Hola Jim et al!

Yes, I think Bushman and I had emailed way back in the past...he's been
at it a long time...don't know about some of it...watched most of the
clip but not the whole thing and taking notes..have to find time for it..

not so sure a nuclear reactor could be effectively shielded for a flying
machine but hey, if they can do it on a sub, should be possible on a
plane/saucer if you can get past the weight of the shielding material.

Along the lines of Bushman's experiments;

You might remember Don Kelly out in Florida? He publishes a free energy
newsletter called SEA (Space Energy Association) and he did gravity drop
experiments that had interesting results;

http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_6_2_8.html
http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_5_7_5.html

"Several years ago Don Kelly invented an incredibly interesting gravity
experiment. A special arrangement of magnets and coils fell slower in
drop experiments when the special coils were energized. With all of the
interest in the 1/2% to 2% changes in gravity by various rotating
superconductors, why is there not an equivalent interest in Kelly's
gravity drop experiments?"
--------------------
Comments on Gravity Drop Tests performed by Donald A. Kelly of
Clearwater, Florida

http://www.hasslberger.com/phy/phy_3.htm
--------------------
http://www.mail-archive.com/interact@listserv.capital-master.com/msg00311.html

6) Another physics test might be to duplicate Don Kelly's gravity drop
experiments where he used mobius/caduceus coils inside identical boxes.
He dropped these boxes mechanically over a fixed distance to get the
average fall time. Then he connected a battery to the coil and noted
that THE BOXES FELL SLOWER when the circuit was powered. You could use
a pulse generator and compare many different arrangements. That would
blow them away if you take all precautions and use statistical averages
with as much reliable mechanical drop components and photo detectors to
be triggered to calculate fall times under different circumstances.

Nick Nelson, who used to work at the Oregon Vortex, wrote a book called
'The Golden Vortex' where he describes some of the anomalies he
investigated. He says he learned how to create a vortex phenomenon just
about anywhere and that he can create or dissipate it at will, but he
won't spill the beans as to how its done.

So if gravity is isotropic, with 'push' lines normally converging
towards the center of all masses with an intensity dependent on mass
density, yet there are areas of the planet where the inflowing lines are
weaker, we might be able to tap into it.

Perhaps this could be done using gyro precessional forces such as
Laithwaites claim of losing some 18 pounds in a rotating 50 pound
gyroscope which is lifted.

Or something like the experiments of the late Lloyd Zirbes using
dissimilar materials dropped to show a difference in velocity over
distance...or the gravity drop experiments of Don Kelly using sealed
boxes containing powered and unpowered mobius/caduceus/bifilar/toroidal
coils which showed speed variations, thus indicating 'interference' with
local gravity flows towards the earth.
--------------------
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=2420.msg340121;boardseen

Donald A. Kelly, an independent researcher and consultant to the Space
Energy Association in Clearwater, Florida, has been performing, from
1991 onward, an impressive series of tests that measure the behavior of
dropping weights in a magnetized or electrically energized state as
opposed to their behavior in a non-magnetized (inert) state.

Various forms of magnetization and electrical energization have been
used: Permanent magnets arranged both horizontally and vertically on
test plates, electromagnets, non-inductive "Hooper-type" windings, as
well as a combination of permanent magnets with bifilar, non-inductive
coils. The electric energization was achieved by direct current (12 Volt
DC) as well as alternating current (12 Volt 60 Hertz AC). Kelly
described his results in various reports (1).

Work on these experiments is currently continuing with a view to
investigating differences of behavior of dropping weights not only
between DC current and 60 Hertz AC, but with various other frequencies
and various wave forms of AC.
--------------------
http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/publish/article_803.shtml

And Don Kelly's gravity drop experiments showing how a
moebius, especially when energized will slow the fall
to a measurable degree. The point being there does seem to be a spin
relationship to gravity and thus a link to time.
--------------------
http://conference.worldnpa.org/index.php?turn_page=84&module=pagemaster&PAGE_use\
r_op=view_page&PAGE_id=9&MMN_position=9:5

Equations for the gravitational field of a point mass moving with
constant velocity along a straight line or along a circular orbit are
derived from retarded integrals representing Newton's gravitational law
generalized to time-dependent mass distributions. It is shown that
Newton's inverse square gravitational law is only approximately valid
for gravitational fields of moving bodies. It is concluded that the
nature of Mercury's "residual" perihelion precession of 43" of arc per
cent...
--------------------
Eric Laithwaite antigravity experiment, lifting a 50 pound wheel with
one hand, appeared to float, to lose weight I remember one claim that
said when measured, this 50 pound spinning weight lost up to 18 pounds;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaOIWXqH9Io
--------------------
I also remember when we spent time with Dr. Harold Aspden in Colorado,
he said the angle of the DNA helix can produce gravity loss and be used
for free energy production;

http://www.mail-archive.com/interact@listserv.capital-master.com/msg00087.html

Now comes into play experiments holding a gyro (shaft of a spinning
bicycle wheel) by the late Eric Laithwaite and how it appeared to lose
weight AND follow a mysterious arc equivalent to the turn angle of DNA;

weight loss in a 50 pound spinning gyro;

http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_5_9_5.html

I had typed that up about Aspdens DNA angle correlation and posted it on
the now defunct eScribe archive which of course no longer exists;

http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m7392.html

As I recall, the angle was something like 32 degrees....as the spinning
gyro was lifted a series of stills were taken, then combined to plot the
arc and measure the angle degree...

Prompting Harold Aspden to suggest this angle as seen to in mechanical
rotation to match the natural incline of DNA, thus it might be a magic
angle useful for free energy and gravity control researchers.

I'll have to look all that up again and this time post it as a complete
page on KeelyNet along with this information, where it will always be
available for reference...
--------------------
http://keelynet.com/energy/inertia1.txt

One other point, Eric Laithwaite did a demonstration in front of Harold
Aspden where he took a heavy metal disk suspended on a bearing and
attached to a shaft.....you hold the shaft in both hands out in front of
you and somewhat close to the body...then while the heavy disk is
spinning, you try to life the shaft upwards......

it WON'T GO UP, it goes sideways and up, no matter how much force you
use....successive still photos of this show that the arc prescribed is
32.8 degrees, (this might not be the EXACT NUMBER, but I am quoting from
memory) which is exactly the angle found in DNA.....

Aspden thinks this angle has free energy and other
applications....anyway, thanks again for sharing your information, I
think it will make a wonderful followup file for the BBS with relation
the Kidd type precessional/inertial drives..
--------------------
http://tesla3.com/free_websites/zpe_keelynet2.html

I'd have to look up the article to see if it the mercury was ionized
into a plasma but I don't think it was. The idea being to rapidly move a
dense mass and then, like the Dean drive, stop or slow it almost to a
stop very rapidly, then rapidly accelerate it again.

RAPID NEAR STOP and RAPID START
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m299.html

Dr. Harold Aspden did an experiment which indicates that aether actually
couples to mass, like velcro hooks that seep into and hold static
masses...(my interpretation)....when the mass spins, these velcro hooks
are partially broken to allow the mass to accelerate to speed....that is
the resistance/inertia that must be overcome to get the mass spun up TO
that speed.

Essentially, he measured how much energy it took to get a mass rotating
to a certain speed....then he would bring this to a stop....he did this
over and over, to make sure the electrical energy requirement was very
nearly the same in each test. Then he brought the heavy rotating mass to
a 'near stop', then accelerated it again...when accelerated in this
fashion, it only took about 30% of the energy necessary to go from a
FULL STOP to full velocity, than it had before....he repeated this
several times and it always came out the same....it ties in very well
with Puthoffs paper on 'ZPE as the Cause of Inertia'.
--------------------
http://keelynet.com/interact/archive/00001563.htm

The surprise is that the free end of the shaft lifts with very little
effort, totally incommensurate with the 50 pound weight of the wheel.
By such lifting action, the wheel rises following a helical path with
the shaft still horizontal.

An even greater surprise is that the helix angle is 32 degrees, which
also happens to be the helix angle of type A DNA, angle 32.7 degrees.

Surely, this is one of the most basic discoveries ever made?

The spinning mass restrained only so as to precess freely about an axis
will find it can travel around a helical path centered on that axis and
do this without any particular regard for the potentials opposing its
motion.

It seems that the energy needed to overcome these potentials, for
example gravitation, is drawn from the spin energy.
--------------------
And the gravity drop experiments of the late Lloyd Zirbes;

http://www.briansbetterworld.com/books/betterworld/bookreview.html

the research of Lloyd Zirbes will have a profound effect upon
technologies brought forth by future generations of scientists, if they
become acquainted with Lloyd Zirbes' experiments, for practical
applications of his research would enable us to create communication
systems (audio and video) based upon the broadcasting of gravity instead
of electrons, anti gravitic systems for space travel, free energy
systems and the ability to rearrange the atomic structure of matter by
means of injected gravity.

All bodies, regardless of whether they are a planet or a sub atomic
particle, are in motion and are influenced by gravitational fields. In
the case of the Milky Way galaxy, the primary gravitational field is
that of the universe, whereas the sun's gravitational field influences
planet Earth.

All bodies of matter are attracted toward the center of the
gravitational field through which they move, but possessing their own
weaker gravitational fields, which offer a repulsive force to that of
the more powerful gravitational field, adopt a stable orbital path
around the source of the stronger gravitational field.

Zirbes' experiments demonstrated that as a body falls it expels a force
of extracted energy along the leading edge of the fall, which causes the
body to rotate in the direction of the extraction. This extracted energy
is expelled from the equatorial region of the body (the Bloch wall),
then flows over the surface of the body to re-enter the body at the poles.

According to Zirbes, the extracted energy is gravity. The centrifical
force exerted on the rotating body also causes an ejection of mass from
the body. Zirbes claimed that mass in motion was magnetism and that
protons and electrons were clusters of sub atomic particles in motion.

He stated that an electron was composed of eighty one such bodies while
protons and neutrons each possessed twenty two thousand individual
bodies, identical in composition to those comprising electrons. These
bodies would correspond to the gluons of quantum mechanics and explains
why a proton or ion has a much greater mass charge than an electron.

The experiments of Lloyd Zirbes and his scientific team demonstrated
that a rotating body expels extracted energy that forms a field which we
call gravity, the strength of which is determined by the permeability of
its mass and angular velocity of the body.

The author suggests that it is the gravitational field of the sun that
distorts the path of starlight, not the presence of curved space. In
other words, curved space may only exist in the fertile imagination of
mathematicians and theoretical physicists, not in the physical universe.

Zirbes Fluxomatic motor;

http://www.rexresearch.com/zirbes/zirbes.htm

Zirbes accordingly conducted an experiment in which a sphere of iron and
a sphere of graphite of equal weight were simultaneously dropped down a
two thousand feet mineshaft. At the bottom of the shaft, the final few
feet of the fall was recorded by means of a high speed camera.

"Amazingly, the graphite sphere, although considerably larger than the
iron sphere because of its lower density, and therefore prone to more
wind resistance, impacted when the iron sphere was still six feet from
impact. A similar experiment using spheres of other metals revealed that
the iron sphere still impacted later than all the other spheres.
Moreover, the spheres diverged considerably from each other prior to
impact and also developed a specific rotation when falling.

"So what? Only that the work of Galileo, Newton and later scientists was
very badly flawed; Zirbes research suggested that the sun is not a
gigantic fusion reactor as claimed by academia, but rather consists of
thousands of individual bodies which release energy by means of the
interaction between their respective gravity fields. In other words, the
sun’s energy production is by mechanical not nuclear means, something
also claimed by that brilliant scientist and Sumerian scholar, Dr.
George Merkl.

After twenty five years of research, Zirbes invented a device which
created gravity. So successful was the first test that everything in the
lab that was not bolted down, degravitated and flew around, severely
injuring the hapless Zirbes in the process. While he was hospitalized,
his laboratory, van and some of his research notes were destroyed in an
arson fire.
--------------------
The closest thing to 32 degree angle in DNA is;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_helix

Proline either breaks or kinks a helix, both because it cannot donate an
amide hydrogen bond (having no amide hydrogen), and also because its
sidechain interferes sterically with the backbone of the preceding turn
- inside a helix, this forces a bend of about 30° in the helix axis.[9]

http://books.google.com/books?id=Q6Yd-qYvx9UC&pg=PA103&lpg=PA103&dq=angle+of+dna\
+helix&source=bl&ots=Xg4F_iZo9m&sig=-jFet20rMfn_flkQ0RVMbwgLKvk&hl=en&ei=C-c8TZP\
hIoS8lQebmMDqBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CDoQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepa\
ge&q=angle%20of%20dna%20helix&f=false

In the molecule shown in Figure 3.4B with L=18 there are only 18 helical
turns. This will change the average rotation per residue from 34.29
degrees [(20 X 360)/210] to 30.86 degrees [(18 X 360)/210].
Energetically, this represents an unfavorable winding of the DNA double
helix.
--------------------
Can't find a DNA angle that precisely matches the suspected 32.7/32.8
degree angle Aspden said Laithwaite experienced when lifting the
spinning 50 pound disc. There was mention on two different sites of 45
and 72 degrees which might also be worth carrying out.

In the one article quoted above, photo stills of the lifted rotating
disc mapped out showed the angle and I wonder if it could have
variations depending on velocity, amount of weight, energy provided to
the lift, etc..

I think all of these angles (32.7, 45, 72) are worthy of investigation
if they provide a key to gravity control or free energy.
--------------------
Ok, enough of that for now...

Thanks Jim for the Bushman link, I'll check it out with my notepad handy
for goodies worth archiving.

Hasta Luego!

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico



Jim Nicholson wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> I've watched Boyd Bushman before but I didn't recall him saying that he
> knows the pilot that shot down the Roswell Ufo which he does in this clip
> _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzwOFCSFms4_
> Is he who he says he is? He said this stuff a while ago and....nothing.
>
> Thanks for your stuff and your site.
>
> Jim


--

As always, Research continues....

----
========================================================
"I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
Hope through Science and Invention
Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
MexiStim Energy Stimulator
http://www.keelynet.com/mexistim/nexcrock.htm
Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================