I've checked out the teps and there is no new regressions over the 4_55 release. The following things have been done so far: * GPL headers to the code *...
... I spoke too soon. We have one new regression. t0111.jal no longer compiles. ... Any ideas? [mgross@bp6 src]$ jal -cA f877_20 t0111.jal jal 0.4.56 (GCC...
Hi ... Of course I am NOT the root operator on my ISP unix account and I never will be. Still, I think it should be possible to compile and install the JAL ...
Hi After failure @ my ISP, I managed to checkout Jal under cygwin, configure, make and install it. Make did generate some 7 screenfuls of warnings. Anyone ...
The source that failed to compile must have been from the File Release area. That package was built incorrectly, so several of the files have the wrong...
Craig Franklin
craigfranklin@...
Jun 1, 2003 7:50 pm
485
... ??? I did a CVS checkout, configure, make, make install. The jal source file is some file that has been altered by a lot of people but should not give...
... It seems that they arn't going to let you run make. Will they allow you to run gcc? If so cd to where the jal.c file is and do a gcc -o jal *.c If you get...
... What version are you building this jpic628.jal file with? I have 4 versions, old_jal (initial GPL code), jal_redone (the early split up source code),...
... This is complete abacadabra to me. I did $ cvs (some black magic pserver:etc here) checkout jal Should I do $ csv (black magic) checkout jal_4_56 ??? I've...
... The problem is that cvs jal version don't accept old libraries, needs to be executed with the libraries in cvs. The key is that we splitted an internal jal...
... I cut and paste the one from your initial email regarding this problem into a file named jpic628.jal. So I think your version is giving me problems. ...
... In the original message you state that you can't compile jal, but you didn't state the source of the files. If you try to compile the package from the...
Craig Franklin
craigfranklin@...
Jun 2, 2003 2:45 am
494
... That could explain it. Configure did report: checking for style of include used by make... none I would expect: checking for style of include used by...
Craig Franklin
craigfranklin@...
Jun 2, 2003 3:06 am
495
... There is no tag for 0.4.56 because it hasn't been released. If there was, you would do this: cvs checkout -r jal-0_4_56 jal ... That is language that Mark...
Craig Franklin
craigfranklin@...
Jun 2, 2003 5:13 am
496
... I made a second attempt with Cygwin, under Windoze. That did work. ... Compiling of a JAL file, with the correctly(?) compiled JAL executable. ... I do not...
Eur, A simple modification for multiplication can be : for x_s loop add2424(prod_s, prod_h, prod_l, y_l, 0, 0, prod_s, prod_h, prod_l) end loop for x_h loop ...
add2424 works. here is test program ... include 16f628_4 include jrtl include jpic628 pragma target fuses 0x_3f62 cmcon = 7 var byte xxx2 = 0x23 , xxx1 = 0xfa,...
24 bit integer subtraction procedure sub2424 works . here is test program ... include 16f628_4 include jrtl include jpic628 pragma target fuses 0x_3f62 cmcon =...
We have one regression to solve, or chose to not solve until the next release. Test program t0111.jal now fails to compile, from the comment in the t0111.jal ...
Hi Mark, This is the mayor change I made for sub involved operators with 12F cores, and of course the source of our headache. I can write a laarge email with...
I understand most of this, and I have for a while now that isn't my issue. My problems are; 1) why does a Pic12 specific change have to wripple into...
... Javi, sorry I can't follow this thread, and I cann't follow the above statement ???? I guess 12F629 and 12F675 are both "12F-core" ?? And the documentation...
I am not an expert but just a simple user. When I started with JAL I discovered that (some) libraries can't be mixed, that JAL 4.50 behaves differently than...
pic12 refers to 12-bit core PICs, like the 12C509. In its infinite wisdom Microchip decided to use the '12' designation for 8 pin chips (that is, for 12 and 14...
... Because the Pic12 cores problem it's derived from the bug in a = b - c That is if "x" it's a var and "c" can be a literal or a var (2 literals are computed...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
