On vie, 2005-10-28 at 00:45 +0200, Marco Pantaleoni wrote:
> Hi,
> I've added support to jal for cpp-like preprocessors (cpp, gpp, ...).
> This essentialy allows to write macros using #define (and correctly handle
> line numbers when using #include). gpp also has some extensions to cpp that
> can be useful with jal (like user-definable comment syntax, immediate macro
> evaluation, ...).
> I attach the unified diff patch agains the cvs version of jal.
> I hope that this could be useful to someone else beside me.
>
> Cheers,
> Marco
>
Hi, I've added support to jal for cpp-like preprocessors (cpp, gpp, ...). This essentialy allows to write macros using #define (and correctly handle line...
... Hi Javier, I apologize for the late answer, but I've been out of town. ... of course. The main use of preprocessor support in jal is to write macros, short...
... I've added that switch. Now if you run jal with the "-P" switch, it will invoke cpp for you. Compiling the example of the previous message would become: $...
Hi Marco, Sorry, I've been busy. ;) Just 2 questions. The main one: seems that needs an external C preprocessor, isn't it? This will be useless for 95% of...
... Yes, but if someone doesn't need it, he can just ignore it. One possible solution could be to selective enable the preprocessor support when running the...
Hi Marco, ... Yes, but what about sharing code? These macro functions will make JAL "other" language (JAL-cpp vs JAL), that is you'll not able to share code ...
... You are right, it would impede code sharing. I think of this feature as a "sharp knife", to be used exclusively when unavoidable, but I understand that ...
... hello Marco, Javi, As a non-C-programmer, I cann't understand the full extend / consequences of this C-isch macro implementation, but here a few remarks: ...
... I agree, but while on unix-like systems a pre-processor is (almost) always present, on other systems (windows), it is not. I'm not interested in windows ...
Hi all, ... Marco, you hit in the bulls eye. Ask in the jallist how many of them have a C compiler to build latest JAL sources .... ... and now think that...
... Yes, I understand. ... This sounds great! Thanks. In the meantime I'll try to come to a more integrated solution. I'll keep you posted. Cheers, Marco -- ...
Hi all, Available patches in jal.sf.net: ID Summary 1352435 10Fxxx support 1352433 Preprocessor support 1118846 JAL 16F648 Extensions Regards, Javi....