Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
MyVirtualPowerForum · Conversations About Virtually Everything
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
"Invitationitis" was Re: Losing favour with the Scoble.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #17593 of 47721 |
On 10/18/06, Scott Allen <scott@...> wrote:

> The author complains mainly about being spammed by link junkies (don't
> we all) but I though some here, may want to weigh into that discussion
> (or Duncan or KOnstantin may want to do some damage control...)

 
This is why the "to each his own" philosophy doesn't really work.  The negative impact of unwanted link requests affect everyone who uses LinkedIn, not just the people making the requests.  And if damage control is warranted, then that means that behavior is affecting LinkedIn's management, investors, and so on.

 
It is a system – we are a network.  The behavior of even a small minority of its members has system-wide effects.

Scott Allen



















Scott,
I want to chime in and cast my vote with you that the "to each his own" philosophy doesn't work.

I received an invitation on Wednesday from someone I'd turned down before on the Linkedin platform and turned down again today as a result of receiving another of his bulk email invitations - this time OFF the Linkedin platform.  The bulk mail invitation wasn't even sophisticated enough to address me by name.

The guy has known my name for over a year and a half and has demonstrated not one jot of interest in actually "WORKING" with me - on anything. 

Yet, he wants to link/re-link, continuing to send invitations both on Linkedin and off Linkedin while investing no time in "networking" with me. 

But unless he has an epiphany and discovers the value of respecting other people's value systems, I can't imagine accepting any of his invitations in the future.  

This is not about being snobbish or elitist - it's about insisting that networking be taken seriously as a business practice and not just as a puerile exercise good for nothing but giving the impression that one knows how to build a network when, in actuality, some can't get past the seeming neurosis of merely collecting email addresses.

So, I thought I'd coin the word "invitationitis" for this apparent affliction where a person places more emphasis on building up their email count than actually building a viable, working network of human beings.

Now, if we can just coin a term for people who want to abuse other people's networks but who would squeal to high heaven if their networks were similarly disrespected.
--
Thanks!
Vincent Wright
Chief Encouragement Officer
www.VincentWright.com |
www.MyLinkedinPowerForum.com | www.LinkedinBusinessDiscussionIndex.com |
"Encouraging Linkedin Users"

Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:10 am

linkedinrecr...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #17593 of 47721 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

... Scott, I want to chime in and cast my vote with you that the "to each his own" philosophy doesn't work. I received an invitation on Wednesday from someone...
Vincent Wright
linkedinrecr...
Offline Send Email
Oct 19, 2006
6:10 am

Could you explain the "Linkedin Junks" and the amount of SPAM you're complaining about that you're receiving. I have been a member of MLPF for awhile and have...
mczebotar
czebotarmt
Offline Send Email
Oct 19, 2006
9:37 pm

A linkedin Junkie is a Rolodex Fiend. One of those people that thinks that having access to a network of people istoa have a huge list of names in their...
Peter Quodling
pquodling
Offline Send Email
Oct 21, 2006
9:53 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help