about creating a total non-biological
type nano assembler using only some kind of electronic means?

Looks like there is no real objection to my solution to nano-accidents;
in light of the recent Lhc hacking, I've come to see that my space
colony ejectable nano-manufacturing solves the early foresight
societies worries about privacy.

If you've got more than one group of people in their own space colony
using their own developed nanotechnologies, then because they are not
standardized with respect to one another . . . well, it's like two
different languages; they can kind of translate, but not really; and,
in the computer world, when you don't have every colon, dot, hyphen and
so on readable to a computer, the computer program doesn't work.

And oh yes, two space colonies going their separate ways . . . more
privacy!  The wonders an open and rigorous mind can do;

Actually, this might be more like what your looking for!

http://www.physorg.com/news140438326.html