GREENHOUSE EQUASIONS DECLARED WRONG

Miklow Zaoni isn't just a physician and environmental researcher. He is also a
global warming activist and Hungary's most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto
Protocol. Or was. That was until he learned the details o a new theory o the
greenhouse effect, one that not only give far more accurate climate predictions
here on Earth by on Mars too.

The theory was developed by another Hungarian scientist, Ferene Miskolezi, as
atmospheric physicist with 30 years of experience and a former researcher with
NASA's Langley Research Center. After studying it, Zagoni stopped calling global
warming a crisis, and instead focused on presenting the new theory to other:
they simplify the calculations and often end in a result that still very closely
matches reality. But not always.

So Miskolczi re-derived the solution, this time using the proper boundary
conditions or an atmosphere that is not infinite. His result included a new
term, which acts as a negative feedback to counter the positive forcing. At low
levels the new term means a small difference—but as greenhouse gasses rise, the
negative feedback predominates, forcing values back down.

But NASA reuses to release the results. Miskolezi believes its motivation is
simple. "Money," he tells Daily Tech.

Research that contradicts the view of an impending crisis jeopardizes funding,
not only or his own atmosphere-monitoring project but for all climate change
research. Currently, funding for climate research tops US $-billion per year.

Miskolezi resigned in protest; stating in his resignation letter: "Unfortunately
my working relationship with my NASA practice of handling new climate
change-related scientific results."

His theory was eventually published in a peer-review scientific journal in his
home country of Hungary. His conclusions are supported by research published in
the Journal of Geophysical Research last year by Steven Schwartz of Brookhaven
National Labs, who gave statistical evidence that the Earth's response to carbon
dioxide was grossly overstated.

His equations also answer thorny problems raised by the current theory which
doesn't explain why "runaway" greenhouse warming hasn't happened in the Earth's
past. The new theory predicts that greenhouse gas increases should result in
small, but very rapid temperature spikes followed by much longer, slower periods
o cooling—exactly what the palaeoclimatic record demonstrates. –Source: Daily
Tech.com, 6 March 2008 http://tinyurl.com/2foo2k also: www.GuardDogBooks.com