Hi Marti, ... know if ... parsing ... display an ... Thanks a lot for your post - I'm not 100% on Exception handling, and you make the issues very clear. Your...
bren@...
Oct 1, 2001 1:46 pm
710
The following JSX-ideas poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: For the developer: what features would make it easier for you to...
JSX-ideas@yahoogroups...
Oct 1, 2001 7:26 pm
711
I'll give 0.9.0.3 a try Tuesday morning and see how the exception behavior fits for me. One of the biggest problems I had was when I changed the name of a...
Marti DeMore
Martha.D.DeMore@...
Oct 2, 2001 2:15 am
712
Hi Marti, ... You raise a central conumdrum for schema evolution. The behaviour you describe (silent failure) is what binary serialization does, too. (I just...
bren@...
Oct 2, 2001 2:56 am
713
... attributes ... to JSX, in ... and exclude ... layer - ... it is etc? ... is valuable. ... Hi! Sorry for the late response. It took some time for me to...
oysteins2001@...
Oct 2, 2001 10:08 am
714
Hey Bren, Do I get my name in lights for catching the internal class $ XML bug? -- (the other) Mark...
Mark Woodman
mwoodman@...
Oct 2, 2001 2:19 pm
715
... bug? YES! Sorry to not have done so earlier - that issue sparked such debate that it distracted giving credit where credit was due. Please, anyone else...
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 2:37 am
716
Hi Andreas, Sorry not to reply sooner - I'll try to check out this problem today. Thanks for spotting this area where JSX is not mimicking binary serialization...
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 2:42 am
717
Hi Merten, Thanks for picking up this bug and reporting it. Sorry for the delay in replying! I will need some time to check out your code - I will try to do...
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 2:48 am
718
Thanks very much to all who voted in the poll! It makes a big difference, to be aware of how important these issues are. Many have already been addressed: ...
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 7:45 am
719
Dear "potential licensee of the JSX technology", JSX is almost 100% complete - to reward those who can see the commercial value of the JSX technology, the...
bren@...
Oct 3, 2001 8:04 am
720
If the userObject is anything more complex than a String, it's not saved. The objects themselves are saved in other places, but aren't identified within the...
mccusker@...
Oct 3, 2001 8:54 pm
721
Hi Jim, Thanks a lot for your bug report. JSX had DefaultMutableTreeNode working perfectly many months ago - you may have found a regression bug that has been...
bren@...
Oct 4, 2001 12:10 am
722
When I write out a string containing the Euro sign (\u20ac), I only see a "?" character instead of the Unicode sequence. Should JSX not take care about...
Thomas Hiller
thomas.hiller@...
Oct 4, 2001 8:33 am
723
Hi Thomas, Thanks a lot for this bug report. ... Yes, it should. Perhaps it is my terminal setup, but I do see the Euro symbol (at least, I *think* it's the...
bren@...
Oct 4, 2001 9:05 am
724
... BTW, I've worked around the problem. My object doesn't implement Serializable. That must be it. So I guess you use the Serializable interface where...
mccusker@...
Oct 4, 2001 2:28 pm
725
Hi Jim, ... No - it's nothing to do with JSX. DefaultMutableTreeNode takes control of its own serialization - it implements writeObject() and readObject()....
bren@...
Oct 5, 2001 2:31 am
726
Hi Merten, Your bug report was certainly challenging! The cause was imperfect Exception handling in JSX, which is getting a lot of attention recently (due to...
bren@...
Oct 5, 2001 12:31 pm
727
This email is to inform you of release '0.9.1.1' of 'Java Serialization to XML' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information can be found at...
noreply@...
Oct 5, 2001 2:21 pm
728
I have an unusual Serialization problem that I think JSX can solve. We use TypeSafeConstants which are classes that emulate enumerations from C++. Here is an...
Patrick D O'Hara
pdohara@...
Oct 5, 2001 5:07 pm
729
Hi Patrick, ... Yes, JSX can help here: add a "readResolve" method to your class, which checks the *value* of the object deserialized, and returns the actual...
bren@...
Oct 6, 2001 8:08 am
730
Hi Andreas, Sorry to take so long to tackle your bug report - there's quite a bit of setup time. Firstly, yes, classloading has been a problem ... I couldn't...
bren@...
Oct 6, 2001 11:20 am
731
Hi Andreas, ... [...snip...] ... problem? OK, after many hours, I am finally able to reproduce the problem! I'm not very familiar with classloading (only...
bren@...
Oct 7, 2001 5:58 am
732
Hi again Andreas, Thanks for the initial diagnosis - though the behaviour of the two seems to be the opposite way around. That is, standard serialization uses...
bren@...
Oct 7, 2001 6:18 am
733
Hi, I was wondering whether the no-argument constructor is called upon deserialization of an object? I have a transient eventListenerList inside a class to be...
stonehenge1966@...
Oct 8, 2001 1:02 pm
734
Hi Chris, ... No, JSX never calls the constructors of objects. ... Yes, that sounds right. This is the same behaviour as Java's own serialization. If you do...
bren@...
Oct 8, 2001 1:20 pm
735
... is...
bren@...
Oct 8, 2001 1:21 pm
736
Hi Andreas, I sure hope you are getting all these replies! I can see how to emulate the standard Serialization approach; but it doesn't work, and I can't...
bren@...
Oct 8, 2001 2:54 pm
737
I'm not sure if this is a bug or is the latest 0.9.1.1 distribution incomplete. I get this error with any ObjIn constructor, even the default:: java -cp...
ciminop@...
Oct 8, 2001 7:49 pm
738
... It looks like you are using JDK1.4 beta - JSX doesn't work with this yet. You need to use JDK1.3 or JDK1.2. JDK1.4 support will come, but other work on...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
