. Now: 2003.11.11+07:57:00 < +4089.0065 in my universe... > Using the plus sign {date+time} makes more sense, as the concept of time is additional to date,...
Well, I don't seem to agree here with the reverse solidus for timespans for human use. Now, something I would like to note (it has been noted before in the...
The tilde is nice, I agree. Thinking about it, it makes more sense than solidus, actually. < I wrote reserve, not reverse > My universe: Number of posi4seconds...
... From: pa_ria To: ISO8601@yahoogroups.com Sent: 2003 11 11 Tuesday 16:28 Subject: [ISO8601] Re: Is "2003-11-22 13:30:15" an ISO-8601 date in your opinion? ...
Budai, Andrew
bandi@...
Nov 12, 2003 11:59 pm
713
Go into the Regional/Language settings under Control Panel in your Windows OS, look for the locale "English: United Kingdom". Now, look for the "Date" tab....
If you use the "Hungarian" setting, you'll get a long date in year-month-day order and I believe a weekday after the actual date. I think the exact format is...
The ISO-8601 idea that 1999-12-31T24:00:00 = 2000-01-01T00:00:00 is not workable. The standard must be changed. Example of the problems with UNIX time zone. ...
hjwoudenberg@...
Dec 5, 2003 3:31 am
716
Hello. Why should North America avoid the use of "24:00:00"? The end of one day is the beginning of the next. It makes sense. If you are talking about file...
... From: NGUYEN Adam To: ISO8601@yahoogroups.com Sent: 2003 12 06, Saturday 00:35 Subject: Re: [ISO8601] Fwd: Must do away with time "24:00:00" Hello. Why...
Budai, Andrew
bandi@...
Dec 5, 2003 5:28 pm
718
As I have seen a fair amount of confusion in others on how to handle 24:00:00, thus like avoiding it in most cases. The only exception is using it as a...
Yes, Budai! The full format should really be YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss (no T in the middle, as that will cause confusion). Even YYYY/MM/DD hh:mm:ss is fine for me,...
Yes, the ONLY time 24 h, 24:00, or 24:00:00 is used is to mean an event ending time (eg. The party goes from 18:00 - 24:00). ... Outgoing mail is certified...
... From: piebaldconsult To: ISO8601@yahoogroups.com Sent: 2003 December 06, Saturday 08:54 Subject: [ISO8601] Re: Fwd: Must do away with time "24:00:00" No,...
Budai, Andrew
bandi@...
Dec 6, 2003 1:33 am
723
... This is a strange thing to say in a group dedicated to discussion of ISO 8601. ISO 8601:2000(E) says: # 5.3.2 Midnight # # The complete representations in...
You can't argue that it _should_ be in the spec because it _is_ in the spec. It's a non-sensical value (when dealing with an individual timepoint) and should...
[2003-12-11] Since the silly season seems to be back with us, a quick recap: * Only quote a SMALL part of any previous message when replying. * Write your...
Well, my case must be a special one as my antivirus program automatically adds some text to all incoming e-mails and I don't think my e-mail program allows...
Two dates separated by a solidus as in ISO 8601 or a hyphen or the like imply a time-interval with known start and end. It may be used for anniversaries of...
OK, thanks for the information... ... Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.560 /...
You don't seem to state a point. But it seems to me that simply leaving out the end timepoint would serve the purpose. ... person, ... be ... is ... (zh)...
... 8601 date. You could of course consider it an ISO 8601 date followed by an ISO 8601 time, but since the date and time are related it would not be correct....
In a message dated 1/18/2004 6:09:34 AM Central Standard Time, per@... writes: As you state, strictly speaking "2003-11-22 13:30:15" is not an ISO ...
hjwoudenberg@...
Jan 20, 2004 5:11 am
734
... ISO ... would ... It's true. A note under 5.4.1 of ISO 8601 Final Draft dated 2000-12- 15 says that the letter T may be omitted if readily understood. ... ...
... I didn't even know that. Haven't read the new final draft in detail. ... I was somewhat disappointed to see the first edition of ISO 8601, since the ISO...