Hi Shine, I just checked over this old email from you, about XMLEncoder (see below) In it, you say that XMLEncoder cannot work, because much information is...
JSX FAQ - 14 November 2001 ======= JSX instantly XML-enables applications, by re-implementing the Serialization API for XML. FAQ Contents: (1). Background (2)....
JSX-ideas@yahoogroups...
Sep 4, 2002 7:27 pm
1303
Hi David (resent for benefit of the list - also a better version display snippet), ... Great! Since we're looking at making JSX work nicely with another...
Can you check this out and get back to Brendan on the results? Also - some time back I submitted a patch to support the J9 VM (the class field thing). Can you...
Hi Benoît , Thanks a lot for all the info! Most likely, JSX will work fine with these. But if there are problems in future, we have a place to link them in....
This email is to inform you of release '1.0.4.0' of 'Java Serialization for XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information can be found at...
noreply@...
Sep 9, 2002 1:29 pm
1308
Hi Ralph, Thanks a lot for your bug report! ... Sorry to take so long to reply! The bug you reported was due to primitive char fields not being escaped ...
Hi all, I'd like your opinion on something, and also to set you a challenge... OPINION: Is it important to you that JSX can serialize object whose class does...
Here is the challenge! There's a bit of background to explain first, about how Serialization works with subclassing a class that isn't serializable, and the...
What are other pros/cons of keeping it/removing it? Am I correct in thinking that removing the ability to serialize non-serializable Objects will greatly...
Hanasaki JiJi
hanasaki@...
Sep 11, 2002 6:17 am
1312
(Here it is again, with nicer formatting) CHALLENGE: There is a slightly esoteric rule in serialization, that comes into play when you take a non-serializable...
Hi, ... No, unfortunately... JSX doesn't do any special tricks to be able to do this - it's quite easy. Therefore, there will be absolutely no observable...
Hi, Attached and appended is some code and results that show that JSX and JOS *do* give different results for the case where a Serializable class extends a ...
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Brendan Macmillan wrote: hello *! ... you raise a very difficuly question here. people have to decide wether they want full-magic...
Raimund 'Raimi' Jacob
raimi@...
Sep 11, 2002 7:01 am
1316
Hi Raimi, ... Good points. The only way to tell how many of each is to ask them... ... Yes, but I prefer small tools, that do one job well....
I remember people having posted, in the past, that they rely on JSX serializing non-java.io.Serializable classes, so I think some effort should be taken to...
Hi Brendan, Have you fixed the problem with serializing a DecimalFormat which used to arise from an "illegal" character when looking at an XML file in IE6? I ...
Thanks Mark, Raimi and Hanasaki for your replies! It's a pity we didn't get anyone using JSX in production to say that they need non-"Serializeable" objects to...
... Yes - but not released yet. Will be in the next release (perhaps tommorrow). ... Your code got better? ;-) That's very funny! I think it might be a case...
Hi, An example which stopped me in my tracks when I was starting my development was the inability to serialize java.awt.geom.GeneralPath (honestly it is or was...
Hi, ... Some fresh gcj+JSX news: A simple patch to compile with GCJ (replace the instance block by a private method called in each constructor). blabla......
Hi Mike, Thanks a lot for your comments! ... I think your example shows that it is definitely a useful feature, on occasion. But not vitally useful all the...
Hi Brendan, Are you going to put in a thing in your Config class to handle the serialize everything case? Perhaps you could include a doc file for Config in...
... Documentation is a good idea, but not yet. Also, the "serialize everything case" would work implicitly, in the way Mark C suggested, and so wouldn't need ...
This email is to inform you of release '1.0.4.1' of 'Java Serialization for XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information can be found at...
noreply@...
Sep 13, 2002 5:58 am
1327
We switch back and forth between JOS and JSX. Sometimes we're surprised when JOS stops working, because JSX is so forgiving. It might be nice to have a...
[Forwarded from an off-list email] ... OK, I assume your applet is running Java 1.2 or higher. The applet viewer/browser (or whatever) will need to have this...
Hi Bill, ... Yes, I've found that, too, in tests that compare JSX and JOS. It's annoying... and yet, it's the JOS that is annoying! ;-) ... I think strict is...
This email is to inform you of release '1.0.4.2' of 'Java Serialization for XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information can be found at...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
