I have'nt tried either...

As far as I know about the meg, what is important is to get fast
switching. Faster you go, the better it should be (as said in the
book "Energy from the vacuum" from Bearden). So, if that's the case,
the fastest and the most "energetic" switching should be happening
when you switch the 2 entries at the same time.

That said, the other reason is more "technical". To test that kind of
entry, I would need to change my electronic design. I will probably
do it some time, but for now, my focus is elsewhere.

Still, I have noted your recommendation and when I'll have time to
test it, I will give you some feedback

Ccool

--- In MEG_builders@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Jordan" <enki@...> wrote:
>
>
> No. Never tried.
>
>
> On 20 Apr 2006 at 12:43, Kevin Petrones wrote:
>
> >
> > Have you gotten one of these things to work?
> >
> > On 4/20/06, Mark Jordan <enki@...> wrote:
> > On 20 Apr 2006 at 2:15, ccool_j wrote:
> >
> > > Also, my inputs are 2 50% square waves generated by a
> > D-latch. These
> > > 2 signals then go through 2 sets of push-pull fet
> > combination (n and p
> > > fets). And like JL Naudin's design, I used nFet to
> > "drain" the
> > > current. My fets are IRF520
> >
> > Have you tried lower pulse width with a deadtime in betwwen?
> > Say something like 2 x 40% with 10% OFF.
> >
> >
> > Mark Jordan