I realize that this is a continuation of a very old thread -- last
seen Dec 1st, 2004, in fact -- but I bought myself a new computer
this week, and I'm seeing this problem routinely and regularly on
the new one once again.

As I reported at the time, I had this problem on a desktop I owned
back then, but not on the laptop I owned at the same time.  Well,
since then that desktop died a tragic death, and for a long time --
until this week -- all I used was that laptop, so I didn't encounter
this problem and in fact pretty much forgot about it.  But now it's
back.

I'm not actually urgently pleading for you to do something about
this right away, but I did want to at least mention that it's
happening to me again.  (Better to say something, just for the
record, than to suffer in silence, I suppose.)  I'm happy to do
whatever I can to help resolve the issue, but if you decide that
it's a low priority (if I'm the only person on the planet who is
seeing it, for example), I won't argue ... too much.

Brian
-=^=-

Jeff Gordon wrote:
> Dear David,
> Sorry, but my version of TV Writer which I registered using the 2002
> code you suggested is still showing TV WRITER DEMO converted and
> non-converted images.
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> Regards,
> Jeff and Olga Gordon
> +7 87934 20092

My apologies Jeff.  That was a temporary licence code - I've just e-mailed
the full code.

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.eu
Email:  davidtaylor@...



___________________________________________________________
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The
Wall Street Journal
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

Dear David,
Sorry, but my version of TV Writer which I registered using the 2002 code
you suggested is still showing TV WRITER DEMO converted and non-converted
images.
What am I doing wrong?

Regards,
Jeff and Olga Gordon
+7 87934 20092

For your information:

------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups will be continuing our database maintenance on Monday night,
January 9, at 9:00 pm Pacific Time (5:00 am on the 10th (GMT)).  For
approximately 30 minutes, the Groups site will be down for all groups. In
addition, 25% of groups will be unavailable for an additional 30-45
minutes.  Messages sent to affected groups during that time will be queued
and delivered once the groups are back online.

We appreciate everyone's patience and apologize for the unusually frequent
series of maintenance downtimes we have had to schedule recently. The
Holiday season gifted us with an unfortunate combination of hardware
failures and data corruption issues. Fortunately, we're seeing the light
at the end of the tunnel, although folks should expect at least one more
period of downtime in the coming weeks.
------------------------------------

David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

Folks,

I trust you are all recovered from Christmas, and that you had an
enjoyable time.

There is some downtime due on 25% of Yahoo groups this week, most likely
Wednesday morning UTC.  Please see:

   http://groups.yahoo.com/local/whatsnew.html

Any messages you post will be queued and delivered once the groups are
back online.

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

SlideShow

V2.3.0 - display number of slides correctly when starting up, when closing
a slide-show: remove file name from application caption and remove status
line text, rename sorter form as "Slide Show Sorter"


TVwriter

V2.3.0 - add experimental 1280 x 768 output size.


Please see:
   http://www.satsignal.net/   =>  Software,  What's New?

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

Brian Madsen wrote:
> How do I get FindDuplicates to search for duplicates within the
> contents of E:\Images\ together with the contents of F:\ ?
>
> I am finding that if I try to select both the E: and the F: drives in
> the "What to search for" box, and then put "\images,\" into the "In:"
> box, FindDuplicates tries to blend "\images" and "\" together and
> turns them both into "\" -- but on the E: drive, I really don't want
> FindDuplicates to look in E:\ -- I only want it to look in E:\Images\
> and below.
>
> I am also finding that I can't put the drive letters directly into
> the "In:" box because "e:\images,f:\" gets converted
> into "\e:\images\,\f:\", which is also not what I want.
>
> How should I approach this problem?
>
> Brian
> -=^=-

Brian,

I don't think the present version of the program will do this.  If you
want to check for duplicates in \images\ then it needs to be \images\ on
both disk drives.

[Not a serious suggestion]  You could create a \images\ folder on F: and
move all your files there temporarily <G>.  As you would only be moving
directories it shouldn't take long.....  And there's Edit, Undo to move
them back!

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

How do I get FindDuplicates to search for duplicates within the
contents of E:\Images\ together with the contents of F:\ ?

I am finding that if I try to select both the E: and the F: drives in
the "What to search for" box, and then put "\images,\" into the "In:"
box, FindDuplicates tries to blend "\images" and "\" together and
turns them both into "\" -- but on the E: drive, I really don't want
FindDuplicates to look in E:\ -- I only want it to look in E:\Images\
and below.

I am also finding that I can't put the drive letters directly into
the "In:" box because "e:\images,f:\" gets converted
into "\e:\images\,\f:\", which is also not what I want.

How should I approach this problem?

Brian
-=^=-

> No, I understood, Brian,

Oh good.  I'm sorry, I thought you hadn't, but I'm glad you did.

> but I have other items of software
> which include both a File, Close and a File Exit (including
> Microsoft Word), so I'm happy to leave it for now.

Okay, now I see your point too.  I hadn't really noticed before now
that Word does both.  That's a good point, and now that I see that,
I'm content leaving it as is too.

So, I've reviewed the beta version, and I'm very happy with it.  Thank
you again for making those changes, and for making them so promptly.
I recommend letting that beta become official whenever you're ready to
send it out.

Brian

Brian Madsen wrote:
[]
> Ummmm ... I think I may have been misunderstood, or I may have
> misspoken.  Let me try again.
>
> I don't want you to change File Exit.  I'm talking about File
> Close.  I've said nothing about File Exit, and I do want that to
> remain where it is, because, as you say, it's very clear and very
> common.
>
> As you know, your File menu includes BOTH an Exit item AND a Close
> item.  I'm not making any comment about the Exit item, which is
> good, happy, serene, and tranquil where it sits.  I'm commenting on
> the Close menu item, and only that.
>
> I'm suggesting that the CLOSE menu item (not the EXIT menu item)
> might be more accurate if it read CLEAR instead of CLOSE.  That
> solves two related ambiguities: (1) You won't have both a Close and
> an Exit menu item on the same File menu (which can be confusing
> since, as you know, Windows sometimes uses File Close to shut down a
> window application (e.g. File Explorer, Internet Explorer), and
> sometimes uses File Exit to mean the exact same thing (e.g.
> Microsoft Word)) and (2) what you really mean by "Close" is NOT the
> same thing that File Explorer means by "Close"; what you really mean
> is "clear the contents of this window", not "shut this window
> down".  I suggest that, thanks to both File Explorer and Internet
> Explorer, most people think of File Close as a way to shut down an
> entire window, when you only mean for it to clear out the contents
> of that window.
>
> Brian

No, I understood, Brian, but I have other items of software which include
both a File, Close and a File Exit (including Microsoft Word), so I'm
happy to leave it for now.

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

> > Changing the subject (and this suggestion is just a half-baked
> > one, and is just occurring to me just now): Do you think
> > the "Close" menu item should read "Clear" instead of "Close"?
> > Generally, when a File menu includes a "Close" option, as in
> > the case of Windows File Explorer (explorer.exe), that menu
> > item shuts down the whole window, rather than just clearing
> > the contents of the window as is the case here.  Just an
> > oddball thought, but it might make the meaning of File Close
> > more clear (pardon the pun).
> >
> > Brian
>
> Good point, but File, Exit seems to be quite common, so I'll
> leave it for now unless others comment as well.
>
> Cheers,
> David


Ummmm ... I think I may have been misunderstood, or I may have
misspoken.  Let me try again.

I don't want you to change File Exit.  I'm talking about File
Close.  I've said nothing about File Exit, and I do want that to
remain where it is, because, as you say, it's very clear and very
common.

As you know, your File menu includes BOTH an Exit item AND a Close
item.  I'm not making any comment about the Exit item, which is
good, happy, serene, and tranquil where it sits.  I'm commenting on
the Close menu item, and only that.

I'm suggesting that the CLOSE menu item (not the EXIT menu item)
might be more accurate if it read CLEAR instead of CLOSE.  That
solves two related ambiguities: (1) You won't have both a Close and
an Exit menu item on the same File menu (which can be confusing
since, as you know, Windows sometimes uses File Close to shut down a
window application (e.g. File Explorer, Internet Explorer), and
sometimes uses File Exit to mean the exact same thing (e.g.
Microsoft Word)) and (2) what you really mean by "Close" is NOT the
same thing that File Explorer means by "Close"; what you really mean
is "clear the contents of this window", not "shut this window
down".  I suggest that, thanks to both File Explorer and Internet
Explorer, most people think of File Close as a way to shut down an
entire window, when you only mean for it to clear out the contents
of that window.

Brian

Brian Madsen wrote:
[]
> But:
>
> Now that I see that I can move slides with the mouse, I also see
> that the status bar area is putting text there when I do ("Move
> slide: 8 to: 16").  However, that text, and the "16 slides" text,
> are both remaining even after I do a File Close, and I think those
> text areas should get cleared at that point.  Otherwise, when I drop
> new files onto SlideShow after clearing out the old set of files, I
> still see "Move slide: 8 to: 16" there, even though the new set of
> files might only include 4 slides!  (It's also a little disorienting
> to leave the "16 slides" text there after a close, because there are
> obviously not 16 slides in that case -- there are zero!)  I think
> that once a user does a Close, if you could clear out both of those
> status bar text areas, that would do it.

Fixed in the beta I've just uploaded.

> Changing the subject (and this suggestion is just a half-baked one,
> and is just occurring to me just now): Do you think the "Close" menu
> item should read "Clear" instead of "Close"?  Generally, when a File
> menu includes a "Close" option, as in the case of Windows File
> Explorer (explorer.exe), that menu item shuts down the whole window,
> rather than just clearing the contents of the window as is the case
> here.  Just an oddball thought, but it might make the meaning of
> File Close more clear (pardon the pun).
>
> Brian

Good point, but File, Exit seems to be quite common, so I'll leave it for
now unless others comment as well.

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

Thank you, David, for such a quick response!  This does indeed
address my concerns, with one small remaining item.

I actually didn't know that the left mouse button could drag images
from one position to another.  I don't know how I missed that.  It
makes so much sense now that I see it! It just wasn't something that
I was aware of, and so I misunderstood, thinking that the left mouse
button was going completely unused.  Now that I see what it's for,
it makes sense, and I'm happy leaving it as is.

But:

Now that I see that I can move slides with the mouse, I also see
that the status bar area is putting text there when I do ("Move
slide: 8 to: 16").  However, that text, and the "16 slides" text,
are both remaining even after I do a File Close, and I think those
text areas should get cleared at that point.  Otherwise, when I drop
new files onto SlideShow after clearing out the old set of files, I
still see "Move slide: 8 to: 16" there, even though the new set of
files might only include 4 slides!  (It's also a little disorienting
to leave the "16 slides" text there after a close, because there are
obviously not 16 slides in that case -- there are zero!)  I think
that once a user does a Close, if you could clear out both of those
status bar text areas, that would do it.

Changing the subject (and this suggestion is just a half-baked one,
and is just occurring to me just now): Do you think the "Close" menu
item should read "Clear" instead of "Close"?  Generally, when a File
menu includes a "Close" option, as in the case of Windows File
Explorer (explorer.exe), that menu item shuts down the whole window,
rather than just clearing the contents of the window as is the case
here.  Just an oddball thought, but it might make the meaning of
File Close more clear (pardon the pun).

Brian

Brian Madsen wrote:
[]
> Enhancement request:
>
> It would be nice if left-clicking on an image would do something.
> My preference would be for it to do a Full Screen View of the
> image.  I understand that there are a number of potential choices
> for what the left-click might do.  Perhaps this could be
> configurable?  That way left-click could mean "Full Screen View" for
> me but "Start Slideshow from here" or "Properties" or what have you
> for someone else.  In any case, it would be nice if the left mouse
> button did SOMEthing.
>
> These are all very minor and low priority, and certainly nothing
> I can't live with.  However, if any of these can get added to your
> to-do list, that'd be great.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian

Brian,

Many thanks for your careful observations and suggestions.  There is a
beta-test version available at:

   http://www.david-taylor.myby.co.uk/software/beta.htm

which fixes your reported bugs 1, 2 and 3.  Bug 3 really refers to the
fact that although the program is a Slide Show program, it has a number of
different functions such as the slide sorter, test card, and slide show
itself.  I've renamed the sorter function to be "Slide Show Sorter".

Of course, the left mouse button is used to select the slide for
drag-and-drop altering of the display order, and the right-button to
select other functions.  I agree there isn't a "left-click" action, but
for now I hope the "right-click" action offers enough choices.

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

Using SlideShow.exe version 2.2.6.64, 2005 Jan 28:

Bug #1:

If I start SlideShow, and drag-and-drop files onto it, the status
bar shows the number of images on the window (e.g. "8 slides").

If I save this to an SSH file (e.g. "Images.ssh"), then close
SlideShow and then reload it by clicking on that SSH file from File
Explorer, all eight slides are loaded, but the status area doesn't
read "8 slides" until I resize the window.  Unless I resize the
window, that area that ordinarily reads "8 slides" is just blank.
Once I resize, then it displays the slide count.

Bug #2:

If I load "Images.ssh", the title bar reads "Slide Sorter -
Images.ssh".  Now, from the File menu, select Close.  All images are
removed from the window, but the title bar doesn't change.  Now drag-
and-drop more files onto the window.  The title bar still doesn't
change.  Now save those new files by selecting "Save" from the File
menu.  SlideShow prompts for a new file name, correctly (in my
opinion) reasoning that since the slides have been cleared out and
repopulated, you probably don't still want to be saving them
to "Images.ssh".  But if that's the case, shouldn't "Images.ssh" get
removed from the title bar at some point along the way (probably,
I'm guessing, at the point where you do a File | Close).

Bug #3:

I never quite know whether to call this program "SlideShow"
or "Slide Sorter" because of the fact that the executable is called
SlideShow, but the title bar reads "Slide Sorter".  Considering that
http://www.david-taylor.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/software/imaging.html
refers to it as "Slide Show", probably the title bar should too.

Enhancement request:

It would be nice if left-clicking on an image would do something.
My preference would be for it to do a Full Screen View of the
image.  I understand that there are a number of potential choices
for what the left-click might do.  Perhaps this could be
configurable?  That way left-click could mean "Full Screen View" for
me but "Start Slideshow from here" or "Properties" or what have you
for someone else.  In any case, it would be nice if the left mouse
button did SOMEthing.

These are all very minor and low priority, and certainly nothing
I can't live with.  However, if any of these can get added to your
to-do list, that'd be great.

Thanks,
Brian

Brian Madsen wrote:
> How much trouble is it to omit scrollbars when ImageViewer is used to
> display non-JPEG images (e.g. *.BMP images)?
>
> Right now, scrollbars appear for those image types in all cases, even
> if the image is small enough that it doesn't need them, and I have no
> way to change that.
>
> Brian
> -=^=-

I'll look into that.

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

How much trouble is it to omit scrollbars when ImageViewer is used to
display non-JPEG images (e.g. *.BMP images)?

Right now, scrollbars appear for those image types in all cases, even
if the image is small enough that it doesn't need them, and I have no
way to change that.

Brian
-=^=-

I have tied EVERYTHING I've found on this forum with the same result -
memory stick error when I insert my new memory stick - 256MB.  My file
structure is exactly as described with a DCIM folder and 100MSDCF and
101MSDCF sub f0lders with DSCXXXXX.jpg files inside put there with
TVWriter.  I've tried saving the files optimized for the web and then
transferring to no avail!  Any ideas???

--- In DavidTaylorsSoftware@yahoogroups.com, "John Dillard"
<john@b...> wrote:
>
> --- In DavidTaylorsSoftware@yahoogroups.com, "John Dillard"
> <john@b...> wrote:
> > I downloaded the trial version (2.2.0) of TVWriter hoping to
create
> > jpgs I can write to a memory stick and display on my Sony Grand
Wega
> > HDTV (KF-50WE610). I can't get it to work.  I'm able to display
images
> > taken with my Canon camera and xferred to the memory stick but the
> > images I convert using TVWriter do not display. I have both types
of
> > images in the same memory stick directory but only the original
Canon
> > jpgs display. The TVWriter images are there too but the TV shows a
> > "File Error".  I've tried all the different file naming
conventions.
> > Any suggestions?
>
> I finally figured out my problem. My Sony TV will only display jpg
> images created a certain way. For example, in Photoshop 7.0, if I
use
> "Fille/Save As..." to create a jpg file it won't display on my Sony
> TV. If I use "File/Save for Web...", it works fine. I had similar
> results with other image editing software.

Brian Madsen wrote:
[]
> That's perfectly fine.  Thank you for considering them.  In the
> meantime, I think that this -- what I tested, what we have so far --
> is ready for prime time, and should get posted to your website right
> away.
>
> Brian
> -=^=-

Thanks, Brian.  Being uploaded as I write this.

Cheers,
David

>Brian,
>
>Many thanks for your suggestions.  These will need to wait until the next
>version.
>
>Cheers,
>David


That's perfectly fine.  Thank you for considering them.  In the meantime, I
think that this -- what I tested, what we have so far -- is ready for prime
time, and should get posted to your website right away.

Brian
-=^=-

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Brian Madsen wrote:
>> Thanks for the report, Brian.  I've sent you a beta for testing
>> (in which I position the image by hand rather than relying on
>> setting "Screen Centre" in the program).
>
> I got it, I've tested it, and I love it!!  It solves all of the
> major concerns that I had had with image positioning, and I'm very
> pleased.
>
> My only other comments are minor ones, and if you don't implement
> them, I won't object.  I think that what I'm testing now is a great
> enhancement.  But let me throw a couple of ideas on the table for
> consideration:

Brian,

Many thanks for your suggestions.  These will need to wait until the next
version.

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

> Thanks for the report, Brian.  I've sent you a beta for testing
> (in which I position the image by hand rather than relying on
> setting "Screen Centre" in the program).

I got it, I've tested it, and I love it!!  It solves all of the
major concerns that I had had with image positioning, and I'm very
pleased.

My only other comments are minor ones, and if you don't implement
them, I won't object.  I think that what I'm testing now is a great
enhancement.  But let me throw a couple of ideas on the table for
consideration:

1) I have an image which is 800 pixels wide and 1200 pixels high.
On my 1024x768 display, right-clicking it gives me a scrollbar on
the side so that I can see all 1200 pixels of the height.  That's
great, I love that.  But the scrollbar across the bottom seems
unnecessary, since the image -- even when enlarged -- isn't wider
than my display.  The image is 800 pixels wide, and my screen is
1024 pixels wide.  Can we do without that horizontal scrollbar in
that case?

2) Similarly, what do you think of the idea of not adding scrollbars
at all if you know that the image already fits on the screen?  Given
an image which is, let's say, 640x480 on my 1024x768 display, it
strikes me as necessary for scrollbars to appear even if I right
click on that image.  I can imagine that either approach might seem
confusing to users, since they may be saying, "Hey, I right-clicked
and nothing happened" or they may be saying, "Hey, I right-clicked
and got these scrollbars, but why did I need them when the image
already fits here?"  I'm not sure what the right usability answer
is, but my (very slight) preference would be to omit the scrollbars
in that case.

Brian
-=^=-

Brian Madsen wrote:
> Using the newly released (28 Feb 2005) Image Viewer, and with a
> Windows task bar which is not auto-hidden and appears along the
> bottom of my display (as opposed to, say, the left side or the top of
> the display), and with a monitor that is configured at 1024x768
> resolution, I am noticing the following anomaly:
[]
> Brian

Thanks for the report, Brian.  I've sent you a beta for testing (in which
I position the image by hand rather than relying on setting "Screen
Centre" in the program).

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

Using the newly released (28 Feb 2005) Image Viewer, and with a Windows task bar
which is not auto-hidden and appears along the bottom of my display (as opposed
to, say, the left side or the top of the display), and with a monitor that is
configured at 1024x768 resolution, I am noticing the following anomaly:

If I right click on a JPEG image in the Image Viewer to enlarge the image,  ...
then ...

... if doing so results in an image which would be wider than my desktop -- in
other words, if the actual size of the image is wider than 1024 pixels -- then
the Image Viewer's enlarged window appears over the top of the task bar. 
Otherwise, if the actual size of the image is narrower than 1024 pixels, then
right-clicking on the image in Image Viewer results in an Image Viewer window
which appears underneath the task bar.

Brian
-=^=-

many thanks, david , to you too
orlando
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: David Taylor
   To: DavidTaylorsSoftware@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 9:06 AM
   Subject: [DavidTaylorsSoftware] Holiday greetings!



   A very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

   David




         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

         Get unlimited calls to

         U.S./Canada




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Yahoo! Groups Links

     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DavidTaylorsSoftware/

     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     DavidTaylorsSoftware-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

A very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

David

--- In DavidTaylorsSoftware@yahoogroups.com, "John Dillard"
<john@b...> wrote:
> I downloaded the trial version (2.2.0) of TVWriter hoping to create
> jpgs I can write to a memory stick and display on my Sony Grand Wega
> HDTV (KF-50WE610). I can't get it to work.  I'm able to display images
> taken with my Canon camera and xferred to the memory stick but the
> images I convert using TVWriter do not display. I have both types of
> images in the same memory stick directory but only the original Canon
> jpgs display. The TVWriter images are there too but the TV shows a
> "File Error".  I've tried all the different file naming conventions.
> Any suggestions?

I finally figured out my problem. My Sony TV will only display jpg
images created a certain way. For example, in Photoshop 7.0, if I use
"Fille/Save As..." to create a jpg file it won't display on my Sony
TV. If I use "File/Save for Web...", it works fine. I had similar
results with other image editing software.

k0rob wrote:
> Hi David
>   I just downloaded your WX Tracker program for the ISS Shadow
> Project. I AM very impressed with your program.. it's absolutely
> wonderful. After getting installed, and set on ISS I was able to
> monitor ISS on the next pass it made overhead... Thank You Very Much
> for this program. I hope to register with you in the future to make
> the program fully functional, as of right now I'm working on a
> shoestring budget
> Thanks Again
> Sincerely Rob (K0ROB)

Rob,

I'm delighted to have your report, and to have my software in use for your
International Space Station project.  Yes, a registration would be
appreciated in the future.  If there are any additions you need to the
program I would be interested to hear about them.

By the way I have two groups for my software, and discussion about by
radio and satellite-tracking software is best carried out here:

   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SatSignal/

While writing, may I wish all group members a very Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!

Cheers!
David
--
SatSignal Software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.net
Email:  davidtaylor@...

Hi David
    I just downloaded your WX Tracker program for the ISS Shadow
Project. I AM very impressed with your program.. it's absolutely
wonderful. After getting installed, and set on ISS I was able to
monitor ISS on the next pass it made overhead... Thank You Very Much
for this program. I hope to register with you in the future to make
the program fully functional, as of right now I'm working on a
shoestring budget
Thanks Again
Sincerely Rob (K0ROB)

Brian Madsen wrote:
[]
> Looks good.  I like it.  Go ahead and call it a no-longer-a-beta.
>
> Thanks for doing that.
>
> Brian
> -=^=-

Thanks, Brian.  I've now released V2.2.4 of both the SlideShow and
TVwriter programs each with a minor update suggested by users.

Cheers,
David