hi JAll, I'm still working on the SM-bus (Simple Measurement Bus, it's a pure coincidence that these are also my initials ;-). At the moment I've good results...
... Wouter that sounds great ! I would be much obliged if one of the JAL developpers could merge the "pragma raw interrupt' into a new version !! It could...
hi All, I use JAL compiler 00.04-53 (bc55), and the following code generates an error on the SECOND "pragma error" <JAL> pragma target chip 12F675 if...
... I think Javi is back, but if you use the 4.55 version I hit the first pragma. <JAL> pragma target chip 12f675 pragma target clock 20_000_000 pragma target...
... Thanks Mark, that works. I has a little trouble finding 4.55, both on Javi's site and the developpers Yahoo group the latest version was 4.54, but this...
I reviewed cvs and the released files. Below is a list of issues that need to be resolved. Please keep in mind that this isn't meant to critize any...
Craig Franklin
craigfranklin@...
May 7, 2003 3:15 am
411
Hi Craig, ... that ... Don't worry, I'm the first critizing me! I was going to answer line by line your post (thanks for it). But all my answers goes to a...
... I wouldn't tak too much of the blane Javi. The missing GPL headers, the missing my fault. The POSIX release distclean thing is partialy my doing as is...
hi All, I found a bug, both in my program and in JAL compilers (or at least an inconsistancy) <JAL> if x > 5 then </JAL> the above statement gives an...
... Apparently, you disagree with my comments about the windows package. Please elaborate....
Craig Franklin
craigfranklin@...
May 8, 2003 2:02 am
416
... I just re-read your issues. You are correct, issue 5 needs to be fixed for the windows Binary release. I thought in issue 3 you where talking about the ...
... jal-0_4_55 cvs tag has been added. I can't find a copy of the 0.4.54 source so I can't tag it. ... Fixed. I also added a few flags for linux. It generates...
Craig Franklin
craigfranklin@...
May 9, 2003 7:53 am
418
Turning on the debug tracing I see that node nr=0870 triggers the assertion. Node 0870is the + op for 'byte' type. 0870@0009 N: op + 'byte' [0] ...
does any of you, knows (briefly) which is the difference between jal04.53 and jal04.55 splitted versions ? because in jal04.53 there isn't this error. top 10...
... I do now. This problem and the issue with the build of the wisp628rh not working because of the 4.55 version of JAL makes larger images for some code is...
Well, I rolled back that one function and I've done some more testing. It seems that its better. The asm looks good, and the a = a - b bug is still fixed and...
by gum he's right. Althoug, fixing it or not is almost a no-op. The following code hits this code path (line 106 of parser.c from the CVS code tree) c = ( 10...
I finally created a BASH shell script for running the test suite that is in the Source Forge CVS. That DOS batch file set was driving me crazy. Its a starting...
My Jal produced in incorrect length field in the .hex file for 18F eeprom data. XWisp ignores this error, but MPLAB/PS+ has chokes on it. I think I corrected...
I can merge this into the SF tree if you like. What function is do these 4 lines of changes go into? Also, I curious. Do you have other tweaks do you have...
Hi Mark, ... ... What I remember this is not new. There are to diferent cases here: - Make the correct asm code. - There's still a bug in my changes that...
Hi Mark, Tell me what's the situation now, after some days missing I'm missed. :-( I think that we need to check this with the other type of variables ...
... yes. I've been working more on proving regression status of the CVS JAL and I backed out a change you made to one function becuase it seemed to cause ...
I just double checked the behavior of the Linux GCC, Cygwin-GCC and the MSVC build of the the CVS tips and they all assert in codegen.c. Only it now asserts at...
Hi Mark, Compiled in minGW, it's "jal 0.4.54 (GCC 3.2)". Is this correct? Take exe file from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/files/jal.exe ... and...
I removed rtllibrary.c a few days ago. It was an empty file. A comment said its data was moved to another file. This is an inherent problem with having...
Craig Franklin
craigfranklin@...
May 24, 2003 6:46 pm
433
The version in the CVS prints jal 0.4.55 (GCC 3.2) not 0.4.54. I'll try you exe when I get a chance later, I'm on my Linux box at the moment. --mgross...
... Thats ok, its not a big deal. ... Its an MSVC'ism, that isn't fixible through the config scrips. Its also not a big deal. I'll fix it monday, I bet I...