Very well said.... and I await your results eagerly...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Norm Fletcher" <fletchmo47@...>
To: <MEG_builders@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: [MEG_builders] Re: help needed for MEG tuning


> --- In MEG_builders@yahoogroups.com, "Wayne Robey" <robeyw@...> wrote:
>>
>> Since the core is not continuously saturated, the primary will always
>> couple highly to the
> secondary on it's leg.
>
> You can see this clearly in old TV fly-back transformers. Could this
> secondary resonance
> be what you are tuning for?
>
> OK
> Let me see if I can make clear what I've been trying to point out. You
> make an excellent
> point in the first statement "Since the core is not continuously
> saturated, the primary will
> always couple highly to the secondary on it's leg".
> It's just that we don't want ANY coupling. Before you think I just don't
> understand
> transformers I'd like to point out that a perfectly successful MEG is NOT
> a transformer. It is
> a dual closed flux pathway with 2 flux switches.
> Consider a MEG core with output coils and magnet as we see on the
> patent. Now, instead
> of input coils, we cut an air gap in the core and put in that gap a
> "magic" material that
> would act as a switch for the flux. The 'magic' stuff would react to a low
> power electronic
> input by radically changing it's permeability from very permeable to
> perhaps the
> permeability of air. It would do this without introducing flux into the
> core. The only flux in
> the core would be the magnet's.
> The primary coils described in the MEG patent, IF wound properly, IF
> excited with a
> correctly shaped waveform, IF firing at exactly the right frequency, will,
> in theory, give us
> an over-unity condition. The problem arises in the delicate balance of
> necessary "IF"
> conditions that must be met for a successful experiment. What I'm
> suggesting is that we
> knock out some of these "IFs" by dropping the input coils as they are
> described in the
> patent and work on some kind of flux switch for the core instead. This
> could be a new,
> specially designed coil, or an exotic array of metals or something else.
> What Dr. Bearden
> has said all along is that we need to stop thinking along the lines of
> traditional
> transformer building. Anyway, that's what I've been working on.
>
> Norm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Main page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MEG_builders
>
>
> To post a message to this group, send email to
> MEG_Builders@yahoogroups.com
>
> To contact the moderator of this group, send email to
> MEG_Builders-owner@yahoogroups.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> MEG_Builders-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>