Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
MEG_builders · The MEG builders group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1139 - 1170 of 1372   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1139
All, First off, while the moderators of this site ... of which I am one ... have recently discouraged critiquing of Naudin's MEG replications, I feel that if...
Stan Mayer
mayerstan
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2002
2:49 pm
1140
I reported to this group many months ago that I saw a change in output voltage when I pulled the magnet in my Meg. But I wasn't able to repeat it, so I thought...
carbonprobe
Offline Send Email
Dec 5, 2002
5:02 am
1142
... your math is incorrect 1024*0.1112/sqrt(2) = 80.5 not 10.2 the correct calculation is (1024*0.5*.707)*(0.1112*0.5*.707)*.707 = 10.2 I've known about this...
carbonprobe <carbonpr...
carbonprobe
Offline Send Email
Dec 7, 2002
4:42 am
1144
(Moderator preface: While this message isn't on-topic for this group, I am approving it because it is I think "News", promises "free" energy and might just...
ZPEnergy
vlad_zpe
Offline Send Email
Dec 10, 2002
2:09 am
1145
Sorry for my english,i am a Italian MEG builder and i have test it in www.progettomeg.it/prova6.htm (last update) I have a problem with control board(i have...
duffy70re2000 <duffy7...
duffy70re2000
Offline Send Email
Dec 10, 2002
9:46 pm
1146
In my latest experiments when the magnet is inserted into the meg the output voltage increases 280V (unloaded) and the input power increases to less than 1mW....
carbonprobe <carbonpr...
carbonprobe
Offline Send Email
Dec 13, 2002
8:12 pm
1147
Hi Ken Nice work on the MEG. I have a MEG too, and to test the voltage change when you take the magnet in and out might give some new information. Regards ...
sveinutne <utne@...>
sveinutne
Offline Send Email
Dec 15, 2002
4:20 pm
1148
Hello Ken and all! ... is ... to ... Very clear explanation :-) ... In ... via ... coil ... decays ... this ... On ... the ... Your explanations delight me,...
trapierenrj <blanc200...
trapierenrj
Offline Send Email
Dec 16, 2002
11:10 pm
1149
... in ... Ciao Sandro ! Sono francese, ma e pui facile per me di parlare inglese che italiano. I've donwloaded your site, to have a look, seems to be a good...
trapierenrj <blanc200...
trapierenrj
Offline Send Email
Dec 16, 2002
11:12 pm
1150
Hello Phil ! ... Ok about the resonant frequency, that's exactly wath I thought when I read Ken's post... but before saying that MEG is a fraud, it would be ...
trapierenrj <blanc200...
trapierenrj
Offline Send Email
Dec 21, 2002
7:46 pm
1151
Hello: Have any of you noticed the following passage by Dr. Bearden (May 13, 1994), on the web at: ...
ecolynx_com <SMichael...
ecolynx_com
Offline Send Email
Dec 24, 2002
5:13 pm
1152
Camelazur, et. al.: I think that Phil Karn is very likely incorrect - ... This is because Stan Mayer did an excellent experimental analysis on this exact...
Dave N.
dnarby
Offline Send Email
Dec 26, 2002
3:04 am
1153
With respect to Stan's excellent work with his core, he noted very little change in inductance with and without magnets inserted. The problem is that he is...
davidj95650 <djenkins...
davidj95650
Offline Send Email
Dec 27, 2002
7:32 am
1154
http://www.geocities.com/carbonprobe/pp-flux-sw.html...
carbonprobe <carbonpr...
carbonprobe
Offline Send Email
Dec 31, 2002
7:37 pm
1155
Dave, ... total reluctance is still small. ... This is true - and while it would be interesting to see comparisons between cut and uncut cores, Naudin used a...
Dave N.
dnarby
Offline Send Email
Jan 4, 2003
5:14 am
1156
Naudin gives new MEG test results. http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg31tst1.htm...
dtb1000 <dtb1000@...>
dtb1000
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2003
4:39 am
1157
All, How does JLN manage to get .508 A rms thru a conditioned 100K resistor at 715 V rms? Also, I see ~30 degrees phase shift in the output voltage current ...
jonfli
partzman2001
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2003
2:31 pm
1158
Oops- Make that ~ 60 degrees phase shift. Jon ... current...
jonfli
partzman2001
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2003
3:17 pm
1159
Hi The MEG intrigued me, and it still does, but I never used a conditioned carbon resistor. Naudin sent me email with links to his page: ...
sveinutne <utne@...>
sveinutne
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2003
5:10 pm
1160
Hi Svein, In my opinion, as I look at the scope pix of the output voltage and current waveforms of JLN's newest MEG tests, several things stick out. First, the...
jonfli
partzman2001
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2003
7:08 pm
1161
question - if the voltage and current are measured purely across and thru a 100% resistive load (Rload + Rcur), shouldn't the resulting waveforms be purely in ...
brandon richardson
richar18
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2003
8:49 pm
1162
I calculated a phase difference of 55.4 degrees which results in a power factor of .57 output V = 735vrms output I = .53Arms output power is P=IVcos(theta) ...
carbonprobe <carbonpr...
carbonprobe
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2003
4:22 am
1163
Ken, ... From: <carbonprobe@...> To: <MEG_builders@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:00 PM Subject: [MEG_builders] Re: Naudin Retests...
jonfli
partzman2001
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2003
3:22 pm
1164
Hi Ken It was interesting to hear you have tried a conditined resistor and got the same waveforms and phase differences like Naudin. I wonder did you get OU...
sveinutne <utne@...>
sveinutne
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2003
3:50 pm
1165
All, In reviewing Naudin's latest MEG 3 measurements and the phase relationship between load current and voltage, it occurred to me that the reason for the...
Stan Mayer
mayerstan
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2003
6:14 pm
1166
All; Despite implications, there is no way to confirm from these pictures alone that MEG circuit measurements are being made correctly. ...In reference to URL;...
Mark Coffman <mscoffm...
mscoffman
Offline Send Email
Jan 11, 2003
7:46 pm
1167
In message 1166 Mark Coffman wrote in part: I just wanted to point out, that while the current probe shown in the picture makes it extremely easy to know the...
Stan Mayer
mayerstan
Offline Send Email
Jan 12, 2003
4:45 pm
1168
A copy of a definition for COP. From: Tom Bearden [mailto:soliton@b...] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:11 AM To: webmaster@i... Subject: Slight Correction...
dtb1000 <dtb1000@...>
dtb1000
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2003
2:50 pm
1169
Hello all, A number of things poped out at me as I was reading Naudin’s results and all the associated emails. First, a meaningful MEG must transfer energy. ...
Rob Modeste
realhwman
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2003
3:05 pm
1170
I don't agree that the current *magnitude* is correct. I have used that exact same model of ammeter clamp, and I'm always having to double-check the polarity...
dtb1000 <dtb1000@...>
dtb1000
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2003
3:06 pm
Messages 1139 - 1170 of 1372   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help