KARL JASPERS FORUM, TA111 (Beamish), Comment. 5 (to R4 by peter Beamish)
CONSERVATION --- by Dr. Serge Patlavskiy, 11/23/2008, posted 11/26/2008.
[All [square brackets] as such, are new comments by 'peter' and "CETA."]

- - - - - [Lines 48-51 ** seem: significant, critical, vital!] - - - - -

{1} <peter B.> wrote: "Mass does not move faster than the speed of light
in vacua. Energy does not move faster than the speed of light in vacua."

{2} <Serge P.> "To move" means to change one's position IN REFERENCE to
a point which is taken to be fixed. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Agree.]

{3} As to the energy, it does not need to move at all since it is always
as if "already there". - - - - - - - - - [For all energies -> disagree.]
I mean that there is nothing like vacuum in sense "devoid of everything
including energy". - [Agree as all space appears filled with particles.]
Instead of the vacuum we should talk about the "optimally energized
space", or something like that. - [All space contains some Mass/Energy.]
"Somethingness" & "nothingness" are deviations from that optimality. [?]

{4} [An] -object may disappear in one point of space and instantaneously
appear in some other point of space. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [???]
(It may even disappear in the present, and appear in the past, or in the
future). [Impossible! One cannot GO backwards in "Conventional time, t!]

{5} According to the mentioned above law of conservation, if the areas
of space which are characterized as "nothingness" [But there are none!!]
- this will force - (material bodies, planets, stars) - to attract each
other - - - - - - - - - - [Such is mainly the impact of gravity, Serge!]
Reality -- it is a totality of "somethingness" and "nothingness" - [???]

{6} <peter B.> wrote: But mind is a volume, neither composed of mass, or
energy but defined by motion of "Mental Vector Processes, MVPs," travel-
ling inwards in "Conventional time, t," and, ANALYSED by mental thoughts
outwards in the reverse of "t." - - - [Please note: Concept "ANALYSED."]

{7} <Serge> I would like to second this idea by and large, since I be-
lieve that we should make [a] difference between the movement of light &
the propagation of information. - - [SOME information propagates by Mass
&/or Energy. OTHER information ** is "Encoded In Rhythm Based Time, T."]

The last may be instantaneous, and may even be sent as to the past, so
into the future. ["<ALL REAL TIME IS NOW TIME>" ("RBC Concept #57). "The
past and future" are "TEMPORAL SCALAR LABELS," made of Mass and Energy.]

[There exist ONLY 2 KNOWN PHENOMENA: 1) Mass/Energy & 2) Information **.
The following is a "CETA" immense paradigm shift, experimentally proven:
** There seem 2 forms of information: 1) Mass/Energy moving in t = "con-
ventional time," & 2) Mass/Energy COMBINED WITH "T = Rhythm Based Time,"
AND, the latter COMBINATION may be a "null signal," with NO Mass/Energy,
OR, it may be such information INDEPENDENT OF ANY SPECIFIC MASS/ENERGY!]

Sincerely, 'peter' c. beamish, ph.d., director, "CETA-Research," Canada.
"CETA" is: "CommunicaTions Et (And) 'TEMPS (TIME = t + T)' AssociaTion."