We will be providing a free seminar on Tuesday, March 25th,
2008. The discussion is titled “Refactoring Data” and
subtitled “Mitigating the Risks of Structural Changes.” The
topic is bringing real Agility to the database world by enabling refactoring
and thus emergent design. This will be the first presentation.
This seminar is not an advertisement. No attempt will
be made to sell or market anything.
In this article, we explore how evolutionary thinking
benefits software development, reduce the thinking to the core value it
provides, and re-instantiate that value in the database world.
This... uh... month's technical article is actually a series of articles: Rethinking Agility in Databases. Right now, there's just an introduction. In the next day or so, there should be an article with some real meat to it. Keep an eye out here, or subscribe to the Rethinking Agility in Databases RSS feed (or one of the superset feeds) to keep current on this new series of articles.
I have just written and published to our site the article "Immutable, Self-Referential Graphs: Why & How."It can be found here.
This is the first in a new line of content, for Hexagon Software: Technical Articles.These articles are intended to delve more deeply into the problems we are trying to solve.They do contain references to our products but only in the context of how they either address the problem at hand or were instrumental in discovering the solution.
You are also invited to visit our Technical Articles blog, which has an associated RSS stream.
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
HexagonSoftwareUsers group:
What do you think of Common Components SDK's Design Patterns support features?
(e.g.: ObjectProcessor, ChainObjectProcessor, and SequenceObjectProcessor)
o I haven't looked at it, yet.
o I don't understand what it's for.
o I understand what it's for but I think that it's too complex.
o I like it.
o (Abstain)
To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HexagonSoftwareUsers/surveys?id=12703423
Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.
Thanks!
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
HexagonSoftwareUsers group:
What do you think of Common Components SDK's
(http://www.hexsw.com/Products/Components/Common/Default.aspx) immutable
graph-building technology?
(e.g.: GraphStagingArea, GraphNodeStagingPoint, GraphBuilder, et cetera)
o I haven't looked at it.
o I don't understand why I would use it.
o I understand why I would use it but think it's too complex.
o I like it.
o (Abstain)
To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HexagonSoftwareUsers/surveys?id=12703410
Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.
Thanks!
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
HexagonSoftwareUsers group:
Based on your experience so far, how likely would you be to recommend
DataConstructor to a colleague?
o 1 - No way!
o 2
o 3
o 4
o 5
o 6
o 7
o 8
o 9
o 10 - Definitely!
To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HexagonSoftwareUsers/surveys?id=12703399
Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.
Thanks!
These releases represent a significant improvement in DataConstructor and Common Components. DataConstructor is now twice as powerful: it allows you to apply the same idiom used for databases to XML data stores. Common Components is also significantly more powerful; with increased Design Pattern support.