Hi Mike, Thanks a lot for your comments! ... I think your example shows that it is definitely a useful feature, on occasion. But not vitally useful all the...
1322
Benoît Sibaud
oumph
Sep 12, 2002 9:55 pm
Hi, ... Some fresh gcj+JSX news: A simple patch to compile with GCJ (replace the instance block by a private method called in each constructor). blabla......
1321
Mike Goldwater
m_h_goldwater
Sep 12, 2002 7:12 pm
Hi, An example which stopped me in my tracks when I was starting my development was the inability to serialize java.awt.geom.GeneralPath (honestly it is or was...
1320
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 12, 2002 8:41 am
... Yes - but not released yet. Will be in the next release (perhaps tommorrow). ... Your code got better? ;-) That's very funny! I think it might be a case...
1319
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 12, 2002 7:51 am
Thanks Mark, Raimi and Hanasaki for your replies! It's a pity we didn't get anyone using JSX in production to say that they need non-"Serializeable" objects to...
1318
Mike Goldwater
m_h_goldwater
Sep 12, 2002 7:44 am
Hi Brendan, Have you fixed the problem with serializing a DecimalFormat which used to arise from an "illegal" character when looking at an XML file in IE6? I ...
1317
Mark Collette
mark_collette
Sep 11, 2002 10:59 pm
I remember people having posted, in the past, that they rely on JSX serializing non-java.io.Serializable classes, so I think some effort should be taken to...
1316
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 11, 2002 7:45 am
Hi Raimi, ... Good points. The only way to tell how many of each is to ask them... ... Yes, but I prefer small tools, that do one job well....
1315
Raimund 'Raimi...
raimi@...
Sep 11, 2002 7:01 am
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Brendan Macmillan wrote: hello *! ... you raise a very difficuly question here. people have to decide wether they want full-magic...
1314
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 11, 2002 6:36 am
Hi, Attached and appended is some code and results that show that JSX and JOS *do* give different results for the case where a Serializable class extends a ...
1313
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 11, 2002 6:27 am
Hi, ... No, unfortunately... JSX doesn't do any special tricks to be able to do this - it's quite easy. Therefore, there will be absolutely no observable...
1312
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 11, 2002 6:18 am
(Here it is again, with nicer formatting) CHALLENGE: There is a slightly esoteric rule in serialization, that comes into play when you take a non-serializable...
1311
Hanasaki JiJi
hanasaki@...
Sep 11, 2002 6:17 am
What are other pros/cons of keeping it/removing it? Am I correct in thinking that removing the ability to serialize non-serializable Objects will greatly...
1310
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 11, 2002 6:16 am
Here is the challenge! There's a bit of background to explain first, about how Serialization works with subclassing a class that isn't serializable, and the...
1309
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 11, 2002 5:55 am
Hi all, I'd like your opinion on something, and also to set you a challenge... OPINION: Is it important to you that JSX can serialize object whose class does...
1308
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 11, 2002 2:22 am
Hi Ralph, Thanks a lot for your bug report! ... Sorry to take so long to reply! The bug you reported was due to primitive char fields not being escaped ...
1307
noreply@...
Sep 9, 2002 1:29 pm
This email is to inform you of release '1.0.4.0' of 'Java Serialization for XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information can be found at...
1306
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 9, 2002 9:41 am
Hi Benoît , Thanks a lot for all the info! Most likely, JSX will work fine with these. But if there are problems in future, we have a place to link them in....
1305
Benoît Sibaud
oumph
Sep 7, 2002 8:40 pm
Hi, ... With gcj 3.2 and JSX 1.0.3.1 (*) 8<--------------------------------------------------- $ ./a.out java.specification.version=1.3 ...
1304
Alex Lennon
alexjlennon
Sep 6, 2002 8:51 am
Can you check this out and get back to Brendan on the results? Also - some time back I submitted a patch to support the J9 VM (the class field thing). Can you...
1303
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 6, 2002 7:57 am
Hi David (resent for benefit of the list - also a better version display snippet), ... Great! Since we're looking at making JSX work nicely with another...
1302
JSX-ideas@yahoogroups...
Sep 4, 2002 7:27 pm
JSX FAQ - 14 November 2001 ======= JSX instantly XML-enables applications, by re-implementing the Serialization API for XML. FAQ Contents: (1). Background (2)....
1301
Brendan Macmillan
egroups_yow
Sep 4, 2002 3:45 am
Hi Shine, I just checked over this old email from you, about XMLEncoder (see below) In it, you say that XMLEncoder cannot work, because much information is...
1300
Mike Goldwater
m_h_goldwater
Aug 30, 2002 10:40 am
Hi Bill, ... I have already found a copy amongst my e-mails. Thanks. Regards Mike _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos...
1299
wnreynolds
Aug 30, 2002 6:29 am
Mike - what is it you need? A copy of the jar? -bill ... not ... supply with ... jvm but ... alone other ... y......
1298
Ralph_Hunderlach@...
elvis_untot
Aug 29, 2002 9:15 am
Hi! I am just beginning with Java and stumbled over JSX. The the new Mozilla* had a problem with the .xml file which was generated. code, .xml and error are in...
1297
Mike Goldwater
m_h_goldwater
Aug 27, 2002 10:51 am
Hi Bill, Brendan has asked me to test your new version of JSX. (I have so far not seen any problems not of my own making with it). Please can you supply with a...
1296
Bill Reynolds
wnreynolds
Aug 17, 2002 7:51 am
JSX 1.0.3.1 doesn't work under 1.4. All of the java.io.* specific stuff changed under 1.4, so the 1.3 code, which relies on the internal details of the java.io...
1295
JSX-ideas@yahoogroups...
Aug 4, 2002 12:51 pm
JSX FAQ - 14 November 2001 ======= JSX instantly XML-enables applications, by re-implementing the Serialization API for XML. FAQ Contents: (1). Background (2)....
1294
egroups_yow
Aug 3, 2002 8:31 am
Hi JSX users, Due to the recent economic downturn, prices have been halved for the JSX commercial licenses (GPL use remains free): $ 495 USD for the current...
