Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
GraphingCalcUsers · User group for Pacific Tech's Graphing Calculator math education visualization software
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
port to iPhone/iPod touch?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1582 of 1655 |
Re: [GraphingCalcUsers] why won't this graph

Chris young should be able to figure this out!


On 11/27/08 9:37 AM, "Bill Briggs" <web@...> wrote:


 

Greetings,

I confess to having, from time to time, difficulty knowing why GC won't graph some things. I've used sliders in other animated graphs, but I've messed with this thing for an hour and can't sort out why it won't plot. I want to have a wave moving to the right and a reflected wave moving to the left, and the resulting standing wave. But I'm trying to incorporate sliders so I can change the reflection coefficient (both amplitude and phase). It's your basic transmission line with an unmatched termination. I don't seem to be able to sort out why, with some constructs, GC won't plot the function. And in my last modification it switched to a 3D view, which I definitely didn't want. Does the presence of a "w" make GC think it's a parametric equation that triggers the move to 3D space?

I've just taken a screen shot of my equations in the hopes that someone here can point out the error of my ways.

Thanks,
  Bill



 
    



Sat Nov 29, 2008 3:06 pm

kjf103057
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1582 of 1655 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hey Ron, how about porting Graphing Calculator to the iPhone? There is already one graphing calc in the app store, but it doesn't even compare. From what I'm...
tcapiendo
Offline Send Email
Aug 21, 2008
10:38 pm

Ron, Ted and the gang! I totally agree. It amazes me (infuriates me) that I did not suggest this before ;-) As I usually recommend <www.math4mobile.com> and...
Jorge de Sousa Pires
jspxmp
Offline Send Email
Aug 22, 2008
2:45 pm

I'll admit, I've thought of that too. But I really think this may be overkill. I love my TI 89 (not titanium) and I remember great fondness in using the TI 83...
kiodane
Online Now Send Email
Aug 22, 2008
7:57 pm

Hello again Nice to hear several opinions. I do not agree completely with Mike C, but it does not really matter. I like one apparatus rather than several and...
Jorge de Sousa Pires
jspxmp
Offline Send Email
Aug 22, 2008
8:41 pm

Skip the phone Look how much time/work is involved to get 4.0 going! Keep focused...not spread out...
Kevin Farrell
kjf103057
Offline Send Email
Aug 23, 2008
12:54 pm

Hello all, Just to make things clear. I still think the future goes in the direction of a GCx.xx on iPhone (or the like). But let me make it clear to everyone...
Jorge de Sousa Pires
jspxmp
Offline Send Email
Aug 23, 2008
8:28 pm

Hi all, I have to agree with Jorge. And to elaborate further, as MacOSX evolves and incorporates more multi-touch UI features, the time spent porting GC to the...
tcapiendo
Offline Send Email
Aug 26, 2008
1:15 am

Hello all! Have you seen this one? http://www.spacetime.us/iphone/ It is not a secret anymore. Have a nice week-end. Jorge 26 aug 2008 kl. 03.11 skrev...
Jorge de Sousa Pires
jspxmp
Offline Send Email
Oct 10, 2008
7:06 pm

Great Let them do it!!!!!! Energy for gc can remain focused Thanks! ... Re: [GraphingCalcUsers] Re: port to iPhone/iPod touch? Great Let them do it!!!!!! ...
Kevin Farrell
kjf103057
Offline Send Email
Oct 11, 2008
11:42 am

hej Kevin! Correct. We will keep the focus. ... Ciao to all of you, great equationists out there! Jorge ... Great Let them do it!!!!!! Energy for gc can remain...
Jorge de Sousa Pires
jspxmp
Offline Send Email
Oct 11, 2008
7:00 pm

why won't this graph Greetings, I confess to having, from time to time, difficulty knowing why GC won't graph some things. I've used sliders in other animated...
Bill Briggs
lazyscripter
Offline Send Email
Nov 27, 2008
4:00 pm

Hi, The y = ... line probably should read y(x) = ... I don't see w (the one on the first eq. line) used anywhere. I removed it. Also the y(x) = g(x) will not...
Petri Sirkkala
petrisirkkala
Offline Send Email
Nov 28, 2008
9:37 pm

Chris young should be able to figure this out!...
Kevin Farrell
kjf103057
Offline Send Email
Nov 29, 2008
3:05 pm

... The problem seems to have been just with the "w"; GC 3.5 won't accept using reserved letters (t, u, v, w, i, r, etc.). The "w" is used in complex 4D...
Christopher O. Young
c1572young
Offline Send Email
Nov 30, 2008
6:33 pm

... GC is quirky, to be sure. I do hope this gets cleaned up as time goes on. The LONG list of reserved names is one of my pet peeves. I really, REALLY...
David Craig
dcraigx
Offline Send Email
Dec 11, 2008
6:56 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help