Dear Silk,
I am unsure what you mean by “Neanderthals
being in northern
The researchers led a dig at Kostenki, a group of
more than 20 sites
along the Don River in
Kostenki previously yielded anatomically modern
human bones and
artifacts between 30,000 and 40,000 years old, they said. These
included the oldest firmly dated bone and ivory
needles with
eyelets, indicating the inhabitants were tailoring
furs to survive
the cold.
In other words, anatomically modern human
(AMH) remains were found at Kostenki.
Modern humans may have first entered this part of
competitors such as Neanderthals were absent here,
Hoffecker
suggested. "The Neanderthals, who had occupied
200,000 years, seem to have left the back door open for modern humans."
Furthermore, the reason AMHs were able to
populate Kostenki was due to the absence of Neanderthals.
The 200,000 year old date you mention is
when AMH is thought to have been in sub-Saharan
Anatomically modern humans are thought to have
arisen in sub-Saharan
If you have other information, please
explain.
Regards,
Gerry
From:
GlobalBrain@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GlobalBrain@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Silk
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007
3:05 AM
To: globalbrain@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] [GlobalBrain]
Could be? Latest news........
Hi
Gerry... Check out the part about Neanderthals being in northern
200,000 years or more?
Modern humans who first arose in Africa moved into
about 45,000 years ago, a new study indicates.
The evidence consists of stone, bone and ivory tools found
under a
layer of ancient volcanic ash some 250 miles south of Moscow,
said John
Hoffecker of the University of Colorado at
Boulder.
An assemblage of bone and ivory artifacts from the lowest
layer
at Kostenki that includes a perforated shell, a
probable small
human figurine (three views, top center) and several
assorted awls,
mattocks and bone points dating to about 45,000 years ago. (Courtesy
CU-Boulder)
------------
"The big surprise here is the very early presence of modern
humans in
one of the coldest, driest places in
of the last places we would have expected people from
first."
The site yielded the earliest evidence of modern humans
in
perforated shell ornaments and a carved piece of mammoth
ivory, he
said.
The latter, found five years ago, seems to be the head of a small human
figurine-bro
40,000 years ago, said Hoffecker. "If confirmed, it will be the
oldest
example of figurative art ever discovered."
Hoffecker and colleagues at the
the findings in the Jan. 12 issue of the research journal
Science.
The researchers led a dig at Kostenki, a group of more than
20 sites
along the Don River in
Kostenki previously yielded anatomically modern
human bones and
artifacts between 30,000 and 40,000 years old, they said. These
included the oldest firmly dated bone and ivory
needles with
eyelets, indicating the inhabitants were tailoring
furs to survive
the cold.
"The artifacts are unmistakably the work of
modern humans,"
Hoffecker said, adding that his team dated the overlying
sediment by
several methods.
Anatomically modern humans are thought to have arisen
in sub-Saharan
Kostenki also contains evidence that modern humans
were rapidly
broadening their diet to include small mammals and
freshwater foods,
an indication they were "remaking themselves
technologically,
Hoffecker said. They may have used traps and snares to catch hares and
arctic foxes, exploiting large areas fairly easily,
he added: "they
probably set out their nets and traps and went home for lunch."
Modern humans may have first entered this part of
competitors such as Neanderthals were absent here,
Hoffecker
suggested. "The Neanderthals, who had occupied
200,000 years, seem to have left the back door open for modern humans."
Except for some early sites in the Near East, the oldest evidence
of
modern humans outside Africa comes from
years ago, said Hoffecker.
In the same issue of Science, researchers led by Frederick
E. Grine of
the State University of New York at Stony Brook presented
what they
called the first fossil evidence that modern humans
left sub-Saharan
Africa for
scientists had argued that this occurred a few tens of thousands
of
years earlier.
The evidence consisted of a South African skull, dated
as about 36,000
years old and closely resembling those of humans then living
in Europe
and far eastern
common ancestor," wrote Ted Goebel of
commentary in the journal. He wrote that modern humans
likely first
migrated out along the South Asian coast and into
later into harsher northern zones such as Kostenki.
chao/Silk