Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
KMTech
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: REALITY - "REAL (Mental) TIMES" as Scalars: A Debate with Drs.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #2963 of 2992 |
Re: REALITY - "REAL (Mental) TIMES" as Scalars: A Debate with Drs. Boyd & Klein

Dr. Akira Kanda [time] wrote: - - [Comments in "[xx]," + 5 line ending.]
Hello ['peter'], - - - - - - - - - - [Reply is 54 lines or 1 page side.]
I still have difficulty in the energy, momentum, force etc. mentioned in
your quote. [Our quotation was that "REAL TIME" is a scalar label trans-
ported TO a mind, BY "A Mass &/or An Energy Vector," creating an "MVP."]

These concepts are defined in terms of time and mass and not vice versa
as the dimensional analysis shows. [No!! Velocity is defined in terms of
a displacement divided by "a duration," and, NOT divided by "REAL TIME!"
And, "a duration" is a difference between two, "temporal scalar labels."
And, "momentum" is defined in terms of mass together with its velocity.]

[AND, "REAL TIME IS NOW TIME (Essos)" AS DETERMINED BY A RECEIVING MIND.
AND, ALL OTHER "TEMPORAL CONCEPTS" ARE MERELY "TEMPORAL SCALAR LABELS."]

Dimensional analysis shows the hierarchy of concepts involved in theo-
retical physics. [There may be a duration hierarchy, but this is not re-
lated to "REAL TIME" or "NOW TIME," which is fundamental to biophysics.]

I trust that this is where modern physics failed as it violated this
hierarchy. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Interesting!!]

- but time and space are definitely most fundamental. - - - - - [Agree!]

After all mathematics & physics are different things. [And the 20th cen-
tury physics of time differs from: "A 21ST CENTURY BIOPHYSICS OF TIME."]

From physics point of view, Minkowski's theory is a meaningless general
abstract nonsense. [Space = vector, time = scalar, use "time-in-space".]

Relativity theory, Quantum Physics, the standard model, string theory -.
None of them are of mathematical significance either. [With "ALL TIME IS
NOW TIME," we may need to modify the temporal aspects of such theories!]

From: [time] "Peace and science" to Dr. Atso, posted Dec. 15th, 18:35 h.

For me, a "reactionary" space has a most fundamental place and then time
has a basic place which is not symmetric to space. - [Scalar time labels
exist everywhere "in space" where there exist clocks, & said recordings.
Recall that there are "zillions" of clocks, in "our world!" And beyond?]

- I have no theory of time & space. [Try "RBC Theory" *** which has been
found to be what "The Great Whales" use, for low stress communications.]

- I am not an expert of time, but it seems to me that this concept is
still very debatable even within theoretical physics. [Both conventional
time t, as well as "Rhythm Based Time T," when real, are not readings ON
a clock, but instead are: "Scalar Label Mental Readings OF Said Clock."]

Sincerely, 'peter' c. beamish, ph.d., director, "CETA-Research," Canada.
For details of "MVPs" see < http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13163 >.
*** Major "RBC" Concepts at: <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/14607>
"A New Definition of Mind:" <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13743>.
2 page glossary is @ http://www.animalcontact.com/research/glossary.html




Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:30 am

drpeterbeamish
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #2963 of 2992 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Robert Neil Boyd writes: You might be interested in this article, which describes the unification of time with gravitation and electromagnetism. - - - - - <...
peter beamish
drpeterbeamish
Offline Send Email
Dec 15, 2008
7:07 pm

Dr. Akira Kanda [time] wrote: - - [Comments in "[xx]," + 5 line ending.] Hello ['peter'], - - - - - - - - - - [Reply is 54 lines or 1 page side.] I still have...
peter beamish
drpeterbeamish
Offline Send Email
Dec 16, 2008
10:30 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help