No one does it better. No one does is more brief. _http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-timezone-20051013/_ (http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-timezone-20051013/) hjw...
I see that they have still not managed to move away from a strictly Newtonian view of time: "1.1.1 ... at any given moment it is the same time in UTC...
In a message dated 6/5/2006 4:44:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time, david.settle@... writes: see that they have still not managed to move away from a strictly...
ummm, if it isn't relevant to 8601, do we need to discuss what I presume was intended as a light hearted response to the admiration expressed for the w3c note?...
hjw says: I failed to realize the this is not a serious discussion group. So if I eliminate the double negative, you are saying that you do realize this is a...
OK, I am confused about your point of view. But the discussion is likely boring for the list. Feel free to write me privately. Otherwise let's drop it. tex In...
yes, that was my intended sentiment. _____ From: ISO8601@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ISO8601@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of piebaldconsult Sent: Tuesday, June 06,...
Can anyone tell me which are the Official Departments in US who advice on using the day month year order in their official documents rather than usual month...
... advice ... I doubt any regularly use that format. But I notice my passport is in that order, but the month is spelled out. Perhap the government does it ...
Hey, can anyone answer the following: - is this a valid ISO8601 date: 2006-02-30 (i.e. 30th of feb 2006, a non-existent date) If this date *is* valid, what...
On almost all U.S. forms they always state the date in MM/DD/YYYY format however one U.S. Customs declaration form that I've seen currently being used...
Right. I guess there probably is a rule to be unambiguous, and a format like '23 Aug 2006' would be unambiguous for anyone reading the (English) document it's...
I don't think that this is a valid ISO date, because the standard specifically states that there are only 28 days in February (29 in leap years). However, I...
... values will be stored in a single field, though another separator may be chosen with discretion. A space is a popular allowed human readable alternative. ...
... What are the sections in 2004 which state this? Is the wording exactly the same as 2000? I want to figure out how this misunderstanding arose and get it...
... The files section for this group on Yahoo! has a summary of differences between ISO8601:2000 and :2004. It is called ISO8601diff.doc I believe that there...
... 2000's section 4.4 says " The space character shall not be used in the representations. " 2004's section 3.4.1 says " Unless explicitly allowed by this...
... The article says nothing of the sort. It just states that a space is part of the standard. There are a number of examples of supposedly standard dates...
