On Apr 12, 2009, at 6:58 AM, jma wrote:

> Rybo, This is as much for myself as to respond to your thoughts.
> Spin and angular momentum imply a vortex, that includes the idea of
> friction in space as well as infinity. Bodies with angular momentum
> and spin have polarity and the fun begins.

Ok, fair enough then.

Splitting is resultant of "spin and angular momentum", which have a
coinciding "polarity".


> One of Haramein’s early quests was how to relate infinities to
> finite boundaries: the relation of finite and infinite. Also early
> on he relied on geometry, and on the notion that the Point or Zero
> involved infinity and all dimensions as well. The combination of
> fractal with zero led to his idea of an infinite fractal in a
> boundary, a sphere.

The latter is almost the exactly like Fullers conclusion i.e. we have
finite physical universe, infinitely subdividing.

Infinite subdivision can only coincide with eternity.

Fullers VE is the static, Operating System of Universe in balanced /
equilbrium between positive and negative aspects.
....( 24 circumferential chords and 24 radials ).....

The 4-fold VE is rationally coordinate with the all-space filling and
4-fold, Isotropic Vector Matrix( IVM )

The 5-fold Icosahedron does not ---in mosts cases-- rationally
commensurate with 4-fold VE or the IVM.

4 * Pi * r^2 = sphere surface area and the area of the spherical VE's
4 great circle planes.

4 * Pi^2 * r^2 is torus surface

So we split the 24 and arrive at 12.

We split the 12 and arrive at 6.

We split the 6 and arrive at odd 3.

We split the odd 3 and arrive at the irrational 1.5.

.5( pos ) + .5( pos ) + .5( neg ) = 1.5

24 / 1.5 = 16
12 / 1.5 = 8
6 / 1.5 = 4
3 / 1.5 = 2

16 + 8 + 4 + 2 = 30

The Icosahedron has 30 chords, so, we may say, that, we have a
numerical commensuration of 5-fold Ico. chords with 4-fold VE chords
via the 4-fold set of iterations and subsequent addition of their
resultants I give here above.
...( this is a type of commensuration is a new occurrence I have
never crossed before ).....

So, numerical 10, ergo two odd 5's, and odd 3, give us access to
Ico's 30 chords and its subsequent splitting as 15.

30 / 2 = 15
15 / 2 = 7.5
7.2 / 2 = 3.75
3.75 / 2 1.875
-----------------
/ 2.........(. 9375 )
/ 2.........(.46875 )
/ 2.........( .234375 )
/ 2.........( .234375 )
/ 2.......( 0.05859375 )
/ 2.......( 0.029296875 )
/ 2.......( 0.0146484375 )

30 / 1.875 = 16
15 / 1.875 = 8
7.2 / 1.875 = 4.26666666667
3.75 / 1.875 = 2

Compare iterations of Ico. above to VE below.

24 / 1.5 = 16
12 / 1.5 = 8
6 / 1.5 = 4
3 / 1.5 = 2

16--to--16
8---to--8
4.26666666667---to---4
2--to--2

The VE and Ico. share the same number of surface events i.e. 12---
to---12.

Whereas the chords are 30--to--24.

The VE is systemic integrity whereas Ico. is structural integrity.

So, the VEs 12 chords will in-fold to become doubled-valenced as 12
chords of 4-fold Octahedron.

Via spin / torque if not also angular momentum will infold to become
quadruple-valenced chords as the 6 of hte Tetrahedron aka the minimal
volumetric --ergo 3D--- polyhedron of universe.

This Tet. can infold further as an octa-valanced 3 chords as a 2D
triangle.

Is EM-Radiation the infolding --contraction/accumulation?--

or outfolding/unfolding --expansion/subdivsion-- of spacetime?

Are fermions and bsosons the infolding or outfolding of spacetime?

We directly observe the fermions but not so much the force particles,
which are exchanged between fermions.

My Rybonics places the bosons into to 5-fold Ico. catgory and
fermions into the 4-fold catagory, in general.

Rybo