Hello everyone:
	 I have been studying the phenomenon that is the marks coil. In my little world
there can only be two truths about it's operation, either it was a great big
hoax made to bilk investors out of money or it actually worked. If it had been a
hoax there was technology that was worth some money just by itself. If the coil
worked it appeared to be to simple to keep the public from building their own at
home, which would have prevented him from making a profit.

	 First off I believe that the Marks coil worked and have I studied the videos
carefully. I have also made some observations that came from eye witness
accounts and researching Marks back ground  I have a background in electronics
and have been converted from Quantum Mechanics to Aether Mechanics (a discussion
for another time).  In the following comments I will try to state my
observations and why I feel they are important.

	 The Marks coil (I.M.H.O) are energy conversion devices  by means of transformer
action by heterodyning a local magnetic disturbance with most likely the solar
disturbance of either the Earths magnetic field or the Sun's radiation or even
our own electrical grid. This may have been how other devices worked like the
Moray tubes. Regardless of the source of  primary energy and the conversion
process involved, the recent designs of a Marks' coil I believe have not been
true recreations of what have been seen on the videos. The important facts of
the coil are 6 KHZ  oscillations, DC output, heat build up, gyroscopic effects
and diminished performance due to orientation of coil while running(watch
carefully).

	 The first most important observation is that the Mark's transformer is not
constructed in a toroidal fashion. If we are to believe the videos it is made
from two metal rings, an upper and lower separated by a dielectric (air or foam
seen in a later video that is covered in vinyl). It is unclear if they are
joined / separated by metal post in the center at 90 deg, but my guess is they
are due to the solidness of the structure. As seen in one of the videos is the
secondary appears wound around  the lower ring. I believe there are four drive
coils wrapped around wooden blocks that are held with electrical tape to the
support post, these blocks are also long enough to act like table legs, but I
don't believe the wire wraps around the metal support beams. Marks' assistant
clamed that Marks used to be a TV repair guy, so the coils were probable wrapped
like a TV yoke. I believe that in later designs the coils are placed underneath
the two rings but are probable close to the metal supports if they exist.

	 So what is the big deal and what difference dose it make? In a toroid the
magnetic field is focused in the center of the structure and there is very
little magnetic influence felt outside the core. For the device to have the
greatest effect a confined magnetic field is undesirable when attempting to
effect the environment(see Tesla's Colorado Notes and use of air cores).  Also
if the device was a Toroid the secondary would have to be wound around the
primary for effective power transfer (or around both upper and lower rings).

	 Concerning the primary remembering the statement of gyroscopic effects leads me
to believe that it maybe configured as in a two phase induction motor ran by a
single phase (see electric motors for more detail). Although the split coil per
phase configuration would remain at 90deg there orientation of polarization
maybe inverted, but would require investigation. The second reason I maintain
that this type of primary configuration with wood / air cores was used is the
statements of heat, DC voltage and frequency. The high frequency would make a
solid / iron core less desirable. The heat and DC secondary voltage are common
side effects of a closed core transformer being pulsed in one direction only.
Since it would appear that the primary and secondary are perpendicular to each
other, and the secondary is wrap around the lower ring, it maybe safe to assume
the magnetic field is rotating around the rings (think of a compass placed in
the center of the ring and it spinning around). The primary's could still be
pulse sating DC and could produce this effect. (Side note: to stop the core from
heating air gapping the rings might work just like regular air gapped
transformers).

	         Final comment, gyroscope effects are not common for motors without
rotors, but in Aether Mechanics this effect could be manifested if the medium
formed a vortex  through the device like a tornado, while the agitating force
was at a right angle like horizontal blades of a fan. If such a self sustaining
condition occurred, a quick rotation of the device from horizontal to vertical
would stop the immediate condition, but slowly build up in the new direction. I
believe this is seen in the videos especially the one where he walking around
with a light bulb and trying to keep the unit from getting to hot.  This is also
the reason I believed the device works. Lastly if you or anyone else demonstrate
a free energy device, don't use light bulbs because the magic house sells  fake
bulbs all the time. Show me a glowing wirer or heating element so I know that
energy is being consumed at a rapid rate.

There is more, but this enough for now.
let's discuss and best whishes
Mike

The prize is 30 million. But how much would it cost to have a working anti-grav
device to enter into the competion.....

31 million?

--- In KeelyNet_Interact@yahoogroups.com, "Rising" <portaugutta@...> wrote:
>
>
> The prize is 30 million. But how much would it cost to have a working
anti-grav device to enter into the competion.....
>
> 31 million?
>

priceless

Hola Bert et al!

Bert Pool wrote:
  >
  > http://techshop.ws/
  >
  > I like the idea!
  >
  > Bert

Yes, I posted this as a news item when they first came out a couple of
years ago...I too love the idea.

http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/a-practical-approach-to-hands-on-scienc\
e-and-engineering/

and

http://keelynet.com/indexsep907.htm

09/30/07 - Entrepreneur Creates "Kinko's For Inventors!"

The Tech Shop, located in Silicon Valley's Menlo Park, California, is a
playground for grown-ups where you can make invention prototypes, fix
your stuff, sew your products, or further artistic designs. Your "toys"
are actually pretty big machines such as "lathes, plasma cutters, sheet
metal equipment, drill presses, band saws, industrial sewing machines,
hand tools, plastic working equipment, electronics design and
fabrication facilities, tubing and metal bending machines, electrical
supplies and tools," and, Jim Newton says, "pretty much everything you'd
ever need to make just about anything all by yourself."

Like he says, "a Kinko's for inventors." Newton put his Tech Shop
playground together with mostly used equipment in a relatively low-rent
area, making his start-up costs manageable, and when he opened his shop,
he put his business plan to work.

Offering one time entries and membership plans to inventors, hobbyists,
artists, and dozens of other enthusiasts, Tech Shop operates much like a
health club: you can come in anytime and use whatever equipment you want.

With a long-term membership, you can even make advance reservations for
the equipment you need. Hours? Not a problem. Tech Shop is open from
9:00 a.m. to midnight!

Staff? Always someone there to help you out. And no need to let those
big machines intimidate you either. For the safety of you and others,
Tech Shop offers 18 classes in how to use the equipment it offers! A
tremendous boost to DIY inventors are the CNC classes that teach you how
to model your own prototypes from 3-D CAD designs.

Inventors need this service, if only to get out of our cocoons. But,
more practically, to legitimize our ideas, those we've had closeted for
so long because we didn't have the time or the big bucks to act on them.
- Source

http://inventorspot.com/articles/entrepreneur_makes_invention_ver_6804
-----------------------
Bert, do you remember when kids were totally fascinated by how things
work and wanting to build things and learn about mechanics and whatever???

Best expressed by the little kid in 'The Day the Earth Stood Still'
where Klaatu is explaining to the kid about how space travel worked, max
speed, slowing the ship, etc...and this buffoon comes over snorting and
laughing saying you really had the kid going...friggin idiot..

I found this killer compilation of some of the best scenes from the
movie...it has this kid/Klaatu scene;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WXye1YpWXQ

The government, philanthropists, even private companies should fund such
things as this TechShop idea to promote interest and grow our talent.

So many kids don't have a clue about technology other than as users...we
need fun science and handson projects to get them excited and wanted to
learn and build...

Idle minds, idle hands and they get into mischief like drugs and gangs.
   How about science gangs..<lol>...competing for technical dominance!

Naw, just learn, share, enjoy...knowledge is power and power (applied)
is money so it will help them with jobs, inventions, etc. in life.

Yes, TechShop is a brilliant concept and I hope they spread all over the
place.

Thanks...

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hola ***** et al!

*****wrote:
  > Mechanical?  Similar to effects shown by gyroscopes
  >
  > Electrical/Magnetic?  Several people working in and producing
  > effects, hard to reproduce
  >
  > I have been dreaming (again) about some form if action that
  > would allow VTOL (vertical takeoff and landing) and heavy lifting.
  >
  > Think negation of mass rather than antigravity.  I am
  > interested in your ideas and even more, practical results
  > from your experiments.
  >
  > *****

So many ways to approach it....my favorite is direct interference with
the aether/zpe flows into matter...reduce that and weight fades, inertia
fades, the object is lighter...reduce it enough to cancel the pressure
and it floats like a balloon filled with natural gas...

reduce it even more and it shoots away from the planet, to be left
behind as the earth moves about 50,000 mph around the sun plus our solar
system moves through space at 568,000 mph...so its adios and so sorry
you lost your test object!

But we can use diamagnetics to push against the earths magnetic field or
super high density negative charges to repel from the earths negative
charge, see;

http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2010/11/20/electrostatic-levitation/

http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/earliest-reference-describes-christ-as-\
magician-2/

And of course inertial drives...cycloid or apsidal motion to redirect
mass weight to a preferred direction..up, down, sideways...

Some other links from the past;

http://www.mail-archive.com/interact@listserv.capital-master.com/msg00045.html

http://keelynet.com/interact/arc_1_98-7_98/00001738.htm

http://keelynet.com/energy/inertia1.txt

http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2009/05/11/inertial-drive-in-space/

http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/strange-lifting-force-used-in-novel-air\
ship-jan-1931/

http://u2.lege.net/John_Keely/keelynet.com/interact/archive/00001998.htm

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%\
2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5197279.PN.&OS=PN/5197279&RS=PN/5\
197279

http://www.zamandayolculuk.com/cetinbal/zeropointgravity.htm

and on and on...<lol>..

Take care...

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hola Folks!

Esa Ruoho wrote:
  >
  > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNN4Oo0KhZo

Thats cute, would go over big in a mall, at a carnival, etc...thanks.

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hola Folks!

Received this from Duncan. It's very timely with the Japanese reactors
spinning out of control;

Duncan M. Roads wrote:
  >
  > Begin forwarded message:
  >
  > *From: ***
  > *Date: *12 February 2011 2:29:49 PM AEST
  > *To: nexusmagazine
  > *Subject: **Thorium*
  >
  > Dear Duncan,
  >
  > I know Thorium Energy Generators are often seen as nuclear
  > and therefore painted with this wrong brush.
  >
  > Thorium would be a very safe solution to our energy problems
  > and could eliminate most of existing nuclear waste.
  >
  > I attach a presentation in slide form as TIF files.
  >
  > Some text and pictures are used with permission of the
  > Thorium Alliance.
  >
  > I look forward to hear from you.
  > Best regards
  >
  > Dr. *************
  > Sydney
  > Duncan
  >
  > Duncan M. Roads,  Editor, NEXUS Magazine
  > PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia.
  > Tel:  07 5442 9280;  Fax:  07 5442 9381
  > http://www.nexusmagazine.com

Hola Duncan!

He is right, Thorium is the answer for 'clean' atomic power...

http://energyfromthorium.com/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/7970619/Obama-could-kill-fossil-fuels\
-overnight-with-a-nuclear-dash-for-thorium.html

Thorium is so common that miners treat it as a nuisance, a radioactive
by-product if they try to dig up rare earth metals. The US and Australia
are full of the stuff. So are the granite rocks of Cornwall. You do not
need much: all is potentially usable as fuel, compared to just 0.7pc for
uranium.

Moving away from solid fuel may overcome some of thorium’s
"idiosyncracies". "You have to use the right machine. You don’t use
diesel in a petrol car: you build a diesel engine," said Mr Sorensen.

Thorium-fluoride reactors can operate at atmospheric temperature. "The
plants would be much smaller and less expensive. You wouldn’t need those
huge containment domes because there’s no pressurized water in the
reactor. It’s close-fitting," he said.

Nuclear power could become routine and nonthreatening. But first there
is the barrier of establishment prejudice.

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hola Folks!

I received this odd email;

*****@*****.*** wrote:
  >
  > This is something I've been saying for years but with no proof.
  > Bearden is a stinking Government disinformation agent:
  >
  > http://www.whale.to/b/subversion_of_alternitive_energy.html

I checked out the page and it is a most curious link to big oil. I never
saw any of that before so sent it to Tom Bearden to see what he has to say.

Here is their;

"Introduction:

If you wanted to sabotage alternative energy development and misdirect
any interested individuals, while simultaneously creating the illusion
of progress in solving the energy crisis, how would you go about doing
it?  One very good method would be to covertly fund so called
alternative energy experts, who would setup websites and publish books.

All of which would be filled with impressive sounding scientific
information, and pictures of devices that almost (but never quite seem
to) work.  There would be dozens of these websites, all interlinked with
each other, thereby creating the illusion of a vast network of
individuals and organizations, tirelessly working to solve the world's
energy problem.

These individuals would also organize conferences and seminars, where
for a small admission fee, the public could learn about the latest
breakthroughs in alternative energy.  And of course there would be
books...  Lots and lots of books.  Each one full of information, and
promising that a breakthrough is just around the corner.

In point of fact, the "breakthrough" took place over one hundred years
ago, and what you're witnessing today is a immense disinformation
campaign, perpetrated on a scale so vast, its almost unimaginable.

The following is an exposé outlining the connections between some of the
most high profile individuals in alternative energy, and the
corporations that are covertly backing them."


Years ago when he changed from phase conjugation to dissipative
conductors, I thought what a turnaround...when I asked him about it, he
said;

http://www.textfiles.com/bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/brdn180.asc

Lets see what he has to say about it...might be they just offered him
free space and support without conditions...it happens and there are no
conspiracy or coverups involved.

But everyone has the right to challenge such statements.

As of 03/14/11 I have not heard anything from Tom about it. Maybe its
just not worth the time to respond.

We shall see..thanks!

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Well.........IF the agenda was truely focused on cooperation to develop and
furnish cheap efficient energy to everyone, then methods such as thorium would
probably be explored.  However, IMHO the intent is not to provide energy as much
as it is to implement control over people.  When the individuals in governmental
regulatory capacities and those knowledgable of the industry decide it is time
that we minions have access to better alternatives, they will magically appear.

As to the nuclear power plant issue, the same people bitching about the problems
now are the same people who were yelling about the cost overruns and the expense
of all the redundant systems when they were being built.  One has to learn to
ignore the screaming meemies and do what's necessary.  I personally feel that
those who hollar the loudest about the pollution of carbon based fuels should
demonstrate their sincerity by disconnecting from the grid and not use any form
of transportation that uses those fuels.  Their argument would then become more
believable, wouldn't it?

R





--- In KeelyNet_Interact@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Decker <jdecker@...> wrote:
>
> Hola Folks!
>
> Received this from Duncan. It's very timely with the Japanese reactors
> spinning out of control;
>

This link to the original essay may be more creditable:
http://www.commerceware.net/cc.html.  The whale link may be too far out overall
for most people to take anything there too seriously.

It is kind of hard to buy into most of this even though the data looks
convincing since as I remember Smith was supposed to have been microwaved to
death remotely by the "Powers-That-Be".


-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Decker
Sent: Mar 14, 2011 10:37 PM
To: Interact
Subject: [KeelyNet_Interact] Curious email about ownership of Beardens'
Cheniere.org





Hola Folks!

I received this odd email;

*****@*****.*** wrote:
>
> This is something I've been saying for years but with no proof.
> Bearden is a stinking Government disinformation agent:
>
> http://www.whale.to/b/subversion_of_alternitive_energy.html

I checked out the page and it is a most curious link to big oil. I never
saw any of that before so sent it to Tom Bearden to see what he has to say.

Here is their;

"Introduction:

If you wanted to sabotage alternative energy development and misdirect
any interested individuals, while simultaneously creating the illusion
of progress in solving the energy crisis, how would you go about doing
it? One very good method would be to covertly fund so called
alternative energy experts, who would setup websites and publish books.

All of which would be filled with impressive sounding scientific
information, and pictures of devices that almost (but never quite seem
to) work. There would be dozens of these websites, all interlinked with
each other, thereby creating the illusion of a vast network of
individuals and organizations, tirelessly working to solve the world's
energy problem.

These individuals would also organize conferences and seminars, where
for a small admission fee, the public could learn about the latest
breakthroughs in alternative energy. And of course there would be
books... Lots and lots of books. Each one full of information, and
promising that a breakthrough is just around the corner.

In point of fact, the "breakthrough" took place over one hundred years
ago, and what you're witnessing today is a immense disinformation
campaign, perpetrated on a scale so vast, its almost unimaginable.

The following is an exposé outlining the connections between some of the
most high profile individuals in alternative energy, and the
corporations that are covertly backing them."

Years ago when he changed from phase conjugation to dissipative
conductors, I thought what a turnaround...when I asked him about it, he
said;

http://www.textfiles.com/bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/brdn180.asc

Lets see what he has to say about it...might be they just offered him
free space and support without conditions...it happens and there are no
conspiracy or coverups involved.

But everyone has the right to challenge such statements.

As of 03/14/11 I have not heard anything from Tom about it. Maybe its
just not worth the time to respond.

We shall see..thanks!

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
"I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
Hope through Science and Invention
Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
MexiStim Energy Stimulator
http://www.mexistim.com/
Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hola Folks!

I received this from Tom Bearden regarding the website cited, he addresses his
relationship with Tony Craddock and some of the misunderstandings regarding his
work.

The name Tony Craddock sounded vaguely familiar and it didn't hit me til Tom
wrote this, but when Walter Rosenthal died I posted an obituary about him and
used a small low quality photo I found from a free energy DVD ad page, and I put
in a description of the DVD and included the link in case people might want to
buy it.

Within days I received what I thought was a rather snippy takedown notice from
Tony Craddock saying he had the rights to that photo and I didn't have
permission to use it. That SPOKE VOLUMES to me about what was going on...

So I immediately took it down and contacted Walter Rosenthal's daughter direct
who sent me a very nice, MUCH BETTER photo of Walter which I could use as I saw
fit and I did in the obituary...thanks to her for wanting to see her father
recognized for his lifetime achievements.

For some people, its all about money and control...I won't say more but you can
figure it out for yourself. I have seen this before...with patents its call
trolls...

Anyway, Tom kindly sent the following to respond to the basic question of why
there is an oil company connection to his website.

Here is what he sent;

Hi Jerry,

Let's see: The fellow SMITH whose skeptical work you refer to, cannot even spell
"alternative" correctly, but he proposes to be decisively
knowledgeable on "alternitive" energy. Also, he apparently knows little or
nothing about modern quantum physics, which has been born, tested and proven
since the 1920s and early 1930s. So he really does not know what a charge IS or
what a dipole IS, much less what it DOES.

Well, every charge and dipole in the entire universe is already a proven, known,
and established "free EM energy source" that continually and freely pours out a
steady stream of EM energy -- a steady stream of real, usable, observable
photons -- that comprises what the electrical engineer in his sad old archaic
1892 model calls "static voltage". Note that the archaic old 1892 EE model still
assumes that the "vacuum" is just empty space and has no energy at all in it.

The broken symmetry of any dipole is directly from modern physics, not Tom
Bearden or Tony Craddock. The discovery and proof of broken symmetry by Lee and
Yang was responsible for the award of the Nobel Prize to them in 1957.

So every dipole (and indeed every charge) in the universe already is a
legitimate and proven "free EM energy system" continually and freely pouring out
free EM energy until the end of time, if one simply makes or produces the
dipolarity and then LEAVES IT ALONE.

But Smith seems to think he "knows" that there are and can be no working
overunity energy systems, such as Bedini and other inventors have built and
demonstrated for more than 40 years, including at the recent Renaissance
Conference in Coeur d'Alene Idaho last July, and such as will be demonstrated
again this coming July by a second Renaissance Conference there. And such as is
proven by every electric charge, magnetic pole, or electric or magnetic dipole
in the entire universe. Again, according to modern physics and as rigorously
proven, the universe is already alive -- and always has been -- with untold
quadzillions of free EM energy emitters!

Thus the free-energy problem for the engineer is not in obtaining the
emission of the energy from the vacuum via the ASYMMETRY of the charge or
dipole. That is cheap, quick, and the easiest thing in all the world to do. Just
make a dipole, glue it down, and then leave it alone. Instead, the problem is in
building the REST of the total usable electrical power system that will be used
to power the loads -- that is, the receiving and collecting and using subsystem
or what the EE calls the "external circuit system" -- so that this added
"windmill" part of the system sits SEPARATELY in the downstream of steady EM
energy (the free EM energy wind) from the primary source dipole, and  never,
never, never connects back (current-wise)
to the primary dipole. Instead, in a free energy power system, the
"windmill" (external circuit subsystem) of the overall system must just
separately sit downwind in that steady and free EM energy wind from the source
dipole, divert a little of the flowing EM energy wind aside and collect it
SEPARATELY, and then use this FREELY DIVERTED AND COLLECTED EM ENERGY to power
its loads and losses in the external circuit.

Specifically, the "windmill" system (the external circuit) must not use ANY of
its collected free energy to destroy the source dipole by regarding it as an
"external load" and pumping current back up through it (though its back EMF) and
thus continually DESTROYING the source dipole and cutting off its own steady and
free EM energy wind.

In other words, you have to build a "system" consisting of an "internal" or
SOURCE DIPOLE system which furnishes and pours out the EM energy wind from the
vacuum freely, and a SEPARATE external RECEIVING or windmill system which freely
and separately sits in that free EM energy wind and diverts and uses some of it,
but absolutely without passing any current back through the primary source
dipole (the source of the free EM energy wind) at all. It's that simple.

This rigorously is also an ASYMMETRICAL system, and since the EE is always
conditioned to build only SYMMETRICAL systems, then his own SYMMETRICAL model
and his lack of knowledge of asymmetrical electrodynamics mean that the EE --
following his own teaching and model -- can never build an overunity circuit or
system.

The steady flow of real photons from the source dipole also continually creates
and sustains what the EE mistakenly calls "static voltage". It isn't static at
all, but each part of it (each photon) is moving at light speed.

In short, one has to actually drive one's "external circuit" system (the
downwind "windmill" system) by coupling this pure "static voltage"
(potentialization without current) only. That concept, of course, does not even
exist in the standard EE model, since it was deliberately eliminated by Lorentz
from the original Heaviside equations (at the elicitation of the evil J. P.
Morgan) to yield the severely mutilated EE model from its very birth in 1892.
Yet in 1931 or so, according to legitimate sources Tesla had actually powered an
electric car apparently by "static voltage" (i.e., electrostatic scalar
potential only), a car that had drawn no CURRENT from
its "battery". Thus the car was run for multiple weeks without "recharging the
battery".

We will make the statement, without further elaboration or discussion, that if
the average researcher knew what Tesla had actually done for his nation (the
United States), which additional work is still highly classified and thus "does
not officially exist", he would be stunned. Suffice it to say that we owe Tesla
a great debt of honor, not only for the AC power, the rotating magnetic field
that made electric motors and generators possible, radio, etc. that he gave us,
but also for things we will not be openly informed of for the next 50 years or
more.

Tony Craddock is indeed my website manager. Tony has a company that
specializes in furnishing technical workers and engineers to the big oil
companies when they need them, which is a service he legitimately performs for a
fee. And that's it. He is not "owned" by "big oil" in any fashion, and he has
absolutely no desire or commitment to seeing the perpetuation of our
overwhelming use of oil, coal, and gasoline.

Tony is actually a great humanitarian who intensely wishes to see free EM energy
systems developed and being universally used for the benefit of all humankind.
He has labored and is laboring very hard to preserve the present precious
overunity inventor's hard-won knowledge and discoveries, such as the epochal
discoveries of Howard Johnson, John Bedini, and others.  Tony Craddock has done
and he does most of this great humanitarian effort at his own personal expense,
with his own money and labor and efforts and time, and by doing much actual
filming and documentation of working bench models successfully invented by
Bedini and others, and then making the results available to the public on DVDs,
in books, etc. He personally has done more
than any other living person that I know of, to see that the significant
discoveries of the best of our leading free energy researchers are not lost to
humanity when the inventors die, but instead are documented for future
generations to know and perhaps even to understand and reproduce and utilize.

Again, to anyone who knows a little modern physics, the simple dipole -- once it
is made easily and for peanuts -- will thereafter just sit there and freely
extract real EM energy from the seething virtual state vacuum, and pour this
energy out continuously as a free and steady-state stream of real observable
photons which the electrical engineer erroneously calls "static voltage". It is
"static" only in the sense of a "static" waterfall, which is continually created
and sustained by the steady flow of water molecules.

As a matter of fact, Nikola Tesla already had such real working free energy
systems as early as 1891.  He would indeed have given the world FREE EM ENERGY
had he not been mercilessly stopped and destroyed by the infamous J. P. Morgan.
The rigorous mathematical proof that Tesla had such systems already working is
given by T. W. Barrett in "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC)
Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41.
Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of
potentials in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit
that a conventional electrical
engineering analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla's patented circuits did
exactly this asymmetric shuttling function. So Tesla's special circuits could
dissipate power where he wished in his external circuit, powering different
parts of the external circuit independently. [Paper is carried on the
cheniere.org website at internet link
http://www.cheniere.org/references/TeslaOSC.pdf . ]

Here are some pertinent quotes from Tesla himself:

"The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but
I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of
the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which
has ever been recorded in history." [Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless,"
Electrical Experimenter, May 1919.] Again we stress that Tesla's education was
in the PHYSICS of his time, before electrical engineering was even born!

"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power
obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in
the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it
among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid
mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or
kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is,
for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in
attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a
speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891.
Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of
Time, Simon and Schuster, 2001].

"Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the
world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common
fuels." [Nikola Tesla].

"We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever
inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of
any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not
far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the
operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium..."
[Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of
generators at Niagara Falls.].

"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be
rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." [Nikola Tesla, 1900].

For an excellent article on the suppression of Nikola Tesla, see Les Pastor
http://peswiki.com/index.php Site:LRP:The_Deliberate_Curtailment_of_Nikola_T
esla%27s_Primary_Energy_Source .

The infamous J. P. Morgan elicited Lorentz to deliberately modify the
proposed Heaviside equations to specifically eliminate any of those
"confounded Tesla systems obtaining their energy freely from the active medium."
This modification (symmetrization of the equations) yielded what would become
the standard electrical engineering model thereafter, and which is still used
today. The modification was done specifically to prevent all our future EEs from
ever using their EE model to design and build an asymmetric (overunity) EM
system because their mutilated model was deliberately curtailed (SYMMETRIZED) to
only contain SYMMETRIC (i.e., COP<1.0) systems.

At the time, there was not a single electrical engineer on earth; there were
only about three dozen physicists who had some knowledge of Maxwell's theory.
And Maxwell's actual theory is 20 quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns, so
that it contains both symmetrical and asymmetrical systems.

Simply put, a "symmetrical" EM system passes all the external circuit
current (the "windmill system" current in the external circuit and thus in its
loads and losses) back through the primary source dipole to destroy it and thus
continually cut off the flow of free EM energy.

The sad old 1892 EE model contains a dozen falsities -- absolute lies still
taught today to our electrical engineers as "truths". This has been pointed out
by Nobel Prizewinning physicists. As a single example, EEs are taught that the
vacuum itself HAS NO ENERGY, and is naught but "empty space". That has been
known and proven to be false since the advent of quantum physics in the 1920s
and early 1930s. As another example, the EE is taught that force fields exist in
empty space, which is a lie. By the simple equation F = - d/dt(mv), all one has
to do is put in m = 0 and see that force does not exist in the absence of mass.

What actually exists in space are the POTENTIALS and their variations. When a
variation of a potential encounters and interacts with an electron in the wiring
in the circuit, THAT ONGOING INTERACTION is a force. And a force field is a set
of such ongoing interactions.

We continually stress that modern quantum physics and its proven knowledge of
the energy of the vacuum and of the virtual state was not yet even born in 1892.
The suspected particle we call the electron was not even "named" until 1894, and
it was not fully discovered until 1897. There was no such known thing as a
photon, and the vacuum was considered to be total emptiness containing no energy
at all. Such totally erroneous assumptions (a dozen of them) are still included
in the standard but archaic old 1892 electrical
engineering model today, without change since 1892.

Note that, to build free energy-from-the-vacuum systems, you first need to
VIOLATE the sad and decrepit old 1892 EE model! That is the FIRST REQUIREMENT!

And finally, to completely clinch the matter:

We strongly point out that physicist Victor I. Klimov and his associates at Los
Alamos National Laboratory have rigorously proven and demonstrated that real
physical power systems can be built which do pour out more usable energy than
the operator inputs to them, with the excess output energy being freely obtained
from the virtual state vacuum. A microscopic solar cell, when struck by a proper
photon, emits an electron which immediately dives into the virtual vacuum sea,
takes on additional energy, and emerges as a highly excited entity which decays
to produce from two to seven electrons. Thus the special nanocrystalline solar
cell emits 200% to 700% more electron energy than the normal solar cell's
photoelectric effect. This effect, rigorously validated at both Los Alamos
National Laboratory and the National Recoverable Energy Laboratory, completely
demonstrates -- and proves for all time -- that real physical systems can be
built which directly extract and use excess EM energy from their surrounding
active virtual state vacuum. This work is rigorously reproduced and validated by
two great national laboratories, (1) the Los Alamos National Laboratory and (2)
the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.  This work and its validation
has been published in the leading physics journals of the world now, and in the
leading nanocrystalline journals of the world.

For an "educated layman's" description of the Klimov work and effect, see Herb
Brody, "Solar Power - Seriously Souped Up." New Scientist, May 27, 2006, p. 45.

For some technical journal references, see the following:

Richard D. Schaller, Vladimir M. Agranovich and Victor I. Klimov;
"High-efficiency carrier multiplication through direct photogeneration of
multi-excitons via virtual single-exciton states."  Nature Physics  Vol. 1,
2005, pp. 189-194.

Richard D. Schaller, Melissa A. Petruska, and Victor I. Klimov; "Effect of
electronic structure on carrier multiplication efficiency: Comparative study of
PbSe and CdSe nanocrystals"; Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 87, 2005, 253102.

Richard D. Schaller, Milan Sykora, Jeffrey M. Pietryga, and Victor I.
Klimov, "Seven Excitons at a Cost of One: Redefining the Limits for
Conversion Efficiency of Photons into Charge Carriers," Nano Lett. Vol. 6, 2006,
p. 424.

Victor I. Klimov, "Spectral and Dynamical Properties of Multiexcitons
in Semiconductor Nanocrystals," Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 58,
No. 1, 2007, p. 635.

M. C. Hanna, A. J. Nozik. "Solar conversion efficiency of photovoltaic
and photoelectrolysis cells with carrier multiplication absorbers," Journal of
Applied Physics, vol. 100, No. 7, 2006, p. 07450.

Sung Jin Kim, Won Jin Kim, Yudhisthira Sahoo, Alexander N. Cartwright,
Paras N. Prasad, "Multiple exciton generation and electrical extraction from a
PbSe quantum dot photoconductor," Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2008,
p. 031107.

Alberto Franceschetti, Yong Zhang, "Multiexciton Absorption and
Multiple Exciton Generation in CdSe Quantum Dots," Physical Review Letters, Vol.
100, No. 13, 2008, p. 136805.

G. Allan, C. Delerue, "Role of impact ionization in multiple exciton
generation in PbSe nanocrystals," Physical Review B, Vol. 73 (20), 2006, p.
205423.

Hsiang-Yu Chen, Michael K. F. Lo, Guanwen Yang, Harold G. Monbouquette,Yang
Yang, "Nanoparticle-assisted high photoconductive gain in composites of polymer
and fullerene," Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 3 (9), 2008, p. 543.

M.C. Beard, R.J. Ellingson, "Multiple exciton generation in
semiconductor nanocrystals: Toward efficient solar energy conversion," Laser &
Photonics Review, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2008, p. 377.

In short, the feasibility of getting and using excess EM energy from the
seething virtual state vacuum has been rigorously and strongly proven and
validated by those two great U.S. national laboratories, and published widely
and accepted in both physics and nanocrystalline science worldwide.
==========================================================

So it is rigorously and scientifically proven -- both theoretically and
experimentally -- and it never has to be proven again!

I think the above makes the point beyond argument: Mr. Smith doesn't know what
he's talking about.

Free EM energy from the vacuum IS NOT included in the standard and decrepit old
1892 electrical engineering model!

It is, however, included and directly proven beyond any question in modern
physics.

For anyone seriously interested in free energy from the vacuum, he must read and
understand modern PHYSICS, not the sad and mutilated old electrical engineering
model. Let the truly interested and impartial reader simply read and study the
physics references and then make his own decision.

Best wishes,

Tom Bearden


--- In KeelyNet_Interact@yahoogroups.com, annoy9619@... wrote:
>
> This link to the original essay may be more creditable:
http://www.commerceware.net/cc.html.  The whale link may be too far out overall
for most people to take anything there too seriously.
>
> It is kind of hard to buy into most of this even though the data looks
convincing since as I remember Smith was supposed to have been microwaved to
death remotely by the "Powers-That-Be".
>

...snip...

On
a programme on Discover Channel, where a scientist (part of the Nobel peace
prize winning team) has to choose among various new technologies and inventions
that will suit a future megapolis and must be eco-friendly. Out of the lot, one
invention, a refrigerator, that cools by using sound wave (no compressor, no
cooling coils) attracts my attention. I want to know more about the invention
and its working principle and requesting other to send me links on net about
that paper.

This invention has been prototyped and on camera it has shown its
effectiveness. At least the examiner scientist haven't showed any kind of doubt
on the working principle of the product. Therefore, though that product may not
now reach market but that's real, no question about that.

Thanks in advance for future help.

Pranab Jyoti Ghosh



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hola Bert et al!

Bert Pool wrote:
  >
>
http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2011/03/25/134855990/highbeams-of-the-gods-do-ufos\
-need-headlights


The guy is way too simplistic.

I think the lights from UFOs are part of their drive
technology...electrostatic or maybe UV downshifted to visible
light...look at all the cases where people get conjunctivitis from being
too close to them...welders burn...from the intense UV.

Even back in the last 1800s with the Airship mysteries, people reported
these airships having bright lights but I don't think those ships used
plasma or electronic drives, most likely the 'float gas' claimed by the
Sonorro Aero Club and its members as first pulled together and posted on
the Keelynet BBS years before anyone else ever heard of it, but many
have taken off and found out more, as it should be, plant the seeds and
watch it grow, see;

(there are nine of these files from the Keelynet BBS in 1991) my contact
and friend Jimmy Ward died in 1995 and I think Pete Navarro is also gone
but his daughter contacted me a few years ago to thank me for keeping
her fathers name alive on the net..<lol>...);

http://keelynet.com/gravity/aero1.txt

http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/dellschaus-flying-machines/

http://www.rense.com/ufo2/airshipmyst.htm

Same for so many iconic images from history which show beams of
light...maybe they are levitation beams or scanning for something on the
ground, but its more likely they are just looking for something or to
help find their way, who knows?

I remember a case in the 1800s where a big UFO buzzed San Fran and
emitted super bright light that lit up the land for miles...I think it
was based on osmium using high voltage to excite it.

You might remember Wally Chariton who wrote 'The Great Texas Airship
Mysteries'? He came to a couple of our Roundtable meetings and some of
us spent some time with him...really nice guy and totally on the
level...one of the better UFO researchers. He was living in Richardson
back then.

So many cases of rotation that produced high voltage sparking...just
like all the cool videos where the thing spins fast enough to appear to
be a single ring of light when it fact its two or more electrodes
showering bolts outward or just at the tip even.

We did that with our 2.3 million volt coil as part of the Zap Dallas
show...called the 'Newtonian Spinner'....and when at velocity it
'almost' looked like a ring of light. Just not fast enough though you
could make a trick photo using time lapse.

So maybe UFOs aren't spinning as a mass or big ring...all they need are
electrodes painting the air.

Kind of like this but imagine it spinning a lot faster;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nI2xhyvc5U

Here its called an 'ion motor' and spins much faster;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbr9rCvBtNw

and this one calls it a 'plasma motor';

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rryKYix_HU0

The problem is the mechanical...if it could be rotating plasma, then we
have it.

Of course the guy down in Australia who does all the cool tesla photos
uses time lapse photography to make some excellent trick shots...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nRqbQr7VGk

Thanks for the link!

Jerry in Ixt
--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

just wonder what you might think of this,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ooQMnTQLQIY   the sound
is low so you might need headphones.

Hola Folks!

Sorry about the idiot who trolled you guys to the trick plasma url.

He's been here awhile and had posted useful info in the past but something
flipped in his brain, so had to kick him out.

a1c3m - qiman13 - Aaron

Hola Folks!

In the event you don't read KeelyNet every couple of days, this TED video popped
up in the news and I think it is just fascinating;

I could so see this lady in our Roundtable group back in Dallas in the
90's...exactly the kind of people I love to be around whenever possible.

04/28/11 - Modding viruses to do things we want and make things we need

MIT's Angela Belcher speeks at TED about how her lab is programs viruses to make
elegant nanoscale structures that humans can use. Selecting for high-performing
genes through directed evolution, she's produced viruses that can construct
powerful new batteries, clean hydrogen fuels and record-breaking solar cells.

This research is one of the most powerful approaches to creating the bots
necessary to fix the bugs in our bodies that allow us to get sick and to age.
Viruses have spent millions of years getting very good at interacting with and
reprogramming our cells. All we need to do is code them to enhance rather than
damage our cells.

Sounds like Grebennikov's Flying Platform which uses nano structures to repel
local gravity and produce lift.

"How and why did I come to this discovery? In the summer of 1988, as I was
examining under a microscope the chitin shells of insects, their pinnate
(feathery) feelers, and the thinnest structure of butterflies' wings, I got
interested in an amazingly rhythmical microstructure of one large insect detail.
It was an extremely well-ordered composition, as though pressed on a complex
machine according to special blueprints and calculations. As I saw it, the
intricate sponginess was clearly not necessary either for the durability of the
detail, or for its decoration. I had never observed anything like this unusual
micro-ornament either in nature, in technology, or in art."

I love this woman, bet she'd be fascinating to be around! She has it in one, the
key is ARRAYS to scale up very weak effects. - JWD) - Full Article Source

http://www.ted.com/talks/angela_belcher_using_nature_to_grow_batteries.html

Hola Folks!

This is so sad and I think helps explains America's decline in science;

04/28/11 - Why Science Is a Lousy Career Choice

"bama had a town hall meeting at Facebook's headquarters last week and said that
he wanted to encourage females and minorities to pursue STEM disciplines
(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics).

However, Pastabagel writes that the need for American students to study STEM is
one of the tired refrains in modern American politics and that plenty of people
already study science, but they don't work in science.

'MIT grads are more likely to end up in the financial industry, where quants and
traders are very well compensated, than in the semiconductor industry where the
spectre of outsourcing to India and Asia will hang over their heads for their
entire career.'

Philip Greenspun adds that science can be fun, but considered as a career,
science suffers by comparison to the professions and the business world. 'The
average scientist that I encounter expresses bitterness about

     (a) low pay,
     (b) not getting enough credit or references to his or her work,
     (c) not knowing where the next job is coming from,
     (d) not having enough money or job security to get married and/or have
children,'

writes Greenspun. 'Pursuing science as a career seems so irrational that one
wonders why any young American would do it.'"

(And the idiot government planners put out 130 million for energy research and
blow 663.8 billion (in 2010) for useless, endless wars and military spending...

country is going to hell in a handbasket and dragging down the whole world,
American children are dumber than ever with little or no interest in science and
we can't stop messing in other countries business and destroying our own in the
process.

What annoys me is many of the root causes for all these problems are identified
and recognized but there is rarely if ever a concerted, organized effort to
correct them.

President Dwight Eisenhower was absolutely PRESCIENT in his warnings about
science, freedom, industry and the threat from the military/industrial complex
as in the excellent sound archives below.

You've probably heard the small excerpt but it would behoove all of us to listen
to and heed with all seriousness the entire speech. There will come a time when
people say enough..what form will it take, marches or armed revolution, we shall
see. - JWD) - Full Article Source

http://science.slashdot.org/story/11/04/25/164228/Why-Science-Is-a-Lousy-Career-\
Choice

Eisenhower Part 1;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pWAGgLSCSQ

Eisenhower Part 2;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oACur8v1188

Hola Folks!

Norman Wootan sent this video URL and I added a bit to it, interesting
idea...how screwed up do we have to get before (if anything) we get help?

04/28/11 - Have we Screwed up so bad now we are ready for Alien Intervention?

War in Iraq, War in Afghanistan, War in Libya, Gulf oil spill, Government
Imploding, Plutonium in the air, in the water and on the ground worldwide,

People desperate and out of jobs with no hope, financial meltdowns and countries
failing worldwide, drought, tornados, firestorms, hasn't been such chaos since
WWII.

If ever there was a time for aliens to step in and either HELP fix our problems
or Invade, now is the time.

Maybe all this is the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Armegeddon, Aztec/Mayan
2012 or whatever end times theory to which you subscribe.

Sure seems like we just can't help but screw up everything mankind touches, out
of greed or sheer stupidity. - Full Article Source

UFO Invasion?;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RvDBxZiy88

most salient parts of 'The Day the Earth Stood Still' warning us we are watched
and if we don't get it together, we will be snuffed out;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WXye1YpWXQ

Hola Folks!

These guys are onto something really great, DIY civilization builders;

04/28/11 - Open-sourced blueprints for civilization

Using wikis and digital fabrication tools, TED Fellow Marcin Jakubowski is
open-sourcing the blueprints for 50 farm machines, allowing anyone to build
their own tractor or harvester from scratch.

And that's only the first step in a project to write an instruction set for an
entire self-sustaining village (starting cost: $10,000). Check out
OpenFarmTech.org - Full Article Source

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GEMkvT0DEk

http://www.openfarmtech.org/

Hola Folks!

I've always been interested in other ways of approaching problem solving...for
many years I was fascinated by Edward de Bono's 'lateral thinking' because of
all the new branches it opens when applied.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_thinking

"Lateral thinking is solving problems through an indirect and creative approach,
using reasoning that is not immediately obvious and involving ideas that may not
be obtainable by using only traditional step-by-step logic. The term lateral
thinking was coined by Edward de Bono in the book New Think: The Use of Lateral
Thinking published in 1967."

I remember posting it on the KeelyNet BBS many years ago and the article I
sourced said it was sideways thinking...imagine a crab who walks sideways rather
than in a straight line.

Now comes this fascinating and entertaining TED video;

04/28/11 - "The shock of the possible" - Learn Productive Thinking

Think you think as well as you can? Think again. Regardless of your basic
equipment you can learn to think better — more productively, more creatively,
more effectively.

Tim Hurson (@tim_hurson) shows you a proven, repeatable process that will help
you have more ideas, better ideas, more of the time. Tim Hurson's Productive
Thinking model has helped thousands of people in Fortune 500 and FTSE 100
corporations around the world think more creatively, more innovatively, and more
productively.

Learn the real secret of the great minds in history — that productive thinking
is a skill that can be learned and developed. - Full Article Source

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62PgFb2cXSg

Hola Tom et al!

Tom Bearden wrote:
  >
http://www.projectworldawareness.com/2010/10/terrifying-scientific-discovery-str\
ange-emissions-by-sun-are-suddenly-mutating-matter/

  >

Yes, received your 05/04 email with the above URL, thanks Tom. It
sounded familiar so I found it posted on Keelynet back on December 28th;

http://www.keelynet.com/indexdec1210.htm#28

Now isn't that an odd synchronicity/coincidence....that the automatic
indexer numbered that article as #28 and it was posted on 12/28/11.

Of course there were a total of 24 items posted on the 28th out of a
total of 318 items for that month but still its more than a bit odd.
-----------------------
When such things happen we are supposed to wake up and look around
because they have a hidden meaning which we are supposed to discover.

http://keelynet.com/unclass/insight.htm

If you feel connected to something other than yourself, you are becoming
a part of a greater purpose and recognizing that you have a part to play.

Each coincidence is a test. You can't learn until you pass the test. If
you don't get it the first time, you get successive opportunities, each
with a firmer influence.

Each time is a louder wake up call. It is up to each of us to recognize
when the coincidence occurs and try to find the message that is being
communicated to us.

7th Insight

The 7th insight deals with the process of consciously evolving yourself,
staying alert to every coincidence, every answer the universe provides
for you.

Sometimes, when things have a special meaning, they jump out at you,
entering your consciousness in a forceful way, coming to you as guidance.
-----------------------
Besides the amazing article of itself, this part stands out as important
to me;

"If particles interacting with the matter are not the cause—and matter
is being affected by a new force of nature-then time itself may be
speeding up and there's no way to stop it."
------------------------
And the Mayan Calendar 2012 is supposed to be the 'end of time';

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2007-03-27-maya-2012_n.htm

"In 2012, Daniel Pinchbeck anticipates a "change in the nature of
consciousness," assisted by indigenous insights and psychedelic drug use."

"Its Long Count calendar, which was discontinued under Spanish
colonization, tracks more than 5,000 years, then resets at year zero
(2012)."
------------------------
And the late Terence Mckenna developed his entire Timewave Zero theory
and software with 2012 being the end of time;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon

"Timewave zero" is a numerological formula that purports to calculate
the ebb and flow of "novelty", defined as increase over time in the
universe's interconnectedness, or organized complexity.[63]

According to Terence McKenna the universe has a teleological attractor
at the end of time that increases interconnectedness, eventually
reaching a singularity of infinite complexity in 2012, at which point
anything and everything imaginable will occur simultaneously.

He conceived this idea over several years in the early to mid-1970s
while using psilocybin mushrooms and DMT.[63]

McKenna expressed "novelty" in a computer program which purportedly
produces a waveform known as timewave zero or the timewave. Based on
McKenna's interpretation of the King Wen sequence of the I Ching,[40]
the graph appears to show great periods of novelty corresponding with
major shifts in humanity's biological and sociocultural evolution.

He believed that the events of any given time are recursively related to
the events of other times, and chose the atomic bombing of Hiroshima as
the basis for calculating his end date of November 2012.

When he later discovered this date's proximity to the end of the 13th
b'ak'tun of the Maya calendar, he revised his hypothesis so that the two
dates matched.[64]

The first edition of The Invisible Landscape refers to 2012 (but no
specific day during the year) only twice. It was only in 1983, with the
publication of Sharer's revised table of date correlations in the 4th
edition of Morley's The Ancient Maya, that each became convinced that
December 21, 2012, had significant meaning.

McKenna subsequently included this specific date throughout the second
edition of The Invisible Landscape, published in 1993.[2]
------------------------
So whether this 28 synchronicity has any meaning or is it just a
coincidence or is it meaningless is anybody's guess.

These days everyone is exposed to so much information and so many things
happening, we have to stress ourselves out just to try to keep up.
------------------------
Ray Kurtzweil thinks man is fast approaching a singularity;

http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2009/04/singularity-man.html

Here are some video interviews for a fascinating introduction to Ray
Kurzweil's ideas about where the exponential growth of technology will
lead.

"A long time ago the brain was a hydrodynamic system. Then the brain
became a steam engine. When I was a kid, the brain was a telephone
switching network. Then it became a digital computer. And then the brain
became a massively parallel digital computer. About two or three years
ago I was giving a talk and someone got up in the audience and asked a
question I'd been waiting for — he said, "but isn't the brain just like
the World Wide Web?"

http://blog.freshjive.com/2011/04/ray-kurzweil-the-rise-of-singularity/

Although much of the Singularity debate revolves around the fusion of
human and machine, Kurzweil also believes that Singularity will spur the
conversion of more physical objects into information files.

“[In the future] I will be able to email you a toaster or toast or a
blouse or a solar panel or a module to build housing or transportation.
What we now consider physical products will become information
files—email attachments.”

Under the theory of Singularity, human beings will for the first time be
able to transcend the limitations of their biological bodies and brains.

Highlighting the rise in Singularity as a massive increase in
intelligence, rather than technology, Kurzweil envisions a point in time
where it will be possible to build a machine that is more intelligent
than humanity.
--------------------
If time is speeding up and since time is associated with gravity and
inertia, electricity and magnetism, then would gravity and inertia be
reduced or increased?

If reduced, the velcro hooks that connect gravity and inertia to mass
might weaken and partially unhook to create havoc with atomic and
molecular bonding at all scales, planetary expansion, earthquakes,
floods, massive climate changes, tornadoes, volcanos but we'll be
smarter for it though I suspect with shorter lifespans.

...as well as mutations as per the article...

Of course everything will change proportionately so how will we be able
to measure such changes if our instruments are also affected?

Curiouser and curiouser...thanks Tom!

Jerry in Ixt

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hola Tom and folks!

Sorry, I screwed up with this;

"Now isn't that an odd synchronicity/coincidence....that the automatic
indexer numbered that article as #28 and it was posted on 12/28/11."

It's 4:30AM and I'm tired so didn't catch it til I'd sent it out. Try
12/28/10...

Jerry in Ixt

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hola Ken et al!

You must be referring to the Pierce Arrow car demo ;

http://keelynet.com/energy/teslafe1.htm

there has always been lots of speculation about that;

1) intercepting cosmic rays (my choice)
2) special high density batteries
3) a local transmitter with the car receiving energy
4) some kind of zero point energy converter

The best bet is #1 since Tesla talked often about the incredible energy
that bombarded us from space yet we hadn't yet learned to tap.

#2 means the batteries had to be recharged, but the story says the
converter didn't work until he put in a secret part

#3 the car was driven as far as 100 miles so I don't think you could
transmit enough useful power to do anything at that distance

#4 is another possibility but it would tie in with cosmic energy though
explained differently due to the quantum foam properties of zpe

I've studied a lot about the properties of time and what is possible
based on what we know and what we suspect.

At this point, I don't think we can actually travel through time, not
backwards or forwards, but we can speed it up or slow it down LOCALLY...

Meaning we could move superfast if we speed time up in our body as so
well described in the excellent novel, then TV show, then movie;

The Girl, the Gold Watch & Everything;

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080792/

When Kirby inherits only one thing from his millionaire uncle: a pocket
watch that can stop time. Only, the bad guys know that he has it, and
will do anything to take it from him. But they don't know that he's
found the girl of his dreams, and she's got a sense of humor that, when
combined with the watch, is devastating.
---------------
The watch didn't 'stop time', it just slowed it down really slow by
speeding up the body of the person or people and things within the field
of the watch.

Here is a brief video clip;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY9sBATdA0Q

and this is the whole movie 1 of 10 parts;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IPX--Q5mkk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAusxtrbZZA&NR=1

the original time machine part 1 of 11;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcziOmxNuus
---------------------
Now some say time is like pages in an animation....as you flip the
pages, you see motion.

Because of this, we could flip back through the pages of time to allow
us to visit any past location.

Of course they rarely address the fact that the earth is spinning about
1,000 miles an hour and orbiting the sun about 50,000 miles an hour and
the solar system is rocketing through space...

So we must also need to return to the same PLACE for that time.

Now one theory claims when we are born, we are connected by some
clocking mechanism to the planet and its fields.

So by tuning to the frequencies of the field at any given time in the
past, it would automatically correct for location and move us only to
the temporal conditions extant at that moment in time.

Our actions could well create entirely different timelines depending on
how drastic those actions were.

There are of course tons of complex other factors that come into
play...what happens if you meet yourself in the past, or if you killed
your great grandfather or showed them something that totally changed
history....

Many movies use the device of a Time Cop or Temporal Oversight group
which makes sure no one screws with time enough to change their current
timeline and alter history.

I think if thats the case, once you change a current timeline enough, it
creates a totally different timeline which pulls you along with it
(Lense-Thirring Frame Dragging).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame-dragging

This other timelines idea was very well presented in the excellent TV
series 'Sliders' which you can watch for free at HULU;

http://www.hulu.com/sliders

This of course was preceded by the interesting TV series 'The Time Tunnel';

http://www.hulu.com/the-time-tunnel

Lots of room for experimentation...the main clues I've come across over
the years are documented (for what they are worth) at;

http://keelynet.com/time.htm

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry in Ixt


--- On Mon, 5/9/11, panacea1 <***@***> wrote:

      From: panacea1 <***@***>
      Subject: Re: interesting ...
      To: "Jerry Decker" <***@***>
      Date: Monday, May 9, 2011, 5:43 PM

      I second that motion ... let's get a time machine
      and go back to get that black box from Tesla!
      Then you can update it with today's technology
      and scale it down or up as needed ...lol

--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hola Folks!

Just received this interesting email from Tom Bearden;

From: Tom Bearden [***@***]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 5:43 PM
To: ***@***
Subject: The World Energy Crisis: Solved by Klimov et. al. of Los Alamos
National Laboratory

Gentlemen:

This is eerie, but absolutely true. Please check it out yourself.  Four
years ago, Dr. Victor Klimov et al. at Los Alamos National Laboratory
produced a permanent solution -- including working models -- of the
world energy crisis.

This work is printed now in leading physics journals of the world, and
in leading nanocrystalline science journals of the world. It was
validated by two great U.S. National Labs: (1) LANL and (2) NREL.

So it is a scientific fact, proven forever.

The below information is attached for you to check it out technically if
you wish to. But at least you should be aware of it.

Sincerely,
Tom Bearden
LT COL, U.S. Army (Retired)
M.S. Nuclear Engineering
www.cheniere.org

P.S. Several nations of the world are now frenziedly using this great
nanocrystalline power breakthrough to develop superpowerful but very
small self-powering ultra-laser weapons that will revolutionize warfare
permanently. - T.E.B.

(I could not find the URL for the article so am posting what Tom sent
me, enjoy. - JWD)
============================================

http://www.heatmyhome.co.uk/solar-panels/solar-panel-energy-seriously-souped-up/\
10

============================================

Free and Practical EM Energy from the Vacuum and Its Use to Power Loads

The solution to the World Energy Crisis has been rigorously demonstrated
and proven by Klimov et. al. at the Los Alamos National Laboratory
(LANL) and further validated by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory
(NREL) about four years or so ago.

It has been openly published in leading physics journals of the world,
and in leading nanocrystalline science journals.

Please check this rigorous work four years or more ago by Dr. Victor
Klimov et al.

Dr. Klimov and his colleagues in LANL have constructed tiny
nanocrystalline solar cells which can absorb the light of a specific
wave length in such a way, that one photon input to a solar cell can and
will energize more than one output electron.

As soon as the output electron absorbs a photon, it disappears for a
very short moment into the quantum field. Being in the virtual state the
electron can borrow energy from the vacuum and thereafter appears again
in our reality.

Now the highly excited electron (with all its excess energy taken freely
from the active virtual state vacuum) can energize up to 7 output
electrons.

This leads to a theoretical coefficient of performance (COP) of up to
700%. A COP = 200% can be easily achieved and it has been, as have been
higher values.

The experiment has also been replicated successfully and validated by
the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden Colorado. [See Herb
Brody, "Solar Power - Seriously Souped Up." New Scientist, May 27, 2006,
p 45].

Quoting Brody: "Make solar cells as small as a molecule; and you get
more than you bargained for. Could this be the route to limitless clean
power?"].

Comment by T.E.B.: Note that the super-excited electron, after emerging
from the seething virtual state vacuum immersion, actually splits into
two or more energized electrons! So the output current of the solar cell
process is freely amplified by excess energy taken on from the local
virtual state vacuum.

Note that at about COP = 3.0, one could conceivably add clamped positive
feedback of one of those output electrons back to the "dive back into
the seething virtual state vacuum" input, replacing the original
electron input, and the unit would be "self-powering" (powered by energy
from the vacuum) while putting out the other two electrons as output.

Or by using some of the output current in a standard photon
radiation-producing process, one could have the positive feedback input
changed to a radiation photon, to replace the initial solar input entirely.

In this fashion, once "jump started" by some source of solar radiation,
the resulting "solar panel" system would become totally self-powering,
taking all its input and output energy directly from the seething active
virtual state vacuum itself.

Indeed, if many of these tiny nanocrystals are packed together, their
output furnishes their own input photons and thus the assemblage becomes
"self-powering". An assemblage about the size of your thumb is
sufficient to power a large electric automobile.

It appears that Klimov's team and its work is being used presently to
develop superpowerful but exceptionally small ultra laser weapons that
will revolutionize modern warfare.

E.g., a powerful, self-powered Klimov laser weapon the size of a bazooka
and carried by one infantryman can in principle be developed that can
destroy large buildings, destroy hostile tanks and vehicles easily,
destroy ships and boats and trains, shoot down hostile aircraft, and --
with a small sensor apparatus added -- detect and shoot down incoming
hostile field artillery rounds.

Such a weapon is self-powering, and so it "never runs out of bullets".
No ammunition resupply is needed.

It appears that the long-desired superpowerful laser pistol is also
being developed for U.S. Internal Security civilian guard forces, also
as an application of Klimov's work.

Such a pistol will be able to disable or even kill a targeted human or a
group of them at a mile and a half. And it will be self-powering.

Additional references: Richard D. Schaller, Vladimir M. Agranovich and
Victor I. Klimov; "High-efficiency carrier multiplication through direct
photogeneration of multi-excitons via virtual single-exciton states."
Nature Physics  Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 189-194.

Richard D. Schaller, Melissa A. Petruska, and Victor I. Klimov; "Effect
of electronic structure on carrier multiplication efficiency:
Comparative study of PbSe and CdSe nanocrystals"; Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol.
87, 2005, 253102.

Richard D. Schaller, Milan Sykora, Jeffrey M. Pietryga, and Victor I.
Klimov, "Seven Excitons at a Cost of One: Redefining the Limits for
Conversion Efficiency of Photons into Charge Carriers," Nano Lett. Vol.
6, 2006, p. 424.

Victor I. Klimov, "Spectral and Dynamical Properties of Multiexcitons in
Semiconductor Nanocrystals," Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, Vol.
58, No. 1, 2007, p. 635.

M. C. Hanna, A. J. Nozik. "Solar conversion efficiency of photovoltaic
and photoelectrolysis cells with carrier multiplication absorbers,"
Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 100, No. 7, 2006, p. 07450.

Sung Jin Kim, Won Jin Kim, Yudhisthira Sahoo, Alexander N. Cartwright,
Paras N. Prasad, "Multiple exciton generation and electrical extraction
from a PbSe quantum dot photoconductor," Applied Physics Letters, Vol.
92, No. 3, 2008, p. 031107.

Alberto Franceschetti, Yong Zhang, "Multiexciton Absorption and Multiple
Exciton Generation in CdSe Quantum Dots," Physical Review Letters, Vol.
100, No. 13, 2008, p. 136805.

G. Allan, C. Delerue, "Role of impact ionization in multiple exciton
generation in PbSe nanocrystals," Physical Review B, Vol. 73 (20), 2006,
p. 205423.

Hsiang-Yu Chen, Michael K. F. Lo, Guanwen Yang, Harold G. Monbouquette,
Yang Yang, "Nanoparticle-assisted high photoconductive gain in
composites of polymer and fullerene," Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 3 (9),
2008, p. 543.

M.C. Beard, R.J. Ellingson, "Multiple exciton generation in
semiconductor nanocrystals: Toward efficient solar energy conversion,"
Laser & Photonics Review, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2008, p. 377.

Quoting: "Now Victor Klimov and colleagues at the Alamos National
Laboratory have designed nanocrystals with cores and shells made from
different semiconductor materials in such a way that electrons and holes
are physically isolated from each other. The scientists said in such
engineered nanocrystals, only one exciton per nanocrystal is required
for optical amplification. That, they said, opens the door to practical
use in laser applications."  ["Scientists Create New Type of
Nanocrystal," PHYSORG.COM, Nanotechnology, May 24, 2007].

Seo, Hye-won; Tu, Li-wei; Ho, Cheng-ying; Wang, Chang-kong; Lin,
Yuan-ting. "Multi-Junction Solar Cell," United States Patent
20080178931, July 31, 2008. A photovoltaic device having multi-junction
nanostructures deposited as a multi-layered thin film on a substrate.
Preferably, the device is grown as InxGa1-xN multi-layered junctions
with the gradient x, where x is any value in the range from zero to one.
The nanostructures are preferably 5-500 nanometers and more preferably
10-20 nanometers in diameter. The values of x are selected so that the
bandgap of each layer is varied from 0.7 eV to 3.4 eV to match as nearly
as possible the solar energy spectrum of 0.4 eV-4 eV.

J. R. Minkel, "Brighter Prospects for Cheap Lasers in Rainbow Colors,"
Scientific American (website), May 25, 2007.
===============================================

Additional Background Information

Meanwhile, with respect to the desperately needed civilian applications
to power automobiles, homes, cities, trains, ships, aircraft, etc., the
U.S. Department of Energy is sitting on its hands, and totally ignoring
how easily the world energy crisis can now be (indeed HAS BEEN)
permanently solved, even after rigorous scientific proof has already
been accomplished, and even though it has been developed and validated
by LANL, validated also at NREL, and is now widely published in leading
physics and nanocrystalline journals worldwide.

The bottom line is that the world energy crisis has been rigorously
solved, rigorously replicated and validated, and this solution is now
accepted worldwide in physics and nanocrystalline science.

Thus it has been rigorously proven for all time, and it never has to be
proven again.

But eerily, it just has not been "generally noticed" yet!


--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

Hello!



It's been years since I studied this technology seriously, be we are having
quite a drought here in Texas, and I am wondering if anyone has had any GOOD
experiences using these Cloud Buster devices? Has anyone acquired any
drawings and directions for making some?  Years ago, I saw some that looked
like large saxophones.. I "think" I remember seeing some that were just
various heights of PVC pipe, in some sort of bucket. but I can't recall.



Any experiences with this idea?  Good / Bad / Otherwise?



Thanks!



Jennifer



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Anybody know anything about this? It looks like a hoax to me, but I would like
some solid information, please, if any exists.
 
 
 
Now a classified technology of the US Military that is being developed since
decades. The trigger was that the Nazis first developed it, which was known to
Albert Einstein and one of the reasons of his giving the atomic bomb to
President Roosevelt, and the head of this project was Wernher von Braun, who
later worked for the NASA in USA. It was him who first started experiments, then
in USA, with this weaponry and since then it was developed further through a
long range of experiments that go to this day and that cost the lives of
hundreds of US marines. All is documented in this well-written but very
technical book:


http://www.amazon.com/Secrets-Antigravity-Propulsion-Classified-Technology/dp/15\
9143078X/


See also the many links of this Google search to get the information that many
Americans ignore. Why? For the same reason that Tesla's scientific documents
landed with the FBI/CIA and are exploited secretly, and without giving credit to
the pioneer. This is how it works in USA, and this is really notorious. The very
reason to classify technologies is an instrument in the hands of a government
that by and large never was leading people, but is manipulating and sidetracking
people into consumerism, namely to keep them from finding their true identity
through getting true knowledge.
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=president+obama+declassified\
+antigravity&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
 
 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I believe you should read the Klimov papers before getting too excited -- as
indicated they are available.  Great work has been done by him and his team,
however, well, just read his papers for yourself....

Hola Robert!

I don't have the links but you must, so why don't you post them along with a
refutation or whatever you are trying to say but are not saying about what was
posted?

Otherwise what was the point of your post if you can't offer something???

I can only do so much ya know...

Jerry in Ixt



--- On Wed, 5/11/11, annoy9619@... <annoy9619@...> wrote:

> From: annoy9619@... <annoy9619@...>
> Subject: Re: [KeelyNet_Interact] Free EM energy from the Vacuum
> To: KeelyNet_Interact@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 5:10 PM
> I believe you should read the Klimov
> papers before getting too excited -- as indicated they are
> available.  Great work has been done by him and his
> team, however, well, just read his papers for yourself....
>

Hola Ash et al!

With regard to Lawrence;

  > His concept is simple and it makes sense at a certain level. The root
  > function is this: When a system is resonant, the impedance drops to a
  > minimum and when the impedance is low enough, energy from the
  > environment can be mixed with energy in the system with little or no
  > restrictions.

  > He has actively looked for natural systems that provide this process.
  > One place he looked was to tuning forks. If his concept (which he
  > attributes to God) was right, then adding more sympathetic tuning
  > forks would allow energy to be extracted from the air to keep the
  > vibrations going and to amplify the power of the sound.

  > Theoretically if energy is being extracted from the original fork,
  > then it will decrease in amplitude as more and more forks are
  > added to the group and the wave energy is absorbed to cause the
  > sympathetic vibrations.

  > Purportedly (and someone should get the details on this and
  > publish them, or replicate the test for proof), the 'MIT' of
  > China did the test just to satisfy the fact that no such test
  > exists on the record so far.

  > To everyone's surprise, adding 10 forks and striking the primary
  > not only increased the amplitude of the resonate wave, but
  > also increased the length of time for the group vibration to
  > . . . IIRC, 3 days. That is what Lawrence claimed. According to
  > him, the University will be writing a paper on their findings. He
  > then told me that he was able to obtain 30 seconds of run time on
  > his air coil after the battery was removed.

A few things come to mind;

Dr. Hartmann writing about Keely's views on tuning forks;

http://keelynet.com/keely/klybrain.txt

Everybody knows  that  a note struck upon  an  instrument will produce
sound  in  a  correspondingly  attuned  instrument  in its vicinity.

If connected with a tuning fork, it  will produce a corresponding sound
in the latter; and IF CONNECTED WITH A THOUSAND SUCH  TUNING  FORKS, IT
WILL MAKE ALL  THE THOUSAND SOUND, AND PRODUCE A NOISE FAR GREATER THAN
THE ORIGINAL SOUND, WITHOUT THE LATTER BECOMING ANY WEAKER FOR IT.

Here, then, is the AUGMENTATION OR MULTIPLICATION  OF POWER.  If we had
any means to  TRANSFORM SOUND again into MECHANICAL  MOTION,  we  would
have a THOUSANDFOLD MULTIPLICATION OF MECHANICAL MOTION.

...Nor does the idea seem to be Utopian if we remember that modern
science heretofore only knew  the  law  of the conservation of energy;
while to the scientist of the future the law  of the AUGMENTATION OF
ENERGY will be unveiled.

As the age which has passed away has been the age of steam,  the coming
era will be  the age of induction.  There will be a universal rising up
of LOWER VIBRATIONS INTO HIGHER VIBRATIONS, in the realm of motion.

Mr. Keely will, perhaps, TRANSFORM  SOUND  INTO  MECHANICAL  MOTION  by
applying the LAW OF AUGMENTATION AND MULTIPLICATION OF FORCE."
-----------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ernst_Worrell_Keely

In 1872, Keely invited scientists to attend a demonstration at his
laboratory at 1422 North Twentieth Street Philadelphia, of a machine
which he asserted was motivated by a new and hitherto unknown force.
Keely announced that he had discovered a principle for power production
based on the musical vibrations of tuning forks and that music could
resonate with atoms or with the aether.

Keely assembled an apparatus on top of which was screwed a globe with
several apertures to which tubes were fixed, leading to cylinders. A
reporter asked if he could see the globe's contents, but Keely declined,
saying that it would take too long, and that he wished to show results
rather than the mechanism. Keely then proceeded by taking a violin bow
and rubbing it across one of two large tuning forks which formed part of
his apparatus. After making a minor adjustment to the device, he opened
a stopcock leading into one of the cylinders and the witnesses heard "a
hiss as of escaping air". Keely told them that it was in fact "etheric
vapor", adding "It ain't compressed air or any vapor having substance."
The force was then used to lift some weights, and Keely claimed that he
had about 22,000 psi of pressure at his disposal.[3]
-------------------
Egyptian tuning forks

http://keelynet.com/keely/fork.htm
-------------------
The tuning fork car

http://keelynet.com/interact/archive/00001461.htm
-------------------
http://tesla3.com/free_websites/zpe_keelynet3.html

The Hubbard & McKie machines appear to have used the principle Keely
talks about where one excited tuning fork, placed in a room of hundreds
of thousands of resonant forks, would cause all the other forks to
resonate to a similar intensity, thus AUGMENTING the force. Magnets
attached to the vibrating tines of tuning forks would be driven in and
out as the tines moved. Coils of wire wrapped around the tines or in
their presence would inductively produce a current that could be
extracted. One excited fork would thus drive many other forks w/magnets
so that energy would be multiplied. And this method will not produce the
anomalous effects reported with some ZPE tapping devices (as with
Sweet).Any other ideas on how we can quite screwing around and do some
basic tests that will show how power (mechnanical or electrical) can be
extracted as overunity, whether aether/zpe, resonant or gravity driven?
----------------------
You might recall Hubbards claims that you can have one central coil that
feeds 6-8 secondary coils and that through resonance you could 'evoke'
additional energy from space for the same amount of power in the
secondary coils.

http://www.rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm
--------------------
and the more modern Scott Mckie;

http://keelynet.com/energy/mckie.htm
---------------------
My understanding of Bearden 'Final Secret' as something like this..that
you get the same voltage on the end of every wire in a multiwire
bundle....say 100 insulated wires all with the same voltage at the ends...

That where there is voltage you can 'evoke' current equal to whatever
needs the load requires

Best analogy of this I've found is...imagine a huge wire, maybe a foot
thick...voltage free amps can be drawn from the center core to the
outside edge where the no voltage amps mix with the outside voltage to
produce useable power when it flips by 90 degrees and moves as a current
to power the load(s) attached to it.

Tewari, dePalma and others say this with homopolar motors...that the
energy comes from the center of the magnet and is moved to the outside
rim where it is tapped as high amperage DC with brushes or carbon contacts.

Typically homopolar generators produce 1.5 volts DC at anywhere from
1000-1500 AMPS...sounds like a lot of power but Volts X Amps = Watts so
that is 1000 X 1.5 = 1,500 watts
----------------------------
There is a connection here to the mythical Dr. Gee in an old flying
saucer book, ah yes, Frank Scully 'Behind the Flying Saucers' where he
discusses the properties of magnetic lines of force and says if you can
cross flux lines by 90 degrees you can destroy matter, etc.

Possibly if you can tilt one set of flux lines against another at
varying angles LESS THAN 90 you can get various other forces,
electricity, heat, mechanical force, etc...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3927939/BEHIND-THE-FLYING-SAUCERS-Frank-Scully-134-pp-\
ebook

Mantell's plane and every portion of his plane from teh motor to the
tips of the wings hung together by reason of magnetic frequency. This
was true of even Mantell himself. Therefore all that a flying saucer had
to to do disintegrate Mantell's plane, the lecturer revealed, was to
demagnetize it.

No two lines have ever been known to cross each other naturally. If
forced to do so, or if crossed by 'accident' you get disintegration and
fire. Anybody who could create such a magnetic disturbance could wipe
out every living thing on this earth in a second.

They had come to the conclusion that everything existing owed its shape
and being to magnetic lines of force. He explained there are 1,257
magnetic lines of force to the square centimeter. That is to say, to
about a half inch.
----------------
Our late friend Peter Kelly always said 'energy as information'...that
you can suppress the magnetic component of any mass so that you only
have the electric which you can easily modify to whatever you wish
(using radionics and other methods)...then you bring in the magnetic
component and it will TRANSMUTE the mass to fit the new electric pattern...
----------------
So it appears that through resonance we can use the neutral centers of
resonant masses to 'evoke' additional free power that we can convert to
the forms we want...mechanical motion, electricity (coils), heat, etc...

I wish this Lawrence fellow the best of luck in producing a new type of
resonant power generator.

Jerry @ Keelynet in Ixt



Ashtweth Palise wrote:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Harvey Gramm* <hwgramm@... <mailto:hwgramm@...>>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:43 PM
> Subject: "Is this True?"
> To: ashtweth Palise <ashtweth@... <mailto:ashtweth@...>>
>
>
> Hi Ash,
>
> I have learned some things after dealing with Lawrence on a personal
> basis and must state that the internet certainly leaves out important
> details both with regards to his concepts and with regards to him
> personally.
>
> I found him to be very kind and generous in person and he took over 6
> hours with us (including dinner) to try and help me understand his
> concepts. I have done the math on his pendulum spreadsheet and I think
> he has made an error there, but it is not critical that the pendulum
> concept work. He has a difficult time trying to explain it and gets
> exasperated when the matter is not easily grasped - because in his mind
> it is extremely simple - he sees an asymmetry that can be exploited
> there. Thankfully, he has another Harvey, who claims to have degrees in
> mathematics and I have told him that I will patiently await Harvey K.'s
> work which should lay it out for me in the technical terms I understand.
>
> His concept is simple and it makes sense at a certain level. The root
> function is this: When a system is resonant, the impedance drops to a
> minimum and when the impedance is low enough, energy from the
> environment can be mixed with energy in the system with little or no
> restrictions.
>
> He has actively looked for natural systems that provide this process.
> One place he looked was to tuning forks. If his concept (which he
> attributes to God) was right, then adding more sympathetic tuning forks
> would allow energy to be extracted from the air to keep the vibrations
> going and to amplify the power of the sound.  Theoretically if energy is
> being extracted from the original fork, then it will decrease in
> amplitude as more and more forks are added to the group and the wave
> energy is absorbed to cause the sympathetic vibrations. Purportedly (and
> someone should get the details on this and publish them, or replicate
> the test for proof), the 'MIT' of China did the test just to satisfy the
> fact that no such test exists on the record so far. To everyone's
> surprise, adding 10 forks and striking the primary not only increased
> the amplitude of the resonate wave, but also increased the length of
> time for the group vibration to . . . IIRC, 3 days. That is what
> Lawrence claimed. According to him, the University will be writing a
> paper on their findings.
>
> He then told me that he was able to obtain 30 seconds of run time on his
> air coil after the battery was removed. I held that coil in my hand and
> I know that it does not possess enough inductance to ring for 30
> seconds, especially with a dual load on it. That definitely piqued my
> curiosity, and I told him that if he is removing the power source and
> getting extended runs, then the implications are huge. To that he told
> me that a team in China purportedly sustained 30 minutes after removing
> the power source. I don't know any of the details on that at all. This
> information was enough to get me interested in trying to replicate.
> Looking at his coil I recognized a feature which is probably very
> important to these resonant systems - the wires are bonded together so
> there is no mistake of a 1:1 ratio.
>
> He also drew attention to the Joule Ringer which runs for quite a while
> with the battery removed, but Lasersabre does not make any claims with
> regards to that.
>
> Lawrence's claim that I have replicated his FLEET is premature - I have
> only just started and I have not evaluated any power ratios whatsoever.
> The scope shot I sent Lawrence is to show the resonant waveform on the
> secondary. The top trace is an uncalibrated primary voltage (at the
> collector) and the bottom trace is a calibrated secondary voltage.
> Obviously the Emitter is grounded to the scope ground as is the
> secondary reference, so the secondary is not floating, but is bonded to
> the primary by the shared scope grounds.
>
> My first attempt at this is a standard Joule Thief arrangement, with an
> added secondary. Now, keep in mind that the standard JT uses the single
> secondary to turn off the transistor. Lawrence added another winding to
> power a second LED. I decided to forgo the drain to the second LED and
> allow the tertiary winding to simply resonate by adding the proper
> capacitance across the winding. I specifically targeted the system for 6
> kHz because that is a frequency that Steven Marks used in his stuff. To
> my surprise, my JT circuit was oscillating at well over 10 MHz. My 10
> MHz scope could not properly display the wave form. So I started slowing
> the frequency down and was able to get it down to around 2.7 MHz before
> it would crap out. Now mind you, I have not identified the inductance of
> this thing yet, and I was using toroidal coil math and even solenoid
> coil math to get a ball park of what it might be. Those calcs placed it
> down around 0.966 µH - 1.2 µH. I used a couple of different audio
> amplifiers to see if I could dial in the resonance and must say, these
> things have harmonics all over the map and they act like they want to
> resonate with all of them. I'll probably do a vid of what I'm talking
> about. At any rate, I met a crossroads where I either had to try and
> build a special oscillator that would run at my preferred frequency of 6
> kHz, or I would have to revamp my resonant tank to run around 2.7 MHz.
> It was easier to do the latter.
>
> But the circuit was bugging me, nagging at my mind. I used a standard
> everyday flat 3 Wire extension cord - this is a key. All three wires are
> bonded so they have to be the same length. So it doesn't matter if some
> turns are bigger than others because at that location in space, the
> secondary and tertiary windings are precisely right there. But the thing
> that was bugging me, was that we were using one of the windings solely
> to drive the base of the transistor to turn it off - it seemed to defeat
> my goal here. I want two resonant coils, like two extra tuning forks.
> So, even though I was able to get a slightly greater output on that one
> winding, I still feel that I am not in the right place. If it was the
> right place we should get huge reactive amplitudes here. It may be that
> I am losing energy to RF, and I might add that this could be the
> environment where Lawrence is getting his gains from, RF cell towers -
> but that is another topic. Today, I added another winding, precisely on
> top of the center wire all around the cord and changed everything to use
> that winding for the base drive. This allows me to use the other two,
> well bonded as independent resonant tanks inductively coupled to the system.
>
> The amplitude nearly doubled during resonance and I get some really
> interesting harmonic modes as well. So not only did I add another
> reactive circuit, but the amplitude on both of them is greater than it
> would be without. So far, this still falls within my current
> understanding of how things should work, in fact I was expecting much
> higher amplitudes considering there is very little resistance in the
> resonant tanks and the system is being pumped. Evidently the primary is
> draining energy from the secondaries and this caps the levels. The
> entire system is interdependent but seems to thrive off of the magnetic
> storage provided by the extra coils. In other words, more coils means
> better performance as long as they can be precision tuned. I have seen
> NO indication yet that the power source can be removed and have tested
> for this many times - but I'm hopeful that it could happen.
>
> My coil is wrapped around a 3" x 1/2" wide masking tape roll with only a
> few layers of tape left on it (about 1/4" thick cardboard and all). The
> cross section coil diameter is approximately 1", and the overall
> diameter of the toroid as pictured is about 4" with 22 turns. The
> matching capacitance as marked is 1000pf + 100pf + 56pf = 1156pf on one
> winding, and 1000pf + 3 x 56pf = 1168pf on the other side. So it is not
> yet precision tuned as I am manually selecting values from a tray of
> capacitors I have and adding them in to see the resonant spikes. The
> amplitude is different between the two, so that tells us that the small
> capacitance difference does effect the resonant frequency. The primary
> winding is operating near 3 MHz and I am able to adjust this some by
> putting some capacitance across the base emitter and then adjust the
> charge current via the series resistance. I have a course POT (50k), a
> fine POT (10k) and a pair of 1k's in parallel to give me the adjustments
> I have been using. I have some variable caps around here somewhere too -
> but need to find them - they may make tuning easier. I'd like to keep
> the resistance to a minimum on this stuff, but I think Lawrence relied
> on it to get things tuned. The transistor I am using is a standard
> PN2222 and I do have a 1.4V Rectangular Red LED across the collector
> emitter terminals. The circuit is very sensitive to scope probe
> placement and human body capacitance.
>
> So apart from the fact that Lawrence has wrongly jumped to conclusions
> regarding my mathematical background and did rudely hang up the phone on
> me simply because feel I know how the Romerouk-Muller was hoaxed, I
> think there is more to this guy than most people understand. If he does
> not need me to replicate this, then I will cease my work in his behalf
> and let his other 'teams' move on ahead. I met with him, not to evaluate
> his concept, but to help him provide a solid report with regards to the
> power comparisons. He now has Harvey K. to help him understand RMS
> extraction of a periodic non sinusoidal waveform - so I leave him to it.
> I don't need to do that math because I will design my circuit to be
> sinusoidal and the math for that is straightforward.
>
> My last conversation with Lawrence yesterday was "Ok, Harvey, if you
> think Romerouk motor is hoax, then I will not call you any more, goodbye
> - *click*"  to which I immediately called him back and explained that
> what he did was rude and uncalled for. I then told him that I called him
> to let him know that I am looking at my scope and am seeing more output
> than input on a 1:1 wound air coil but since he no longer wishes to
> discuss it, I will respect his wishes - I then said goodbye and hung up
> after which I forwarded him the pics of the coil and scope shot.
>
> Now you know the truth of my temporary brush with Fleet.  Lawrence does
> not have my permission to circulate the pictures I shared with him, nor
> can he truthfully state that I have replicated the Fleet. For a
> certainty, if this is a replication, then the Fleet has serious flaws-
> LOL. No, I think they have something more than what I have here. Because
> of his phone etiquette I have quickly lost interest in helping him but
> if any of you wish to experiment with it, I am happy to help.
>
> Feel free to share this with anyone you wish.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Harvey W. Gramm
>
>
>


--

As always, Research continues....

Nos vemos (seeya!)

Jerry @ Keelynet in Mexico

========================================================
   "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery!"
         from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
             Hope through Science and Invention
        Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
    Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
                 MexiStim Energy Stimulator
                  http://www.mexistim.com/
             Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
               http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
========================================================

The concept and claims and purported test results would be a lot more convincing
if someone (anyone) would use concrete numbers combined with a standard. The
(dB) decibel comes to mind. Or did I miss something in the chain?
+30 seconds on an air coil (speaker?) produced how many (milli)(micro) (nano)
watts?
If a previous post has the answer, just refer to the number.  I don't see it.
Ronald







--- In KeelyNet_Interact@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Decker <jdecker@...> wrote:
>
> Hola Ash et al!
>
> With regard to Lawrence;
>
>  > His concept is simple and it makes sense at a certain level. The root
>  > function is this: When a system is resonant, the impedance drops to a
>  > minimum and when the impedance is low enough, energy from the
>  > environment can be mixed with energy in the system with little or no
>  > restrictions.
>
>  > He has actively looked for natural systems that provide this process.
>  > One place he looked was to tuning forks. If his concept (which he
>  > attributes to God) was right, then adding more sympathetic tuning
>  > forks would allow energy to be extracted from the air to keep the
>  > vibrations going and to amplify the power of the sound.
>
>  > Theoretically if energy is being extracted from the original fork,
>  > then it will decrease in amplitude as more and more forks are
>  > added to the group and the wave energy is absorbed to cause the
>  > sympathetic vibrations.
>
>  > Purportedly (and someone should get the details on this and
>  > publish them, or replicate the test for proof), the 'MIT' of
>  > China did the test just to satisfy the fact that no such test
>  > exists on the record so far.
>
>  > To everyone's surprise, adding 10 forks and striking the primary
>  > not only increased the amplitude of the resonate wave, but
>  > also increased the length of time for the group vibration to
>  > . . . IIRC, 3 days. That is what Lawrence claimed. According to
>  > him, the University will be writing a paper on their findings. He
>  > then told me that he was able to obtain 30 seconds of run time on
>  > his air coil after the battery was removed.
>