Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Know_Nukes
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 22812 - 22841 of 23726   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
22812
Why would he lie and possibly drive votes to Nader and McKinney? He has absolutely *nothing* to gain from being pro-nuclear. Zero. While most Americans are...
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2008
2:44 pm
22813
it's technologically possible if their is a *substantial* net-energy gain. You have to process about a cubic kilometer to get 1 ton of U out of it. That is a...
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2008
2:47 pm
22814
... Your emphasis on the word "have" falsely suggests that seawater uranium has not been mined in experiments ...
csceadraham
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2008
4:30 pm
22815
We are arguing 'value' then. Gold and it's "use" and Uranium and it's "use". In international markets, unfortunately, they are traded as if their actual "use"...
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2008
12:19 am
22816
From: "pete5482" <prowberr@...> ... Yeah, 1.2 cancers per year within 5 km of 16 reactors (from your reference). Emissions from fossil fuels and...
Karl Johanson
karljohanson42
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2008
6:04 am
22817
First off, it's not true that no one takes nuclear energy as their single-issue in this election. I do, and I doubt I'm the only one. Anyone with any sort of...
Reese Dryer
reesedryer
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2008
12:49 pm
22818
By "no one" Reese I mean it's statistically irrelevant politically, ergo, it doesn't guide Obama's POV on the subject. For example, I don't give a rat's ass...
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2008
4:04 pm
22819
I also have nuclear energy support as my number 1 issue determining my vote. I agree totally with Reese, nuclear power is the only current technology that...
nukemannnew2002
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2008
9:47 am
22820
Ads Cite Financial Risks of Nuclear Energy Aaron Glantz, OneWorld US Wed Oct 1, 7:30 PM ET SAN FRANCISCO, Oct 1 (OneWorld) - A leading environmental group ...
Peter
rumjal
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2008
5:04 pm
22821
... Yeah, but what is the half-life of this free, green, carbon-neutral energy source? Best regards, Jim -- Hold the door for the stranger behind you. When the...
Jim Hoerner
jim_hoerner
Offline Send Email
Oct 4, 2008
1:29 am
22822
With wind energy coming on line, now PSEG can close Salem 1 when its 40 year NRC license expires. Well, they could. ;-) As much as we criticize PSEG for how...
Norman Cohen
flower68child
Offline Send Email
Oct 4, 2008
6:17 pm
22823
I think people in NJ *praise* PSEG for running three very safe nuclear reactors which helps keep the price of power down. So...360MW for 1 billion plus...
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2008
3:52 am
22824
From Senator Orrin Hatch's website: ...
schedule80
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2008
10:33 pm
22825
Yes, all true. He really can't stand uranium reactors. Thorium, apparently, he likes. See the discussion on energyfromthorium.com/forum david ... ...
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 6, 2008
3:04 am
22826
... a book on actual paper, that you buy, for much more than it would cost blank. "Prescription for the Planet" by Tom Blees of California. He's an IFR fan....
csceadraham
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2008
8:08 pm
22827
... Good for you. I hope sales go well, but the subtitle, "The Painless Remedy..." seems too good to be true. Not wanting to judge the book by the cover, I saw...
impartial2k01
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2008
9:40 pm
22828
Projected Winter Fuel Expenditures by Fuel and Region The average household winter heating fuel expenditures discussed in this Outlook provide a broad guide to...
Jim Hoerner
jim_hoerner
Offline Send Email
Oct 8, 2008
9:40 am
22829
From: nrc_concerns@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Dave Lochbaum (dlochbaum@...) Sent: Tue 9/30/08 7:00 PM Good Day: NRC launched a new service today....
Know_Nukes Relay
kn_relay
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2008
1:07 am
22830
1 - 7 October 2008 ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT: Australian climate change report 1 October 2008 The final report from Ross Garnaut to the Australian government makes...
Jim Hoerner
jim_hoerner
Offline Send Email
Oct 9, 2008
1:24 am
22831
Fueling our Nuclear Future One frequent argument against the expansion of commercial nuclear power is the the claim that our planet is simply running out of...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Oct 10, 2008
6:04 pm
22832
Excerpt from: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081009144327.htm Promising New Material Could Improve Gas Mileage ScienceDaily (Oct. 10, 2008) -...
Karl Johanson
karljohanson42
Offline Send Email
Oct 11, 2008
1:10 am
22833
Marcel, Thanks - Very Interesting. Question! If nuclear power where to supply the USA's total energy, what countries, if any, would the USA be dependent on...
wolong@...
wolong42
Offline Send Email
Oct 11, 2008
10:20 am
22834
... what ... Canada and Australia. Big problems there. Coal ash yeidling thousands of tons is a possibility. More importantly, undiscovered U deposits. ...
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
1:05 am
22835
From: "David Walters" <dave.walters@...> ... Trading with democracies is a big problem? ... Karl Johanson...
Karl Johanson
karljohanson42
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
2:18 am
22836
There's an article on this topic at: _http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=24376_ (http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=24376) Here's an excerpt (I cannot...
wolong@...
wolong42
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
12:53 pm
22837
I was being sacarstic. :) My point is that there ARE no big problems in uranium fuel. Unless you are India or Pakistan. D. ... uranium"....
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
4:13 pm
22838
He probably has it wrong. We use about 11,000 tons a year, not 67 million! David ... million tons ... domestically ... Russia, ... destination....
David Walters
tialsedov
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
4:15 pm
22839
From: "David Walters" <dave.walters@...> ... Woop. Went right over my head! Karl Johanson...
Karl Johanson
karljohanson42
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
4:34 pm
22840
...   The specific gravity of uranium is roughly 19.  11K tons of uranium therfore has a volume of 11,000/19 = appr. 575 cubic metres, i.e a cube of roughly...
x xx
lesleynward
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
5:07 pm
22841
You can read the rest of my article at: http://www.newpapyrusmagazine.blogspot.com/ Marcel F. Williams ... what ... destination....
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2008
10:29 pm
Messages 22812 - 22841 of 23726   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help