Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

LacanianCompass · Lacanian Compass

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 538
  • Category: Lacan, Jacques
  • Founded: Mar 20, 2006
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 813 - 842 of 968   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#813 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Dec 1, 2011 2:13 pm
Subject: VIIIth WAP Congress -Hurry Up! / 9- english
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Information Bulletin of the VIIIth WAP Congress

Macintosh HD:Users:charlyycele:Desktop:Congreso AMP 2012:Logo definitivo.png

Hurry Up! / 9

Secretary of Hospitality and Tourism / Non-members of the WAP

 

Secretary of Hospitality and Tourism

Important information:

Reduced Rates for rooms at the Hilton Hotel

A new agreement with the Hilton Hotel -venue of the Congress- has been reached, according to which those registered for the Congress who wish to stay at the hotel will benefit from reduced room rates.

New room fees:

- Single Deluxe Room: 239 U$S excl. taxes, breakfast included.

- Double Deluxe Room: 249 U$S excl. taxes, breakfast included.

Reservations may be made through the Congress website www.congresoamp.com, at the Hospitality and Tourism link, where you will find a link to Equinoxe travel agency, who will take care of the whole process (or you can access it directly by clicking here: www.equinoxecongresoamp.com)

For those who would like information and orientation in relation to other hotels, you will also find there other interesting accommodation alternatives.

Equinoxe travel agency will also be able to advise you in all matters concerning your stay in Argentina.

AnalÖa Trachter (Secretary Hospitality and Tourism)

 

Non-members of the WAP

Dear colleagues,╨╨The 8th Congress of the WAP is open to both members and non-members of the WAP.╨The Clinical Day to be held on Wednesday 25th April has been thought of as a space to receive the members' contributions; however, it is not ruled out that some papers proposed by non-members, which may be of special interest, are included.╨Only papers by colleagues who have already registered for the Congress will be received.╨╨

Organising Committee

 

hurry 9

Dieguez Fridman, Argentina



#814 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Sat Dec 3, 2011 3:00 pm
Subject: Pierre-Gilles Gueguen in LQ today on American politics
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
For our Francophone readers . . . 

read Pierre-Gilles Gueguen in today's issue of "Lacan Quotidien" on politics in the United States , which can be found at the link below


LE PARTI DU NON, LE « TEA PARTY » ET « OCCUPY WALL STREET »  Pierre-Gilles Guéguen

http://www.lacanquotidien.fr/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/LQ-105.pdf

#815 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Wed Dec 7, 2011 2:26 pm
Subject: Omaha | Clinical Conversation | Dec 9
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Circle for the Lacanian Orientation of Omaha
and the
Division of Psychoanalysis, Creighton University Department of Psychiatry

invite you to

A Clinical Conversation:

"Where is the Psychoanalytic Act in the Treatment of Psychosis?"
a case presentation by Pam Jespersen

to be held
Friday, December 9
11:30 - 1:00

6910 Pacific Street, Suite 315
Omaha, Nebraska 

There is no fee for this, but as space is limited, you will need to register with Tom Svolos at tsvolos@...
. . . . .
For additional information on Lacanian Compass, visit lacaniancompass.com


#816 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Dec 8, 2011 2:27 pm
Subject: Hurry up! / 11 -English-
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Hurry up! / 11

:::Desktop:Congreso AMP 2012:Logo definitivo.png

VIII Congreso AMP

23-27 de abril 2012 / Hotel Hilton

Macacha Guemes 351 â•„ Puerto Madero â•„ Buenos Aires Argentina

 

╲Space of Art and Psychoanalysis in the 21st Century╡

INVITATION

 

calesita achicada

Parque Lezama, San Telmo, Bs. As.

Dear Colleagues: The organization of the VIIIth Congress of the WAP has been underway for a while now and step by step you have been receiving news of the enthusiastic work being undertaken to make these days in our city an unforgettable experience.

We are aware that the encounter is an epistemic, clinical and political one, but we would also like to take the opportunity â•„ as with our colleagues recently in Brazil during the recent ENAPOL Encounter - to invite all those who work in the field of the plastic arts to share their work in the framework of this Congress

To this end we have obtained a beautiful and ample space in one of the neighbourhoods of this city most rich in history and tradition, which also happens to be located a short distance from the Hilton Hotel where the Congress will take place. A renovated villa which provides space in its rooms for a collection of works of the most distinguished Argentinian artists will be the most propitious context in which to house the artists of the WAP.

Art in the 21st Century is no longer what it was. With respect to its range and proposals there are as many polemics as there are affiliations or refusals. It suffices to visit the spaces dedicated to contemporary art or to glance at the cultural supplements of any newspaper to become aware of this.

Lacan maintained, as did Freud in his way, that the artist is always in advance of the psychoanalyst and that we have to allow ourselves to be taught by them.

This will be a propitious occasion to question in act the status of art in the 21st Century and perhaps to find an adjective that qualifies it in the way that the Buenos Aires poet of song Enrique Santos Discepolo did with the 20th Century. If that was a ╢junk-shop, problematic and febrileâ•˙ then how are we going to name the 21st Century?

The theme of the Congress, ╢The Symbolic Order in the 21st Centuryâ•˙, confronts us with the inescapable of our practice - the new forms of cultural discontent, the new modalities of jouissance that derive from this Symbolic organisation and which the artists of our times reproduce, attenuate or amplify.

By means of light, colour, texture, certain ideas, intuitions or desires take shape, occupy a space, materialise and capture the gaze, proposing a personal take on the world.

Each one of the participants in this exhibition will be able to transmit to us something of their singular way of making art in the 21st Century. This is why we are inviting all our colleagues from the WAP to send in their work in any of the following formats: painting, drawing, sculpture, engraving, photography,collage and textile.

Anyone interested can get in touch with those responsable for the organisation of the Exhibition of Plastic Arts: Rosa Basz and Elsa Maluenda via the following email address: espacioarteamp2012@...

We extend to you in advance an affectionate and cordial welcome


#817 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Dec 8, 2011 2:26 pm
Subject: interview and discussion with Eric Laurent
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
for our Francophone readers . . .

Franois Ansermet and Pierre Magistretti engage Eric Laurent in a discussion on Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience

presented by Fondation Agalma in Geneva

to be found at:


#818 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:47 pm
Subject: LCExpress -- first issue today!!!
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

A new era of the Lacanian Compass journal arrives today: LCExpress.

LCExpress will present one text in each issue and will appear at a greater frequency than in the past.

Many texts will be organized around our Clinical Study Days.

For the first issue, we present "What is the Importance of Dreams in Psychoanalysis Today?"--a text presented by Elisa Alvarenga last year in preparation for Clinical Study Days 5.  The issue is attached in pdf.


2 of 2 File(s)


#819 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:18 pm
Subject: CSD6: Argument and Call for Papers
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Clinical Study Days

presented by Lacanian Compass


CSD6: The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century

February 24-26, 2012
New York, New York


with our guest
Fabin Naparstek
Member of the School and former Analyst of the School
Escuela de la Orientacin Lacaniana

and with the participation of
Pierre-Gilles Gueguen
Analyst Member of the School and former Analyst of the School
cole de la Cause freudienne and New Lacanian School
Special Delegate of the World Association of Psychoanalysis for the United States



ARGUMENT:
"An act," Jacques Lacan declared on January 10, 1968, in reference to the Psychoanalytic Act, "is linked in the determination of the beginning, and very especially where there is need to make one . . ."  We believe we can find two inflections of this: one being the beginning of analysis, the entry of the subject into the analytic discourse, taken from the point of view of the analysant, and the other as the beginning of analysis, the entry of the subject into the analytic discourse, taken from the point of view of the analyst.  This beginning is a beginning for both the analysant and the analyst.  For the analysant, as we explored in Paris during the 2010 Paris-USA Lacan Seminar on "Entering Analysis," this beginning is absolutely specific for each subject, and for each analysis, and, even, for each session, and the beginning is marked by a specific transference, which can be identified from the point of the analysant and the analyst in testimonies and case presentations.  For the analyst, especially at that first moment of being used in the position of analyst, we can find the absolute radical discontinuity between the Lacanian orientation and other approaches to psychoanalysis and clinical practice in Lacan's work: in the formulation of Discourse of the Analyst, in his definition of the transference as the subject supposed to know, and, in the elaboration of the Pass and the institutional structures relating to formation and training elaborated by Lacan and carried forward by Jacques-Alain Miller in the establishment of the Schools of the World Association of Psychoanalysis.

For our next Clinical Study Days, we will explore the status of the Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century.  The Symbolic Order has changed today, even from the moment of the Seminar of Lacan on the Psychoanalytic Act in 1968.  The transference that appeared to Freud closely linked to parental, even paternal, imagos, in part because the Symbolic Order at that moment was closely structured by the Signifier of the Name-of-the-Father, is seen less and less today.  At this moment today, where the Symbolic Order is no longer what it used to be, to take the title of our upcoming Congress of the WAP, the signifier of the Name-of-the-Father no longer functions in the same way, which has implications for the possible paths in the establishment of the transference.  If, as Lacan spoke on November 29, 1967, "this psychoanalytic act is something that is quite essentially linked to the functioning of the transference," what precisely has changed about the transference, or the paths to the establishment of the transference, in today's world?  How do analsants today reach the point of the beginning of an analysis?  And, taken from the perspective of the analyst: in what ways has this new Symbolic Order created a situation that requires a different Direction of the Treatment?  Is it necessary for the psychoanalyst to create new strategies with regard to the transference in the face of this new Symbolic Order?  What is the place of interpretation today in light of this?  And what, for our psychoanalytic institutions, is necessary to sustain a place for psychoanalytic discourse in today's world?  In order for our Schools to facilitate the very passage of an analysant to an analyst, what consequences are there with regard to formation that we are facing in the 21st Century?  These are some of the questions that we raise for our consideration of "The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century."


CALL FOR PAPERS:
The Scientific Committee of the CSD6 is issuing this Call for Papers for the meeting. We are soliciting two types of papers.

The first is clinical case presentations, where the theme of the Study Days The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century should be addressed.  Papers should be both at most 20 minutes long when read aloud and at most 15,000 characters with spaces in length.

The second is papers that address this theme from a cultural or societal perspective, or treat the theme from a theoretical perspective.  They will be part a round table.  Papers in this category should be both at most 10 minutes long when read aloud and at most 7,500 characters with spaces in length.

Please send your texts to the CSD6 Scientific Committee at mcrisaguirre@...

Papers should be submitted not later than December 31, 2011. 

We appreciate your interest and collaboration on the Clinical Study Days, and we are looking forward to receiving your papers and to seeing you in New York City.


Scientific Committee
Maria Cristina Aguirre
Juan Felipe Arango
Alicia Arenas
Thomas Svolos
Karina Tenenbaum





#820 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:44 pm
Subject: nls-messager 272 - DVD 'Rendez-vous chez Lacan'
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 



Messager 272 - 2011/2012


DVD 'Rendez-vous chez Lacan'



16 decembre 2011
16 December 2011


You can order the DVD of Gerard Miller's documentary 'Rendez Vous Chez Lacan' from this website, now: http://www.gerardmiller.fr


"RENDEZ-VOUS CHEZ LACAN" en DVD

Le film de Grard Miller, "Rendez-vous chez Lacan", diffus sur France 3 il y a trois mois, sortira en fvrier en DVD.

Mais vous pouvez ds prsent le commander sur le site : http://www.gerardmiller.fr
et le recevoir ainsi, en avant-premire, ds janvier.

Avec la participation de : Agns Aflalo, Jo Atti, Guy Briole, Antonio di Ciaccia, Jean-Louis Gault, Yasmine Grasser, Alain Grosrichard, Suzanne Hommel, Benot Jacquot, Eric Laurent, Catherine Lazarus, Analle Lebovits, Clotilde Leguil, Lilia Mahjoub, Jacques-Alain Miller, Judith Miller, Jean-Claude Milner, Martin Quenehen, Franois Regnault.


Trois bonus indits ; Entretien avec Judith Miller (17min) - Entretien avec Jacques-Alain Miller (15min) - Le point de vue du ralisateur (14min)


Ci-joint la jaquette du DVD.




Recent NLS-Messager, English: http://www.amp-nls.org/en/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html


Rcents NLS-Messager, franais: http://www.amp-nls.org/fr/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html


Nouvelle cole Lacanienne de Psychanalyse New Lacanian School of Psychoanalysis
www.amp-nls.org http://www.amp-nls.org 

Association Mondiale de Psychanalyse World Association of Psychoanalysis
www.wapol.org http://www.wapol.org  

------

1 of 1 Photo(s)

#821 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:45 pm
Subject: nls-messager 273 - TOWARDS TEL AVIV 13 - Reflections 5
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

nlsMessager2.gif 

Messager 273 - 2011/2012



VERS TEL AVIV 13 / TOWARDS TEL AVIV 13

Xe Congrs NLS 16-17 juin 2012 / 10th NLS Congress 16-17 June 2012


16 decembre 2011

16 December 2011


VERS TEL AVIV 13 - Rflexions 5

 Vers le Congrs de la NLS

"Lire un symptme"                              

"Rflexions"

Cette rubrique a pour but de recueillir diffrents commentaires de collgues, des rflexions, des questions qui pourraient surgir partir de citations choisies, ou des extraits de textes de S. Freud et de J.Lacan. En recueillant des voix et des penses diffrentes, "Rflexions" nous amnera aussi "Lire un symptme" et finalement notre Rencontre Tel Aviv.  Rflexions  vous invite participer ce projet.

Claudia Iddan

                                                                                      Region de Lahich- Danny Barnea   

 

TOWARDS TEL AVIV 13 - Reflections 5

Towards the NLS-Congress

Reading a Symptom


"Reflections"

The aim of this rubric is to gather different commentaries, reflections or questions that emerge from chosen quotes, or from extracts of Freuds or Lacans texts. By gathering different thoughts and voices, Reflections will take us towards Reading a Symptom and in the end to our meeting in Tel Aviv. Reflections invites you to participate in this project.

Claudia Iddan

 ________________________


5 

"A symptom is a sign of, and a substitute for, an instinctual satisfaction which has remained in abeyance; it is a consequence of the process of repression. (p.91) () [It] is that the instinctual impulse has found a substitute in spite of repression, but a substitute which is very much reduced, displaced and inhibited and which is no longer recognizable as a satisfaction (p.95) (...) [T]hus degrading a process of satisfaction to a symptom".

S.Freud; "Inhibition, Symptom and Anxiety" [1926], Standard Edition, Vol. XX, Hogarth.

 

Natalie Wulfing*

Freud formed this theory of symptom formation in terms of a defence against incompatible representations in the much earlier, pre-psychoanalytic text of The Neuropsychoses of Defence [1894]. He differentiates symptoms in Phobia, Hysteria and Compulsion, but the common ground is that a sexual experience (the incompatible idea) gives rise to attempts at erasing it from consciousness. In hysteria this attempt is at the level of repressing the thing, Freud says, at forgetting, which leaves a trace. This memory trace and the affect attached to it cannot be completely rooted out, however, the weakening of the representation by removing the affect is a partial success. In Compulsion afalse connection defuses the original representation, in hysteria it is conversion to the bodily. (SE1)

When we think of the symptom as a satisfaction, it is this different use of the affect that is in question. How has the removal - which in this early text is not at all a removal, but a filteringthrough to a different function, that of the body in hysteria and that of thought in compulsion - maintained a satisfaction and created a symptom? Freud deals with this question in the later text of 1926. The symptom as a sign and a substitute for a satisfaction, evokes the trace that cannot be got rid of.

In his Presentation for Tel-Aviv, Jacques-Alain Miller, making the link to Lacan, positions the symptom in its cause in language, as what, after the effect of repression, abeyance, brings what did not exist in language, into existence. Language is a symptom in the sense that it performs this function of makingsomething exist, through the use of metaphor.

Clearly, what is repressed is a want-to-be par excellence. [...] Language has the function of bringing whatdoesnt exist into Being.

The symptom makes something exist that has no other form of expression, or, hitherto only had an instinctual satisfaction at its disposal.

In one sense, the symptom is that which succeeded in bringing into speech, in the patient's own take on the situation he is in, the expression of something that does not work: I cannot do it, it stops me from living the way I want to, it takes up all my time. The complaint is part of a discourse and a structure that belongs to the category of the deficit, it does not work, hence we think of a desire and a lack in being.

However, Millers argument points beyond the metaphoric element of the symptom:

Under the name of symptomatic leftovers Freud came up against the real of the symptom () [what] falls wide of meaning.

Beyond the complaint, the success of the symptom (it does not work), is the failure of the symptom (the it does not work does not work). Is the failure the same as the real of the symptom? We are reminded of the formula of the real as impossible what does not stop not writing itself. The impossible comes to the fore when the symptoms successful satisfaction leaves something open that disturbs. The reduced satisfaction Freud speaks about, the satisfaction of the symptom, begins to show gaps that let the real of the body come through  unprotected by symptomatic solutions.

Indeed, a symptom vouches for the fact that there has been an event that has marked his jouissance in the Freudiansense of Anzeichen, which introduces an Ersatz, a jouissance there ought not to be, a jouissance that troubles the jouissance there ought to be, i.e. jouissance of its nature as a body.

J.A.Miller; Reading a Symptom  

For Freud, it is the degrading of a satisfaction that becomes a symptom, the grading down of intensity. With Lacan we can say that the fact of having a symptom is indeed a form of taming an otherwise ferocious drive demand. The clinic of the object teaches us that in cases where the object does not function, in states of mania for example, the it does not work is missing, leading the subject to experience the drive in unmediated forms, in its nature as a body.

*Member of the London Society of the NLS, member of the Executive Committee as secretary of the NLS.

__________________



Recent NLS-Messager, English: http://www.amp-nls.org/en/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html

 

Rcents NLS-Messager, franais: http://www.amp-nls.org/fr/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html


Nouvelle cole Lacanienne de Psychanalyse New Lacanian School of Psychoanalysis
www.amp-nls.org http://www.amp-nls.org

Association Mondiale de Psychanalyse World Association of Psychoanalysis
www.wapol.org http://www.wapol.org 



#822 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:55 pm
Subject: Hurry up! 12 / Extension
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Hurry up! / 12

 

VIII Congreso AMP

23-27 de abril 2012 / Hotel Hilton

Macacha Guemes 351 ╄ Puerto Madero ╄ Buenos Aires Argentina


 

Extension

Due to the numerous requests received from our colleagues we have decided to extend the deadline for submission of papers at the Clinical Day on April 25th, until december 31th 2012.

 



Mar del Plata, la FelÖz.



#823 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:55 pm
Subject: CSD6: Argument and Call for Papers
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

The deadline for the submission of papers is extended to January 15!


Clinical Study Days

presented by Lacanian Compass


CSD6: The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century

February 24-26, 2012
New York, New York


with our guest
Fabin Naparstek
Member of the School and former Analyst of the School
Escuela de la Orientacin Lacaniana

and with the participation of
Pierre-Gilles Gueguen
Analyst Member of the School and former Analyst of the School
cole de la Cause freudienne and New Lacanian School
Special Delegate of the World Association of Psychoanalysis for the United States



ARGUMENT:
"An act," Jacques Lacan declared on January 10, 1968, in reference to the Psychoanalytic Act, "is linked in the determination of the beginning, and very especially where there is need to make one . . ."  We believe we can find two inflections of this: one being the beginning of analysis, the entry of the subject into the analytic discourse, taken from the point of view of the analysant, and the other as the beginning of analysis, the entry of the subject into the analytic discourse, taken from the point of view of the analyst.  This beginning is a beginning for both the analysant and the analyst.  For the analysant, as we explored in Paris during the 2010 Paris-USA Lacan Seminar on "Entering Analysis," this beginning is absolutely specific for each subject, and for each analysis, and, even, for each session, and the beginning is marked by a specific transference, which can be identified from the point of the analysant and the analyst in testimonies and case presentations.  For the analyst, especially at that first moment of being used in the position of analyst, we can find the absolute radical discontinuity between the Lacanian orientation and other approaches to psychoanalysis and clinical practice in Lacan's work: in the formulation of Discourse of the Analyst, in his definition of the transference as the subject supposed to know, and, in the elaboration of the Pass and the institutional structures relating to formation and training elaborated by Lacan and carried forward by Jacques-Alain Miller in the establishment of the Schools of the World Association of Psychoanalysis.

For our next Clinical Study Days, we will explore the status of the Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century.  The Symbolic Order has changed today, even from the moment of the Seminar of Lacan on the Psychoanalytic Act in 1968.  The transference that appeared to Freud closely linked to parental, even paternal, imagos, in part because the Symbolic Order at that moment was closely structured by the Signifier of the Name-of-the-Father, is seen less and less today.  At this moment today, where the Symbolic Order is no longer what it used to be, to take the title of our upcoming Congress of the WAP, the signifier of the Name-of-the-Father no longer functions in the same way, which has implications for the possible paths in the establishment of the transference.  If, as Lacan spoke on November 29, 1967, "this psychoanalytic act is something that is quite essentially linked to the functioning of the transference," what precisely has changed about the transference, or the paths to the establishment of the transference, in today's world?  How do analsants today reach the point of the beginning of an analysis?  And, taken from the perspective of the analyst: in what ways has this new Symbolic Order created a situation that requires a different Direction of the Treatment?  Is it necessary for the psychoanalyst to create new strategies with regard to the transference in the face of this new Symbolic Order?  What is the place of interpretation today in light of this?  And what, for our psychoanalytic institutions, is necessary to sustain a place for psychoanalytic discourse in today's world?  In order for our Schools to facilitate the very passage of an analysant to an analyst, what consequences are there with regard to formation that we are facing in the 21st Century?  These are some of the questions that we raise for our consideration of "The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century."


CALL FOR PAPERS:
The Scientific Committee of the CSD6 is issuing this Call for Papers for the meeting. We are soliciting two types of papers.

The first is clinical case presentations, where the theme of the Study Days The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century should be addressed.  Papers should be both at most 20 minutes long when read aloud and at most 15,000 characters with spaces in length.

The second is papers that address this theme from a cultural or societal perspective, or treat the theme from a theoretical perspective.  They will be part a round table.  Papers in this category should be both at most 10 minutes long when read aloud and at most 7,500 characters with spaces in length.

Please send your texts to the CSD6 Scientific Committee at mcrisaguirre@...

Papers should be submitted not later than January 15, 2012. 

We appreciate your interest and collaboration on the Clinical Study Days, and we are looking forward to receiving your papers and to seeing you in New York City.


Scientific Committee
Maria Cristina Aguirre
Juan Felipe Arango
Alicia Arenas
Thomas Svolos
Karina Tenenbaum





#824 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2012 2:16 pm
Subject: CSD6: Argument and Call for Papers
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 

Ten more days till the deadline for the submission of papers!


Clinical Study Days

presented by Lacanian Compass


CSD6: The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century

February 24-26, 2012
New York, New York


with our guest
Fabin Naparstek
Member of the School and former Analyst of the School
Escuela de la Orientacin Lacaniana

and with the participation of
Pierre-Gilles Gueguen
Analyst Member of the School and former Analyst of the School
cole de la Cause freudienne and New Lacanian School
Special Delegate of the World Association of Psychoanalysis for the United States



ARGUMENT:
"An act," Jacques Lacan declared on January 10, 1968, in reference to the Psychoanalytic Act, "is linked in the determination of the beginning, and very especially where there is need to make one . . ."  We believe we can find two inflections of this: one being the beginning of analysis, the entry of the subject into the analytic discourse, taken from the point of view of the analysant, and the other as the beginning of analysis, the entry of the subject into the analytic discourse, taken from the point of view of the analyst.  This beginning is a beginning for both the analysant and the analyst.  For the analysant, as we explored in Paris during the 2010 Paris-USA Lacan Seminar on "Entering Analysis," this beginning is absolutely specific for each subject, and for each analysis, and, even, for each session, and the beginning is marked by a specific transference, which can be identified from the point of the analysant and the analyst in testimonies and case presentations.  For the analyst, especially at that first moment of being used in the position of analyst, we can find the absolute radical discontinuity between the Lacanian orientation and other approaches to psychoanalysis and clinical practice in Lacan's work: in the formulation of Discourse of the Analyst, in his definition of the transference as the subject supposed to know, and, in the elaboration of the Pass and the institutional structures relating to formation and training elaborated by Lacan and carried forward by Jacques-Alain Miller in the establishment of the Schools of the World Association of Psychoanalysis.

For our next Clinical Study Days, we will explore the status of the Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century.  The Symbolic Order has changed today, even from the moment of the Seminar of Lacan on the Psychoanalytic Act in 1968.  The transference that appeared to Freud closely linked to parental, even paternal, imagos, in part because the Symbolic Order at that moment was closely structured by the Signifier of the Name-of-the-Father, is seen less and less today.  At this moment today, where the Symbolic Order is no longer what it used to be, to take the title of our upcoming Congress of the WAP, the signifier of the Name-of-the-Father no longer functions in the same way, which has implications for the possible paths in the establishment of the transference.  If, as Lacan spoke on November 29, 1967, "this psychoanalytic act is something that is quite essentially linked to the functioning of the transference," what precisely has changed about the transference, or the paths to the establishment of the transference, in today's world?  How do analsants today reach the point of the beginning of an analysis?  And, taken from the perspective of the analyst: in what ways has this new Symbolic Order created a situation that requires a different Direction of the Treatment?  Is it necessary for the psychoanalyst to create new strategies with regard to the transference in the face of this new Symbolic Order?  What is the place of interpretation today in light of this?  And what, for our psychoanalytic institutions, is necessary to sustain a place for psychoanalytic discourse in today's world?  In order for our Schools to facilitate the very passage of an analysant to an analyst, what consequences are there with regard to formation that we are facing in the 21st Century?  These are some of the questions that we raise for our consideration of "The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century."


CALL FOR PAPERS:
The Scientific Committee of the CSD6 is issuing this Call for Papers for the meeting. We are soliciting two types of papers.

The first is clinical case presentations, where the theme of the Study Days The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century should be addressed.  Papers should be both at most 20 minutes long when read aloud and at most 15,000 characters with spaces in length.

The second is papers that address this theme from a cultural or societal perspective, or treat the theme from a theoretical perspective.  They will be part a round table.  Papers in this category should be both at most 10 minutes long when read aloud and at most 7,500 characters with spaces in length.

Please send your texts to the CSD6 Scientific Committee at mcrisaguirre@...

Papers should be submitted not later than January 15, 2012. 

We appreciate your interest and collaboration on the Clinical Study Days, and we are looking forward to receiving your papers and to seeing you in New York City.


Scientific Committee
Maria Cristina Aguirre
Juan Felipe Arango
Alicia Arenas
Thomas Svolos
Karina Tenenbaum




#825 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2012 2:14 pm
Subject: nls-messager 282 - 2011/2012 VERS TEL AVIV 18 - TOWARDS TEL AVIV 18 - Preparations in Israel (Completed Programme)
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 

Messager 282 - 2011/2012



VERS TEL AVIV 18 / TOWARDS TEL AVIV 18

Xe Congrs NLS 16-17 juin 2012 / 10th NLS Congress 16-17 June 2012


 

27 decembre 2011

27 December 2011


 


VERS TEL AVIV 18 - Prparation en Isral (programe complt)

Dans sixmois nous nous retrouvons Tel Aviv pour le Xe Congrs de la NLS.


Nos collgues israliens, membres du GIEP-NLS, prparent cette rencontre avec beaucoup de dynamisme et dinvention. Leur programme de travail, que nous communique Claudia Iddan, nous donne une ide des nombreuses activits organises au sein du GIEP et dans les divers lieux o ils travaillent et enseignent. Le dsir quils savent ainsi susciter autour deux pour la psychanalyse lacanienne est communicatif et est une invitation chacun de nous nous joindre au travail et les rencontrer en juin Tel Aviv.

ANNE LYSY





 

TOWARDS TEL AVIV 18 - Preparations in Israel (Completed Programme)




In six months we be in Tel Aviv for the 10th NLS-Congress. 

Our Israeli colleagues, GIEP-NLS members, are preparing this event with a lot of dynamism and invention. Their programme for the year, which Claudia Iddan sent us, gives us an idea of the amount of activities that are organised, both within the GIEP, and in the various places where it works and teaches. Le dsir quils savent ainsi susciter autour deux pour la psychanalyse lacanienne est communicatif et est une invitation chacun de nous nous joindre au travail et les rencontrer en juin Tel Aviv. The desire they know and encourage amongst themselves for Lacanian psychoanalysis communicates itself to us and is an invitation to each of us to join the work and to meet up in June in Tel Aviv.

ANNE LYSY


Prparation du Congrs

Programme de travail en Isral



Soire d'ouverture : "Commentaires (lectures) sur 'Lire un symptme'"

Marco Mauas - "Le juif - sinthome".

Gabriel Dahan - "Lire avec un symptme"

Deux commentaires sur "Lire un symptme" de J.A.Miller. 

-

"Lire une citation"- srie de rencontres mensuelles bases sur la lecture de citations autour du thme du Congrs. Chaque soire aura lieu une rencontre de deux membres du Giep qui parleront de leurs lectures sur des paragraphes choisis.

Participants: Perla Miglin, Nehama Guesser, Ahinoan Mezer-Gur, Omri Bichovssky, Malka Shein, Shlomo Lieber, Diana Bergovoy, Anat Frid, Mabel Graiver, Marcela Tofler.

 

Sminaire prparatoire: "Symptme: une formation substitutive", 27-1-2012

Anne Lysy et Guy Briole seront nos invits ce sminaire prparatoire o on mettra en valeur les rfrences freudiennes ausymptme et bien entendu on les picera avec des points de tmoignage de lapart de nos invits, deux A.E. en fonction.

Nos collgues Dafna Amit-Selbst et Marcela Brusky-Tofler apporteront galement leurs travaux sur le thme.

 

Journe de travail:   "Comment on lit un symptme?" [titre provisoire]  16-3-2012

Cette Journe de travail propose de faire ressortir en particulier les rfrences lacaniennes sur le thme du Congrs.

 

Nouage -NLS: Giep Asreep  19-5- 2012

Nous compterons dans ce sminaire sur la prsence de Anne Lysy et Dominique Holvoet. Sandra Cisternas, membre de lAsreep (Suisse) et Yotvat Elberbaum prsenteront des cas cliniques.

-

Symposium:  " Reading a Symptom: Psychoanalytical  and Literary Perspectives", an International Symposium at Tel Aviv University, 14 May 2012, Dan David Building, Prof. Shirley Sharon-Zisser, organizer. 

-

Confrence l'Universit de Bar-Ilan

"Conversation sur le symptme dans la psychanalyse", 3  janvier 2012.

Gabriel Dahan et Omri Bichovsky parleront sur le symptme avec les participants du programme "L'interprtation et la culture".

 

Activits diverses en coopration avec le Centre d'enseignement "Le Rseau Lacanien"

1- Sminaire l'hpital Ichilov, Tel Aviv,- "Lire sur le symptme"- responsable: Susana Huler.

2- Sminaire: "Verbes pour des dbutants"- responsables: Diana Bergovoy, Marcela Tofler et Eliane Zomerfeld.

3-Sminaire: "Destins du symptme"- responsables: Gabriel Dahan, Claudia Iddan

4-Sminaire Hamakom- Conversations: "Des vignettes de lecture"- responsables: Rona Cohen, Haguit Aldema et Ruth Ronen.

5- Sminaire- "Le symptme et la rptition"- Jerusalem, responsable: Claudia Iddan 

 

Activits diverses en coopration avec le projet Dor-a

 

1-Cours "Introduction", autour des confrences N*17 et N* 23 de S.Freud, et "Inhibition, Symptme et Angoisse" ; responsables: Mabel Graiver, Shlomo Lieber, Avi Rivnitzki

 

2-Cours "Clinique", orient sur les axes de la lecture du symptme selon le texte introductif de Jacques-Alain Miller au Congrs de la NLS, et d'autres textes ; responsable: Perla Miglin

 

3-Sminaire "Projets", lectures du Sminaire 5 de Jacques Lacan, en accentuant la signifiance du phallus, ouverture la lecture du symptme ; responsable: Marco Mauas

 

4- Sminaire de lecture du sminaire V orient par l'introduction de Jacques-Alain Miller au thme du Congrs de la NLS ;responsables: Mabel Graiver, Perla Miglin, Marco Mauas, Dafna Amit Selbst, Avi Rivnitzki, Shlomo Lieber, Samuel Nemirovsky.

 

5- Sminaire "Commencements", orient par la lecture de J.Lacan sur le symptme de Hans dans le sminaire 4, responsable: Dafna Amit Selbst.

 

6- Sminaire de recherche: une lecture de L'Etourdit,avec sa traduction en hbreu ; responsable: Samuel Nemirovsky.

 

Srie de confrences : "Le symptme: de Freud Lacan"

Une srie de confrences organise sous la responsabilit de Sergio Mischkin sur le thme du Congrs dans les institutions:

Le service psychologique-Universit de Ben Gurion - 25 octobre 2011.

Hpital Soroka- Beer Sheva- l'quipe de psychologues de l'hpital - 24 novembre 2011 et 19 janvier 2012.

Le Centre de Sant Mentale  Beer Sheva - 26 mars 2012.

D'autres confrences sont planifies.

-

Traduction de textes en hbreu:

Nehama Guesser, Gabriel Dahan, Shirley Zisser-Sharon, Malka Shein, Abigail Chemerinsky, Ilana Rabin.






Recent NLS-Messager, English: http://www.amp-nls.org/en/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html

 

Rcents NLS-Messager, franais: http://www.amp-nls.org/fr/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html


Nouvelle cole Lacanienne de Psychanalyse New Lacanian School of Psychoanalysis
www.amp-nls.org http://www.amp-nls.org 

Association Mondiale de Psychanalyse World Association of Psychoanalysis
www.wapol.org http://www.wapol.org 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Desinscription: envoyez un message a: nls-messager-unsubscribe@...
Pour obtenir de l'aide, ecrivez a: nls-messager-help@...

#826 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2012 2:14 pm
Subject: NLS MESSAGER 284 from Lacan Quotidien
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Messager 284 - 2011/2012

LQ Translations - a selection from Lacan Quotidien: 96, 110

3 janvier 2012
3 January 2012

LACAN QUOTIDIEN in English 
A selection of texts from Lacan Quotidien, the daily online Lacan news bulletin 
[a selection from Lacan Quotidien: 96 and 110 is attached]

Lacan Quotidien in English brings you quick translations of this vibrant and fast moving daily publication, which NLS-Messager sends in the French original on the same day. 
Translations will be selective and pragmatic, in an attempt to transmit some of the abundant material and its spirit: spontaneous, of the moment, quirky, humorous and inspired! 
If you can help with translations, please come forward [nwulfing@...] and support this project, which plays an important role in transmitting to our Anglophone colleagues Lacan's legacy and the vibrancy of the movement led by Jacques-Alain Miller, who ensures Lacan's unique relevance in our contemporary praxis. We thank the translators who have already started work for giving their time. NW



#827 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2012 2:12 pm
Subject: HURRY UP 13
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Hurry up / 13

29 decembre 2011
29 December 2011

Information Bulletin of the VIIIth WAP Congress

Hurry Up / 13
23-27 de abril 2012 / Hotel Hilton
Macacha Guemes 351 Puerto Madero Buenos Aires Argentina
Communiqu pour les non membres! / Announcement for non Members!

Communiqu pour les non membres!
Chers Collgues
Etant donnes les nombreuses inscriptions des non membres au VIII Congrs de lAMP, nous avons dcid de recevoir leur travaux pour la journe clinique. La Commission scientifique aura en charge la slection des travaux. La date finale pour les recevoir sera le 15 janvier 2012
Recommandations gnrales Les travaux ne dpasseront pas 4000 signes, espaces compris. Les travaux slectionns seront rpartis entre des mentors, qui sattelleront favoriser lchange avec leurs auteurs, ainsi que lajustement au thme de la salle dans laquelle ils sont seront prsents. Les travaux devront tre adresss ladresse lectronique suivante: amp.congreso2012@....
Lobjet du mail mentionnera: Journe clinique.

Announcement for non Members!
Dear colleagues:
Considering the big amount of non members registered to the VIII WAP Congress, we have decided to receive non member papers for the Clinical Day. The final paper selection and acceptance decision will be in charge of the Scientific Committee. Deadline for paper submission will be January 15th 2012.
General indications Papers should have a maximum of 4000 characters including spaces. Selected papers will be distributed among the chosen mentors, in order to facilitate a dialogue with the authors to begin a work of adjustment according to the theme of the panel in which they will be presented. Papers should be sent to the following e-mail address: amp.congreso2012@...
The subject field of the message must be: Clinical Day.


#828 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2012 2:14 pm
Subject: nls-messager 286 - 2011/2012 ICLO-NLS Clinical Conversation with Pierre-Gilles Gueguen; Lacan's Joyce: The Sinthome
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 



Messager 286 - 2011/2012


ICLO-NLS Clinical Conversation with Pierre-Gilles Gueguen; Lacan's Joyce: The Sinthome



5 janvier 2012
5 January 2012
 



Recent NLS-Messager, English: http://www.amp-nls.org/en/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html


Rcents NLS-Messager, franais: http://www.amp-nls.org/fr/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html


Nouvelle cole Lacanienne de Psychanalyse New Lacanian School of Psychoanalysis
www.amp-nls.org http://www.amp-nls.org 

Association Mondiale de Psychanalyse World Association of Psychoanalysis
www.wapol.org http://www.wapol.org  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Desinscription: envoyez un message a: nls-messager-unsubscribe@...
Pour obtenir de l'aide, ecrivez a: nls-messager-help@...

#829 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2012 2:39 pm
Subject: Hurry up! / 14 Space for Art and Psychoanalysis in the 20th Century
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Hurry up! / 14

VIII Congreso AMP

23-27 de abril 2012 / Hotel Hilton

Macacha Guemes 351 ╄ Puerto Madero ╄ Buenos Aires Argentina

 Space for Art and Psychoanalysis in the 20th Century 


 

 



 

VIIIth WAP Congress 2012

Space for Art and Psychoanalysis in the 20th Century

Dear Colleagues and Friends: Following the enthusiastic response to the invitation issued in Hurry Up! No. 11, we are now happy to be able to inform you about certain practical questions:

Who can participate: Members of the WAP and non-Members registered for the Congress.

Size of the works: Must not exceed 120cm in any of their dimensions.

Theme and Medium: Open

Number of works: To be determined according to the space and the proposals received.

1st stage: We will accept photographs of the proposed works until the 5th of February 2012.  These should be in jpg format with a resolution of 72 dpi (1024 by 650).  The photographs must be accompanied by the following information:

 

Name of the artist

Title of the work

Means used

Size of the work

Date of production

 

2nd stage:

The place and date for the reception of works will be communicated in due course.

Note: The transport of the works will be the responsibility of the artists.

 

We await your proposal at the following email address: espacioarteamp2012@...

Rosa Basz and Elsa Maluenda (Responsible for the organization of the exhibition). 

 



#830 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Thu Jan 5, 2012 2:23 pm
Subject: WAP CONGRESS IN BUENOS AIRES
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Announcement for non Members  WAP!

 
 
B
uenos  Aires


VIII CONGRESS OF THE W.A.P.

 

WORLD ASSOCIATION OF PSYCHOANALYSIS

 
 
The symbolic order 

in the XXI Century

it is not what it used to be.

What consequences for the treatment?


 
Considering the big amount of non members registered to the VIII WAP Congress, 
we have decided to receive non member papers for the Clinical Day. 
The final paper selection and acceptance decision will be in charge of the Scientific Committee. 
Deadline for paper submission will be January 15th 2012.

 
General indications Papers should have a maximum of 4000 characters including spaces. 
Selected papers will be distributed among the chosen mentors, 
in order to facilitate a dialogue with the authors to begin a work of adjustment according to the theme of the panel in which they will be presented.
 
Papers should be sent to the following e-mail address: amp.congreso2012@... <mailto:amp.congreso2012@...
The subject field of the message must be: Clinical Day

April 23 - 27 2012
Hotel Hilton
Macacha Gemes 351, Puerto Madero
Buenos Aires, Argentina
(from amp-uqbar)

#831 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:14 pm
Subject: CSD6 website and registration
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

the website for Clinical Study Days 6 "The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century" is live


http://clinicalstudydays.us/

 

registration now available online

 

 


#832 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:33 pm
Subject: NLS-Messager 305 - 2011/2012 Communiqu of the Freudian Field of 16 January 2012
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 


Messager 305 - 2011/2012


Communiqu of the Freudian Field of 16 January 2012



17 janvier 2012
17 January 2012



Communique of the Freudian Field

 

January 16, 2012

 

E. Roudinesco and Seuil convicted of defamation

 

Elisabeth Roudinesco and Seuil were convicted of libel by the 17th chamber of the High Court of Paris, in their respective capacities of author and publisher of the book, Lacan, against all odds.

 

This book alleged that in fact the last will of Lacan concerning his funeral was not met: Although he (Lacan) expressed the wish to end his days in Italy, in Rome or in Venice and would have wished for a Catholic funeral, he was buried without ceremony and in the privacy of the cemetery of Guitrancourt. As a result, Judith Miller, daughter of Jacques Lacan, who took care of his funeral, considered herself defamed.

 

In his judgment, delivered on the 11th of January, the judge admitted the defamatory character of the remarks and rejected the defendants explanations:

 

By its lapidary formulation, its construction and the words used, the sentence: While () he would have wished for a Catholic funeral, he was buried without ceremony and in the privacy of the cemetery Guitrancourt, cannot in any way be interpreted as an expression of a point of view, or a hypothesis, even if reasonable, for showing up a paradox, a mere wish attributed to Lacan (), a dream of great Catholic funerals that Jacques Lacan one day uttered with bravado. This phrase by its brevity, its composition and the opposition on which it is built between the wish expressed by Jacques Lacan, presented as a certain and objective fact, and the opposing reality of the funeral, meaning that a wish of Jacques Lacan was not respected by those in charge of organising the funeral.

 

 

The court then considered whether the author of the incriminating words could take advantage of her good faith. He has found that in 1993, E. Roudinesco had raised the same question in the following terms: Lacan was an atheist, though, out of bravado, he had once dreamed of great Catholic funerals. This formulation, said the court, should not in any way be confused with the statement, as concise and as conclusive, that is subject to these proceedings. Considering the fact that the author did not have a serious piece of information to support her on her remarks, the court concluded that the benefit of good faith cannot be granted to E. Roudinesco.

 

 

The author and editor were sentenced to pay one euro in damages to Judith Miller, and 6000 euros for legal costs.

 

Translated by Francine Danniau

 

 

Note on good faith exception (from Wikipedia).

 

The exception in good faith entitled in law to the press <http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonne_foi_en_droit_de_la_presse>

 and publishing houses does not involve proof of the truth of the facts.

It is awarded based on four criteria, recalled by the Court of Appeal of Paris in a decision. <http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cour_d%27appel_de_Paris>

-material delivered on 6 June 2007:

 

 

1.The legitimacy of the aim pursued;

2.The lack of personal animosity;

3.Prudence and moderation in the expression;

4.The quality of the investigation.

 

Reproduction or quotation of defamatory libel may represent a new defamation and be subject to prosecution.

 

  

 

Bovenkant formulier



Recent NLS-Messager, English: http://www.amp-nls.org/en/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html


Rcents NLS-Messager, franais: http://www.amp-nls.org/fr/template.php?sec=actualites&file=actualites/nls_messager.html


Nouvelle cole Lacanienne de Psychanalyse New Lacanian School of Psychoanalysis
www.amp-nls.org http://www.amp-nls.org 

Association Mondiale de Psychanalyse World Association of Psychoanalysis
www.wapol.org http://www.wapol.org  



#833 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:25 pm
Subject: Hurry up! / 15 / English / Buenos Aires Lacaniano 2011-2012 / Eric Laurent
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Liste de diffusion de l'EuroFdration de Psychanalyse



Information Bulletin of the VIIIth WAP Congress

Hurry Up / 15

23-27 de abril 2012 / Hotel Hilton

Macacha Guemes 351 Puerto Madero Buenos Aires Argentina


Buenos Aires Lacaniano 2011-2012

Eric Laurent

Summer in Buenos Aires can be very hot.  The city becomes sweltering in spite of its proximity to the sea, to which it turns its back for bizarre historical reasons.  Beware of the air conditioning!  One has always the idea of a lost Norwegian in command, wandering, trying to find the lost sensations of his distant homeland.  The end of November and the first week of December were scorchers.  The second week was ideal.  Everything conspired for Buenos Aires to be Lacanian: the air, the light, the mild weather.  On the one hand this happiness, on the other hand, those responsible for the EOL had a difficult challenge to overcome. The Study Days of the EOL were scheduled to take place on December 10 and 11 due to a series of unpredictable circumstances whose triggering event was the postponement of the IVth Enapol [International Encounter of the Freudian Field] in 2009 due to the H1N1 outbreak that shook the world.  There was a residue of a commitment with the hotel that could only be settled for those dates.  The annoying thing is that this was a special long weekend in Argentina.  Argentina does not have the cumulative effects such as the RTT in France (Recuperation of the working time, a calculus that gives extra time out if one works more than the 35 hours work week), but has created "touristic" days to stimulate the service industry.  Moreover, Saturday the 10th was also the day of the inauguration of the President, elected now for a second term of office.  The exodus of the inhabitants of Buenos Aires for the beaches allowed the massive influx of South American Presidents and their entourages to celebrate the event, as well as the arrival of young activists by all different means of transport.  It also permitted the closure of certain critical streets in the capital that would bring traffic to a halt in ordinary times.  But . . . would the promise of vacation cut down the public for the Study Days and the public events planned to mark the thirtieth anniversary of the death of Lacan?  Or, conversely, would this break permit all those who, from neighboring countries, from the interior, and from the "provinces" who might be interested in new propositions to come to the capital?

Thus, the construction of a "Lacan Week" in the same spirit as the planned week in 2009 that had grouped together the Enapol and the Study Days of the EOL in a compressed event.  So, from Tuesday to Sunday, every day, there were a series of work projects in different settings, culminating in the Study Days.  The University schedule was such that the end of the academic year coincided with the first days of the week.  Thus, the idea of a lecture at the University addressed to all available students of psychology (1500).  Thanks to the benevolent attention of the Dean and her Office, for the first time, the theme of the 2012 Congress of the WAP could be presented in the midst of the Faculty.  The fact that the Study Days of the EOL were considered "of cultural interest" by the Ministry of Culture helped with that.  More than a thousand students thronged, into three rooms with video transmission, to participate in the event.  Nihil obstat on behalf of the multiple and active student organizations in the life of the Faculty.

Tuesday night, the presentation of a book by Eric Laurent published by Diva, related to the theme of the Congress, was held in the beautiful premises of the National Library.  Another place, with another audience, smaller but filling the room Horacio Etchegoyen, the former President of the IPA, who in the past broke the silence between the WAP and the IPA made the friendly gesture to attend. Wednesday morning saw the clinical conversation of the Clinical Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA): interesting cases, participants living up to their name, a discussion rich with interest.  Quite the buzz!

On Thursday, a break allowed everyone to continue analysis and controls, one by one.  On Friday, the first day of the holiday weekend, events followed one another throughout the day. First, the Institute Oscar Massota (IOM) bringing together the teaching activities of the EOL in the provinces had its Study day, followed by a Colloquium-seminar celebrating the publication of a new book of the Course of Jacques-Alain Miller, Donc.  At the end of the Colloquium, a round table dedicated to "Lacan in the Twenty-First Century" brought together contributions constructed as a tribute.  The readers of Lacan Quotidien will hear an echo of this by the publication of one of these contributions, that of Juanqui Indart.  Over six hundred people participated in the colloquium, whose registration was separate from that of the Study Days of the EOL, which bore witness to the successful wager for "Lacan Week."  Everyone was there so as to miss nothing of the events.  That evening, the General Assembly of the EOL unanimously adopted new statutes modernizing the procedures of the School, adapting them to the new spirit in the air.  Surer of itself, the School no longer fears the chaotic results of elections or unresolved conflicts between groups.  The Council will turn over more quickly.  There was also a Presidential succession: Mauricio Tarrab, who followed the course of the statutory reforms gave his place to Adriana Testa.  The new President gave a speech in which the School recognized itself.  A great success!  The next day, Saturday, the Study Days opened in a transformed city.  The atmosphere was vibrant.  Not too far from the hotel that welcomed us, the President took office in a newly designed wing of the Casa Rosada, the presidential palace.  Bands of young Peronists filled the deserted avenues. They came by cars, trains, busses, trucks, etc.  The Film industry also made the most of it. Buenos Aires became a setting for movies and series, becoming a convincing New York with the aid of a few yellow taxis and the uniforms and motorcycles characterizing the police there.  It was also the international Day of the Rights of Man.

The Study Days of the School on "Lacanian Praxis" opened in an atmosphere of success, of participation and of "buena onda."  [TN: in Spanish: good vibes]. President Cristina Kirchner took office at the same time.  She received 53% of the vote.  Certainly elected, then, but a solid 40% were not for her.  Women were honored in the ceremony.  The President spoke of Ana Teresa Diego, a student of astronomy and a communist, who disappeared in 1976, and whose name was given recently by an Argentinian astronomer to a new asteroid.  She noted that Dilma Roussef, the President of Brazil, present in the audience, was arrested and tortured for 22 days during the military dictatorship.  A woman in the office of the President is an Argentinian tradition.  Argentina had already been led by a woman, Isabel Martinez de Peron, in 1974, at the time of the death of her husband.  Her weakness with regard to the strong man of the Peronist right, Lopez Rega, "el Brujo," [in Spanish in the original: the sorcerer] and the militia of his triple A (Alianza Argentina Anticomunista) left bad memories.  Eva Peron, who died of uterine cancer at the age of 33, was briefly a candidate for the Vice Presidency.  She had to give up her candidacy before becoming a mummified icon.

Cristina Kirchner had already been elected in 2007, while her husband, Nestor, was alive.  His sudden death by a heart attack on October 27 2010, left open ended the historical situation for Cristina.  Would she become Evita or Isabelita?  Neither one or the other, she firmly took the reins of the country and was elected again in the first round of elections.  The oath she gave at the ceremony is original.  Normally, one swears to God and the Nation.  She added to that "to Him" with a capital H.  The "Him" refers to Nestor Kirchner.

This addition shows without doubt that she will have need of all of her supports to reinvent Kirchnerism in the coming months.  The "Peronism, version K" is a mixture.  At the cultural level, the accent is place on a return to left-wing political rhetorics  accompanied by a constant reference to human rights.  From the economic point of view, the plan was to refuse the neo-liberal practices that led the country to the collapse of 2001.  It relied rather on  raised taxes on agricultural exports (soybeans, meat) won through difficult negotiations with the organization of landowners, "El Campo," to then redistribute subsidies to the energy and transportation sectors.  The system reached its limits.  In Argentina as here [TN: France], the State wants to cut its obligatory spending to find room to maneuver for investment and reindustrialization.  Two months ago, subsidies were drastically reduced, leading mechanically to inflation due to the rise of the artificially contained prices.  The battle is thus about the measure of inflation through various indexes and accusations of covering up. The reconstruction of an alternative project is yet to be done.  It is accompanied, as everywhere else, by a fight against capital flight and tax evasion.  The new Prime Minister Juan Manuel Abal Medina is forty three years old.  He presents himself on his Facebook page as "Peronist version K, hincha de River. [TN: in Spanish, fan of River, see below]  The Vice President Amado Boudou cultivates the look of a rock-fan and shows up at meetings with his guitar.  The Minister of Finance , Hernan Lorenzino, is 39 years old.  The passing of generations is assured, even if it is dynastic.  The Prime Minister, "Jefe de gabinete," is the son of a hardline leader of the party and a nephew of one of the founders of Montoneros.  The multiple versions of the Peronist party are a world unto themselves where opposing views on many points coexist.  It is an expanding universe, reconfigured by the K version, a small narrow core, young and close to Cristina, too narrow to the taste of many.  Even if there are many groups, there are always moments where Argentinian politics are structured into two camps according to the Clausewitzian confrontation: elections, negotiations with the Campo, and football games.  In Buenos Aires, Lacanian or not, one is a fan, "hincha," of River or of Boca, the two clubs that compete for the heart of the people.  The video that was the most viral on the Internet during the pre-campaign showed a father of a family "hincha de River" in front of his television, filmed by his son.  He gets enraged during a game, eventually screams, throwing whatever he can get his hands on at his television, exasperated with the defeat of his team.  River was relegated to the second division in 2011.  What will happen this year?  It is a fast moving world that awaits the Congress of the WAP in April 2012.  Brazil pulls ahead of the BRICS and Argentina wants to follow in mobilizing all its resources. The stakes are high.  On this side of the Atlantic also, we are interested on the invention of the Buenos Aires Lacaniano to come, which will take shape in 2012.

Translation from the French by Thomas Svolos




____________________________________________


#834 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:55 pm
Subject: NYFLAG: "Occupy Wall Street"
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
The New York Freud and Lacan Analytic Group
Culture and Psychoanalysis Seminar presents

'OCCUPY WALL STREET'
January 25th - 8:30PM

Barnard Hall, Room 409B
3009 Broadway (117th Street)

Presentation by Ross Shields: It Is Right to Rebel Without a Cause (these grievances are not-all inclusive)
Discussion led by Cyrus Saint Amand Poliakoff and Robert Buck

Occupy Wall Street appears leaderless, without demands, and without a causeit would seem to be lacking the very traits that used to identify social and political movements. The seminar will investigate the extent to which the coherence of "The 99%" depends on the incoherencethe lackof the "one demand". Have the politics of representation been replaced by a symptom of their failure: occupation? How might the movement itself occupy the position of the absent cause orienting politics towards the real?


Suggested Reading:

Chapters VII and VIII of Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Sigmund Freud.
The Direction of the Treatment and Its Principles of Power. Ecrits, Jacques Lacan
The Sinthome, A Mixture of Symptom and Fantasy, Jacques-Alain Miller
Chapter 20 of The Seminar Of Jacques Lacan: Book XI.

#835 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:41 pm
Subject: Clinical Study Days 6 | New York | February 24-26, 2012
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

registration now available online:  http://clinicalstudydays.us/


CSD6: The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century

February 24-26, 2012
New York, New York


with our guest
Fabin Naparstek
Member of the School and former Analyst of the School
Escuela de la Orientacin Lacaniana

and with the participation of
Pierre-Gilles Gueguen
Analyst Member of the School and former Analyst of the School
cole de la Cause freudienne and New Lacanian School
Special Delegate of the World Association of Psychoanalysis for the United States




ARGUMENT:
"An act," Jacques Lacan declared on January 10, 1968, in reference to the Psychoanalytic Act, "is linked in the determination of the beginning, and very especially where there is need to make one . . ."  We believe we can find two inflections of this: one being the beginning of analysis, the entry of the subject into the analytic discourse, taken from the point of view of the analysant, and the other as the beginning of analysis, the entry of the subject into the analytic discourse, taken from the point of view of the analyst.  This beginning is a beginning for both the analysant and the analyst.  For the analysant, as we explored in Paris during the 2010 Paris-USA Lacan Seminar on "Entering Analysis," this beginning is absolutely specific for each subject, and for each analysis, and, even, for each session, and the beginning is marked by a specific transference, which can be identified from the point of the analysant and the analyst in testimonies and case presentations.  For the analyst, especially at that first moment of being used in the position of analyst, we can find the absolute radical discontinuity between the Lacanian orientation and other approaches to psychoanalysis and clinical practice in Lacan's work: in the formulation of Discourse of the Analyst, in his definition of the transference as the subject supposed to know, and, in the elaboration of the Pass and the institutional structures relating to formation and training elaborated by Lacan and carried forward by Jacques-Alain Miller in the establishment of the Schools of the World Association of Psychoanalysis.

For our next Clinical Study Days, we will explore the status of the Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century.  The Symbolic Order has changed today, even from the moment of the Seminar of Lacan on the Psychoanalytic Act in 1968.  The transference that appeared to Freud closely linked to parental, even paternal, imagos, in part because the Symbolic Order at that moment was closely structured by the Signifier of the Name-of-the-Father, is seen less and less today.  At this moment today, where the Symbolic Order is no longer what it used to be, to take the title of our upcoming Congress of the WAP, the signifier of the Name-of-the-Father no longer functions in the same way, which has implications for the possible paths in the establishment of the transference.  If, as Lacan spoke on November 29, 1967, "this psychoanalytic act is something that is quite essentially linked to the functioning of the transference," what precisely has changed about the transference, or the paths to the establishment of the transference, in today's world?  How do analsants today reach the point of the beginning of an analysis?  And, taken from the perspective of the analyst: in what ways has this new Symbolic Order created a situation that requires a different Direction of the Treatment?  Is it necessary for the psychoanalyst to create new strategies with regard to the transference in the face of this new Symbolic Order?  What is the place of interpretation today in light of this?  And what, for our psychoanalytic institutions, is necessary to sustain a place for psychoanalytic discourse in today's world?  In order for our Schools to facilitate the very passage of an analysant to an analyst, what consequences are there with regard to formation that we are facing in the 21st Century?  These are some of the questions that we raise for our consideration of "The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century."


Scientific Committee
Maria Cristina Aguirre
Juan Felipe Arango
Alicia Arenas
Thomas Svolos
Karina Tenenbaum

#836 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:43 pm
Subject: LCE2: "Some Ideas on the Act of Reading in Psychoanalysis" Ram Mandil
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Volume 2, Issue 2, of LC Express NOW AVAILABLE ONLINE  >>   http://lacaniancompass.com/journal/

LCEXPRESS
Some Ideas on the Act of Reading in Psychoanalysis
Ram Mandil

,

Precis
This essay by Ram Mandil was presented to an international audience on November 13th 2011 as part of the ongoing 2011- 2012 video seminar series of the Lacanian Compass in preparation for Clinical Studies 6: The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century.  CSD6 will be held in New York City from February 24th - 26th 2012.  In this work, Mandil identifies life in the 21st century as an era in which there is no place for the inconsistency of the Other.  Under such conditions, there is a foreclosure of the act and as a result the subject returns in some tragic ways.  Nevertheless, through an innovative analysis of Freudʼs comments on the Dora case as well as an intellectually rich and nuanced framing of Lacanʼs notion of reading the symptom “otherwise,” Mandil gives us useful guidance on how to proceed both as analysts and analysands in our current social experience. 
Gary S. Marshall, Co-Editor


Issue 2
The LC EXPRESS delivers the Lacanian Compass in a new format. Its aim is to deliver relevant texts in a dynamic timeframe for use in the clinic and in advance of study days and conference meetings. The LC EXPRESS publishes works of theory and clinical practice and emphasizes both longstanding concepts of the Lacanian tradition as well as new cutting edge formulations.


#837 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Wed Feb 1, 2012 3:19 pm
Subject: CSD6 website and registration--start and stop times for CSD6
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 

the website for Clinical Study Days 6 "The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century" is live


http://clinicalstudydays.us/

 

registration now available online


please note that there will be a collaboratively sponsored lecture on Friday evening and that the program for CSD6 will run from 8:30 a.m. on Saturday through 1:30 p.m. on Sunday--more information forthcoming on the schedule

 

 


#838 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:27 pm
Subject: before the CSD6: Fabian Naparstek: "The Comedy of the Sexes"
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
#839 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Sun Feb 5, 2012 8:06 pm
Subject: LCE3: a preparatory "must read" from Gerardo Réquiz for Clinical Study Days 6
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
announcing the release of LC Express, issue 3:

"The Entry Into Analysis and Its Relationship to the Analytic Act from Lacan’s Late Teaching"
Gerardo Réquiz

available at >>>   http://lacaniancompass.com/journal/


Precis

This work by Gerard Réquiz is a must read. The essay begins with a summary of the late teachings of Lacan. Then, through a detailed discussion of the dynamics of the entry into analysis, Réquiz crystalizes the limitations of working exclusively at the level of the signifier without reckoning with the primacy of jouissance. He then frames the analytic act in the context of the real, reminding us that there is no “depth” in the unconscious. Rather, when a piece of the real is the nodal point for the direction of the treatment, the form that analytic work takes is of going around an edge, or a border. As with the previous two issues of the LC Express this work was presented to an international audience on as part of the ongoing 2011- 2012 video seminar series of the Lacanian Compass in preparation for Clinical Study Days 6: The Psychoanalytic Act in the 21st Century.

page1image16432
page1image16704
page1image16976

Gary S. Marshall, Co-Editor 


#840 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:02 pm
Subject: NLS MESSAGE 330: Report on the London Society Knowwting Seminar by Philip Dravers
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Messager 330 - 2011/2012
 

 
Report on the Knottings Seminar, London Society


3 fevrier 2012
3 February  2012
     

Report on the London Society Knottings Seminar
 
 
 
14th January 2012
 
Philip Dravers
 
“Interpretation as knowing how to read aims at reducing the symptom to its initial formula, i.e. the material encounter between a signifier and the body, the pure shock of language on the body. So, admittedly, to treat the symptom you have to pass through the shifting dialectic of desire, but you also have to rid yourself of the mirages of truth that this deciphering brings you and aim beyond, at the fixity of jouissance and the opacity of the real.” [1]
 
            This year’s Knottings seminar inLondon took place on the 14th of January on a lovely winter afternoon with a fresh chill in the air and the sun set firmly in the sky. Our main speaker on this occasion was Anne Lysy, president of the NLS, who gave us avery clear exposition of the theme of this year’s congress. Our approach to the theme was both broadened and deepened by two case presentations, one by ourcolleague, Despina Andropoulou, joining us from Athens, who threw light on the symptom’s role as an invented solution in a case of ordinary psychosis, and a second by our very own Bogdan Wolf.
            Anne Lysy began her presentation by reflecting on the many different occasions she has presented on this theme in the various geographically distanced groups that make up the NLS. She thus reminded us of the purpose of the Knotting seminars: to make our School exist in a process of interlinking that binds its disparate elements together with the common thread of an orientation and the elaboration of a common theme. This year, the principle thread for this orientation has been provided by Jacques-Alain Miller’s paper “Reading a Symptom” and our speaker went on to comment on this text at some length, while also developing references to various other texts by Freud, Lacan and Miller, including: “Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety”, Lecture 23 on the “Pathways to Symptom Formation”; Seminar XX, Encore; and the lectures from last year’s Cours.
            Anne Lysy declared that the overall purpose of her presentation, entitled “The symptom and the trauma of language”, was to explore the symptom as a “body event”, namely the symptom defined on the basis of the reiteration of an initial encounter between the body and language, and how this relates to Freud’s conception of the symptom and the role of fixation in its formation. More specifically, she indicated that her talk had four principle aims:
§ to situate what Jacques-Alain Miller means when he says that psychoanalysis “targets the pure shock of language on the body” and what it means to define the symptom as the reiteration of this initial encounter
§ to ask what relation there is between this encounter and what Freud called “fixation”
§ to explore what Lacan meant by defining the symptom on the basis of the body event and how this relates to what, in his paper on the end of analysis, Freud described in terms of leftovers, residues and remainders.
§ to discuss a range of consequences that the new perspective on the symptom has for theorientation of the treatment and its relation to the differential clinic.
            Indexing her comments on the penultimate paragraph of “Reading a Symptom” (see above) Anne Lysy then proceeded to draw out an oppositional framework which later served to orient our discussions.
 
Desire
Jouissance
Truth
Real
Dialectics
Fixity
Mirages
Opacity
 
            On the one side, you have truth, desire and the minimum signifying combinatory of S1àS2; and on the other you go beyond the dialectics of desire and its deciphering to the real at stake in the symptom. In the course of her presentation Anne Lysy developed this schema by exploringMiller’s references and drawing out essential points.
 
Meaning (sens)
Outside meaning (hors-sens)
S1-S2
S1//
A
J
@ J
Language
Lalangue
Symptom
Sinthome
$
Parlêtre
Symbolic (SI,R)
Real (S.I.R.)
Signification
Body
Signifier
Letter
Fantasy
Sinthome
Listening, understanding
Writing, reading
Advent of signification
(“avènement de signification”)
Event of the body (“événement de corps”):
 
The initial shock & its reiteration
 
“The etc. of the symptom”:
 
It never stops writing itself/being written
 
As she went on to explain, the left hand column derives from a time when Lacan grounded his teaching on the axiomatic of language and the primacy of the symbolic and the right hand one from a timewhen this is replaced by an axiomatic of jouissance in which the concept oflanguage finds itself displaced by lalangue and the primacy of the real is brought to the fore. Although the ‘symptom’ (as decipherable) has been placed in opposition to the ‘sinthome’ (as ‘opaque jouissance’) on the schema above, Anne Lysy indicated that the symptom could also be placed in the middle: it is a Janus, J.-A. Miller says, as it has an aspect that concerns truth (left column) and an aspect that is real (right column). The logic that governs the first column is encapsulated in the phrase, “Jouissance is prohibited to whoever speaks, as such”;[2] while the second finds its most succinct expression in a phrase from “Joyce le symptôme”, where Lacan speaks of “the jouissance proper to the symptom” as being “an opaque jouissance for having excluded sense”.[3] In this respect, it is important to note that the term “reading”, which orients our theme for this year, appears in the right hand column of the table, since what the analytic discourse teaches us to read is ultimately beyond meaning. As Jacques-Alain Miller declares “Knowing how to read, consists in putting a distance between speech and the meaning it carries, based on writing as outside-meaning, as Anzeichen, as letter, based on its materiality”.
Here the Freudian Anzeichen, is placed on a par with Lacan’s late teaching, as it indexes the fact that, as our speaker drew out in her talk, the jouissance of the speaking being is not primary, but is rather produced by the impact of language on the body. Here the signifier appears as the cause of jouissance – which effectively locates Seminar XX as the point of transition between the two perspectives represented on the schema above. Indeed, as Miller declares, in “Reading a Symptom”, in terms strongly reminiscent ofEncore: “a symptom vouches for the fact that there has been an event that has marked [the speaking being’s] jouissance in the Freudian sense of Anzeichen, which introduces an Ersatz, a jouissance there ought not to be, a jouissance that troubles the jouissance there ought to be, i.e. jouissance of its nature as a body” – hence the notion of the clinamen of jouissance, the point at which our jouissance gets diverted, “swerves” or goes off track so to speak, which Miller invites us to target in analysis.[4] Our main speaker devoted a lot of attention to a careful examination of howlanguage marks the body of the speaking being and how its repetition serves as the basis for the symptom’s mode of jouissance. This part of her presentation provoked a lively discussion as did her reference to a “metaphor of jouissance” in the context of an elaboration on the substitutive satisfaction of the symptom. During the course of this discussion Anne Lysy referred to J.-A. Miller’s following schema of the symptom:
As I write this report, it strikes me that there could be no better way of accounting for this formula than by referring to a comment that Miller makes in a paper about to be published in issue 24 of the Psychoanalytical Notebooks: “all satisfactions are substitutes for a satisfaction that does not exist, namely the one which, if it did exist, would give the truly genuine sexual relation”.[5]
Anne Lysy’s presentation was warmly received by the London Society and other members of the audience. It gave rise to a passionate discussion on the themes that guide our work for this year. This discussion then gave way to the two case presentations below.
In her presentation “Between Two Languages”, Despina Andropoulou, approached the symptom from the perspective of Lacan’s late teaching where, as she explained: “The symptom is no longer considered as a message to be deciphered but a solution that shows the unique, even uncommon style of life that a subject lives in their effort to deal with the real, the trauma of language”. The case she presented was one of ordinary psychosis (with a schizophrenic underlying structure) and charted the history of a subject who came into analysis after the semblants had vacillated for the third time in her life. At the moment of consultation, a separation from the other was at stake under circumstances that were intolerable for the subject. Knowledge, which until then had given meaning to her existence, had ceased to motivate her due to its unsubjectified status. She had become petrified in a state of inertia and tremendous doubt, which soon gave rise to body phenomena. A new solution had to be found and, as our guest speaker explained, the invention constructed by the subject in the course of the analysis established a way of regulating the death thatlalangue incarnated for her by means of another language, and at the same time allowed her to reconstruct a social bond. After her presentation, an interesting discussion took place which raised a number of key points. For her part, Anne Lysy posed the question of the distinction between the “body event” (which defines the symptom in Lacan’s latest teaching) and the “body phenomena” we often speak about in the clinics of psychosis or neurosis.
Bogdan Wolf then presented the case of a young male homosexual subject in which the direction of the treatment was indexed primarily on the subject’s position in relation to the phallus. His presentation generated a lot of discussion, particularly around his use of the triad of frustration, castration and privation (which Lacan referred back to in his transition to the Borromean clinic) to organise the material of the case and also about how the case related to our theme.
In short, the knottings seminar that took place in London earlier this month was a great success. Our guests were warmly received and the event, which was conducted in an atmosphere of lively debate, has helped us to orient ourselves towards this year’s NLS Congress in Tel Aviv.
 


[1] Jacques-Alain Miller, “Reading a Symptom”, Hurly-Burly 6 (2011), p.152
[2] Jacques Lacan, “The Subversion of the Subject”, Écrits, trans. Bruce Fink (Norton: London, 2006), p. 696
[3] Jacques Lacan, “Joyce le symptôme”, Autres Écrits, p. 570. Cf. Anne Lysy, “The Unconscious and Interpretation”, Hurly-Burly 1 (2009), p. 78.
[4] Notwithstanding the importance of the conceptual shift brought about by Lacan’s seminar Encore, let us not forget that Lacan also refers to the “clinamen” at the end of his chapter on “Tuché and Automaton” in The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis.
[5] Jacques-Alain Miller, “Psychoanalysis, the City and Communities”, Psychoanalytical Notebooks 24 (2012).
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 

Nouvelle École Lacanienne de Psychanalyse — New Lacanian School of Psychoanalysis
www.amp-nls.org http://www.amp-nls.org 

Association Mondiale de Psychanalyse – World Association of Psychoanalysis
www.wapol.org http://www.wapol.org  

#841 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:03 pm
Subject: NLS MESSAGER 227: "The Symptom is the Social Link" Omri Bichovski
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
nlsMessager2.gif 
 
Messager 327 - 2011/2012


VERS TEL AVIV 26 / TOWARDS TEL AVIV 26
Xe Congrs NLS 16-17 juin 2012 / 10th NLS Congress 16-17 June 2012

3 fevrier 2012
3 February 2012
                                                                             


 
TOWARDS TEL AVIV 26 - Reflections 11
 
 
Towards the NLS-Congress

Reading a Symptom

"Reflections"
The aim of this rubric is to gather different commentaries, reflections or questions that emerge from chosen quotes, or from extracts of Freuds or Lacans texts. By gathering different thoughts and voices, Reflections will take us towards Reading a Symptom and in the end to our meeting in Tel Aviv. Reflections invites you to participate in this project.
Claudia Iddan
 ________________________

11 
 
 

 
"The Symptom is the Social Link"
(Jacques-Alain Miller, Conversation d'Arcachon.)
 
Omri Bichovski *
 
 
It's reasonable to assume that the symptom is related to the social, but what grounds the symptom itself as the social link? This question is all the more pressing against the background of the movement ofLacan's teaching from emphasizing the symptom as carrying truth addressed to the Other, towards the symptom as Real, namely as a  jouissance that is addressed to no one.
From a chronological perspective one can view the symptom first as a message offering its ciphered truth to be deciphered. Later the symptom can be viewed as theground on which is established the relation of analysand to analyst this is the basis for Freud's transference neurosis. The symptom is attached by means of transference signifier to the analyst. Finally the symptom is a ring in the borromean knot with the two options that Miller designates: as a 4th element in a borromean knot or as a supplement when the knot fails[1].
Those constructions don't rule each other out, rather they find their way to join in the new conception. For example it is within transference that the symptom has its truth value that what it wants to say is heard. But they join under a different topology: that of the knot instead of Freud's topology of the sack a topology that enables to situate the symptom as that which ties.
In my view the question of the social link should be read radically. Wittgenstein paves the way to such a radical reading.
Wittgenstein states in the Tractatus that "The subject is a limit of the world"[2]. He elucidates it by an analogy to the relations between the eye and the visual field. " But really you do not see the eye," he adds, "And nothing in the visual field allows you to infer that it is seen by an eye[3]. With Wittgenstein's reasoning we are confronted with the following two problems: a. How can the subject be in any reflexive relation with and through the world (i.e. how can a subject know itself?). b. how can a relation be established between one subject and another? In my opinion the consequences are as actual today as they were in 1922, namely, you can't put, so to speak, two subjects in the same world (chamber) contrary to the communication utopia of "intersubjective psychoanalysis". Wittgenstein goes on to say that no part of our experience is at the same time a priori. His reasoning leads him to infer solipsism because there is a disconnection between the subject and the world. But the subject is not outside the world. Rather it is its limit. Itechoes the way Laurent[4] situates the subject in Russel's paradox, which means that when included in the set it is ejected, and as it is not included it is in the set. It is in this paradox that, as Wittgenstein says: "The self[5] of solipsism shrinks to a point without extension"[6].
"Symptom abolishes the symbol"[7], says Lacan. The symbol, according to Wittgenstein, belongs to the world; the subject is a limit of the world. thus the split is located between the subject and the symbol. Therefore only by abolishing the symbol can the paradoxicalabyss between the subject and the world be traversed. An analogy can be drawn from one of Borges' story 'The Other', in which what crosses the impossibility of the meeting between younger and older Borges is a coin that succeeds where, we might say, language fails. By the same token the symptom this two-faced Janus: truth and real[8] - crosses the impossible terrain between the subject and the world due to the fact that it is not entirely a being of language.
Although nothing enables us to infer the seeing eye from the visual field, the former can beeffected, even ache, by the visual field. There, at this littoral[9], the symptom materializes this "point without extensions".
 
 
*member of the NLS, GIEP-NLS.
 
 

[1] Miller J.A.,  Le Partenaire-Symptme, 19/11/1997
[2] Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, . 5.632
[3] Ibid, 5.633
[4] Laurent, E., The Symbolic Order in the 21st Century,Hurly Burly (5), p. 202-203
[5] Wittgenstein stresses that it is not a psychological self that is at stake, but rather a metaphysical one.
[6] Wittgenstein, 5.64
[7] Lacan, J., Joyce the Symptom. Conference given on the 16th of June, 1975, Published in L'ne, 1982, no. 6. Translated by Aaron Benanav.
[8] Miller J. A., Reading a Symptom Towards Tel Aviv, London, 2011
[9] Lacan, J., Lituraterre

 
 


 

Nouvelle cole Lacanienne de Psychanalyse New Lacanian School of Psychoanalysis
www.amp-nls.org http://www.amp-nls.org 

Association Mondiale de Psychanalyse World Association of Psychoanalysis
www.wapol.org http://www.wapol.org 

#842 From: Thomas Svolos <tsvolos@...>
Date: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:01 pm
Subject: NLS MESSAGER : FAQ about the Symptom - 1, by Anne Lysy
tsvolos@...
Send Email Send Email
 
nlsMessager2.gif 
Messager 342 - 2011/2012


 TOWARDS TEL AVIV 27
10th NLS Congress 16-17 June 2012

10 February 2012




TOWARDS TEL AVIV 27 FAQ about the symptom - 1


FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions. I propose this new rubric for our preparation of the Tel Aviv Congress following my trips to one NLS group after another since the beginning of September, where Reading a Symptom gave the direction for work (in Geneva, Athens, Warsaw, Sofia, Moscow, London, Ghent, Tel Aviv)
 
Each time I undertook to present the theme; I approached it in different ways, from different angles, but always by speaking about JAMs text Reading a Symptom. In my effort to make the axes of our research clear, I came up against some opaque points; in the course of theoretical and clinical discussions in the encounters with colleagues, questions emerged, remarks struck me, details stayed with me.
 
I would like to make something out of these stumbling blocks, these scraps and remainders. Not all remnants (as one says in relation to fabric leftovers) are suitable for keeping, but some of them seem to me to be worthy of being elevated to the order of a question that I will pose to you, and I propose that you do the same. The seminars, lectures and cartels, as well as individual work leave a trace not only in the more constructed pieces of work, or in the always interesting reports that we read, but in these brief flashes, the short remarks, the questions that remain without answer.
Elements of a response can thus be proposed, references can be pointed out, precisions or contradictions can be brought up. It is not so much a matter of tying things up before the congress itself; it is rather about bringing together the ingredients that will precipitate our reflections.
 
Anne Lysy



FAQ1
 
Body event and body phenomena
 
How to differentiate these two terms?
And then, how to articulate them?
 
We often use the term "body phenomena" in our clinical constructions, mostly in relation to psychosis, but also, more broadly, as if it covered all the phenomena affecting the body (hysteric conversions, psychosomatic symptoms,various pains, etc.). Moreover, this year, we had a tendancy to use body phenomena and body events (in the plural) without distinction, as if they were synonymous.
 
But it seems to me that they have a different status and that we should make a distinction between the body event (in the singular) and body phenomena. It involves revisiting our idea of the body; why, for example, could the obsessions, as 'illness of thought', not sometimes be classed as a body event?
Hence my question.
 
A few points of reference:
 
Lacan makes the symptom "a body event" in his last teaching, specifically in his text "Joyce the symptom", published in 1979 (Autres crits, p. 569).
 
J.-A. Miller extracted this term to make it a key concept of this last teaching and to situate it in the perspective of Encore, where the signifier has effects of jouissance and not of mortification. Jouissance supposes the body, a living body, which is not an image, and no longer the same body as the one of the mirror stage; it is a body defined as "what enjoys itself"; not a 'natural' enjoyment but a jouissance from the impact of the signifier.
 
The body event is the meeting between the signifier and the body, for a subject, or rather for a parltre, it is the "percussion" of language on the body, the trauma of language. It is an event which is "at the very origin of the subject. It is, in a way, the original event and, at the same time, a permanent event, one that is ceaselessly reiterated (1). The body event is the sinthome (in this new writing, distinguished from the symptom), i.e."something which happened to the body because of language" (2). Reading a symptom "targets this initial shock", "aims at reducing the symptom to its original formula, i.e. the material encounter between a signifier and the body, the pure shock of language on the body" (3). It aims at the real of the symptom, beyond meaning, beyond the defiles of desire. The real is in the letter, in its materiality out of meaning. There is an affinity between the body event and the letter.
 
A body event has a relation to the contingency of the initial shock, the iteration of the same One of jouissance, the singularity of the sinthome.
 
As for the phenomena of the body, are they as such automatically a body event, in the strict sense of a condition of the subject, or rather of the parltre? Are they an "original and permanent event that is constitutive for the subject? There are a wide variety of phenomena, sometimes in the same subject. What status do these phenomena have? When we describe a young woman, for example, who has spasms when under the gaze of the other; or another who is invaded by body phenomena in moments in which she loses her support in knowledge (stomach pains, spots on the skin, etc.): this is something that happens to the body, but will we call it body events?
 
In the "Conversation sur les embrouilles du corps (Conversation on the entanglements of the body) in Bordeaux in January 1999 (4), with regard to body phenomena J.-A. Miller made a distinction between "intermittent (eclipse) phenomena and permanent phenomena": "body phenomena are qualified as 'sinthomes' when they become permanent and order the life of a subject."
 
In his course of last year, J.-A. Miller situated the body event at the level of the Freudian fixation, "the fixation of the drive at the root of repression"; "there is a One of jouissance that always comes back to the same place" (5).
Another question arises out of this: how do we identify this 'One' of enjoyment, what is that One - a master signifier, a word that struck, a sound, a letter...?
 
To be followed.
 
Anne Lysy,
9 February 2012
  
 
(1)  Miller, J.-A., "Reading a symptom.
(2)  Miller, J.-A., Pices dtaches, lesson of 15 December 2004, Cause freudienne, 61, p. 152.
 (3)   Miller,J.-A., "Reading a symptom.
(4)   Miller, J.-A., in: "Conversation sur les embrouilles du corps", Ornicar? 50, 2003, p. 235.
(5)   Miller, J.-A., course on March 30, 2011, unpublished.
 
Translated by Natalie Wulfing  

Messages 813 - 842 of 968   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help