Hi Marti, ... know if ... parsing ... display an ... Thanks a lot for your post - I'm not 100% on Exception handling, and you make the issues very clear. Your...
710
JSX-ideas@yahoogroups...
Oct 1, 2001 7:26 pm
The following JSX-ideas poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: For the developer: what features would make it easier for you to...
711
Marti DeMore
Martha.D.DeMore@...
Oct 2, 2001 2:15 am
I'll give 0.9.0.3 a try Tuesday morning and see how the exception behavior fits for me. One of the biggest problems I had was when I changed the name of a...
712
bren@...
Oct 2, 2001 2:56 am
Hi Marti, ... You raise a central conumdrum for schema evolution. The behaviour you describe (silent failure) is what binary serialization does, too. (I just...
713
oysteins2001@...
Oct 2, 2001 10:08 am
... attributes ... to JSX, in ... and exclude ... layer - ... it is etc? ... is valuable. ... Hi! Sorry for the late response. It took some time for me to...
714
Mark Woodman
mwoodman@...
Oct 2, 2001 2:19 pm
Hey Bren, Do I get my name in lights for catching the internal class $ XML bug? -- (the other) Mark...
715
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 2:37 am
... bug? YES! Sorry to not have done so earlier - that issue sparked such debate that it distracted giving credit where credit was due. Please, anyone else...
716
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 2:42 am
Hi Andreas, Sorry not to reply sooner - I'll try to check out this problem today. Thanks for spotting this area where JSX is not mimicking binary serialization...
717
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 2:48 am
Hi Merten, Thanks for picking up this bug and reporting it. Sorry for the delay in replying! I will need some time to check out your code - I will try to do...
718
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 7:45 am
Thanks very much to all who voted in the poll! It makes a big difference, to be aware of how important these issues are. Many have already been addressed: ...
719
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 8:04 am
Dear "potential licensee of the JSX technology", JSX is almost 100% complete - to reward those who can see the commercial value of the JSX technology, the...
720
mccusker@...
Oct 3, 2001 8:54 pm
If the userObject is anything more complex than a String, it's not saved. The objects themselves are saved in other places, but aren't identified within the...
721
bren@...
Oct 4, 2001 12:10 am
Hi Jim, Thanks a lot for your bug report. JSX had DefaultMutableTreeNode working perfectly many months ago - you may have found a regression bug that has been...
722
Thomas Hiller
thomas.hiller@...
Oct 4, 2001 8:33 am
When I write out a string containing the Euro sign (\u20ac), I only see a "?" character instead of the Unicode sequence. Should JSX not take care about...
723
bren@...
Oct 4, 2001 9:05 am
Hi Thomas, Thanks a lot for this bug report. ... Yes, it should. Perhaps it is my terminal setup, but I do see the Euro symbol (at least, I *think* it's the...
724
mccusker@...
Oct 4, 2001 2:28 pm
... BTW, I've worked around the problem. My object doesn't implement Serializable. That must be it. So I guess you use the Serializable interface where...
725
bren@...
Oct 5, 2001 2:31 am
Hi Jim, ... No - it's nothing to do with JSX. DefaultMutableTreeNode takes control of its own serialization - it implements writeObject() and readObject()....
726
bren@...
Oct 5, 2001 12:31 pm
Hi Merten, Your bug report was certainly challenging! The cause was imperfect Exception handling in JSX, which is getting a lot of attention recently (due to...
727
noreply@...
Oct 5, 2001 2:21 pm
This email is to inform you of release '0.9.1.1' of 'Java Serialization to XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information can be found at...
728
Patrick D O'Hara
pdohara@...
Oct 5, 2001 5:07 pm
I have an unusual Serialization problem that I think JSX can solve. We use TypeSafeConstants which are classes that emulate enumerations from C++. Here is an...
729
bren@...
Oct 6, 2001 8:08 am
Hi Patrick, ... Yes, JSX can help here: add a "readResolve" method to your class, which checks the *value* of the object deserialized, and returns the actual...
730
bren@...
Oct 6, 2001 11:20 am
Hi Andreas, Sorry to take so long to tackle your bug report - there's quite a bit of setup time. Firstly, yes, classloading has been a problem ... I couldn't...
731
bren@...
Oct 7, 2001 5:58 am
Hi Andreas, ... [...snip...] ... problem? OK, after many hours, I am finally able to reproduce the problem! I'm not very familiar with classloading (only...
732
bren@...
Oct 7, 2001 6:18 am
Hi again Andreas, Thanks for the initial diagnosis - though the behaviour of the two seems to be the opposite way around. That is, standard serialization uses...
733
stonehenge1966@...
Oct 8, 2001 1:02 pm
Hi, I was wondering whether the no-argument constructor is called upon deserialization of an object? I have a transient eventListenerList inside a class to be...
734
bren@...
Oct 8, 2001 1:20 pm
Hi Chris, ... No, JSX never calls the constructors of objects. ... Yes, that sounds right. This is the same behaviour as Java's own serialization. If you do...
735
bren@...
Oct 8, 2001 1:21 pm
... is...
736
bren@...
Oct 8, 2001 2:54 pm
Hi Andreas, I sure hope you are getting all these replies! I can see how to emulate the standard Serialization approach; but it doesn't work, and I can't...
737
ciminop@...
Oct 8, 2001 7:49 pm
I'm not sure if this is a bug or is the latest 0.9.1.1 distribution incomplete. I get this error with any ObjIn constructor, even the default:: java -cp...
738
bren@...
Oct 9, 2001 3:02 am
... It looks like you are using JDK1.4 beta - JSX doesn't work with this yet. You need to use JDK1.3 or JDK1.2. JDK1.4 support will come, but other work on...
