Lets say for example I have: class foo1 { String a; String b; } and I have literally hundreds of different objects of class foo1 serialised to different XML...
Good Morning All. I have two issues that I am hoping someone can help us address. We purchased JSX around 9 months ago and have been very happy but have ...
Hi James, We should be able to fix these hassles up quickly. Expired: I just checked the purchase version now, and confirmed that it is working normally (ie....
Hi James, Did the current download work for you? When you get a chance, could you send the version info that JSX outputs. I need the exact strings to be able...
Sorry. I went a reply via email last week but looks like it never made it into the system. Here is a copy of that email: Here is the message from JSX while...
This email is to inform you about the release of version '2.2.5.3' of 'Java Serialization to XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information...
noreply@...
Jan 1, 2007 3:19 pm
2173
Hi Stephen, "serialPersistentFields" is the approach I was talking about. Here's an example: ...
This email is to inform you about the release of version '2.2.5.4' of 'Java Serialization to XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information...
noreply@...
Jan 8, 2007 8:01 am
2175
This email is to inform you about the release of version '2.2.5.5' of 'Java Serialization to XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information...
noreply@...
Jan 15, 2007 2:21 pm
2176
This email is to inform you about the release of version '2.2.5.6' of 'Java Serialization to XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information...
noreply@...
Jan 31, 2007 2:17 pm
2177
We have a site license for JSX. We have upgraded our project to JDK1.6.0 and now JSX is complaining. Does JSX continue to operate properly despite the message?...
Hi Duncan, Thanks for posting full information. ... We have not yet made JSX compatible with Java 1.6 - there is clearly a need for this now. ... It depends on...
Hi Damien, Thanks, it's good to hear what is needed. It's the time for Java 1.6 (your enterprise license will cover this, regardless of the work involved). ...
This email is to inform you about the release of version '2.2.6.0' of 'Java Serialization to XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information...
noreply@...
Feb 26, 2007 2:15 pm
2182
... Just to confirm: the just released version of JSX is compatible with Java 1.6, and it is free for you because your license covers all 2.2.* version of JSX....
Hello, I am working on a GPL project which uses the old GPL JSX version, how coud ... is: implVendor='Sun Microsystems Inc.' specVersion='1.5' ...
Juan Carlos Sanchez R...
tupijallegar@...
Jun 22, 2007 8:28 am
2184
Hi, Officially, we don't support the GPL version, and work stopped on the GPL codebase before Java 1.5 was released. (The commercial version of course supports...
Hi Edison, You can customize the JSX serialization of the class using the standard techniques as for JOS (Java Object Serialization). See below. But first, let...
Hi Ed, A simple first test is to try it with JOS (ie. replace JSX.ObjectWriter with java.io.ObjectOutputStream and equivalent for reading) JSX emulates JOS, so...
Hi Ed, OK, I've just had a look at the attachments, and I don't see any obvious problems. Because JOS behaves the same as JSX, it sounds like a bug in the code...
[forwarded on behalf of Paul] Hello, I am developing a Java program I plan on distributing, and it needs Object Serialization. I need to use JDK version 1.6...
[forwarded on behalf of Daniel] Hi, JSX stops us from upgrading from JDK 1.6.0_05 to JDK 1.6.0_07 and JDK 1.6.0_10. When will you provide an upgrade of the...
[forwarded from Joël] Dear Sir, Dear Madam, We are using JSX 2.2.3.8 (full version) and encountered problems with recent Sun JRE (early revisions of 1.5 and...