Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
GeneTechWatch · Gene Tech Watch
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
'Supermouse' bred to beat cancer   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #2409 of 2482 |
Wednesday, 28 November 2007, 10:48 GMT

'Supermouse' bred to beat cancer

Mice carrying a gene which appears to make them invulnerable to
cancer may hold the key to safer and more effective treatments for
humans.

The new breed, created with a more active "Par-4" gene, did not
develop tumours, and even lived longer, said the journal Cancer
Research.

University of Kentucky researchers said a human cancer treatment was
possible.

Cancer Research UK said that more research would be needed to prove
it didn't just work in mice.


We are thinking of this as a holistic approach that not only would
get rid of the tumour, but not harm the organism as a whole
Dr Vivek Rangnekar
University of Kentucky

Par-4 was originally discovered in the early 1990s working inside
human prostate cancers, and is believed to have a role in "programmed
cell death", the body's own system for rooting out and destroying
damaged or faulty cells.

The Kentucky team used an existing mouse breed known to be more
vulnerable to cancers to test whether Par-4 could be used to fight them.

They introduced the gene to mouse eggs, and it was active in both the
resulting pups - and their own offspring.

The mice with active Par-4 did not develop cancers, and lived
slightly longer than those without the gene.

Dr Vivek Rangnekar, who led the research, said that the gene offered
a potential way, unlike most other cancer treatments, of destroying
cancer cells without harming normal cells.

"When a cancer patient goes to the clinic, they undergo chemotherapy
or radiation and there are potential side effects associated with
these treatments.

"We are thinking of this as a holistic approach that not only would
get rid of the tumour, but not harm the organism as a whole."

Early stages

He said that much more research would be needed, however, before a
human treatment could be launched.

A spokesman for Cancer Research UK said: "Although at an early stage,
research like this allows us to understand more about the faulty
genes involved in cancer and throws open new avenues to explore for
cancer treatment.

"It's important to remember that this work has only been done using
genetically engineered mice, and more research is needed before we'll
know if it can be translated to humans."




Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:02 pm

dhushara
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #2409 of 2482 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Wednesday, 28 November 2007, 10:48 GMT 'Supermouse' bred to beat cancer Mice carrying a gene which appears to make them invulnerable to cancer may hold the key...
Chris King
dhushara
Offline Send Email
Nov 28, 2007
9:58 pm

This list is now pro GE or what ? ... Michel Dussandier - - - http://midier.net " Devant un ennemi supérieur en nombre, être plus fort que lui en calcul...
Michel
ghanima22000
Offline Send Email
Nov 29, 2007
7:22 am

... No not at all. Personally I have generally found GE to be a dangerous process driven by corporate interests, but I simply take a look at the science news...
Chris King
dhushara
Offline Send Email
Nov 29, 2007
7:29 am

Thanks Chris. There is a problem with the science attached to GE however. It is not neutral at all, but biased by the fact that it addresses problems with a...
Michel
ghanima22000
Offline Send Email
Nov 29, 2007
8:35 am

... GE is reductionist in the sense that it attempts to alter genes or gene sequences in living organisms, but this isn't itself any more reductionist than...
Chris King
dhushara
Offline Send Email
Nov 29, 2007
8:55 am

... I use the term 'reductionist' in the way that, if we want to deal with the many issues concerning our civilization (!) like hunger, diseases, etc, we...
Michel
ghanima22000
Offline Send Email
Nov 30, 2007
10:08 am

... Specialization does blind but we have a deeper problem that goes beyond science. Science is analytic but we don't have a synthezsizing world view that can...
Chris King
dhushara
Offline Send Email
Nov 30, 2007
10:45 am

why is it supposed to be pro this pro that, anyway? knowing where you stand doesn't necessarily require a label of proism, which has a blinding effect and...
Iclal Akcay
iclal@...
Send Email
Nov 29, 2007
10:12 am

... you stand doesn't necessarily require a label of proism, which has a blinding effect and eventually locks you into the corner of conservatism. Too true....
Chris King
dhushara
Offline Send Email
Nov 29, 2007
10:19 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help