Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
MEG_builders · The MEG builders group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
My MEG replication   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1354 of 1374 |
Re: My MEG replication

Hi
I wanted to give you some of the results of my MEG replication and the
current state of
my ongoing investigation.
Some initial notes:
1. The MEG should not be viewed as a transformer. Doing so will just
confuse what the
system is designed to accomplish.
2. The usual output of a transformer with a magnet placed as it is in the
MEG is that
of a biased transformer. Most likely, your output waves were not symetrically
sinusoidal
but skewed to either the leading edge or the trailing edge of the sine curve.
This skewing
is due to the magnet's flux direction. This apparently happens at most
frequencies except
for a few near the resonant frequency or harmonics thereof.
If you change the load, as you observed, the resonant frequency changes. Then
the MEG
becomes inefficient with a common underunity output. Dr. Bearden describes the
MEG as
"Highly non-linear" and one can surmise why with all the variables changing by
the
nanosecond.
3. I prefer to think of the MEG core as a dual flux pathway for the magnet
with the
control coils acting as flux switches. The unfortunate result of the MEG as
described in the
patent is that the flux from the input coils does not remain locally and change
the
permeability of the core in that small area of the core near the input coils.
Instead, the B
field traverses the entire circuit of the core and mixes with the magnet's flux.
And, just to
recap, the resonant frequency depends on load variance, winding quality, circuit
Q,
strength of the magnet, permeability of the core, slew rate of the core and God
knows
what else.
We believe we have stumbled upon an answer to this problem and sometime in late
June
or July we will be testing a MEG core with radically new input architecture.
As soon as this metalurgic process has a provisional patent status, I will
publish the "how
to" to this group. We hope new MEG consturction will produce a linear device
capable of
determining output based on the usual formulaic components: frequency, core
area, core
permeability, amount of dynamic flux and number of windings.

Wish us luck!

Norm




Mon May 21, 2007 6:31 am

fletchmo47
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1354 of 1374 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi all! I'm an EE and was intriqued by MEG because of simple circuitry required to operate. I've built my own replication of the MEG - also unsuccessfully (I...
lichtrov
Offline Send Email
Apr 15, 2007
4:31 pm

Hi Lichtrov, What was your gate driving voltage and frequency? You will get mysteriously little out of Bearden and Naudin, if anything. Dr. GG Pitz...
George Pitts
ggpitz192
Offline Send Email
Apr 24, 2007
10:35 pm

Sounds like you have done quite a bit of homework. This seems to be a typical result from MEG builders In a video that I watched where bearden goes into detail...
Kent Andersen
hakware2000
Online Now Send Email
Apr 24, 2007
10:37 pm

... That makes sense since the primary and secondary should be closely coupled ( as distinct from the sine output of a high Q self resonant secondary that is...
Wayne Robey
ey930
Offline Send Email
Apr 26, 2007
3:19 pm

Thank you for the response. I'm thinking about load matching also. Where the video, you're talking about, can be downloaded from? And one more question: does...
lichtrov
Offline Send Email
Apr 26, 2007
10:06 pm

well I think you could use a smaller secondary coil on it. Most of these guys go for big voltage because they get the idea that big voltage = big power. you...
Kent Andersen
hakware2000
Online Now Send Email
Apr 29, 2007
5:05 am

Hi, At this very moment you can purchase the Metglas AMCC 320 cores for $110 from http://elnamagnetics.com There's some very important information MEG...
softwarelabus
Offline Send Email
Apr 29, 2007
1:02 pm

Wow Paul! Very good research! I am very impressed with what you have presented here. I might add that that one way to get them to dynamically change resonance...
Kent Andersen
hakware2000
Online Now Send Email
May 1, 2007
12:42 am

... My speculation based on Naudin's observations that his HV windings gave out due to internal corona discharge after extensive testing and his claim that a...
Wayne Robey
ey930
Offline Send Email
Apr 29, 2007
5:05 am

Hello! Keep up the good work on that MEG. Basically (from what I understand), it is transforming ether/virtual particle flux energy into the circuits. Erin ...
Erin Casson
solidstatefu...
Offline Send Email
Apr 24, 2007
10:37 pm

Hi I wanted to give you some of the results of my MEG replication and the current state of my ongoing investigation. Some initial notes: 1. The MEG should not...
Norm Fletcher
fletchmo47
Offline Send Email
May 21, 2007
12:33 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help