Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
DialogueMapping · Dialogue Mapping Discussion Forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re Mapping without Compendium   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #300 of 500 |
Re: [vims] Compendium and social issues in a meeting

Jeff, Richard, Nishchal, and others...

given the conversation that is taking place on this list, maybe this
is a good time for me to mention that the Dynamic Facilitation manual
is now available freely from my website at http://www.diapraxis.com.

As some of you may already know, Dynamic Facilitation is a "chart
paper and markers" approach that has some similar features to
Dialogue Mapping. As a result, it may be helpful to people who are
learning Dialogue Mapping...

One major difference between the two approaches is that in DF we
don't end up with a map that specifies the connection between the
various questions, solutions, pros, and cons (which ones go with
which.) We just have four numbered lists -- problem statements,
solutions, concerns, and data. The mapping of which solution goes
with which question, etc. is carried naturally in people's heads.
While for many situations, this seems to work just fine, creating a
Dialogue Map can of course add much greater value, especially when
handling massive amounts of information.

Where the Dynamic Facilitation manual might be of use to folks who
are learning Dialogue Mapping, is with regard to the "listening
cycle", as in BOTH methods, listening well and in depth to each
individual perspective (instead of trying to get the group to "agree"
to anything) is paramount.

Another thing that the Dynamic Facilitation manual might help
clarify, is that in both Dynamic Facilitation and Dialogue Mapping,
we are NOT attempting to corral participants to speak in "logical
order"... for example, we do NOT say at any point, "okay, for the
next 15 minutes, as a facilitator I only want to hear the pluses and
minuses for this particular idea, so that we can complete that
section of our diagram."

INSTEAD, a participant might offer a different solution, or a minus
to a previous solution, or a different question altogether....

the power of Dialogue Mapping, in my view, is that it allows you to
create a LINEAR, ORDERED display, out of a NON-LINEAR, CREATIVE
process.

I am concerned that this key point may not come across sufficiently
clearly to people who have not seen the process first-hand...

and, it is something that i have attempted to emphasize in the
Dynamic Facilitation manual.

with all best wishes,

Rosa



********

Rosa Zubizarreta, M.A.
Facilitating Creative Collaboration:
Organization Development * Community Engagement

Great Barrington, MA
http://www.diapraxis.com



Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:26 pm

rosazubi
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #300 of 500 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I'm going to echo Jeff Conklin's position - 'use what works'. I too though use Compendium in each engagement - having made the switch from indented lists to...
Turning Lead into Gold
paranelle
Offline Send Email
Mar 8, 2006
5:18 pm

What is a talking stick? A microphone? Can you say a little about how you START using Compendium or any dialogue mapping in meetings? Do you ask for or get...
Richard Karpinski
dick@...
Send Email
Mar 8, 2006
6:31 pm

Actually a microphone could be used as a talking stick, but it has more ancient and venerable origins ... see http://www.acaciart.com/stories/archive6.html . ...
Jeff Conklin
jeff.conklin@...
Send Email
Mar 8, 2006
7:39 pm

I have been following the ongoing discussion on Compendium and other techniques related to Dialogue mapping. I would like to know, considering meetings, it is...
Nish
colourchip
Offline Send Email
Mar 9, 2006
3:13 pm

Nishchal, my experience with Dialogue Mapping is that it gives hidden agendas no place to hide. Granted, the facilitator must listen and listen well, but ...
Michael Knowles
mwkn0wles
Offline Send Email
Mar 9, 2006
5:13 pm

Hi Nishchal, I think it's useful to tease apart two aspects of your question. First, the job of the dialogue mapper is to "translate" from the way people...
Jeff Conklin
jeff.conklin@...
Send Email
Mar 10, 2006
6:27 am

Jeff, Richard, Nishchal, and others... given the conversation that is taking place on this list, maybe this is a good time for me to mention that the Dynamic...
Rosa Zubizarreta
rosazubi
Offline Send Email
Mar 10, 2006
2:57 pm

Michael, Jeff, Rosa Thanks for your comments. Social issue (discussed earlier) was one thing on my mind. The following second and third questions are also...
Nish
colourchip
Offline Send Email
Mar 12, 2006
8:41 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help