Anyone else in the group actively using the 5.1 release for
production work?

I'm curious as to others thoughts on some of the 5.1 changes. In
particular the way that the name of the library a geom came from is
now incorporated into the geometry name.

comp("L1002", "1005_8p_CHIP_ARRAY", @placed, 5.625, 6.0,
0, @top)

in the pdb now becomes:

comp("L1002", "<internal>:1005_8p_CHIP_ARRAY", @placed,
5.625, 6.0, 0, @top)

Instead of adding an attribute to the design they put the name of the
library in the geom name, just like when the height property was
augmented with the gap height information to become:

prop("COMPONENT_HEIGHT", "0.6,0.0")
when it should have been done like this:
prop("COMPONENT_HEIGHT", "0.6")
prop("GAP_HEIGHT", "0.0")

Here's my basic beef (beyond the fact that a augmenting other data
onto a property or field violates database integrity) is that the
impact affects most everything everything:

1) the library name appears before the geoms name in the GUI so it
makes it difficult to read the real meaningful name of your geom as
it is usually to long to fit in the display now.
2) Perl commands that used to return the component geometry name now
include the library in the name which screws up any and all perl
scripts you may have dealing with opening and closing geometries or
reporting geoms information to a file.
3) Schematics driving pantheon from a non-mozaic/Indx path are now
royally messed up because the schematic that says "SOIC_8P" needs to
say "<internal>:SOIC_8P" instead.

Anyone else finding this a pain in the backside?

Greg