Well said...
the proper meg resembles a well tuned antenna more than anything else I've
seen...
keeping the flux where it belongs is essential...
both in the primary windings and in the core so the secondaries aren't
contaminated, thereby inhibiting their ability to be energized by the flux
pulsations
everything Mr. Bearden has stated in the way of clarification has stated
this over and over... that's why he believes the meg needs a year of
labratory calibration studies...
to map the event horizons that represent the the transfer of power from
where the energy orginates (getting his book and READING it would help you
all understand this) into our dimension as exhibited by the overunity in the
secondaries when everything is tuned up properly....

It's a classic example of an emerging technology... after all, the first
radio transmitters were nothing but two wires rubbed together to
spark!!!!!!!!
Only later, after much, much calibration of material combinations (Edison,
3,000 filament attempts) did we arrive at combinations that were efficeint
in the extreme...

Brent Selleck


----- Original Message -----
From: "Norm Fletcher" <fletchmo47@...>
To: <MEG_builders@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 3:19 PM
Subject: [MEG_builders] problem with the MEG as described in the patent


> Those of us who have built a MEG know the basic circuitry is simple
> enough to impliment. Obtaining the Metglas core is also just a matter
> of the proper email or phone call plus money. However, there is a flaw
> in the patent design which only stands out after a thorough study of
> the effect that the MEG attempts to exploit-The Aharanov-Bohm effect.
> This effect covers several areas of physics to include magnetics. An
> understanding of the AB magnetic effect is essential to the proper
> building of a device like the MEG. If we carefully study the AB
> effect, we will come to the conclusion that a traditional build of the
> MEG, using typical transformer technology, will yield a transformer
> and not an over-unity device. Here's the bottom line: if the control
> coils create flux which travels outside the core, the device becomes a
> transformer. In fact, that's why the Metglas core was used in the
> first place! It is so permeable to flux that the inventors hoped that
> the control coils flux would stay inside the core. Anthony Craddock
> (Bearden's website guy and an engineer) told me that successful MEG
> configurations were very carefully wound. However, careful winding and
> attention to material is not what the MEG needs. What the MEG needs,
> instead of control coils, are areas of the core which have variable
> permeability controllable with the same basic circuitry. The control
> coils are meant to change permeablity, but introduction of flux into
> the space around the core makes the MEG just a magnetically biased
> transformer. If some of us come up with a core which has control
> areas-that leak no flux into the space around the core, we won't even
> need Metglas any longer.
> Let's stick together and come up with the solution!
>
> Norm
>
>
>
>
>
> Main page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MEG_builders
>
>
> To post a message to this group, send email to
> MEG_Builders@yahoogroups.com
>
> To contact the moderator of this group, send email to
> MEG_Builders-owner@yahoogroups.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> MEG_Builders-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>