A vote FOR Obama was a vote AGAINST nuclear power. But sadly, many "pro-nukes" lack clarity of vision, preferring instead to ingratiate themselves before the...
"The Chosen One" was chosen in just about the fairest and most democratic system that I know. Not perfect, but even fairer and more accountable than we have in...
[A problem nukes don't have...] Wind turbine's deadly ice shower Published Date: 02 December 2008 By Kirsten Beacock Residents were left fearing for their...
From: "Paul" <iprimap@...> ... A vote for either US party was a vote for fossil fuels & trivial support for any other energy type. ... Hitler & Stalin?...
During the Great Depression, the Roosevelt administration decided to create jobs in the US by expanding electric power into some of the rural areas of America...
Members of this list may be interested in the Nuclear Energy Forum at the online Wall Street Journal. You must be a paid subscriber to the service and...
I was eagerly awaiting Paul's tirade once Obama was elected and I am not disappointed. He manages to inlcude both Hitler and Stalin in his post. <golf clap> ...
Betting the company, even with insurance, is a bad idea Advocates of loan guarantees for new nuclear power plants have argued that federal insurance for 100%...
The Republicans wasted over 600 billion dollars of the tax payer's money in Iraq. And then to add insult to injury, they tried to put an internationally...
The actual cost is nearer $1.4 trillion. True about Sarah Palin. The only way the Republican party could have done more to assure a democrat victory would have...
$1.4 trillions would of gotten us...a $ 5 billion per 1GW plant, about 300 GWs of nuclear, enough to shutdown about every single coal plant in the US reducing...
This is without adding the economies of scale, building multiple units of identical design, the local economic benefit of the construction and operation of the...
... That, of course, assumes that the mass production of so many nuclear reactors wouldn't significantly reduce capital cost which I believe could fall to...
The NEI will have a hard time topping this ad by the American Coalition for Clean Coal Energy... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3q6HeImpPs -- Hold the door...
Obama's Energy & Environment Team They can sing but can they dance? President-elect Obama has picked a sterling team to head up the federal government's energy...
... nuclear reactors wouldn't significantly reduce capital cost which I believe could fall to close to 2 to 3 billion dollars each. ... On the original topic,...
Sorry Jim, but this has it beat by far mostly because it's been running in PRIME TIME: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdHuB7Ovl2o&feature=related Wonderful...
Back in the 1950's nuclear scientists envisioned a post-fossil fuel world with nuclear as the principal powering source for mass produced electric vehicles....
... That's still a bargain. Each AP-1000 reactor produces more than 1100 MWe of power. So that's 4.9 billion to 8.75 billion per 1.1GWe. The TVA's recently...
... The point was: it's nowhere near 2-3 billion$, and it's on the increase. On the other hand... ... ...it's interesting how quickly these things can turn...
... So? Actually, the Chinese are bringing their latest set of SIX at $1565/KW installed: CHEAP. The point is that ALL generation methods have increased, wind...
Guys, Please see the attached Microsoft Word file for NRC approval of final rule expanding security requirements for nuclear power plants. Â In Caritate...
... MW: That's because they're only building two reactors. The way to dramatically reduce capital cost is to build at least 8 reactors at each site. I've...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
