Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
DialogueMapping · Dialogue Mapping Discussion Forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Dialogue Mapping without compendium   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #291 of 499 |
Re: [vims] Dialogue Mapping without compendium

My experience with Compendium is quite different. I just finished a two-day
strategy
session with the Fibre Channel Industry Association board of directors. Using
Compendium and Dialogue Mapping, I was able to capture the entire session, in
context
and on the fly, far faster than I could do in the sort of indented structure to
which
you're referring. And I type 90 wpm.

The resulting maps contain over 400 nodes. The group was astounded at how much
material
we worked through in such a short period.

The richness of the display and the ability to capture all comments works for
me. That being
said, I did not use the shared display in this particular case. With this group,
the shared
display actually got in the way. I do find that people who are not particularly
visual
have a difficult time following the graphical display. Anyone else have this
experience?

That being said, I think in the end the best tool for Dialogue Mapping is the
one you
can comfortably and efficiently use. So, if a note-taking system works for you,
I say
use it!

Michael

At 10:18 PM 3/6/2006, you wrote:
>I've been reading about and using Compendium today. It is not pleasing.
>
>Why would anyone put up with a note taking system which can't keep up
>with typing?
>
>When I see how little fits on a page, I'm inclined to forgo the icons
>completely and just use an indented structure and abbreviations.
>Perhaps (in part) like this:
>
>?? What dialogue mapping tool should I use?
> . . !! Compendium
> . . . . ++ Nice icons
> . . . . ++ Hypertext
> . . . . ++ Transclusions
> . . . . ++ Conversions to other media
> . . . . - - slow
> . . . . - - wastes space
> . . . . - - takes hours of practice
> . . !! TextEdit
> . . . . ++ I'm already proficient
> . . . . ++ dense on the screen
> . . . . ++ unlikely to hang
> . . . . - - no help for hypertext
> . . !! TextWrangler
> . . . . ++ can use two column display
> . . . . ++ super dense on the screen
> . . . . ++ can use tabs (but not in email)
> . . . . - - no help for hypertext
>
>Have you made do with no specialized tool except a laptop & digital
>projector?
>Am I just being silly and resisting spending the few hours to become
>proficient?
>Are the icons really important?
>Am I fooling myself about the density on the shared display?
>
>Dick

Michael Knowles, One Straight Line LLC
Co-author of "The Entrepreneur's Concept Assessment Toolbook"
http://www.onestraightline.com/
mknowles@...
Phone: 888-551-0051
cell: 831-234-4765




Tue Mar 7, 2006 6:35 pm

mwkn0wles
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #291 of 499 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I've been reading about and using Compendium today. It is not pleasing. Why would anyone put up with a note taking system which can't keep up with typing? When...
Richard Karpinski
dick@...
Send Email
Mar 7, 2006
6:41 am

I've had similar thoughts about using Excel spreadsheets to do this, but haven't gotten around to putting a sample dialogue together. If anyone has...
timzebo
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2006
3:13 pm

My experience with Compendium is quite different. I just finished a two-day strategy session with the Fibre Channel Industry Association board of directors....
Michael Knowles
mwkn0wles
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2006
6:41 pm

Hi Dick. I think the main issue you raise is a very important one ... the dialogue mapping technique is distinct from the tools/media used to support the...
Jeff Conklin
jeff.conklin@...
Send Email
Mar 7, 2006
10:21 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help